Texas House Passes Raft of Dan Patrick Priorities Imposing Conservative Mandates on Public Ed

posted in: All news | 0

Instead of attending family barbecues or local parades, Texas state representatives spent Memorial Day on the floor of the House scrambling their way through a long list of controversial priority bills like Senate Bill 13, which would further empower parents and school boards to review school libraries’ books for “indecent or profane” content. After about two hours of debate on that measure, Representative Gene Wu, the Democratic Caucus chair, felt like he was “taking crazy pills,” he said.

“I think the vast majority of Texans would watch us during this debate and go, ‘What is going on there?’” Wu said “There’s thousands of other problems in our world right now that need addressing.” 

The Texas House spent the long holiday weekend—which came ahead of the final Tuesday deadline for passage of Senate bills—taking up several bills on Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick’s priority agenda. Many of which, including SB 13, were part of the Texas GOP’s larger crusade to impose cultural conservatism on all facets of public education. Among the legislation passed by the Republican majority were a bill to ban diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in K-12 schools, to require every Texas public school classroom to display the Ten Commandments, and to increase political control over the programming and curriculum of public universities.

In addition to removing “harmful” library material, SB 13 would allow parents to access student library records and prevent their children from checking out certain books, and allow for districts to establish parental library advisory councils. GOP state Representative Brad Buckley, who carried SB 13 in the House, said it would “ensure that school library collections are appropriate for their campuses based upon developmental suitability for those grade levels and on community values.” The bill was approved in the House on a 87-57 vote.

Democratic legislators worried about the subjectivity of profane content and community values, potentially leading to the removal of books at the whim of established library councils. “Books help our kids understand the world, and sometimes they help them survive it,” said Representative Christina Morales, a Houston Democrat. “We are here debating books while schools lack basic resources, and many kids are being failed by the systems around them.” 

Earlier in the weekend, the House convened over 13 hours on Saturday to vote on a litany of bills, including Senate Bill 12, dubbed the “Parental Bill of Rights.” The omnibus bill would prohibit all “DEI duties,” including in hiring decisions, and would prohibit instruction on LGBTQ+ topics. Representative Jeff Leach, who carried the bill in the House, got amendments passed to include due process for employees terminated for engaging in DEI duties and clarified that schools could recruit from historically Black colleges to diversify its applicant pool. 

The House also approved an amendment from state Representative Steve Toth that would prohibit teachers from helping students “socially transition” by using a name or pronouns incongruent with a students’ biological sex. The bill passed 88-47 on Sunday. The Senate refused to concur with the House’s changes and have convened a conference committee to negotiate the differences.  

The House also passed an amended version of Senate Bill 37 on Sunday, an omnibus bill focusing on the idea of “shared governance” between the governing board of regents at a higher education institution and its faculty and administration. Under the House’s version of the bill, authored by Representative Matt Shaheen, an institution’s governing board would review core curricula, degree minors, and certificates at least once every five years. “Senate Bill 37 ensures degrees earned in Texas are of value and prepare students for success, both in life and in the workforce,” Shaheen said.

Governing boards, comprised solely of political appointees, would also approve or deny the hiring of provosts. The bill also calls for the Higher Education Coordinating Board to create the office of the ombudsman, a gubernatorial appointee that will act as an intermediary between the Legislature and the state’s university systems. 

Shaheen’s version of that senate bill has some key differences, including the removal of a section that would require universities to evaluate all of its degree programs. 

Opponents of the bill, like Representative Donna Howard, warned that the measure would create a chilling effect on professors and academic freedom writ large. “I believe in accountability, I believe in efficiency, I believe in preparing students for the workforce, but I also believe in local governance and institutional autonomy,” Howard said. “[This bill] undermines faculty voices and injects politics into the classroom at a time when we should be laser focused on expanding access, improving student outcomes, and restoring trust in our education systems.” 

The amended version ultimately passed the House largely along party lines. The Senate also declined to accept the changes on this bill, which now is in conference committee. 

One of the most heavily contested debates of the House weekend marathon came over Senate Bill 10, proposing to mandate by state law that each and every single one of the tens of thousands of public school classrooms—kindergarten to 12th Grade—in Texas display a poster of the Ten Commandments. 

The bill had first come to the House floor on Wednesday only to be flushed back to committee due to a successful parliamentary tactic. But, like Jesus himself, the bill rose from the dead and returned to the House floor three days later. 

In her bill layout, state Representative Candy Noble said the Ten Commandments are “foundational” to the American education system and that displaying commandments in classrooms will ensure kids know not to lie, steal, or kill. “Our classrooms are crying for moral guidance,” said Noble during a committee hearing on the bill. 

The proposed law specifies the very dimensions (at least “16 inches wide and 20 inches tall”) and font size (“legible to a person with average vision from anywhere in the classroom”) required of the state-mandated biblical posters. (The bill does not go so far as to specify a font color—Noble affirmed it could, in theory, be rainbow, “like the one in Noah’s ark.”) Schools must accept private donations of legally compliant posters and otherwise may, but are not required, to use their budget to buy those posters.  

During the bill debate, which took place on Saturday—the Jewish Sabbath—state Representative James Talarico, an Austin Democrat, asked Noble to read the fourth commandment: “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.” 

Talarico also brought up concerns about students who aren’t Christian having to see the Ten Commandments every day. Rather than feeling alienated, Noble said, the students would likely be curious. “It would be to their enlightenment to see what made our forefathers tick,” Noble said. The House tabled several amendments that proposed including other core texts or principles from other religions.

Noble said she looked forward to curious children asking the sort of questions that will surely come from seeing a poster of the Ten Commandments in their classroom—such as, “What is adultery?” or “What is a manservant?”—and for teachers to bear the responsibility of answering such queries. 

Legislators also brought up the concept of separation of church and state, which Noble repeatedly contested was not meant to keep the church out of the state but the government out of the church—“government was made by God for men,” she said.  

Talarico said he worried the bill would push people away from Christianity. “There is a spiritual crisis in our world that must be addressed, but this bill is not the way to address it,” Talarico said. “This is a power play by using our power as legislators to elevate our faith tradition over all the rest. … Instead of leading by example, we’re leading by mandate.” 

The House approved SB 10 on final passage the next day, Sunday—the Lord’s day of rest and worship in Christianity. Governor Greg Abbott has said he intends to sign the bill into law. 

This will almost surely invite a swift legal challenge—a federal judge ruled that a similar Louisiana law was unconstitutional last November. Indeed, Texas Republicans’ very intent with this bill is likely to get the U.S. Supreme Court to take a new stance on the doctrine of church and state separation. 

On that front, the House was kind enough to add an amendment stipulating that the State of Texas must defend and cover any legal expenses incurred by local school districts sued over this law.

The post Texas House Passes Raft of Dan Patrick Priorities Imposing Conservative Mandates on Public Ed appeared first on The Texas Observer.

Tom Robbins and the Truth

posted in: All news | 0

“It was more important to Tom to be right than to be famous — ‘right’ meaning not just factually accurate but also morally correct. Tom was not a prophet or zealot; he lived in a complicated city like the rest of us. But he knew that when encountering moral ambiguity, you had to think harder, not just throw up your hands.”

City Limits honored Tom Robbins at the newsroom’s anniversary celebration in 2018. (Photo by Adi Talwar)

On the day after the night when Tom Robbins died it rained in New York City. The rain was gentle but steady. 

It rained on yellow cabs and for-hire cars driven by people trying to make it through traffic, and trying to make it, period. The water coated the places of power, like City Hall, the courthouses and the anodyne headquarters of bureaucracies. It was raining in the recreation yards of jails while roofs leaked in buildings owned by negligent landlords.

Puddles formed around the graves of the wrongfully dead, and the grass muddied near the tombs of the gangsters who killed them. On construction sites people toiled in the rain and in homeless encampments they hid from it. Tenant organizers and social workers looked out windows streaked wet, then went back to work. Reporters typed against the rhythm of the drops and sipped lukewarm coffee.

The rain fell on the depraved and the noble, on the victims of sweeping injustice and the dispensers of minor mercies, on heroes and nobodies, because even in a place as vast as New York City, there are inescapable truths, no matter your ZIP code, where you went to school, your immigration status, whom you know.

Yesterday that truth happened to be rain, but there are many other truths. Tom knew them. And he wrote them down.

One such truth is that a New York City built for the working class, a place where everyone gets treated with dignity at work and makes enough to afford a decent life, is a thing we could have and is worth fighting for, no matter who dismisses such notions as radical or nostalgic. Tom believed and struggled for working-class New Yorkers his entire adult life. He skipped college and drove a cab before getting canned for trying to unionize the drivers. Then he organized tenants working to salvage a decent place to live in a crisis-ravaged city. Finally, he turned to a typewriter to try to change the world.

That turned out to be a good move. Tom’s stellar career, as the great tributes this week by The Times, The City and others will tell you, took him from a stint as editor of City Limits to the Village Voice, the Observer, the Daily News, and back to the Voice, before he shifted to teaching at the CUNY Newmark Graduate School of Journalism, penning investigative projects for the Times and the Marshall Project, writing for The City, and most recently hosting a terrific show on WBAI. He wrote a book, nabbed snazzy awards, chased scoundrels from power, delivered justice to the imprisoned and taught generations of young reporters what it meant to cover New York.

Tom Robbins, right, with former City Limits’ editor Jarrett Murphy
in 2018. (Photo by Larry Racioppo)

Through it all, Tom seemed like the last of a bygone era when newswriting was a trade and its practitioners brought blue-collar sensibilities to their coverage of the city. He did not dress particularly well. But he wrote clearly and powerfully, a true craftsman, erudite but never showy. Colleagues of Tom’s will remember that one of the sounds of deadline day was the low rumble of him reading his story to himself before he turned it in, so he could make sure it sounded right.

Despite his immense skill and accomplishments, Tom during his life might not have earned the accolades or attention that some of his fellow New York City columnists enjoyed. In part that is because of the outlets where he worked and the types of stories he pursued, which often did not lend themselves to glamor. It is also explained to some degree by the fact that the news business is, to quote a Robbins understatement, “lousy.”

Most important, however, is the fact that Tom’s journalism was never about Tom, not in any sense or dimension. He didn’t seek the limelight, often eschewed credit, even got irritated when people revealed his acts of singular generosity. When the Village Voice fired his great friend Wayne Barrett and Tom told them to fire him too, he hoped the act of solidarity would be low-key. He didn’t want to play the martyr. He knew the truth: that, in the end, it is much more valuable to be a friend.

More broadly, it was more important to Tom to be right than to be famous—”right” meaning not just factually accurate but also morally correct. Tom was not a prophet or zealot; he lived in a complicated city like the rest of us. But he knew that when encountering moral ambiguity, you had to think harder, not just throw up your hands. Tom never gave up on the truth that unions are essential for making sure working-class people get the decent life they deserve. He helped lead the Village Voice union through one of the most contentious contract negotiations in history, when it came so close to a strike the staff had printed all the picket posters. 

Yet Tom’s faith in the idea of organized labor never blinded him to the rampant corruption in many of the organizations that purport to represent workers, and he often exposed their thieving. His commitment to justice led him to the painful decision in 2007 to break a promise to a source and reveal that she had lied on the stand in the trial of a corrupt FBI agent. Saving a mobbed up G-man from a lengthy prison sentence was the last thing Tom wanted to do, but it happened to have been the right thing, so he did it.

That combination of skill, modesty and moral compass gave Tom a quiet strength. He knew what he’d come for and didn’t need to shout or throw chairs to show he belonged there. While he was certainly no pushover, and could make it sufficiently clear that he thought you’d done something wrong (full disclosure: Tom was angry at me for about the first three months we knew each other), he didn’t bluster or humiliate, intimidate or threaten. 

In a big-city political arena where alpha males throw their weight around, he wore a wry smile and a blazer, neither taking the bait nor backing down. He knew that kindness and optimism were journalistic assets, not handicaps. Keep asking questions. Keep reading documents. Believe in the story, even if no one else does. Believe in a better world, even if it seems to be slipping away. Like water, just keep coming, constant, undeterred, unfazed.

Tom Robbins and Annette Fuentes in City Limits’ offices in the early 1980s. (Photo by Brian Patrick O’Donohue)

This is an inopportune moment to lose Tom’s voice, what with cruelty and avarice becoming national policy, cowardice infecting our institutions, unrepentant venality clinging to power in City Hall, the free press under relentless attack everywhere. I don’t know where Tom would have directed his reporting this week if he were still out there. Maybe he’d be at Federal Plaza, where federal agents are arresting New Yorkers playing by “the rules” and showing up for their immigration hearings. Or perhaps he’d be out on the campaign trail, to keep an eye on the municipal candidates bankrolled by casinos and Big Tech. It’s anybody’s guess; the guy was pretty nimble.

But one thing I know for certain is that he would care, and he would try. None of us has an excuse to do less.

Yesterday it rained on all the city Tom Robbins tried to help, and did, across 40 years of journalism—on people who never read his work, but were on his mind and in his notebook, and places he chronicled in front-page articles and forgotten news briefs. It rained on the decent and kind New York he tried to save and embodied. It rained a little today, too, as a matter of fact.

Jarrett Murphy met Tom Robbins in 1999, worked alongside him at the Village Voice, and stood on his shoulders as editor of City Limits from 2010-2020. He’s now a pediatric ER nurse in Manhattan.

The post Tom Robbins and the Truth appeared first on City Limits.

Trump suffered ‘mental anguish’ from disputed CBS News interview with Harris, lawyer says

posted in: All news | 0

By DAVID BAUDER, Associated Press

NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump suffered “mental anguish” from CBS News’ editing of a “60 Minutes” interview with Democratic opponent Kamala Harris last fall, his lawyers are arguing in court papers.

Trump’s status as a “content creator” was also damaged by attention given to the interview, lawyers said. It was part of their argument opposing CBS parent Paramount Global’s effort to dismiss the president’s $20 billion lawsuit against the company, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Amarillo, Texas. Trump has claimed the editing was done to advantage Harris, which CBS rejects.

Even with the effort to dismiss the case, Paramount is engaged in settlement discussions with Trump. The prospect of a settlement has so rattled CBS News that two of its top executives have resigned in protest.

Related Articles


The US academic partnership with China, under strain for years, faces its biggest threat


White House acknowledges problems in RFK Jr.’s MAHA report


State Department notifies Congress of reorganization plan with bigger cuts to programs and staff


Trump meets with the Federal Reserve chairman he has repeatedly scorned


Man who blamed exposure to far-right content gets 3 years for threatening election officials

Trump, who did not agree to be interviewed by “60 Minutes” during the campaign, has protested editing where Harris is seen giving two different answers to a question by the show’s Bill Whitaker in separate clips aired on “60 Minutes” and “Face the Nation” earlier in the day. CBS said each reply came within Harris’ long-winded answer to Whitaker, but was edited to be more succinct.

Trump’s lawyer, Edward Andrew Paltzik, said that “this led to widespread confusion and mental anguish of consumers, including plaintiffs, regarding a household name of the legacy media apparently deceptively distorting its broadcasts, and then resisting attempts to clear the public record.”

Because they were misled, voters withheld attention from Trump and his Truth Social platform, Paltzik argued.

Trump, described as a “media icon” by his lawyers, was “forced to redirect significant time, money and effort to correcting the public record,” he said.

Paramount and controlling shareholder Shari Redstone are seeking the settlement with Trump, whose administration must approve the company’s proposed merger with Skydance Media. CBS News’ president and CEO, Wendy McMahon, and “60 Minutes” executive producer Bill Owens, who both opposed a settlement, have resigned in recent weeks.

Meanwhile, the Freedom of the Press Foundation, a media advocacy group that says it is a Paramount shareholder, said that it would file a lawsuit in protest if a settlement is reached.

Seth Stern, the foundation’s advocacy director, said a settlement of Trump’s “meritless” lawsuit “may well be a thinly veiled effort to launder bribes through the court system.” U.S. Sens. Ron Wyden, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have said they are investigating whether a settlement would violate bribery laws.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday that Paramount has offered $15 million to settle but that Trump wants more money — and an apology. A company representative would not comment on the report.

David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder and https://bsky.app/profile/dbauder.bsky.social.

National Spelling Bee runners-up rarely go on to win. But Faizan Zaki hopes to defy the odds

posted in: All news | 0

By BEN NUCKOLS, Associated Press

OXON HILL, Md. (AP) — With the benefit of hindsight, Vikram Raju knows there was almost no chance he would win after being a runner-up in the 2022 Scripps National Spelling Bee.

“The chances of getting that high are infinitesimally small, and the chances of doing it again are an order of magnitude smaller, obviously,” Vikram said Wednesday. “So it’s a really daunting feeling as well because you always try to outdo yourself from the previous year.”

Don’t tell Faizan Zaki those odds.

Faizan, who lost to Bruhat Soma in a “spell-off” tiebreaker last year, was the only speller to earn a perfect score on the written spelling and vocabulary test that determined this year’s quarterfinalists. Then he breezed through seven rounds on Wednesday to become one of nine spellers who will compete in Thursday night’s finals for a trophy and more than $50,000 in cash and prizes.

And he’s done it all with insouciant flair, sauntering to the microphone in a black hoodie, shaggy hair in his face. Once he’s sure of the word, he takes his hands out of his sweatshirt pouch and matter-of-factly says each letter while he mimics typing in the air.

The 13-year-old seventh-grader from Allen, Texas, finally showed a bit of vulnerability on “coterell,” the word that got him to the finals, and he celebrated with a big fist pump after racing through its eight letters.

“It was just very relieving. I have a lot of expectations put on me, so I’m just excited that I’m going to the finals again,” Faizan said.

No matter how often he flexes his knowledge of roots and unfamiliar language patterns, historical trends suggest Faizan is an underdog. In 96 bees over 100 years, only four runners-up have later gone on to win, and just one did so in the last 44 years: Sean Conley, the 2001 champion who finished second the year before.

“Hopefully I can get it done,” Faizan said. “Especially back home, all of my friends, they tell me that I need to win this year.”

Other runners-up

Disappointment has taken many forms for recent runners-up.

Related Articles


Smokey Robinson sues former housekeepers for defamation over rape allegations


Skittles removes controversial additive targeted by RFK Jr.


Judge finds man charged with stalking Jennifer Aniston is mentally incompetent to stand trial


Ex-assistant testifies Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs sexually assaulted her and used violence to get his way


Victoria’s Secret website is down in the US as the lingerie seller addresses a ‘security incident’

Naysa Modi, who finished second in 2018, was eliminated in 2019 by a written test that winnowed the field to 50 spellers, only to watch in dismay as the bee declared eight co-champions who aced words that she also knew.

Simone Kaplan, the runner-up to those 2019 “octo-champs,” didn’t get a chance to come back because the 2020 bee was canceled due to COVID-19.

Chaitra Thummala, runner-up to Zaila Avant-garde in 2021, never contended again, even though she had two more years before she aged out of the competition. Spellers can’t be older than 15 or past the eighth grade.

Then came Vikram, who didn’t make it back in 2023 after a regional bee in Denver that lasted 53 rounds over a span of more than five hours. Vikram and his parents unsuccessfully appealed to Scripps that he misspelled because the bee’s pronouncer made one of several mistakes.

Now 15, Vikram returned to the bee to support his younger brother, Ved — who bowed out in the semifinals — and he’s long past any bitter feelings about how his spelling career ended.

“Even if you know every single word in the dictionary, there are just factors that are completely out of your control,” Vikram said. “The nerves might get too big someday. Maybe the audience is distracting you in that one moment. Maybe your tongue slips. Maybe you get too excited.”

“I don’t want to say that luck is the most important factor, but it’s a huge factor in this competition,” he continued.

Youth and experience

Jacques Bailly has been the bee’s lead pronouncer for 22 years, or nearly three times as long as this year’s youngest speller has been alive.

Yet meeting Bailly was the highlight of a precocious bee debut for Zachary Teoh, an 8-year-old second-grader from Houston.

“We got to read the dictionary together!” Zachary exclaimed.

Zachary was better than half the field in his bee debut. Out of 243 spellers, his official placement was a tie for 74th place after he bowed out on a vocabulary word — “manifold” — during the quarterfinals. He said he felt like it was among the more difficult vocabulary questions, and he knew how to spell the word even though he couldn’t define it.

If Zachary somehow makes it back to the bee in each of his six remaining years of eligibility, he would break the record of six appearances held by Akash Vukoti, who debuted in 2016 at age 6 and spelled his final word in 2023.

Zachary wore a green tartan cardigan that he said has been his lucky garment since kindergarten. It’s getting a bit snug.

“If they give me a new one,” he said, referring to his proud parents, “I can wear both.”

Ben Nuckols has covered the Scripps National Spelling Bee since 2012. Follow his work here.