Nicolae Miu found guilty in Apple River homicide, other stabbings

posted in: Politics | 0

A jury found Nicolae Miu guilty on Thursday of first-degree reckless homicide and other charges in the fatal stabbing of a 17-year-old on western Wisconsin’s Apple River in 2022.

Jury deliberations began Wednesday after testimony ended. The jury also found Miu guilty of four counts of first-degree recklessly endangering safety while using a dangerous weapon, and one count of battery while using a dangerous weapon.

Gasps could be heard in the courtroom, following the verdict, which was read by Judge R. Michael Waterman just after 11 a.m. A sentencing date wasn’t announced in the courtroom.

After the jury left the courtroom, Miu’s attorney Aaron Nelson put his arm around Miu, who shook his head.

Outside the courtroom, two members of Miu’s family were in tears. His fraternal twin brother declined to comment. “Not at this time,” he said.

Miu, 54, of Prior Lake, testified Tuesday that his “fear scale” kept growing during the confrontation with two groups of tubers in Somerset on July 30, 2022.

At the start of the trial, a photo of 17-year-old Isaac Schuman was displayed in front of the jury during the Nicolae Miu trial at the St. Croix County District Court in Hudson, Wis., on Monday, April 1, 2024. (Elizabeth Flores, Pool via Star Tribune)

He said he feared for his life when he stabbed Isaac Schuman, of Stillwater, in the chest and seriously injured Ryhley Mattison, then 24, of Burnsville; A.J. Martin, then 22, of Elk River; and brothers Dante Carlson and Tony Carlson, both in their early 20s, of Luck, Wis. All five were stabbed once. Schuman bled to death.

Prosecutors tried to get across to jurors the confrontation began when Miu ran up to Schuman’s group while he was looking for his friend’s lost phone and that he had opportunities to walk away, despite the taunts from Schuman’s group.

They said it turned violent after he became angry and either pushed Coen or punched her in the face — an alleged assault not on video — and reacted with his pocket knife.

EARLIER: Apple River stabbing trial turns on murder vs. self-defense

Late Tuesday, the prosecution added lesser charges against Miu to go along with the original charges of first-degree intentional homicide, four counts of attempted first-degree intentional homicide and one count of misdemeanor battery.

Miu also faced second-degree intentional homicide; first- and second-degree reckless homicide; and four counts each of attempted second-degree intentional homicide, attempted first-degree reckless homicide and attempted second-degree reckless homicide.

Jurors considered the intentional murder charge first. When they didn’t find him guilty of the other counts, they moved on to considering other charges.

This is a breaking news story and will update.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg says Trump’s hush money criminal trial isn’t about politics

Crime & Public Safety |


2 Hennepin County deputies injured in gunfire exchange in Minnetonka

Crime & Public Safety |


Nicolae Miu’s fate now in the hands of the jury

Crime & Public Safety |


Nicolae Miu testifies he feared for his life when he stabbed Isaac Schuman, admits lying about knife

Crime & Public Safety |


Welfare check at Anoka County park leads to death investigation of woman, 2 children

Are big changes coming to the Boundary Waters?

posted in: News | 0

DULUTH — The U.S. Forest Service is kicking off what may be a two-year or longer process to update the management plan for the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, the first major revision in 31 years.

Superior National Forest officials are taking public comments through May 17 on what issues should be considered heading into the long process of amending the wilderness chapter of the overall forest plan.

“It’s going to be a foundational look at what may need to change in terms of policy,” said Tom Hall, supervisor of the Superior National Forest, which oversees the 1.1 million acre federal wilderness.

The last BWCAW plan was approved in 1993 and wilderness use has not only increased since then, it’s changed markedly, Hall noted. Just about all management issues are on the table — ranging from towboat use and motorboat quotas to group size, the reservation system and entry point and campsite limits.

The BWCAW is the most-visited wilderness in the federal system, and the Forest Service is often caught in the middle of a constant tug of war between visitors who want a wilder, less crowded experience and businesses that cater to tourism who want to see more unfettered use and fewer restrictions. Hall said the plan also must take into account federal laws regarding wilderness areas in addition to people’s desires for the wilderness.

Increasing visitation and changing trends in use are, in general, “adversely impacting” the BWCAW, forest officials noted in announcing the effort. “Monitoring has indicated both social and ecological impacts, such as crowding, noise, light pollution, lack of campsite availability, littering, campsite and portage erosion, campsite expansions, water quality degradation, and other issues preventing the Forest (Service) from managing to standard. There is a need to update management direction to preserve wilderness character, while providing for opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation, restoring naturalness and protecting other features of value across the wilderness.”

People are definitely interested. When the Forest Service asked for comments on the use of towboats — motorboats that ferry canoes, gear and campers across some lakes on the periphery of the wilderness, often at the start of canoe trips — they received more than 1,300 comments. The Forest Service is being sued for allegedly allowing too many towboats to operate, and the forest officials noted that “management direction in the existing Forest Plan concerning commercial towboat may need to be updated to address specific standards and guidelines to continue to preserve wilderness character and ensure compliance with the statutory limits set in the 1978 BWCAW Act.”

Other possible topics include fish stocking, outfitter and guide operations, campsite management, wildfire policy, wilderness education and wilderness research.

(Gary Meader / Duluth News Tribune)

Chris Knopf, executive director of Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness advocacy group, said he expects some big changes when the management revision is finished.

“This isn’t just tinkering around the edges. … I see this as an extremely important process. It’s an opportunity to address evolving issues that are important to protect the wilderness for decades to come,” Knopf said, adding that recreational issues — including potentially restricting the number of visitors and types of uses — will likely rise to the top of the list. “We really need better data on usage that provides the basis for future policy.”

Both the number of people allowed in, and how and where they are distributed across the wilderness are likely issues, Knopf noted, such as allowing people to reserve specific campsites and not just specific entry points.

“A lot has changed since 1993. Now we have cell towers around the wilderness … How people take time off, how long their trips are, have changed. Technology has changed,” Knop noted.

Knopf said the Friends group hopes the Forest Service will tackle the issue of climate change impacts on water quality, wildlife and fish. He also hopes the Forest Service uses the new plan to tackle potential water quality issues from impacts within the BWCAW watershed but outside the wilderness proper, such as proposed copper mining near the BWCAW boundary.

Jason Zabokrtsky, owner and operator of Ely Outfitting Co., a guide and outfitting service, said he, too, expects major changes to develop in the plan amendment.

Related Articles

Outdoors |


Shakopee Mdewakanton challenge board’s decision to allow new form of betting at horse tracks

Outdoors |


Coming soon to St. Paul area: Squad pickups to spot distracted drivers

Outdoors |


Why is the EPA regulating PFAS and what are these ‘forever chemicals’?

Outdoors |


Food shelf visits in Minnesota increased by 2 million in 2023; a new bill hopes to help

Outdoors |


A look at six Minnesota films and events at the Minneapolis St. Paul International Film Festival

“Management of the forest has signaled they are willing to make really significant changes to wilderness management. They showed that two years ago when they cut permits by 13%,” Zabokrtsky said. “What I’d really like to see come out of this is some real good research on wilderness use … most of the talk we hear about there being too much use comes from anecdotal stories, not from real data.”

Zabokrtsky said he expects the biggest impacts to involve motor use in the BWCAW, both day-use motor permits and towboat use. But he said the Forest Service should be careful in any efforts to reduce visitors.

“The Forest Service likes to use terms like crowded. But that’s a loaded word. I’ve never really seen it close to being crowded in a real sense,” Zabokrtsky added. “The BWCAW is one of the world’s great outdoor experiences. To say we need to limit people or prevent people from experiencing that to protect it, that doesn’t seem right.”

Informal discussion starts now

The process won’t be quick. The Forest Service is taking public comments on what issues it should study as part of a formal, in-depth environmental impact statement required by the National Environmental Policy Act. That formal process won’t happen until 2025, Hall said, with a draft out late that year for another round of public comments and a final plan not expected until April 2026.

And that’s if there aren’t any unforeseen issues, Hall noted, which could push the final plan out longer.

“Right now, we’re just in the exploration stage. What are the issues people care about? We are working to develop collaborative input to tell us what we should be looking at,” Hall said.

The Forest Service has reached out to Ojibwe bands in the region, local business groups such as outfitters and lodges, as well as local residents and groups focused on protecting the BWCAW in addition to people who canoe, camp, fish, hike, snowshoe and ski there.

What won’t be changing as a result of the process, Hall noted, are the specific rules, restrictions and allowances built into the 1978 federal law that created the BWCAW, drew its boundaries and cemented it as part of the national wilderness system — albeit a unique member of the system since some motorized use is allowed.

Issues that have developed since 1993 — from lawsuits over towboats to complaints about permit quotas and unruly visitor use during the pandemic push to get outdoors — show that a new plan is overdue, Hall said.

“Our implementation and monitoring over the past 30 years, and changes to national wilderness management policy and guidance, has highlighted several issues affecting wilderness character in the BWCAW and the wilderness experience for visitors,” Hall noted.

Submit comments, attend meetings

The Forest Service wants your input on what BWCAW issues they should look at as part of the long revision process for the area’s wilderness plan. Comments on this stage of the process will be accepted through May 17.

Comments can be made online at fs.usda.gov/project/superior/?project=65777 or in print submitted to: Superior National Forest, RE: BWCAW Forest Plan Amendment, 8901 Grand Avenue Place, Duluth, MN 55808.
An in-person open house is scheduled for Thursday, April 11, from 4:30-7 p.m. at the Superior National Forest Headquarters, 8901 Grand Avenue Place in Duluth.
A virtual, online open house is set for April 18, from 4-6 p.m. at tinyurl.com/SNFBWCAW. Meeting ID: 289 483 854 876, passcode: XPqvvs

Did you know?

The BWCAW contains 1,175 lakes varying in size from 10 to 10,000 acres, more than 1,200 miles of canoe routes, 12 hiking trails and over 2,000 designated campsites.

Related Articles

Outdoors |


Wisconsin loon decline spurred by more rain, less water clarity, study finds

Outdoors |


Spring and summer arts and entertainment: 20+ family-friendly community festivals and celebrations worth checking out in 2024

Outdoors |


Skywatch: It’s solar eclipse time

Outdoors |


Want to catch and release big fish with minimal harm? DNR has tips.

Outdoors |


National public lands group to hold annual gathering in Minnesota

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg says Trump’s hush money criminal trial isn’t about politics

posted in: Politics | 0

By JAKE OFFENHARTZ Associated Press

NEW YORK (AP) — When he was elected two years ago as Manhattan’s first Black district attorney, Alvin Bragg spoke candidly about his unease with the job’s political demands. A former law professor, he’s more comfortable untangling complex legal questions than swaggering up to a podium.

But when the first of Donald Trump’s four criminal prosecutions heads to trial on Monday, about alleged hush money payments to cover up a sex scandal during the 2016 election, Bragg will be at the center of a political maelstrom with few precedents.

Even before announcing the 34-count felony indictment against Trump last year, Bragg was a lightning rod for conservative critics who said he wasn’t tough enough on crime. The upcoming trial will test the Democrat’s efforts to portray himself as apolitical in the face of relentless attacks from the Republican former president and his supporters, who say the prosecution is the epitome of partisanship.

Echoing the racist tropes he has deployed frequently against his legal adversaries, Trump has called Bragg a “thug” and a “degenerate psychopath,” urging his supporters to take action against the “danger to our country.”

Bragg, who declined to be interviewed for this story, has rejected that, comparing the prosecution against Trump to any other case of financial crime.

“At its core, this case today is one with allegations like so many of our white collar cases,” Bragg said in announcing the indictment last year. “Someone lied again and again to protect their interests and evade the laws to which we are all held accountable.”

FILE – Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg listens at news conference in New York, Feb. 7, 2023. As he prepares to bring the first of Donald Trump’s four criminal prosecutions to trial, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg finds himself at the center of a political firestorm. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File)

The first-ever trial of a former U.S. president will feature allegations that Trump falsified business records while compensating one of his lawyers, Michael Cohen, for burying stories about extramarital affairs that arose during the 2016 presidential race.

The charges — which carry the possibility of jail time — threaten Trump’s campaign schedule as he faces a general election rematch with President Joe Biden.

They have also turned a spotlight on Bragg, who since bringing the indictment has been the target of scores of racist emails and death threats, as well as two packages containing white powder.

“Because he is the first to get Trump to trial, and because he’s been successful so far, the level of hate pointed at Bragg is staggering,” said Norman Eisen, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who served as special counsel in the first impeachment trial against Trump. “The threat level is just off the charts.”

Related Articles

National Politics |


Trump is about to go on trial in New York. Here’s what to expect

National Politics |


New York appeals court rejects Donald Trump’s third request to delay Monday’s hush money trial

National Politics |


Trump says leave abortion to the states. That’s where it gets complicated

National Politics |


As medical perils from abortion bans grow, so do opportunities for Democrats in a post-Roe world

National Politics |


Swing states see newcomers as Americans move from blue to red counties

Citing Trump’s threatening and inflammatory statements, Judge Juan M. Merchan imposed a gag order last month that bars Trump from publicly commenting on witnesses, jurors or others involved in the case — though not Bragg or the judge personally. Attorneys for Trump have sought to reverse the order, seizing on the issue as one of several arguments for delaying the trial.

The 50-year-old Harlem-raised Bragg got his early political education during visits to the city’s homeless shelters, where his father worked. He said he was held at gunpoint six times while growing up — three times by overly suspicious police officers — and once had a knife held to his throat.

After graduating from Harvard Law School, Bragg began his career as a criminal defense and civil rights lawyer, later joining the federal prosecutor’s office in Manhattan. As a top lawyer in the New York attorney general’s office, he oversaw investigations into police killings and a lawsuit that shut down Trump’s charitable foundation.

Though he said he had little interest in elected office, Bragg joined a crowded race for Manhattan district attorney in 2019, running on a platform of “justice and public safety.”

Compared to many of his opponents, Bragg took a more measured tone in detailing his plans for the investigations into Trump and his businesses, which began under former District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.

Once in office, Bragg surprised many by pausing the criminal investigation into Trump, leading to the resignation of two top prosecutors who had pushed for an indictment.

When he resurrected the case last April, the charges of falsifying records were raised to felonies under an unusual legal theory that Trump could be prosecuted in state court for violating federal campaign finance laws. Some legal experts say the strategy could backfire.

“It seems a bit of a legal reach, and the question is why are they doing it?” said Jonathan Turley, a professor at the George Washington University Law School. “It can be hard to escape the conclusion that this effort would not have been taken if the defendant was not Donald Trump.”

From his first days in office, Bragg found himself under a barrage of criticism over a memo instructing prosecutors not to seek jail time for some low-level offenses.

He walked back portions of the directive amid fierce protest from New York Police Department leaders, conservative media and some centrist Democrats, though he later said he regretted not pushing back more forcefully. For many on the right, the image of Bragg as a poster child for Democrat permissiveness stuck.

“When you’re the district attorney, you are also a politician, and there’s been a slight failure to grasp that,” said Rebecca Roiphe, a New York Law School professor who taught alongside Bragg and previously worked in the Manhattan district attorney’s office. “The fact that he’s not attuned to what he needs to do politically to get things done is both a strength and a weakness.”

Though most major crime rates in Manhattan remain lower than before Bragg took office, conservatives continue to accuse him of allowing rampant lawlessness. Republicans convened a congressional field hearing in New York to examine what they said were Bragg’s “pro-crime, anti-victim” policies.

Bragg was pilloried on the right again earlier this year when he declined to seek pretrial detention for some men accused of brawling with police officers in Times Square.

The decision sparked criticism not only from conservatives but also Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, and top NYPD officials. Bragg defended himself, telling reporters, “the only thing worse than failing to bring perpetrators to justice would be to ensnare innocent people in the criminal justice system.”

He later announced several men initially arrested played only a minor role or were not present at all.

In 2022, Bragg’s office pressured the Trump Organization’s longtime chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, into pleading guilty to evading taxes on company perks like a luxury car and rent-free apartment. Later that year, it put Trump’s company on trial, and won a conviction on similar tax charges.

After that, Bragg convened a new grand jury, securing the indictment accusing Trump of falsely recording payments to Cohen as legal expenses, when they were for orchestrating payoffs to porn actor Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, to prevent them from going public with claims they had extramarital sexual encounters with Trump.

Trump denies the accusations and says no crime was committed. Now, a jury is on the verge of being picked that will make a historic decision about whether Trump broke the law — or Bragg overreached.

Mother and children who died in Anoka County park incident identified

posted in: Politics | 0

A mother and her two young children were the people who died in an incident at a park in Anoka County, the sheriff’s office said Thursday.

Ramsey police and Anoka County sheriff’s deputies responded to a welfare check on Monday about 10 a.m. at Rum River Center Park in Ramsey. They found Jessica Linette Frank, 33, and Solara Rea Frank, 9, deceased in a parked sport-utility vehicle.

Law enforcement discovered Laiken Lea Frank, 4, was injured in the vehicle. He died at a local hospital.

No one was arrested and law enforcement is not looking for any suspects, Tierney Peters, sheriff’s office community relations coordinator, said earlier this week. The sheriff’s office has not released more information about the circumstances of their deaths.

The family lived in Monticello, according to the sheriff’s office.

Solara was a third grader at Twin Lakes Elementary in Elk River and her brother Laiken was in Discovery Learning preschool, according to a letter sent to Twin Lakes Elementary families Monday night.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Coming soon to St. Paul area: Squad pickups to spot distracted drivers

Crime & Public Safety |


2 Hennepin County deputies injured in gunfire exchange in Minnetonka

Crime & Public Safety |


MN Department of Public Safety names director of Murdered and Missing Black Women and Girls Office

Crime & Public Safety |


Welfare check at Anoka County park leads to death investigation of woman, 2 children

Crime & Public Safety |


For ‘public safety crisis’ of copper wire theft, MN legislators proposing licenses for sellers