Join scientists as they drive into hailstorms to study the costly weather extreme

posted in: All news | 0

By SETH BORENSTEIN, CAROLYN KASTER and BRITTANY PETERSON, Associated Press

SHAMROCK, Texas (AP) — As severe storms once again soak, twist and pelt the nation’s midsection, a team of dozens of scientists is driving into them to study one of the nation’s costliest but least-appreciated weather dangers: Hail.

Hail rarely kills, but it hammers roofs, cars and crops to the tune of $10 billion a year in damage in the U.S. So in one of the few federally funded science studies remaining after Trump administration cuts, teams from several universities are observing storms from the inside and seeing how the hail forms. Project ICECHIP has already collected and dissected hail the size of small cantaloupes, along with ice balls of all sizes and shapes.

An approaching storm with a shelf cloud and rain shaft is visible during a Project ICECHIP operation on Tuesday, June 3, 2025, in Scotland, Texas. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Scientists in two hail-dimpled vehicles with special mesh protecting the windshields are driving straight into the heart of the storms, an area known as the “shaft” where the hail pelting is the most intense. It’s a first-of-its-kind icy twist on tornado chasing.

“It’s an interesting experience. It sounds like somebody on the outside of your vehicle is hitting you with a hammer,” said Northern Illinois University meteorology professor Victor Gensini, one of the lead researchers.

A team of journalists from The Associated Press joined them this week in a several-day trek across the Great Plains, starting Tuesday morning in northern Texas with a weather briefing before joining a caravan of scientists and students looking for ice.

Victor Gensini, Northern Illinois University meteorology professor and a lead scientist of Project ICECHIP, right, and Logan Bundy, PhD Candidate at NIU and ICECHIP IOP assistant, look at cloud formations during a Project ICECHIP operation, Tuesday, June 3, 2025, south of Tipton, Okla. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Driving toward the most extreme forecasts

The caravan features more than a dozen radar trucks and weather balloon launching vehicles. At each site, the scientists load and unload drones, lasers and cameras and other specialized equipment. There are foam pads to measure hail impact and experimental roofing material. There are even special person-sized funnels to collect pristine hail before it hits the ground and becomes tainted with dirt.

Victor Gensini, Northern Illinois University meteorology professor and a lead scientist of Project ICECHIP, checks storm data in the command vehicle during an operation Tuesday, June 3, 2025, south of Tipton, Okla.(AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Already in treks across Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas, the team has found hail measuring more than 5 inches (13 centimeters) in diameter — bigger than a softball, but not quite a soccer ball. The team’s equipment and vehicles already sport dings, dimples and dents that scientists show off like battle scars.

“We got a few good whacks,” said forensic engineer Tim Marshall, who was carrying roofing samples to see if there were ways shingles could better handle hail. “I look at broken, busted stuff all the time.”

Victor Gensini, Northern Illinois University meteorology professor and a lead scientist of Project ICECHIP, speaks with Seth Borenstein, Associated Press science writer, as they stage in a Walmart parking lot before a Project ICECHIP operation Tuesday, June 3, 2025, in Atlus, Okla. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

At Tuesday’s weather briefing, retired National Weather Service forecaster David Imy pointed to potential hot spots this week in Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico. Computer models show the potential for a “monster storm down here near the Red River” later in the week, he said. Acting on the latest forecasts, Gensini and other leaders told the team to head to Altus, Oklahoma, but be ready to cross the Red River back into Texas at a moment’s notice.

A few hours after his briefing, Imy had the opportunity to chase one of the bigger storms, packing what radar showed was large hail at 8,000 feet in the air. Because of the warm air closer to the surface, the hail was only pea sized by the time it hit the ground. But the outing still provided good data and beautiful views for Imy, who was with a group that stationed themselves about a half-mile from the center of the storm.

“Beautiful colors: turquoise, bluish green, teal,” Imy said, pointing to the mushroom shaped cloud dominating the sky. “This is beauty to me and also seeing the power of nature.”

Hannah Vagasky holds a foam board hail pad covered with impact dents in a parking lot Tuesday, June 3, 2025, in Shamrock, Texas, as the team prepares for a day of hailstorm chasing. The hail pad is used to measure the size, angle of impact and intensity of hail. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

A costly but overlooked severe weather problem

This is not just a bunch of scientists looking for an adrenaline rush or another sequel to the movie “Twister.” It’s serious science research into weather that damages a lot of crops in the Midwest, Gensini said. Hail damage is so costly that the insurance industry is helping to pay for the mission, which is primarily funded by the National Science Foundation.

“These are the stones that do the most damage to lives and property,” Gensini said. “We want the biggest hail possible.”

Members of the University of Colorado Boulder’s Integrated Remote and In-Situ Sensing flight team stage in a Walmart parking lot before a Project ICECHIP operation Tuesday, June 3, 2025, in Atlus, Okla. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

A 2024 study by Gensini found that as the world warms from human-caused climate change, small hailstones will become less likely while the larger ones become more common. The bigger, more damaging ones that the ICECHIP team is studying are projected to increase 15% to 75% this century depending on how much the world warms. That’s because the stronger updrafts in storms would keep stones aloft longer to get bigger, but the heat would melt the tinier ones.

Related Articles


Measles vaccination rates drop after COVID-19 pandemic in counties across the US


As trial opens, Mike Lindell’s attorneys say he spread claims about Dominion official because he was ‘triggered’


Ford recalls nearly half a million 2016-17 Explorers due to door trim that can detach while driving


Ground beef sold at Whole Foods may be tainted with E. coli, USDA says


Washington man supplied chemicals used in California fertility clinic bombing, authorities say

The experiment is unique because of the combination of driving into the hail and deploying numerous radars and weather balloons to get an overall picture of how the storms work, Gensini said, adding that hail is often overlooked because researchers have considered it a lower priority than other extreme weather events.

Outside scientists said the research mission looks promising because there are a lot of unanswered questions about hail. Hail is the No. 1 reason for soaring costs in billion-dollar weather disasters in the United States, said meteorologist Jeff Masters, who cofounded Weather Underground and is now at Yale Climate Connections.

“Now a large part of that reason is because we simply have more people with more stuff in harm’s way,” said Masters, who wasn’t part of the research. “Insurance has become unaffordable in a lot of places and hail has become a big reason.”

In Colorado, hail is “actually our most costly natural disaster,” said Lori Peek, director of the Natural Hazards Center at the University of Colorado, adding that “hail does such incredible damage to property.”

Victor Gensini, Northern Illinois University meteorology professor and a lead scientist of Project ICECHIP, right, and Logan Bundy, PhD Candidate at NIU and ICECHIP IOP assistant, left, stand at the command vehicle watching an approaching storm Tuesday, June 3, 2025, in Scotland, Texas. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

Four candidates file for Ward 4 seat on the St. Paul City Council

posted in: All news | 0

Chauntyll Allen (Courtesy of St. Paul Public Schools)

Four candidates have filed to run in the special election this August for the Ward 4 seat on the St. Paul City Council.

Ward 4 covers part or all of five neighborhoods — Hamline-Midway, Merriam Park, St. Anthony Park and parts of Macalester-Groveland and Como.

The candidates include Chauntyll Allen, a leader of Black Lives Matter Twin Cities who serves on the St. Paul Board of Education; Molly Coleman, the founder of the nonprofit People’s Parity Project, which seeks progressive court reform; Cole Hanson, a statewide online education coordinator who teaches nutrition to recipients of federal food assistance, or SNAP; and Carolyn Will, founder of CW Marketing and Communications.

Molly Coleman. (Courtesy of the candidate)
Cole Hanson.

The non-partisan election will take place Aug. 12 by ranked choice, meaning voters will be allowed to rank their candidates in order of preference. There will not be a political primary.

The winner will fill the seat vacated in March by former Council Member Mitra Jalali and serve through the November 2028 election.

Carolyn Will.

Matt Privratsky was recently appointed by the mayor to fill the Ward 4 seat on an interim basis, through the August election. Tuesday was the last day to file for the Aug. 12 election. Candidates may withdraw their names from the ballot through Thursday.

Related Articles


Climate action group schedules first Ward 4 candidate forum


St. Paul elections: 3 mayoral candidates, citations question, Ward 4 race


St. Paul Ward 4 race: School Board member Chauntyll Allen declares; Hamline-Midway Coalition disavows Cole Hanson campaign

Here are the New Anti-LGBTQ Bills Texas Passed into Law

posted in: All news | 0

Johnathan Gooch did a lot of wishful thinking throughout this legislative session. Most recently, he’s been wishing for soundproof walls. 

“The worst thing about being queer in Texas right now is having neighbors, because I just want to scream all the time,” said Gooch, the communications director for Equality Texas, an LGBTQ+ rights advocacy group.  

This session, the group identified and tracked over 200 anti-LGTBQ+ bills, more than any other state in any point in history, Gooch said. A dozen of those bills were ultimately passed by the Legislature and have made it to Governor Greg Abbott’s desk or already been signed into law. Those various bills could threaten to negatively impact queer Texans with restrictions targeting public schools and healthcare and new legal standards that could create unsafe environments for LGBTQ+ people, particularly children. 

Though the deluge of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation isn’t anything new (in 2023, legislators filed 160 such bills), Gooch said that this session, the bills that gained the most traction tended to seem less overtly harmful. “[The harmful provisions are] sometimes buried in other bills or deal with complicated policy areas that might not be immediately evident to queer people or allies across the state who are concerned about what’s going on,” Gooch said. 

One such bill is Senate Bill 1257, which will require insurance providers to cover any adverse consequences relating to gender-affirming healthcare, including procedures to reverse or recover from a gender transition. These procedures are uncommon: according to a 2021 study, about 1 percent of trans people regret gender-affirming surgeries. The bill may cause risk-averse health insurers to stop covering gender-affirming healthcare, Gooch said, making it more difficult for adults to access or afford. Abbott signed SB 1257 into law on May 24 and it will go into effect on September 1. This bill follows the state’s 2023 ban on gender-affirming care for minors. 

Other bills, like House Bill 1106, enact seemingly innocuous changes in legal language that could have devastating impacts. HB 1106 amends the Texas family code’s definition of child abuse to explicitly exclude a parent who refuses to affirm a child’s gender identify or sexual orientation. “This exception, unfortunately, could enable a lot of harmful behavior,” Gooch said. “There’s a long history of using a variety of violent, physically abusive tactics to ‘reform’ young queer people … if a parent is so aggressively opposed to their child’s orientation or gender identity … Where is the limit? What are they allowed to do to force them not to be queer?”

Senate Bill 412, which the governor signed on May 19, similarly tweaks language, removing a legal protection that previously exempted parents, teachers, and librarians from prosecution for providing kids with material that could be considered “harmful” if it was done with an educational intent. 

Emily Witt, a communications strategist for the Texas Freedom Network, said bills that put more power in the hands of parents are part of a larger project of “weaponizing parental rights.” “Parents love their kids and want what’s best for their kids, and if they’re being told that there is this harmful agenda, or that there is something wrong with their kid being trans or LGBTQ+ … I think that parents are a lot more likely to go along with that.” 

This weaponization extends into schools, particularly with Senate Bill 12 and Senate Bill 13, two of Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick’s priority bills. Witt said going after public schools is the first way to change the overall mindset of a population. “It has to do with how foundational our schools are,” Witt said. “Making our public schools places where kids can’t be fully accepted or don’t feel like they can talk to their teachers or be who they are is just another piece of how Republicans are attacking our public education system and changing it from what it’s supposed to do, which is serve our kids.” 

Senate Bill 12, dubbed the “parental bill of rights,” would prohibit teachers from teaching LGBTQ+ topics and from helping students “socially transition” by using a name or pronouns that don’t align with their biological sex. The final version, which passed over the weekend, also clarifies that school districts may not authorize or sponsor clubs based on sexual orientation or gender identity. It also allows parents to have access to their child’s mental health records, which Gooch of Equality Texas said could pose serious risks to queer children. 

“If a young queer person fears that their parents might not be affirming, they need an outlet to process that,” Gooch said. “Having access to counselors at school can be a lifeline to young queer people who are trying to make sense of how they fit in the world and also trying to maintain a healthy relationship with their parents.” 

SB 13 would allow parents to access student library records and prevent their children from checking out certain books. It would also establish procedures to remove books with “indecent or profane” content. According to PEN America, of the most commonly banned books in the 2023-2024 school year, 39 percent featured LGBTQ+ people and characters. SB 13 was approved by both chambers over the weekend. 

House Bill 229, one of several proposed bills seeking to classify people on binary definitions of biological sex, would codify the terms “male” and “female” and require government agencies to abide by these definitions in sex-based data collection. Witt said this bill could pose problems for trans Texans whose gender identity does not align with their biological sex and intersex Texans who do not fit into binary definitions of biological sex. “That’s just another way that we’re seeing lawmakers try to erase Texans and try to really attack freedoms,” Witt said. “They’re trying to control every aspect of trans and queer Texans’ lives. This kind of legislation really just feels like a way to push people out of the state and make them feel like they don’t belong here.” 

Senate Bill 1188 similarly relies on the idea of biological sex, requiring health agencies to create a new field in medical records for sex assigned at birth. It doesn’t, however, prohibit health agencies from including gender identity information. 

Still, the majority of anti-LGBTQ+ bills died during the legislative process, including Senate Bill 18, one of Patrick’s priorities, which made it to the House calendar but didn’t get a reading before the May 27 deadline. SB 18 would have prohibited public libraries from hosting “drag queen storytime” events, and Senate Bill 2920, which would have classified gender-affirming hormone treatment as prohibited steroid use for athletic competitions in the University Interscholastic League, met the same fate. 

Though not much about the session surprised Witt—she said the amount of anti-LGBTQ+ bills was to be expected—she said lawmakers seemed less interested in listening to the testimony of Texans during hearings. “I think they are aware that they’re wasting time attacking a small community instead of passing meaningful legislation that actually affects most Texans,” Witt said. “They just think that they’re in charge and they don’t have to listen to the public anymore, and I think that they’re going to see that that’s a big mistake when it comes election time.” 

Despite the onslaught of bad bills, Texans continued to show up, even at the end of the session: Witt said over 100 people came to a “read-in” protest of SB 13 over Memorial Day weekend. 

“This is a minority of people who are extremists and have been given millions of dollars to push forth this anti-trans legislation, but they don’t actually reflect Texas,” Witt said. “We still have so many people who are willing to show up for each other and keep each other safe, and I saw that throughout the entire session.” 

The post Here are the New Anti-LGBTQ Bills Texas Passed into Law appeared first on The Texas Observer.

Made in St. Paul: A Charli XCX-inspired exhibition of portraits at the M

posted in: All news | 0

Kylie Linh Hoang had been looking at a lot of faces.

As the assistant curator at the Minnesota Museum of American Art, she co-created the downtown museum’s new flagship exhibition of its permanent collection. The show, “Here, Now,” opens on a pair of gallery walls with some two dozen portraits looking down upon visitors, welcoming them in.

Behind the scenes, as Hoang was considering the hundreds of portraits in the M’s collection, many of which ultimately fell outside the scope of the “Here, Now” show, she found herself reflecting on the invisible relationship between the subject of a portrait and the artist. A portrait doesn’t only depict what a person looks like — instead, more precisely, it depicts how one person perceives another.

“Even if you do feel you’re looking your best, it’s kind of scary to let somebody that close to you,” she said. “There’s a sort of reciprocity in that process. The portrait tells you just as much about the painter or the artist as it tells you about the subject.”

Minnesota Museum of American Art assistant curator Kylie Linh Hoang sits on a bench in an exhibition she created, called “When You’re In The Mirror…,” on May 21, 2025. Artworks in this particular gallery are hung a few inches lower than is common, which Hoang said is meant to challenge traditional ideas of who is prioritized in art museums. (Courtesy of the Minnesota Museum of American Art)

This is the idea behind the adjacent exhibition “When You’re In The Mirror…,” Hoang’s first solo-curated show, on view through Aug. 3 following a four-month extension. If we solely pay attention to the subjects of portraits, the exhibition argues, perhaps we’re missing part of the story.

To illustrate her point, Hoang points out one of the exhibit’s vignettes, in which four works are shown together: One finished painting and one unfinished sketch each by Clara Mairs and Clement Haupers, romantically linked St. Paul artists and educators in the early 20th century, with both artists’ pairs of works depicting the other.

In Mairs’ sketch of Haupers, the man’s body is drawn only in quick, gestural outlines but, in his face, she’s careful to render the mustache and arched eyebrows that also show up in her realistic painting of him. More than just confirming that Haupers had a mustache and eyebrows, this could lead us to infer that these were particularly important characteristics of his from the perspective of the person who probably knew him most intimately, which Hoang said illuminates the more tender moments of their relationship.

“Traditionally when you talk about portrait shows, there’s an expectation of very serious faces in gold frames; this person was a general in a war, and this person was a very well-to-do lady philanthropist,” Hoang said. “I didn’t want to recreate that.”

By redirecting focus back onto the artists and their relationships with their subjects, Hoang aims to call attention to and push back against common tropes of depicting men as powerful and stately and strong, and women as anonymous “symbols for other things; virginity, purity, sacrifice, motherhood,” she said.

Minnesota Museum of American Art assistant curator Kylie Linh Hoang discusses Leslie Barlow’s 2020 painting “Alex, at Juxtaposition Arts,” at the museum on May 21, 2025. The exhibition “When You’re In The Mirror…,” Hoang’s first solo curated show, puts portraits in the context of the relationships between their subjects and the artists behind the canvas. (Courtesy of the Minnesota Museum of American Art)

In a portrait of a person in a cowboy hat riding a horse through the desert — made with glitter, and in a crocheted frame — what is artist Moises Salazar saying about gender and masculinity? In the 1922 painting “Dewey Albinson,” Frances Cranmer Greenman depicts her artist friend and student in his studio. Shown directly alongside it is Leslie Barlow’s 2020 painting “Alex, at Juxtaposition Arts,” in which the title man, a graffiti artist, stands in front of his work. What is Barlow, and also Hoang, saying here about what an ‘artist’ looks like, what art is legitimized and how that might change over time?

The exhibition’s title, “When You’re In The Mirror…,” is a cheeky nod to the opening track of pop singer Charli XCX’s album “Brat” — itself a form of self-portrait, Hoang pointed out. And at the end of the exhibition, you’ll find an actual mirror, overlaid with the second half of the show’s titular lyric: “Do you like what you see?”

“I am not a subtle person; I think we’ve established that,” Hoang said, laughing. “I wanted folks to think about how they would feel seeing their faces in this space, too.”

In fact, though, one of the most conceptually interesting aspects of the show is also among its most subtle. Traditionally, museum artworks are hung with their centers about 60 inches from the floor — roughly corresponding to eye-level of the average man, Hoang said — but she positioned the works in “When You’re In The Mirror…,” at an average of about 54 inches from the ground.

“I was thinking about who gets the best view,” she said. “I’m 5’5 — even though I have big shoes on today — and, why don’t I get a good view of things? So the show is actually low, because I was thinking about who’s being prioritized during this viewing experience.”

“When You’re In The Mirror…” is on view at the M’s Nancy and John Lindahl Gallery through Aug. 3. Admission to the museum (350 N. Robert St.), located in the Pioneer Endicott Building and accessible either from the street or skyway, is free during its opening hours, Thursdays to Sundays from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

Related Articles


Made in St. Paul: Hyper-local community radio, by Frogtown Tuned-In on WFNU


Made in St. Paul: Portraits of Old Hollywood by oil painter Richard Abraham


Made in St. Paul: A 20-foot geometric optical artwork, by custom cabinetry shop Designed & Made


Made in St. Paul: Ice skating as storytelling and Black cultural expression, by figure skater Deneane Richburg’s organization Brownbody