Rochester starter DJ Herz stifles Saints in Red Wings 6-3 win

posted in: News | 0

Rochester starter DJ Herz allowed one run on two hits over 5 1/3 innings in the Red Wings’ 6-3 win over the St. Paul Saints in a Thursday morning game in Rochester, N.Y.

Herz, who struck out 10 and walked one, came out after allowing a single and getting a strikeout in the sixth. Reliever Orlando Ribalta struck out Royce Lewis, then gave up a two-run homer to Matt Wallner, his seventh of the season.

The Saints’ Yunier Severino hit a solo home run, his ninth of the season, in the ninth inning.

Lewis, who is on a rehab assignment from the Twins, started at third base and went 0 for 3 with two strikeouts. Alex Isola went 2 for 4 for St. Paul.

Saints starting pitcher Jordan Balazovic allowed two runs on five hits in two innings, and Austin Schulfer followed by giving up two runs on three hits over two innings.

Related Articles

Sports |


Saints shut out Red Wings on the road in series’ game 3

Sports |


Saints pull off split of doubleheader against Red Wings

Sports |


Saints drop last of series to Bison

Sports |


Festa cruises as Saints shut out Bisons 7-0

Sports |


Saints walk their way to a win in Game 1 in Buffalo before loss in second game

Donald Trump is convicted of a felony. Here’s how that affects the 2024 presidential race

posted in: Adventure | 0

NEW YORK — Having been convicted of 34 felonies, Donald Trump cannot own a gun, hold public office or even vote in many states.

But in 158 days, voters across America will decide whether he will return to the White House to serve another four years as the nation’s president.

Trump’s conviction in his New York hush money trial on Thursday is a stunning development in an already unorthodox presidential election with profound implications for the justice system and perhaps U.S. democracy itself.

But in a deeply divided America, it’s unclear whether Trump’s status as someone with a felony conviction will have any impact at all on the 2024 election. Trump remains in a competitive position against President Joe Biden this fall, even as the Republican former president now faces the prospect of a prison sentence in the run-up to the November election.

In the short term at least, there were immediate signs that the unanimous guilty verdict was helping to unify the Republican Party’s disparate factions as GOP officials in Congress and in state capitals across the country rallied behind their presumptive presidential nominee, while his campaign expected to benefit from a flood of new fundraising dollars.

Standing outside the courtroom, Trump described the verdict as the result of a “rigged, disgraceful trial.”

“The real verdict is going to be Nov. 5 by the people,” Trump said, referring to Election Day. “This is long from over.”

The immediate reaction from elected Democrats was muted by comparison, although the Biden campaign issued a fundraising appeal within minutes of the verdict suggesting that the fundamentals of the election had not changed.

“We’re THRILLED that justice has finally been served,” the campaign wrote. “But this convicted criminal can STILL win back the presidency this fall without a huge surge in Democratic support.”

Strategists predict a muted impact

There has been some polling conducted on the impact of a guilty verdict, although such hypothetical scenarios are notoriously difficult to predict.

A recent ABC News/Ipsos poll found that only 4% of Trump’s supporters said they would withdraw their support if he’s convicted of a felony, though an additional 16% said they would reconsider it.

On the eve of the verdict, the Trump campaign released a memo from its polling team suggesting that the impact of the trial is “already baked into the race in target states.”

Trump campaign advisers argued the case would help them motivate their core supporters. So many donations came into WinRed, the platform the campaign uses for fundraising, that it crashed. Aides quickly worked to set up a backup platform to collect money pouring in.

Trump headed Thursday night to a fundraising event scheduled before the verdict, according to a person familiar with his plans who was not authorized to speak publicly.

His two most senior campaign advisers, Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita, were not with him in New York, but in Palm Beach, Florida, where the campaign is headquartered.

And while it may take days or weeks to know for sure, Trump’s critics in both parties generally agreed that there may not be much political fallout, although some were hopeful that the convictions would have at least a marginal impact in what will likely be a close election.

Sarah Longwell, founder of Republican Voters Against Trump, who conducts regular focus groups, suggested the guilty verdict may help Biden on the margins by pushing so-called “double haters” — a term used to describe voters who dislike Trump and Biden — away from Trump.

But more than anything, she suggested that voters simply haven’t been following the trial very closely.

“The best thing about the trial ending is that it ended,” Longwell said, describing the courtroom proceeding as a distraction from more serious issues in the campaign. “There will now be an opportunity to focus the narrative on who Trump is and what a second Trump term would look like.”

Republican pollster Neil Newhouse predicted that the trial may ultimately have little impact in a lightning-fast news environment with several months before early polls open.

“Voters have short memories and even shorter attention spans,” Newhouse said. “Just as the former president’s two impeachments have done little to dim Trump’s support, this guilty verdict may be overshadowed in three weeks by the first presidential debate.”

A plan to campaign after sentencing

The judge set sentencing for July 11, just four days before the scheduled start of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee.

Each of the falsifying business records charges carries up to four years behind bars, though prosecutors have not said whether they intend to seek imprisonment. Nor is it clear whether the judge — who earlier in the trial warned of jail time for gag order violations — would impose that punishment even if asked.

Trump will be able to vote in Florida, where he established residency in 2019, if he is not in prison on Election Day.

And imprisonment would not bar Trump from continuing his pursuit of the White House.

Trump’s daughter-in-law Lara Trump, who was with the former president in court this week and also serves as co-chair of the Republican National Committee, said in a Fox News Channel interview before the verdict that Trump would still try to campaign for the presidency if convicted.

If Trump is given a sentence of home confinement, she said, “We will have him doing virtual rallies and campaign events if that is the case. And we’ll have to play the hand that we’re dealt.”

There are no campaign rallies on the calendar for now, though Trump is expected to hold fundraisers next week.

Biden himself has yet to weigh in.

He was spending the night at his family’s beach house in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, after marking the anniversary of his son Beau’s death earlier in the day at church.

Voters grapple with the verdict

Texas voter Steven Guarner, a 24-year-old nurse, said he’s undecided on who he’ll vote for in the upcoming election.

Guarner, an independent, said the verdict will be a deciding factor for him once he studies the details of the trial. He didn’t think it would sway the many voters who are already decided on the Biden-Trump rematch, however.

“I think his base is the type that might not care much or might agree with him about the court system,” Guarner said of Trump.

Indeed, Republican officials from Florida to Wisconsin to Arkansas and Illinois condemned the verdict as a miscarriage of justice by what they described as a politically motivated prosecutor and blue-state jury.

Brian Schimming, chairman of the Republican Party of Wisconsin’s executive committee, called the case against Trump a “sham” and a “national embarrassment.”

“There was no justice in New York today,” Schimming charged.

And Michael Perez Ruiz, a 47-year-old who was ordering food shortly after the verdict at Miami’s Versailles restaurant, an icon of the city’s GOP-leaning Cuban American community, said he would continue to stand by Trump.

“I would vote for him 20 times,” Perez Ruiz said.

AP writers Emily Swanson and Zeke Miller in Washington; Jill Colvin and Michelle L. Price in New York; Todd Richmond in Madison, Wisconsin; Adriana Gomez Licon in Miami; and Valerie Gonzalez in McAllen, Texas, contributed.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Trump could still vote for himself after New York conviction if he’s not in prison on Election Day

National Politics |


Guilty: Trump becomes first former U.S. president convicted of felony crimes

National Politics |


Trump’s hush money trial verdict could come this week. Here’s what each outcome could mean for the election

National Politics |


Jurors in Trump hush money trial end 1st day of deliberations after asking to rehear testimony

National Politics |


Prosecutor says Trump tried ‘to hoodwink voters’ while defense attacks key witness in last arguments

Minneapolis man gets 30 years for killing St. Paul 19-year-old amid Mall of America holiday shoppers

posted in: News | 0

One of two teens charged in the fatal shooting of a St. Paul 19-year-old at the Mall of America was sentenced to 30½ years in prison Thursday.

TaeShawn Adams-Wright and LaVon Sema-J Longstreet “stalked and executed” 19-year-old Johntae Raymon Hudson — shooting him eight times in the back — while “surrounded by horrified holiday shoppers” in Nordstrom’s on Dec. 23, 2022, Hennepin County prosecutors wrote in a court filing this week.

Johntae Raymon Hudson was fatally shot Dec. 23, 2022, inside Nordstrom’s at the Mall of America. (Courtesy of GoFundMe)

In March, Adams-Wright, 19, of Minneapolis, pleaded guilty as charged to second-degree murder in Hudson’s killing and second-degree assault with a dangerous weapon for wounding a shopper. He faced up to 40 years in prison.

Hennepin County District Judge Paul Scoggin handed down Thursday’s sentence.

“Adams-Wright engaged in gun violence that endangered the lives of countless people as they enjoyed their day at the Mall of America,” Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty said in a statement. “A long prison sentence is appropriate to sufficiently protect public safety.”

Longstreet, of Minneapolis, was 17 when he was charged in juvenile court with the same two counts as Adams-Wright, who was 18 when he was charged. A judge later certified Longstreet to adult court, and he is scheduled to be tried in front of a jury next week.

‘Touted’ the killing

Authorities say the shooting stemmed from an argument, the nature of which hasn’t been disclosed.

Citing surveillance video, the charges say Adams-Wright, Longstreet and three male accomplices chased Hudson, who was with two friends, on the first floor of the department store. A fight broke out and as Hudson tried to run he was knocked into multiple store displays. Customers and employees fled and hid.

Adams-Wright and Longstreet both stood over Hudson and fired their semiautomatic handguns, which were equipped with extended magazines, the charges say.

The group fled the store to a parked car nearby.

Hudson was pronounced dead at the scene, despite the lifesaving efforts of a witness, mall security and medics. Ballistics evidence showed Hudson fired his own gun twice, the charges say.

A woman who was in the store with her teenage daughter reported a bullet grazed her as she was on the floor taking cover.

After the shooting, Adams-Wright, Longstreet and the accomplices went to Longstreet’s aunt’s house, where they all “touted their responsibility” for Hudson’s killing on Snapchat, prosecutors say.

TaeShawn Adams-Wright and LaVon Sema-J Longstreet (Courtesy of the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office)

Within 12 hours, Bloomington police arrested Adams-Wright and he’s remained jailed since.

Longstreet went on the run to Decatur, Ga., where he was arrested by U.S. marshals nearly a month after the killing.

Other MOA incidents

The shooting was the third at the Bloomington mall in a span of just under a year, and the first homicide involving a gun.

It was the scene of a shooting on Dec. 31, 2021, when two men were wounded during an altercation.

Gunfire erupted during a fistfight in the Nike store in August 2022. No one was injured in that incident.

Three weeks later, a Woodbury man was arrested for robbing a kiosk and the Lids apparel store of items at the mall while carrying a long rifle.

RELATED: A behind-the-scenes look at MOA security

MOA bans guns on the premises, but does not have metal detectors upon entry. When the mall opened in 1992, it was not designed with metal detectors in mind, MOA officials say. There are 27 public entrances and, unlike venues that host a relatively limited number of events, the mall is open 363 days a year and up to 16 hours a day. About 32 million people visit the mall annually.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Twin Cities man admits to robbing five metro gas stations with airsoft gun

Crime & Public Safety |


Man dies after shooting in St. Paul’s North End

Crime & Public Safety |


Suspect charged with beating 81-year-old man in restroom of Duluth supermarket

Crime & Public Safety |


Minnesota man sentenced for soliciting minor to have sex with dog

Crime & Public Safety |


St. Paul man charged after toddler son shoots himself in wrist

Opinion: New York’s Legislature Must Act to Address Utility Outages in NYCHA

posted in: News | 0

“The warranty of habitability is implied in all New York residential leases, which means that all landlords—including NYCHA—are responsible for making sure apartments are livable and safe, and prolonged gas, heat, and electricity outages run counter to that duty.”

Adi Talwar

A letter about the gas outage in a NYCHA Red Hook West building, where some tenants have been without cooking gas since Jan. 24.

CityViews are readers’ opinions, not those of City Limits. Add your voice today!

A large cement truck drove through Red Hook West Houses the morning of Jan. 24. Moments later, emergency vehicles descended on the NYCHA development. “One of the construction workers hit something,” Red Hood resident Andrea Mcknight reported. That “something” turned out to be a gas line. To this day, gas service hasn’t been restored.

For the 113 Red Hook West households who depended on that gas line, fresh home cooked meals haven’t been an option since that January morning. Instead, residents trek to the deli, weather the surge in food expenses, and complain to an unresponsive management office. But this is not new. For NYCHA residents across the city, adjusting to utility disruptions has long been par for the course. 

Now, we have the numbers. As law students—in collaboration with Red Hook Community Justice Center (RHCJC)—we’ve spent the last year investigating whether New York law protects public and private tenants equally. Our analysis of the implied warranty of habitability—a particular part of the law—shows that public tenants aren’t as protected as they should be. We also requested data from NYCHA to zoom in on one piece of this puzzle: gas outages. Two data points illustrate the severity of the issue.

Between October 2017 and March 2024, there were 1,323 gas outages in NYCHA buildings (excluding currently pending outages), affecting 32,874 apartments. In 2023, 182 outages affected 5,239 apartments, which was slightly down from the year before, when 212 outages affected 5,887 apartments. The situation is particularly dire in NYCHA developments in Brooklyn and the Bronx, which together account for about 20,000 of the total affected apartments in the last six years.

Janhavi Nemawarkar and Stephen Kpundeh

Moreover, these outages too often take months to be resolved. Of the 1,323 outages captured in this data, 448 lasted for over 100 days. The longest was at the Wagner Houses in East Harlem, where tenants were left with a single hot plate for nearly two years from June 18, 2022 until March 1, 2024, when repairs were completed.

Janhavi Nemawarkar, Stephen Kpundeh

On average, these gas outages last 89 days, often with little to no communication from NYCHA property management about the gas line repair progress. NYCHA routinely refuses to provide tenants with notices or posted updates about utility service restoration even though a City Council law, Local Law 47 of 2015, requires all landlords, including public housing, to do so.

Every day without heat, cooking gas, or electricity is another day when devoted children, parents, and caretakers are forced to pay out of pocket to provide the bare essentials for their loved ones. 

Janhavi Nemawarkar, Stephen Kpundeh

State officials can provide crucial help to NYCHA tenants by amending New York State’s Public Housing Law. The NYCHA Utility Accountability Act (A2573/S546), which is currently pending in the New York Assembly Housing Committee, would reduce the rent tenants have to pay during outages.

The act would require that NYCHA credit tenants with either 10 percent of their rent, or $75 per month—whichever is higher—on a prorated basis for each day of a utility outage. This means, instead of paying for an apartment without utilities, residents can buy food for their families when their stove doesn’t work. Private landlords negotiate with tenants on rent during building utility outages, and this bill would cut through NYCHA’s bureaucracy to permit similar relief.

NYCHA has a responsibility for making sure tenants have essential utilities. The warranty of habitability is implied in all New York residential leases, which means that all landlords—including NYCHA—are responsible for making sure apartments are livable and safe, and prolonged gas, heat, and electricity outages run counter to that duty.

Outages in NYCHA developments across the city are unacceptable, and the thousands of tenants living in these houses without utilities deserve better. The New York State legislature has the opportunity to ease the burden on these residents: pass the NYCHA Utility Accountability Act.

Stephen Kpundeh and Janhavi Nemawarkar are students in the Community Advocacy Lab at Columbia Law School.

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.