‘The Blue Angels’ review: Doc soars with aerial photography, not drama

posted in: News | 0

Watching “The Blue Angels” in your living room, you can’t help but be envious of those making the effort to catch the documentary in IMAX.

Playing May 17 through 23 in theaters with IMAX auditoriums, “The Blue Angels” jets onto Prime Video on May 23.

Depending on your home setup, “The Blue Angels” — billed as offering unprecedented access to the staple of air shows across the country that is the United States Navy Blue Angels program — still may look and sound pretty darned fierce, but no home theater can compare with the stage an IMAX setup can offer the exhilarating aerial footage that is by far this movie’s greatest selling point.

That’s the way you’d love to experience the roaring engines and the trails of smoke.

However, even the largest of IMAX screens can’t plaster over the fact that this Paul Crowder-directed film does not soar when it comes to human drama. As it covers the program from its winter training period through its transition late in the year to those who will fly the Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornets in 2023. Yes, viewers are introduced to the men piloting in the shows throughout 2022 — and the myriad men and women supporting them in other roles on the team — but we barely get to know them.

We do go home, briefly, with Capt. Brian Kesselring — who, as commanding officer and flight leader, is bestowed with the nickname “Boss” — and meet his Marine officer wife, Ashley, and their two little children. Really, though, this feels like a bit of box-checking more than anything else.

Even while showing a playful streak within the program, “The Blue Angels” is every bit as squeaky-clean as its G rating would suggest. If there WERE any real drama behind the scenes, you wouldn’t know it from the film.

Counting among its producers filmmaker J.J. Abrams (“Star Wars: The Force Awakens”), actor Glen Powell (“Top Gun: Maverick”) and retired pilot Greg Wooldridge, the only three-time “Boss” of the Blue Angels, it too often feels like a really expensive recruitment video. The honor of being chosen to be a part of the team and the responsibility to perform to its high standards and to be safe while sometimes flying as close as a few inches from other pilots comes through loud and clear.

That isn’t to say it’s not enjoyable to follow the progress of the team, even as the members go through the monotonous grind of winter training — waking up and going to bed in darkness, flying two to three times in between and sitting through video-aided debriefs in which they get to relive their mistakes.

Members of the United States Navy Blue Angels program review video footage of a training session in a scene from “The Blue Angels.” (Courtesy of Amazon Content Services)

You learn about the different components of their show routine, four planes frequently flying in “Diamond” formation and complemented by solo maneuvers, before the team conducts the six-plane “Delta” formation.

The Blue Angels fly in the familiar “Diamond” formation in a scene from “The Blue Angels.” (Courtesy of Amazon Content Services)

They are supported on the ground by crew men and women — each plane is checked thoroughly before each flight and Monica Borza, the flight surgeon who monitors them closely.

“I know where they should be at all times, their attitudes, their flight speeds,” Borza says.

Related Articles


National Memorial Day Concert to mark 35 years of honoring those who died in service to country


Review: ‘Gasoline Rainbow’ is a memorable teenage road trip along an improvised Oregon trail


The bugs are coming! If a cicada invasion sounds familiar, thank Hollywood


Trump campaign calls ‘The Apprentice’ ‘blatantly false,’ director offers to screen it for him


10 movies for summer 2024: Sequels and reboots, but fingers crossed for a surprise

The team has three new pilots this year, with two others flying in different aerial positions, adding to the stress of Borza and others.

Later in the film, we see other pilots vying to join the team, including Amanda Lee, who hopes to be the first female chosen to fly, and watch as those selected take their first steps toward the 2023 season in the form of some unpleasant-seeming training to prepare them for the gravitational forces with which they will be confronted when they are performing the sky-high wizardry.

“The Blue Angels” also offers a history lesson — about the team’s formation in 1946 by Adm. Chester Nimitz, then the chief of Naval operations, who wanted to create a flight exhibition team to raise the public’s interest in naval aviation and boost Navy morale — complete with some archival footage.

That grainy footage helps remind us that state-of-the-art equipment and techniques was used to capture the footage of this film with the help of a helicopter outfitted with IMAX-certified cameras that became the first civilian aircraft permitted to fly within the performance space, called “the box,” according to the film’s production notes. (The aerial camera unit from the aforementioned “Top Gun: Maverick,” led by aerial coordinator Kevin LaRosa II, was brought on board for this project, and it’s easy to wonder if a documentary about the making of this documentary would be a bit more compelling from a narrative perspective than the storyline of “The Blue Angels.”)

“The Blue Angels” isn’t the first time the planes have been captured in moving pictures, with previous showcases including the mid-1990s documentary “Blue Angels: Around the World at the Speed of “Sound and the memorable music video for the 1986 Van Halen hit “Dreams.”

Nonetheless, it’s safe to say you’ve never seen them quite like this before.

‘The Blue Angels’

Where: Prime Video.

When: May 23.

Rated: G.

Runtime: 1 hour, 33 minutes.

Stars (of four): 2.5.

Blue Angels in Cleveland

Cleveland will host the U.S. Navy Blue Angels as headliners of the 2024 Cleveland National Air Show, Aug. 31 through Sept. 2 at Burke Lakefront Airport. The team will present an hourlong choreographed presentation, with Cleveland being one of 30 cities hosting the Blue Angels in 2024, according to press information. Get information and tickets at clevelandairshow.com or call 216-781-0747.

Biden has slight edge in N.H., UML poll shows

posted in: Politics | 0

Despite dodging the state’s first-in-the-nation primary election, a recent poll shows President Joe Biden holds a slight edge over former President Donald Trump in New Hampshire.

A poll of 600 likely New Hampshire voters conducted UMass Lowell’s Center for Public Opinion and YouGov from May 6 to May 14 shows that the 45th President would lose the Granite State for a third time running if the general election were held today, despite the fact the Biden chose not to participate in the state’s primary in favor of allowing South Carolina to vote first.

“Biden leads Trump 42% to 36%, with less than six months until Election Day, Tuesday, Nov. 5. Eleven percent of respondents support independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., while 9% are undecided and 2% say they will vote for another candidate,” pollsters wrote.

Most of those polled expressed their dissatisfaction with the 2020 election sequel presented in 2024. More than half of those polled — 58% — said they were very or somewhat unhappy with the Biden vs. Trump dichotomy do-over. Among independent voters, that number jumps to 71%.

According to Rodrigo Castro Cornejo, the Center for Public Opinion’s associate director and a UMass Lowell assistant professor of political science, “most New Hampshire voters polled are unhappy with the presidential ballot.”

Since that’s a sentiment shared by voters in states across the country, Cornejo says both candidates will need to court the undecided.

“In a polarized America, split along partisan lines, both Biden and Trump will first try to activate their base, and, as November approaches, they will try to appeal to undecided voters. Even though undecided voters are a small portion of the electorate, persuading them will be particularly important in what we can expect to be a highly competitive presidential election,” he said.

The poll also examined the effect of former U.S. Sen. Kelly Ayotte’s anti-Massachusetts stance in her campaign for governor of New Hampshire. The former senator has centered much of her run around the assertion that the Granite State is but “one election away from becoming Massachusetts.”

According to UMass Lowell Professor Joshua Dyck, the polling center’s director and chair of the political science department, New Hampshire voters don’t seem to be buying that message.

“In an increasingly nationalized political environment, it’s unclear whether Kelly Ayotte’s choice to run against Massachusetts liberals is the right strategy to put her into the governor’s mansion. We won’t have a better idea of where this race stands until New Hampshire voters get to know her potential opponents for the fall election. In the meantime, one thing she does have on her side is name recognition in a sea of relatively unknown candidates,” he said.

The poll found 30% of voters think the state is “at great risk” of becoming “too much like Massachusetts.” A little more than a third of those polled said there is some risk, and 36% said there was no risk of the Granite State turning into the Bay State.

Could current COVID vaccines protect against future outbreaks? New study offers hope

posted in: News | 0

Irene Wright | The Charlotte Observer (TNS)

Before March 2020, it was hard to imagine a global pandemic in the modern age.

Now, it’s hard to imagine our lives without one.

As COVID-19 has become less of an active part of our days and more a quick thought when we have a runny nose or cough, it’s time to think about what comes next — and how to stop another pandemic.

A group of researchers had the future in mind when they asked if current COVID-19 vaccines and boosters could also protect your body against future outbreaks in a study published in the journal Nature on May 15.

Here’s what you need to know:

What is immune imprinting?

Researchers from Washington University’s School of Medicine in St. Louis evaluated the ability of the COVID-19 shots to build up memory in the immune system through a process called immune imprinting.

“Immune imprinting is a phenomenon in which prior antigenic experiences influence responses to subsequent infection or vaccination,” according to the study.

This means that when the human body is exposed to an infection, whether by becoming infected or receiving a vaccination, the immune system can build up defenses against it, and those defenses stay in the body even when the infection has left.

“Imprinting is the natural result of how immunological memory works. A first vaccination triggers the development of memory immune cells,” researchers said in a May 17 news release from Washington University. “When people receive a second vaccination quite similar to the first, it reactivates memory cells elicited by the first vaccine. These memory cells dominate and shape the immune response to the subsequent vaccine.”

Related Articles

Health |


Nursing homes wield pandemic immunity laws to duck wrongful death suits

Health |


Cory Franklin: Was Sweden’s COVID-19 approach superior to that of the U.S.?

Health |


Mistrust, fights and blood sport: How COVID-19 trauma is shaping the 2024 election

Health |


There’s a new highly transmissible COVID-19 variant. Could FLiRT lead to a summer uptick?

Health |


New COVID ‘FLiRT’ variants are spreading nationwide. Health experts urge up to date vaccination

But since your body holds onto some “immunity,” it can make it difficult to create a vaccination for the following year that complements an already established immune response and doesn’t interfere.

Doctors already have to deal with this problem.

The annual flu vaccine is updated and adapted each year before the fall rollout to best target the strains of influenza that are particularly strong or infectious.

“In the case of the flu vaccine, imprinting has negative effects,” according to the release, and the cells that are supposed to produce antibodies to fight the virus instead crowd other antibody-producing cells, making the vaccine less effective.

The worry is that if people receive annual COVID-19 boosters, like health officials recommend for influenza, immune imprinting could make the population vulnerable when a new coronavirus, or even another similar virus, starts to spread again, the researchers said.

Their results tell a different story.

‘Gradually build up a stock’

Researchers measured antibodies in people who had all of the updated COVID-19 shots to see if their neutralizing antibodies came from the original variant from the first shots, an omicron variant from updated shots, or both.

They found that most people had antibodies that weren’t unique to the original variant or omicron, meaning the antibodies could also protect against similar strains that haven’t been identified, according to the release.

“The study … shows that people who were repeatedly vaccinated for COVID-19 — initially receiving shots aimed at the original variant, followed by boosters and updated vaccines targeting variants — generated antibodies capable of neutralizing a wide range of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) variants and even some distantly related coronaviruses,” researchers said in the release.

The “cross-reacted” response also extended to far-reaching relatives of COVID-19, like the Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), a coronavirus that was first reported in 2012.

Instead of getting in the way of the body’s natural ability to identify and respond to new variants, periodic re-vaccination against COVID-19 may “instead cause people to gradually build up a stock of broadly neutralizing antibodies that protect them from emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants and some other coronavirus species as well, even ones that have not yet emerged to infect humans,” according to the release.

This assumes, however, that a person maintains the shot regimen recommended by health officials.

Current COVID-19 vaccination guidelines

As of May 14, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends everyone over the age of 5 to receive one dose of the updated COVID-19 vaccine, whether they receive initial doses or not.

This includes the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna and Novavax shots.

Children between the ages of 6 months and 4 years old may need more than one dose to be up to date, including the newest 2023-2024 shots.

People with immune concerns or who are older than 65 should receive one dose of the new shot, as well as an additional spring shot with at least 4 months in between the two, the CDC says.

It is safe for people who are pregnant or who plan to become pregnant to receive updated doses.

If you are experiencing symptoms of COVID-19 — including but not limited to cough, fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue and muscle aches — remain isolated until you have gone at least 24 hours without a fever without taking any fever-reducing medications and your symptoms are improving overall, the CDC says.

©2024 The Charlotte Observer. Visit charlotteobserver.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

The number of births continues to fall, despite abortion bans

posted in: Society | 0

Tim Henderson | (TNS) Stateline.org

Births continued a historic slide in all but two states last year, making it clear that a brief post-pandemic uptick in the nation’s birth numbers was all about planned pregnancies that had been delayed temporarily by COVID-19.

Only Tennessee and North Dakota had small increases in births from 2022 to 2023, according to a Stateline analysis of provisional federal data on births. In California, births dropped by 5%, or nearly 20,000, for the year. And as is the case in most other states, there will be repercussions now and later for schools and the workforce, said Hans Johnson, a senior fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California who follows birth trends.

“These effects are already being felt in a lot of school districts in California. Which schools are going to close? That’s a contentious issue,” Johnson said.

In the short term, having fewer births means lower state costs for services such as subsidized day care and public schools at a time when aging baby boomers are straining resources. But eventually, the lack of people could affect workforces needed both to pay taxes and to fuel economic growth.

Nationally, births fell by 2% for the year, similar to drops before the pandemic, after rising slightly the previous two years and plummeting 4% in 2020.

“Mostly what these numbers show is (that) the long-term decline in births, aside from the COVID-19 downward spike and rebound, is continuing,” said Phillip Levine, a Wellesley College economics professor.

To keep population the same over the long term, the average woman needs to have 2.1 children over her lifetime — a metric that is considered the “replacement” rate for a population. Even in 2022 every state fell below that rate, according to final data for 2022 released in April. The rate ranged from a high of 2.0 in South Dakota to less than 1.4 in Oregon and Vermont.

Trends for Latina women

The declines in births weren’t as steep in some heavily Hispanic states where abortion was restricted in 2022, including Texas and the election battleground state of Arizona. Births were down only 1% in Arizona and Texas. When health clinics closed, many women might have been unable to get reliable birth control or, if they became pregnant, to get an abortion.

Hispanic births rose in states where abortion is most restricted, even as non-Hispanic births fell in the same states, according to the Stateline analysis. It’s hard, however, to tell how much of a role abortion access played compared with immigration and people moving to growing states such as Texas and Florida.

In states where abortion access is most protected, births fell for both Hispanic and non-Hispanic women.

“The big takeaway to me is the likely increase in poverty for all family members, including children, in families affected by lack of access (to abortion and birth control),” said Elizabeth Gregory, director of the Institute for Research on Women, Gender & Sexuality at the University of Houston.

Many of the nation’s most Hispanic states where abortion and birth control are more freely available saw the biggest decreases in births: about 5% in California, Maryland, Nevada and New Mexico.

“Hispanic women as a group are facing more challenges in accessing reproductive care, including both contraception and abortion,” Gregory said in a university report earlier this year. “Unplanned births often directly impact women’s workforce participation and negatively affect the income levels of their families.”

Hispanic women on average have more children than Black or white women. Their fertility rates rose throughout much of the 1980s and 1990s, then fell in the late 2000s to near the same level as other groups. That’s because both abortion and more reliable birth control became more widely available, Gregory said.

The fact that some of the steepest drops were in heavily Hispanic states outside of Arizona and Texas suggests that Latina women are continuing a path toward smaller and delayed families typical of other groups.

Most of the decline in California has been associated with fewer babies born to Hispanic women, especially immigrants, said Johnson, of the Public Policy Institute of California.

“California has a high share of Latinos compared to other states, and so fertility declines in that group have a huge effect on the overall decline in California,” he said. California was above replacement fertility as recently as 2008, he added, and would still be there if Hispanic fertility had not dropped. California is about 40% Hispanic, about the same as Texas and second only to New Mexico at 50%.

Birth rates also declined steeply in heavily Hispanic Nevada and New Mexico, with each dropping about 4% from 2022 to 2023. But Arizona, Florida and Texas, also in the top 10 states for Hispanic population share but faster-growing, saw relatively small drops of about 1%.

Texas banned almost all abortions after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. The state also requires parental consent for birth control, a rule that’s included federally funded family planning centers since a lower court ruling that same year.

Arizona also saw the number of abortions drop in 2022. After the high court’s Dobbs v. Jackson decision, an Arizona judge revived enforcement of a near-total ban on the procedure that was enacted in the Civil War era. Many clinics closed and never reopened.

Abortions in the state plummeted from more than 1,000 a month early in 2022 to 220 in July 2022, and never fully recovered, according to state records. The rate of abortions dropped 19% for the year. Births that year increased slightly, by 500, over 2021.

In Texas, Gregory’s research at the University of Houston research saw an effect on Hispanic births when an abortion ban took effect in 2021. Fertility rates rose 8% that year for Hispanic women 25 and older, according to the report.

Both Texas and Arizona also are growing quickly, making the smaller decreases in births harder to interpret, Arizona State Demographer Jim Chang noted. Chang declined comment on the effect of abortion accessibility on state birth rates.

Budget effects

Overall, the continuing fall in birth numbers could have significant effects on state budgets in the future. The slide augurs more enrollment declines for state-funded public schools already facing more dropouts since the pandemic.

“The decline we see in enrollment since COVID-19 is a bigger problem than just the decline in birth rates,” said Sofoklis Goulas, an economic studies fellow at the Brookings Institution. Rural schools and urban high schools have been particularly hard hit, according to a Brookings report Goulas authored this year.

“We don’t have a clear answer. We suspect a lot of people are doing home education or going to charter schools and private schools but we’re not sure,” Goulas told Stateline.

Still, states need to recognize declining births as an emerging factor in state budgets to avoid future budget shortfalls, said Jeff Chapman, a research director who monitors the trend at The Pew Charitable Trusts.

Nationally, births did increase slightly for women older than 40, indicating a continuing trend toward delayed parenthood, said William Frey, a demographer at Brookings.

“The last two post-pandemic years do not necessarily indicate longer-term trends,” Frey said. “Young adults are still getting used to a recovering economy, including childbearing.”

_____

_____

(Stateline is part of States Newsroom, a national nonprofit news organization focused on state policy.)

©2024 States Newsroom. Visit at stateline.org. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.