Apply Now: CLARIFY News Reporting Internship for NYC High School Students

posted in: News | 0

CLARIFY (The City Limits Accountability Reporting Initiative for Youth)  program is accepting applications from New York City high school students for its summer 2024 and fall 2024 sessions.

Adi Talwar

A CLARIFY participant conducts an interview by phone in the summer of 2022.

CLARIFY (The City Limits Accountability Reporting Initiative for Youth)  program is accepting applications from New York City high school students for its summer 2024 and fall 2024 sessions.

This program offers training in public service reporting and news writing. Participants will collaborate in teams, and under the guidance of an instructor, receive training to report on a public service story. Student work has in the past been published in City Limits. See some of our recent reporting interns’ work here.

Eligibility Requirements:

Applicants must reside within New York City.

Eligible applicants for this session are high school sophomores, juniors, and seniors. 

Applicants should be interested in journalism, writing, and current events. Students must commit to attending all program sessions, without schedule conflicts, and actively participate.

Summer Program Details:

The summer 2024 internship is a six-week program starting Monday, July 1, 2024 – ending August 8, 2024.

Sessions will be held from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. every Monday through Thursday on site in midtown Manhattan, with assignments done from home on Fridays. 

Successful participants will receive a stipend of $2,000 at the end of the program.

Deadline to apply: May 24, 2024.

Fall Program Details:

The fall 2024 internship is an eight-week program starting Tuesday, Oct. 15, 2024

Sessions will be held virtually two days a week, from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., with some on-site field trips scheduled throughout the program.

Students must commit to attending all sessions and actively participate in the virtual sessions with cameras on.

Successful participants will receive a stipend of $500 at the end of the program.

APPLICATION DEADLINES: 

To apply for the Summer 2024 session, complete our application form by May 24, 2024.

To apply for the Fall 2024 session, complete our application form by Sept. 9, 2024.

You may apply for both programs. Due to the limited number of spots, students can only participate in one of the sessions.

This is a highly competitive program and we can only accept a select few candidates due to the limited size. If we are unable to offer you a reporting internship, we encourage you to reapply for future sessions, and to continue your pursuit of journalism. If you have questions about CLARIFY or the application process, please contact info@clarifynews.org.

Welfare check at Anoka County park leads to death investigation of woman, 2 children

posted in: News | 0

Anoka County law enforcement is conducting a death investigation involving an adult and two children, the sheriff’s office said Tuesday.

Ramsey police and Anoka County sheriff’s deputies responded to a welfare check on Monday about 10 a.m. at Rum River Center Park in Ramsey. They found a woman and juvenile female deceased in a parked sport-utility vehicle, along with an injured juvenile male in the vehicle, according to the sheriff’s office.

The boy was taken to a local hospital and pronounced dead.

“At this point in the investigation, this appears to be an isolated incident and there is no known threat to the public,” the sheriff’s office said in a Tuesday statement, saying their investigation is ongoing.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Apple River murder trial Day 7: Miu’s interview with investigator played for jurors

Crime & Public Safety |


Day 6 of Miu trial: Defense says Miu was being taunted by teens before Apple River stabbings

Crime & Public Safety |


St. Paul police investigating after 9-year-old boy possibly injured by gunfire

Crime & Public Safety |


Other voices: When crime comes for Congress, it funds the police

Crime & Public Safety |


Nicolae Miu trial recap: victims, law enforcement, friends testify during first week

Appeals court rejects Donald Trump’s latest attempt to delay April 15 hush money criminal trial

posted in: Politics | 0

By JENNIFER PELTZ and MICHAEL R. SISAK (Associated Press)

NEW YORK (AP) — A New York appeals court judge Tuesday rejected former President Donald Trump’s latest bid to delay his hush money criminal trial while he fights a gag order. Barring further court action, the ruling clears the way for jury selection to begin next week.

Justice Cynthia Kern’s ruling is yet another loss for Trump, who has tried repeatedly to get the trial postponed.

Trump’s lawyers had wanted the trial delayed until a full panel of appellate court judges could hear arguments on lifting or modifying a gag order that bans him from making public statements about jurors, witnesses and others connected to the hush-money case.

The presumptive Republican nominee’s lawyers argue the gag order is an unconstitutional prior restraint on Trump’s free speech rights while he’s campaigning for president and fighting criminal charges.

“The First Amendment harms arising from this gag order right now are irreparable,” Trump lawyer Emil Bove said at an emergency hearing Tuesday in the state’s mid-level appeals court.

Bove argued that Trump shouldn’t be muzzled while critics, including his former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen and porn actor Stormy Daniels, routinely assail him. Both are key prosecution witnesses.

Steven Wu, the appellate chief for the Manhattan district attorney’s office, said there is a “public interest in protecting the integrity of the trial.”

“This is not political debate. These are insults,” Wu said of Trump’s statements.

The trial judge, Juan M. Merchan, issued the gag order last month at the urging of Manhattan prosecutors, who cited Trump’s “long history of making public and inflammatory remarks” about people involved in his legal cases.

Merchan expanded the gag order last week to prohibit comments about his own family after Trump lashed out on social media at his daughter, a Democratic political consultant, and made false claims about her.

It’s the second of back-to-back days for Trump’s lawyers in the appeals court.

On Monday, Associate Justice Lizbeth González rejected the defense’s request to delay the April 15 trial while Trump seeks to move his case out of heavily Democratic Manhattan.

Trump’s lawyers framed their gag order appeal as a lawsuit against Merchan. In New York, judges can be sued to challenge some decisions under a state law known as Article 78.

Trump has used the tactic before, including against the judge in his civil fraud trial in an unsuccessful last-minute bid to delay that case last fall and again when that judge imposed a gag order on him.

Trump’s hush-money criminal case involves allegations that he falsified his company’s records to hide the nature of payments to Cohen, who helped him bury negative stories during his 2016 campaign. Cohen’s activities included Daniels $130,000 to suppress her claims of an extramarital sexual encounter with Trump years earlier.

Trump pleaded not guilty last year to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. He has denied having a sexual encounter with Daniels. His lawyers argue the payments to Cohen were legitimate legal expenses.

Trump has made numerous attempts to get the trial postponed, leaning into the strategy he proclaimed to TV cameras outside a February pretrial hearing: “We want delays.”

Last week, as Merchan swatted away various requests to delay the trial, Trump renewed his request for the judge to step aside from the case. The judge rejected a similar request last August.

Trump’s lawyers allege the judge is biased against him and has a conflict of interest because of his daughter Loren’s work as president of Authentic Campaigns, whose clients have included President Joe Biden and other Democrats. They complained the expanded gag order was shielding the Merchans “from legitimate public criticism.”

Merchan had long resisted imposing a gag order. At Trump’s arraignment in April 2023, he admonished Trump not to make statements that could incite violence or jeopardize safety, but stopped short of muzzling him. At a subsequent hearing, Merchan noted Trump’s “special” status as a former president and current candidate and said he was “bending over backwards” to ensure Trump has every opportunity “to speak in furtherance of his candidacy.”

Merchan became increasingly wary of Trump’s rhetoric disrupting the historic trial as it grew near. In issuing the gag order, he said his obligation to ensuring the integrity of the proceedings outweighed First Amendment concerns.

The gag order does not bar comments about Merchan, whom Trump has referred to as “a Trump-hating judge” with a family full of “Trump haters,” or about Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, an elected Democrat.

Trump reacted on social media that the gag order was “illegal, un-American, unConstitutional” and said Merchan was “wrongfully attempting to deprive me of my First Amendment Right to speak out against the Weaponization of Law Enforcement” by Democratic rivals.

Trump suggested without evidence that Merchan’s decision making was influenced by his daughter’s professional interests and made a claim, later repudiated by court officials, that Loren Merchan had posted a social media photo showing Trump behind bars.

After the outburst, Merchan expanded the gag order April 1 to prohibit Trump from making statements about the judge’s family or Bragg’s family.

“They can talk about me but I can’t talk about them???” Trump reacted on his Truth Social platform. “That sounds fair, doesn’t it? This Judge should be recused, and the case should be thrown out.”

Trump filed a similar legal challenge last year over a gag order in his civil fraud case.

Judge Arthur Engoron had issued that order after Trump smeared the judge’s principal law clerk in a social media post. The gag order barred parties in the case — and, later, their lawyers as well — from commenting publicly on court staffers, though not on the judge himself.

A sole appeals judge lifted the gag order, but a four-judge appellate panel ultimately restored it two weeks later. The panel said Trump’s lawyers should have followed a normal appeals process instead of suing the judge. Trump’s attorneys said they had been trying to move quickly.

Opinion: Working New Yorkers Need ‘Good Cause’ Eviction

posted in: News | 0

“Our elected leaders have come out strong in support of our efforts to fight for fair compensation and decent working conditions for our members on the streets and at the bargaining table. But the gains that we have won are steadily being eroded by the skyrocketing cost of housing.”

Chris Janaro

Tenants and housing activists at a rally in Manhattan last week.

CityViews are readers’ opinions, not those of City Limits. Add your voice today!

The housing affordability crisis has impacted all of New York State. No matter how hard New Yorkers are working, it is becoming nearly impossible for them to make ends meet, stay in their homes or find an affordable place to live. The skyrocketing cost of living is forcing families to make hard choices about whether they can even afford to stay in our state.

Albany cannot let another legislative session go by without addressing this crisis head on by passing Good Cause Eviction, which will provide necessary tenant protections while challenging the unjust practices of landlords who continue to drive out tenants with rent hikes and intimidation tactics.

As the leader of one of New York’s largest labor unions, I have seen how hard the housing crisis has hit and the impact it has on our members. Our members—working class New Yorkers who do the essential work that keeps our state running—are increasingly struggling to make ends meet.

Our elected leaders have come out strong in support of our efforts to fight for fair compensation and decent working conditions for our members on the streets and at the bargaining table. But the gains that we have won are steadily being eroded by the skyrocketing cost of housing.

Over 40 percent of New Yorkers are renters, including many of our RWDSU members. Rental prices in New York are reaching new peaks—and the costs are pushing more and more people out of their homes. To make matters even worse, New York City’s vacancy rate is the lowest it has been in 50 years, making it nearly impossible for New Yorkers to find decent, affordable housing. 

But this is not just a New York City problem. Unaffordable housing costs are sadly hitting the rest of New York just as hard. Syracuse is now the most competitive rental market in the U.S., while 45 percent of renters in Western New York are paying over over a third of their income to rent. In Rensselaer County, holdover eviction filings—where landlords do not have to provide a good cause to evict—increased by 68 percent from 2022 to 2023.

This data is a stunning indictment on our broken tenant protection laws, which simply aren’t working for working class New Yorkers. Today, if you’re one of the 4 million New Yorkers living in unregulated housing, your landlord can raise your rent as much as they want at the end of a lease without giving any reason—or kick you out of your home altogether.

New Yorkers are rightfully demanding that our leaders address this crisis head-on. In order to truly stand up for workers and our communities, we must stand up for their right to an affordable roof over their heads.

Good Cause would help workers stay in their homes and afford the rent by limiting annual rent hikes to 3 percent or 1.5 times the inflation rate (whichever is higher) and requiring landlords to have a valid reason for evicting tenants. Tenants who face rent increases above that cap or believe their eviction to be unlawful could take their landlord to court.

Tenants across New York, including RWDSU members, have been working tirelessly for years to build support for Good Cause—and their organizing has had a powerful effect. Good Cause Eviction already has the backing of many Senate and Assembly members in Albany. Senate Democrats have made clear they will not make a deal on the budget without “protections similar to those in the Good Cause Eviction legislation,” and the Assembly majority has committed to “enacting statewide policies that protect tenants from arbitrary and capricious rent increases and unreasonable evictions of paying tenants.”

Nonetheless, there are still some calling for a “Swiss cheese” version of a Good Cause Eviction bill that would require localities outside of the five boroughs to opt-in, as well as provisions that would deny tenants’ protections based on the size of their buildings or the size of their landlords’ real estate portfolios.

This would devastate thousands of tenants across our state and severely weaken the impact of any bill in the housing package. These carve-outs could leave at least 67 percent of non-New York City renters (872,000 households) vulnerable to predatory rent hikes and retaliatory evictions, leaving many of our members and working New Yorkers unprotected. 

Working people are the backbone of New York. It does not matter if it is a pandemic or a blizzard, we show up to do the essential work that keeps our state running. It’s time for our elected leaders to show up for us by passing Good Cause this session because we cannot wait another year. We are at a breaking point and need relief to remain in our homes. 

Stuart Appelbaum is President of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (RWDSU).