Yellen says Iran’s actions could cause global ‘economic spillovers’ and warns of more sanctions

posted in: News | 0

By FATIMA HUSSEIN (Associated Press)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned Tuesday of potential global economic damage from rising tensions in the Middle East and pledged that the U.S. and its allies won’t hesitate to use their sanctions powers to address Iran’s “malign and destabilizing activity” in the region.

She made her remarks ahead of this week’s spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, saying Iran’s weekend missile attack on Israel “underscores the importance of Treasury’s work to use our economic tools to counter Iran’s malign activity.”

She added: “From this weekend’s attack to the Houthi attacks in the Red Sea, Iran’s actions threaten the region’s stability and could cause economic spillovers.”

Iran’s missile attack on Israel early Sunday came in response to what it says was an Israeli strike on Iran’s consulate in Syria earlier this month. Israel’s military chief said Monday that his country will respond to the attack, while world leaders caution against retaliation, trying to avoid a spiral of violence.

As the IMF and its fellow lending agency, the World Bank, hold their spring meetings this week, high on the agenda are the fast-rising tensions between Iran and Israel and what escalation could spell for the global economy.

Israel and Iran have been on a collision course throughout Israel’s six-month war against Hamas militants in Gaza. The war erupted after two militant groups backed by Iran led an attack on Oct. 7 that killed 1,200 people in Israel and kidnapped 250 others. An Israeli offensive in Gaza has caused widespread devastation and killed over 33,000 people, according to local health officials.

“We’ve targeted over 500 individuals and entities connected to terrorism and terrorist financing by the Iranian regime and its proxies since the start of the Administration,” Yellen said, citing sanctions against Iran’s drone and missile programs, militant groups Hamas, the Houthis, Hezbollah, and other Iraqi militia groups.

“Treasury will not hesitate to work with our allies to use our sanctions authority to continue disrupting the Iranian regime’s malign and destabilizing activity,” she said. “I fully expect we will take additional sanctions actions against Iran in the coming days.”

The annual gathering will take place as other ongoing conflicts, including Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, threaten global financial stability.

Yellen in February offered her strongest public support yet for the idea of liquidating roughly $300 billion in frozen Russian Central Bank assets and using them for Ukraine’s long-term reconstruction.

She said Tuesday that the U.S. is “continuing to work with our international partners to unlock the economic value of immobilized Russian sovereign assets and ensure that Russia pays for the damage it has caused.” Yellen added that she will meet with Group of Seven finance leaders Wednesday to continue discussions on the topic and will look at “a series of possibilities, ranging from actually seizing the assets to using them as collateral.”

Another major issue for this year’s meetings on the U.S. side, Yellen said, will be ongoing conversations about Chinese industrial policy that poses a threat to U.S. jobs and the global economy. She traveled to Guangzhou and Beijing earlier this month, to hold “difficult conversations” with counterparts over what she describes as China’s overcapacity in its wave of low-priced Chinese green tech exports that could overwhelm factories in the U.S. and make it impossible to compete.

Yellen said she plans to meet later this week with her Chinese counterparts for a fourth meeting of the U.S.-China Economic and Financial Working Groups, “to share information, identify potential areas of cooperation, and, when we disagree, frankly communicate concerns.”

U.S. Treasury and China’s Ministry of Finance launched the economic working groups in an effort to ease tensions and deepen ties between the nations.

Charges against Trump and Jan. 6 rioters at stake as Supreme Court hears debate over obstruction law

posted in: Society | 0

By MARK SHERMAN Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday is taking up the first of two cases that could affect the criminal prosecution of former President Donald Trump for his efforts to overturn his election loss in 2020. Hundreds of charges stemming from the Capitol riot also are at stake.

Related Articles


Trump trial: Why can’t Americans see or hear what is going on inside the courtroom?


Only 1 in 3 US adults think Trump acted illegally in New York hush money case, poll shows


More potential jurors dismissed as Trump’s hush money trial enters second day


Charges against Trump and Jan. 6 rioters at stake as Supreme Court hears debate over obstruction law


More potential jurors dismissed as Trump’s hush money trial enters second day

The justices are hearing arguments over the charge of obstruction of an official proceeding. That charge, stemming from a law passed in the aftermath of the Enron financial scandal more than two decades ago, has been brought against 330 people, according to the Justice Department. The court will consider whether it can be used against those who disrupted Congress’ certification of Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential election victory over Trump.

The former president and presumptive nominee for the 2024 Republican nomination is facing two charges in the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith in Washington that could be knocked out with a favorable ruling from the nation’s highest court. Next week, the justices will hear arguments over whether Trump has “absolute immunity” from prosecution in the case, a proposition that has so far been rejected by two lower courts.

The first former U.S. president under indictment, Trump is on trial on hush money charges in New York and also has been charged with election interference in Georgia and with mishandling classified documents in Florida.

FILE – President Donald Trump speaks during a rally in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021. The Supreme Court is hearing arguments Tuesday, April 16, 2024, over the charge of obstruction of an official proceeding that has been brought against 330 people, according to the Justice Department. The charge refers to the disruption of Congress’ certification of Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential election victory over formper President Trump. Trump faces two obstruction charges. Next week, the justices will weigh whether Trump can be prosecuted at all for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)

In Tuesday’s case, the court is hearing an appeal from Joseph Fischer, a former Pennsylvania police officer who has been indicted on seven counts, including obstruction, for his actions on Jan. 6, 2021, when a mob of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol in a bid to keep Biden, a Democrat, from taking the White House. Lawyers for Fischer argue that the charge doesn’t cover his conduct.

The obstruction charge, which carries up to 20 years behind bars, is among the most widely used felony charges brought in the massive federal prosecution following the deadly insurrection.

Roughly 170 Jan. 6 defendants have been convicted of obstructing or conspiring to obstruct the Jan. 6 joint session of Congress, including the leaders of two far-right extremist groups, the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. A number of defendants have had their sentencings delayed until after the justices rule on the matter.

Some rioters have even won early release from prison while the appeal is pending over concerns that they might end up serving longer than they should have if the Supreme Court rules against the Justice Department. That includes Kevin Seefried, a Delaware man who threatened a Black police officer with a pole attached to a Confederate battle flag as he stormed the Capitol. Seefried was sentenced last year to three years behind bars, but a judge recently ordered that he be released one year into his prison term while awaiting the Supreme Court’s ruling.

The high court case focuses on whether the anti-obstruction provision of a law that was enacted in 2002 in response to the financial scandal that brought down Enron Corp. can be used against Jan. 6 defendants.

Fischer’s lawyers argue that the provision was meant to close a loophole in criminal law and discourage the destruction of records in response to an investigation. Until the Capitol riot, they told the court, every criminal case using the provision had involved allegations of destroying or otherwise manipulating records.

But the administration says the other side is reading the law too narrowly, arguing it serves “as a catchall offense designed to ensure complete coverage of all forms of corrupt obstruction of an official proceeding,” including Fischer’s “alleged conduct in joining a violent riot to disrupt the joint session of Congress certifying the presidential election results.”

Smith has argued separately in the immunity case that the obstruction charges against Trump are valid, no matter the outcome of Fischer’s case.

Most lower court judges who have weighed in have allowed the charge to stand. Among them, U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich, a Trump appointee, wrote that “statutes often reach beyond the principal evil that animated them.”

But U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, another Trump appointee, dismissed the charge against Fischer and two other defendants, writing that prosecutors went too far. A divided panel of the federal appeals court in Washington reinstated the charge before the Supreme Court agreed to take up the case.

While it’s not important to the Supreme Court case, the two sides present starkly differing accounts of Fischer’s actions on Jan. 6. Fischer’s lawyers say he “was not part of the mob” that forced lawmakers to flee the House and Senate chambers, noting that he entered the Capitol after Congress had recessed. The weight of the crowd pushed Fischer into a line of police inside, they said in a court filing.

Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Matt Gaetz of Florida and Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia are among 23 Republican members of Congress who say the administration’s use of the obstruction charge “presents an intolerable risk of politicized prosecutions. Only a clear rebuke from this Court will stop the madness.”

The Justice Department says Fischer can be heard on a video yelling “Charge!” before he pushed through a crowd and “crashed into the police line.” Prosecutors also cite text messages Fischer sent before Jan. 6 saying things might turn violent and social media posts after the riot in which he wrote, “we pushed police back about 25 feet.”

More than 1,350 people have been charged with Capitol riot-related federal crimes. Approximately 1,000 of them have pleaded guilty or been convicted by a jury or judge after a trial.

Associated Press writers Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington and Michael Kunzelman in Silver Spring, Maryland, contributed to this report.

Gophers cornerback and lineman enter the NCAA transfer portal

posted in: News | 0

The Gophers football team has had its first players this spring exit the program via the NCAA transfer portal.

Redshirt freshman cornerback Tariq Watson has entered the NCAA transfer portal, a source confirmed to the Pioneer Press on Tuesday. 247sports first reported the news.

Watson, of Gretna, La., made 10 tackles in all 13 games last season. He appeared in line to be a backup cornerback this fall to Justin Walley and Ethan Robinson, a transfer portal addition from Bucknell.

Redshirt freshman lineman Cade McConnell said on X he will enter the portal as well on Tuesday.

McConnell, of Choctaw, Okla., did not play in his first two seasons at Minnesota. He appeared likely to be a backup at both center and guard entering this fall.

The transfer portal opened Monday and will close at the end of April.

Related Articles

College Sports |


Gophers gain top in-state football commit in Robbinsdale Cooper’s Emmanuel Karmo

College Sports |


Gophers’ Cam Christie to explore NBA while keeping college eligibility

College Sports |


Will Gophers get a second chance with former top in-state recruit Jaxon Howard?

College Sports |


Gophers add tall Ohio tight end Cross Nimmo to 2025 recruiting class

College Sports |


Gophers assistant football coach draws laughter during NBC game show appearance

Breakdown of the current Gophers men’s basketball roster

posted in: News | 0

The Gophers men’s basketball roster has undergone significant changes since the end of the 2023-24 season.

Of the 13 total scholarship players, Minnesota has had five players — of varying levels of importance — enter the NCAA transfer portal since mid-March, while five other players have said they will return to next year’s squad.

The U has two departing seniors and two incoming freshmen, so while setting aside one scholarship for Cam Christie, the U now has five vacant scholarships available for incoming players.

The Gophers are actively pursuing players via the portal, with 6-foot-8 Canisius junior forward Frank Mitchell visiting the U this week. He was a big rebounder a season ago, averaging 11.6 boards, along with 12.1 points across 31 games.

Here’s a breakdown of where the current Gophers roster stands as of Tuesday morning:

Starters

Returning: 3

All-Big Ten forward Dawson Garcia is back for his senior season. Point guard Elijah Hawkins and shooting guard Mike Mitchell Jr., also will be back in the fold for their final campaigns in 2024-25.

To-be-determined: 1

Wing Cam Christie said Friday he will explore the NBA draft process, while maintaining his eligibility for his sophomore season at the U this fall. His return to Minnesota is up in the air.

Exiting: 1

Center Pharrel Payne of Park of Cottage Grove said March 28 he would enter the NCAA transfer portal. The developing post player is the most damaging of the five to say they are out.

Role players

Returning: 1

Sixth man Parker Fox shared Friday he will return for 2024-25 — his seventh collegiate season. After getting healthy, the Mahtomedi native was a spark plug off the bench last winter.

Exiting: 2

Sophomores Braeden Carrington and Josh Ola-Joseph — both from Brooklyn Park — also said in late March they will go into the portal to play elsewhere next winter.

Bench

Returning: 1

Forward Kayden Betts played only eight games last season, but the Colorado native will stick with the U for his redshirt sophomore season. If he develops, he could be a contributor.

Exiting: 2

Forwards Kris Keinys and Isaiah Ihnen, who rarely played last season, also entered the portal. Their exits primarily free up two scholarship spots.

Young and old

Incoming: 2

Point guard Isaac Asuma of Cherry and forward Grayson Grove of Alexandria are high school players joining the U this summer. Asuma is more likely of the pair to be in the rotation next year.

Outgoing: 2

Center Jack Wilson and forward Will Ramberg are set to leave the U after their senior seasons. Neither contributed much on the court a season ago.

Related Articles

College Sports |


Gophers forward Parker Fox will return for 2024-25 season

College Sports |


Gophers’ Cam Christie to explore NBA while keeping college eligibility

College Sports |


Dawson Garcia announces he will return to Gophers men’s basketball next season

College Sports |


Gophers men’s basketball coach Ben Johnson opens up about transfer portal

College Sports |


Gophers forward Kris Keinys enters NCAA transfer portal; U has had five departures