Memorial Day 2024 ceremonies and events in the Twin Cities this weekend

posted in: Politics | 0

Memorial Day is Monday, May 27, and there will be a number of events across the Twin Cities metro area over the weekend to honor and mourn those who died while serving in the military.

Memorial Day is observed on the last Monday of May. Since it is a federal and state holiday, many offices will be closed. Most grocery stores and pharmacies are open, however.

Here’s a look at this year’s local events:

St. Paul: 3 to 4:30 p.m. Monday. Ceremony honoring Vietnam War deaths at the Minnesota Vietnam Memorial on the state Capitol grounds.

St. Paul: 10 a.m. Monday. Memorial Day event at Oakland Cemetery, 927 Jackson St. Guest speaker will be Pat Hill of the Civil War Association.

St. Paul: 2 p.m. Saturday. Gary Carlberg, from VFW Post 1782 and Camp 56 SUVCW, will be hosting the dedication of over 20 Civil War Headstones in the Oakland Cemetery, 927 Jackson Street. This event is part of Operation Headstone, a joint MN VFW, MN American Legion and Camp 56 operation to set 250 headstones in 2024 for some of the hundreds of Civil War veterans in unmarked graves. The joint Honor Guard is from American Legion Post 39 from North St Paul and the VFW Post 1782 from White Bear Lake. Soldiers from the 1st Minnesota will be firing three rounds of musketry. The ceremony is open to veterans, those with an interest in Civil War history, and the general public.

The famous Round Tower at the Historic Fort Snelling on Tuesday, May 24, 2022. (John Autey / Pioneer Press)

St. Paul: 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Monday. Historic Fort Snelling will host an event focused on how Minnesota observed  “Decoration Day” during World War II (Decoration Day became known as Memorial Day after World War II).

The site will host programming across the entire 23 acres, from the new prairie landscape to inside the Plank Museum and visitor center. Hear the Brooklyn Big Band perform on the Klas Overlook, witness WWII era military demonstrations and ceremonies inside the historic fort, marvel at a historic plane flyover, watch the 2 p.m. baseball game and learn about how Fort Snelling figures prominently in Minnesota and American history.

The flyover time is estimated between 10 and 11 a.m. For more information go to mnhs.org. Historic Fort Snelling is located at 200 Tower Avenue, St. Paul.

Roseville: 10 a.m. Monday. Memorial Day service planned at the Roselawn Cemetery Veterans Memorial — Soldiers’ Rest. Attendees should bring a lawn chair as seating will not be provided. In the event of inclement weather, the service will be held at the Roselawn Chapel. A picnic lunch — hotdog, chips, cookie, pop or water — will be offered for $5 from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. on Saturday, Sunday and Monday of Memorial Day weekend.

North St. Paul: 9 a.m. Monday. The American Legion Post 39 Honor Guard and VFW Post 1350 Rifle Squad will honor veterans during a ceremony at St. Mary’s Cemetery.

North St. Paul: Noon Monday. The American Legion Post 39 Honor Guard and VFW Post 1350 Rifle Squad will honor veterans during a ceremony at Veterans Memorial Park. Attendees are encouraged to gather at 11:45 a.m. A brief program will be held. Honor Guards from North St. Paul VFW Post 1350 and American Legion Post 39 will fire a three-volley salute, provide flag detail and play taps.

A man pays his respects amidst a field of headstones at Fort Snelling National Cemetery on Friday, May 26, 2023. John Autey / Pioneer Press)

Catholic Cemeteries: 10 a.m. Monday. Memorial Day Mass (rain or shine) will be held at Calvary Cemetery, in St. Paul; Gethsemane Cemetery, in New Hope; Resurrection Cemetery, in Mendota Heights; and St. Mary’s Cemetery, in Minneapolis. For more information, call 651-228-9991.

Stillwater: 11:30 a.m. Monday. Memorial Day Ceremony will honor the St. Croix Valley-area casualties of war. The ceremony will include music by the Croix Chordsmen and Stillwater Area High School band. A flag raising and flyover by the T-6 Thunder Flight Team is planned for noon. Attendees are asked to bring a lawn chair or blanket to sit on. There will be limited seating available. The Stillwater Veterans Memorial is at Third & Pine Streets in Stillwater. More information at stillwaterveteransmemorial.org.

Stillwater area: Monday. The honor guard and auxiliary of VFW Post 323 will participate in the following services: 7 a.m. Rutherford Cemetery; 7:30 a.m. St. Mathews Cemetery; 7:50 a.m. Withrow Cemetery; 8:30 a.m. Marine on St. Croix Cemetery; 9:05 a.m. Stillwater Veterans Memorial; 9:30 a.m. Fairview Cemetery; and 9:50 a.m. Salem Cemetery. Times are approximations.

Mahtomedi: There will not be a parade this year for Memorial Day due to the road construction on Washington County Road 12/Stillwater Road. The American Legion will still hold a ceremony at Veterans’ Memorial Park on Memorial Day at 10 a.m.

Bayport: 8:30 a.m. Monday. Bayport American Legion Memorial Day Parade will begin on Minnesota Highway 95, between Central Avenue and First Avenue North and will proceed through the city to Hazelwood Cemetery.

White Bear Lake: 9:30 a.m. Monday. The White Bear Lake Memorial Day Parade will start at City Hall and progress to Union Cemetery, at U.S. Highway 61 and Minnesota Highway 96. 10 a.m. Memorial Service at Union Cemetery.

South St. Paul: 10 a.m. Monday. A Memorial Day program will be held at South St. Paul High School auditorium at 700 Second St. N. After the program, a hot dog lunch will be held at Gallagher-Hansen VFW Post 295 at 1401 Thompson Ave.

Hastings: 7 a.m. Monday. Memorial Day March. Beginning at 7:30 a.m. at Levee Park in Hastings and proceeding for 10 miles along the River Trail Loop. For more information, go to marchforthem.org.

Radio: 10 a.m. Monday. WCTS Radio will broadcast a locally-produced Memorial Day service featuring patriotic music, religious and historic reading as well as President Ronald Reagan’s remarks at Arlington National Cemetery on Memorial Day 1986. The voices and stories of veterans of war will also be a part of the service, courtesy of the AMPERS network. An encore will air at 5 p.m. WCTS Radio is at 1030 AM, 97.9 FM and streaming at WCTSRadio.com.

Related Articles

Local News |


St. Paul City Council, mayor’s office still wrangling with special event costs

Local News |


Northern Iron & Machine pulls out of community meeting for foundry’s air emissions

Local News |


Minnesota state investment board adopts climate plan

Local News |


Opponents of University of St. Thomas arena appeal to St. Paul City Council

Local News |


Hudson bicyclist injured in hit-and-run plans dance party for June 4

Senate holds a test vote on border bill as Democrats seek to underscore Republican resistance

posted in: Politics | 0

By STEPHEN GROVES and REBECCA SANTANA (Associated Press)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Democrats are trying for a second time to push ahead with a bill to clamp down the number of migrants allowed to claim asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border as Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer sought on Thursday to underscore Republican resistance to the proposal.

The legislation, negotiated by a bipartisan group of senators, was already rejected by most Republicans in February when it was linked to a foreign aid package for Ukraine, Israel and other U.S. allies. But with immigration and border security becoming one of the top issues of this year’s election, Democrats are looking for an answer to the barrage of GOP attacks, led by presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, on border security.

“Senators will face an important decision. Will both sides come together to advance a bipartisan border security bill or will partisanship get in the way once again?” Schumer, a New York Democrat, said this week.

Schumer is trying to defend a narrow Senate majority in this year’s election and sees the Republican’s rejection of the deal they negotiated as a political “gift” for Democrats.

When the proposal was brought up in February, a test vote failed 49-50 — well shy of the 60 votes needed to advance. While a majority of Democrats were expected to again support the procedural vote to begin debate on the bill, the proposal seemed to be losing traction in the Senate as not even the primary Republican author, Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma, expressed support for Schumer’s move.

“This is trying to poke Republicans in the eye rather than try to say, ‘How do we solve the problem?’” Lankford told reporters.

Republican leaders spent much of the week decrying the vote as a bald-faced political maneuver and amplifying a well-worn criticism of President Joe Biden: That he bears responsibility for the historic number of migrants who have made their way to the U.S. in recent years.

“We’re nearing the end of President Biden’ s term, and the American people’s patience for his failing to secure the southern border is running thin,” Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said Thursday.

Earlier in the week, McConnell told reporters, “The president needs to step up to it — do everything he can do on his own because legislation is obviously not going to clear this year.”

Since the collapse of the Senate’s legislation in February, the Biden administration has been considering executive orders on border policy and immigration. It has already made some changes to the asylum system meant to speed up processing and potential removal of migrants. Yet the Senate’s test vote this week was widely seen as part of a lead-up to Biden issuing more sweeping border measures, potentially as early as June.

The Democratic president has considered using a provision in federal immigration law that gives leeway to block entry of certain immigrants into the U.S. if it would be “detrimental” to the national interest of the United States. The authority was repeatedly tapped by Trump when he was in the White House, but some of those actions faced legal challenges.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas told reporters Monday that legislation to address problems at the border — as opposed to executive actions by the president — would be more effective. The Senate legislation would provide more money for Customs and Border Protection officials, asylum officers, immigration judges and scanning technology at the border — all things that officials have said the underfunded immigration and border protection system needs.

“The legislation provides tools that executive action cannot,” Mayorkas said.

The Senate bill is aimed at gaining control of an asylum system that has sometimes been overwhelmed in the last year. It would provide faster and tougher enforcement of the asylum process, as well as give presidents new powers to immediately expel migrants if the numbers encountered by border officials exceed an average of 4,000 per day over a week.

Even before the bill was fully released earlier this year, Trump effectively killed the proposal by labeling it “meaningless” and a “gift” for Biden’s reelection chances. Top Republicans soon followed his lead and even McConnell, who had initially demanded the negotiation over the border measures, voted against moving forward.

A significant number of Democrats have also criticized the proposal, mostly because it does not include any broad relief for immigrants who have already established lives in the United States.

“It fails to address the root causes of migration or to establish more lawful pathways,” said Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat.

The Congressional Hispanic Caucus said in a statement this week that the Senate’s bill “fails to meet the moment by putting forth enforcement-only policies and failing to include provisions that will keep families together.” They have urged executive actions that would provide protections from deportation for immigrants who have lived in the U.S. for years or who have family ties to U.S. citizens.

Amid the tension, Biden’s reelection campaign met with CHC leadership Wednesday to discuss outreach to Latinos, and Biden spoke on the phone with Rep. Nanette Barragán, the chair of the group. She discussed the reasons for the group’s opposition, according to a person familiar with the call who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the private conversation.

Still, for Democratic senators facing tough reelection battles, the vote Thursday provided another opportunity to show they were supportive of tougher border measures.

As Sen. Jon Tester attempts to hold a Democratic seat in the red-leaning state of Montana, he sent a letter to Biden earlier this month saying, “I will continue to fight for the bipartisan border security bill in Congress, but its failure is not an excuse for lack of action from your Administration.”

Political consultant behind fake Biden robocalls faces $6 million fine, criminal charges

posted in: News | 0

By HOLLY RAMER and ALI SWENSON (Associated Press)

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — The Federal Communications Commission has issued a $6 million fine against the political consultant who sent AI-generated robocalls mimicking President Joe Biden’s voice to voters ahead of New Hampshire’s presidential primary.

Steve Kramer, who also faces two dozen criminal charges in New Hampshire, has admitted orchestrating the message sent to thousands of voters. He did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday but previously said he was trying to send a wake-up call about the dangers of artificial intelligence.

The FCC also issued a $2 million fine against Lingo Telecom, which is accused of transmitting the call. A company spokesperson did not immediately respond to a call seeking comment Thursday.

FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said regulators are committed to helping states go after perpetrators. In a statement, she called the robocalls “unnerving.”

“Because when a caller sounds like a politician you know, a celebrity you like, or a family member who is familiar, any one of us could be tricked into believing something that is not true with calls using AI technology,” she said in a statement. “It is exactly how the bad actors behind these junk calls with manipulated voices want you to react.”

How does this end? With Hamas holding firm and fighting back in Gaza, Israel faces only bad options

posted in: News | 0

By JOSEPH KRAUSS (Associated Press)

JERUSALEM (AP) — Diminished but not deterred, Hamas is still putting up a fight after seven brutal months of war with Israel, regrouping in some of the hardest-hit areas in northern Gaza and resuming rocket attacks into nearby Israeli communities.

Related Articles


Thomas Friedman: Bibi is choosing Stefanik and Trump. Don’t be fooled, President Biden


Other voices: Will Iran ever change? The terror regime continues


Robin Abcarian: Israel’s Gaza war is horrific, but that doesn’t mean Hamas is innocent of sexual violence


Families of Israeli hostages release video of female soldiers being captured by Hamas


Spain, Ireland and Norway say they will recognize a Palestinian state. Why does that matter?

Israel initially made tactical advances against Hamas after a devastating aerial bombardment paved the way for its ground troops. But those early gains have given way to a grinding struggle against an adaptable insurgency — and a growing feeling among many Israelis that their military faces only bad options, drawing comparisons with U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

This was the subtext of a rebellion in recent days by two members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s three-man War Cabinet — Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and Benny Gantz, Netanyahu’s main political rival — who demanded that he come up with detailed postwar plans.

They supported Israel’s retaliation for Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack, including one of the heaviest bombing campaigns in recent history, ground operations that obliterated entire neighborhoods and border restrictions that the U.N.’s World Food Program says pushed parts of the territory into famine.

But now the two retired generals fear a prolonged, costly re-occupation of Gaza, from which Israel withdrew soldiers and settlers in 2005. They are also opposed to a withdrawal that would leave Hamas in control or lead to the establishment of a Palestinian state. Hamas has been designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, Canada and the European Union.

Instead, they have put forth alternatives that many Israelis see as wildly unrealistic. Hamas, meanwhile, has proposed its own postwar plan.

Here’s a look at four ways this war might end.

FULL-SCALE MILITARY OCCUPATION

Netanyahu has promised a “total victory” that would remove Hamas from power, dismantle its military capabilities and return the scores of hostages it still holds from the attack that triggered the war.

He has said victory could come within weeks if Israel launches a full-scale invasion of Rafah, which Israel portrays as the last Hamas stronghold.

Amir Avivi, a retired Israeli general and former deputy commander of the Gaza division, says that’s only the beginning. He said Israel would need to remain in control to prevent Hamas from regrouping.

“If you don’t drain the swamp, you cannot deal with the mosquitoes. And drain the swamp means a complete change in the education system, and dealing with local leadership and not with a terror organization,” he said. “This is a generational process. It’s not going to happen in a day.”

Far-right members of Netanyahu’s governing coalition, who hold the key to his remaining in power, have called for permanent occupation, “voluntary emigration” of large numbers of Palestinians to anywhere that will have them, and rebuilding of Jewish settlements in Gaza.

Most Israelis are opposed, pointing to the immense costs of stationing thousands of troops in the territory that is home to 2.3 million Palestinians. As an occupying power, Israel would likely be held responsible for providing health, education and other services. It’s unclear to what extent international donors would step in to fund reconstruction amid ongoing hostilities.

There’s also no guarantee such an occupation would eliminate Hamas.

Israel was in full control of Gaza when Hamas was established in the late 1980s. Israel’s 18-year occupation of southern Lebanon coincided with the rise of Hezbollah, and Israeli troops routinely battle militants in the West Bank, which it has controlled since 1967.

A LIGHTER OCCUPATION, AIDED BY ‘UNICORNS’

Netanyahu has said Israel will maintain security control over Gaza but delegate civilian administration to local Palestinians unaffiliated with Hamas or the Western-backed Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the occupied West Bank. He has suggested that Arab and other countries assist with governance and rebuilding.

But so far, none have shown interest.

No Palestinians are known to have offered to cooperate with the Israeli military, perhaps because Hamas has said they would be treated as collaborators, a veiled death threat.

Efforts to reach out to Palestinian businessmen and powerful families “have ended in catastrophe,” says Michael Milshtein, an Israeli analyst of Palestinian affairs at Tel Aviv University and a former military intelligence officer.

He says Israelis seeking such allies are searching for “unicorns” — something that does not exist.

Arab states have also roundly rejected this scenario — even the United Arab Emirates, which is one of the few to formally recognize Israel and has close ties with it.

“The UAE refuses to be involved in any plan aimed at providing cover for the Israeli presence in the Gaza Strip,” Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan said this month.

A GRAND BARGAIN

Instead, Arab states have coalesced around a U.S. proposal aimed at resolving the decades-old conflict and transforming the Middle East.

Under this plan, a reformed Palestinian Authority would govern Gaza with the assistance of Arab and Muslim nations, including Saudi Arabia, which would normalize relations with Israel in return for a U.S. defense pact and help in building a civilian nuclear program.

But U.S. and Saudi officials say that hinges on Israel committing to a credible path to eventual Palestinian statehood.

Netanyahu has ruled out such a scenario — as have Gallant and Gantz — saying it would reward Hamas and result in a militant-run state on Israel’s borders.

Palestinians say ending Israel’s decades-long occupation and creating a fully independent state in Gaza, the West Bank and east Jerusalem — territories Israel captured in the 1967 Mideast war — is the only way to end the cycle of bloodshed.

Hamas has said it would accept a two-state solution on at least an interim basis, but its political program still calls for the “full liberation of Palestine,” including what is now Israel. Hamas has also said it must be part of any postwar settlement.

A DEAL WITH HAMAS

Hamas has proposed a very different grand bargain — one that, ironically enough, might be more palatable to Israelis than the U.S.-Saudi deal.

The group has proposed a phased agreement in which it would release all of the hostages in return for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners — including senior fighters — as well as the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, a lengthy cease-fire and reconstruction.

That would almost certainly leave Hamas in control of Gaza and potentially allow it to rebuild its military capabilities. Hamas might even claim victory, despite the extensive death and destruction suffered by Palestinian civilians since Oct. 7.

But thousands of Israeli protesters have taken to the streets in recent weeks calling on their leaders to take such a deal, because it’s probably the only way to get the hostages back.

They accuse Netanyahu of standing in the way of such an agreement because it could lead his far-right allies to bring down his government, potentially ending his political career and exposing him to prosecution on corruption charges.

Supporters of such a deal say there would be other benefits for Israel, beyond freeing the hostages.

The low-intensity conflict with Lebanon’s Hezbollah would likely die down as regional tensions ease, allowing tens of thousands of people on both sides of the border to return to their homes. Israel could finally reckon with the security failures that led to Oct. 7.

And it could prepare for another inevitable round of fighting.

Milshtein says Israel should adopt Hamas’ concept of a “hudna” — a prolonged period of strategic calm.

“Hudna doesn’t mean a peace agreement,” he said. “It’s a cease-fire that you will exploit in order to make yourself stronger and then to attack and surprise your enemy.”