Legal Marijuana Now loses major party status following Minnesota Supreme Court ruling

posted in: News | 0

The Legal Marijuana Now Party will no longer be recognized by Minnesota as a major political party following a Friday ruling by the state Supreme Court.

Now the state is left with two major parties with automatic ballot access — the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party and the Republican party. That’s down from four just two years ago.

Justices of the high court unanimously rejected an appeal from the pro-marijuana legalization party to stop a petition by the DFL to strip them of their major party status.

As a result of the ruling, Legal Marijuana Now will no longer be granted automatic ballot access, so their candidates will have to gather signatures in order to appear.

Court agrees party failed to meet standards

In their ruling, justices agreed with the DFL, who had argued the legalization party had failed to meet major party standards set by Minnesota law, including having a statewide central committee that’s ultimately under the control of a statewide convention — a new rule the state adopted last year.

“The LMNP has failed to articulate any burden, much less a severe burden, upon its associational rights that is specifically created by the requirements,” justices wrote in their opinion, rejecting the party’s claims the law violated its Constitutional rights.

The DFL filed a petition to strip LMNP’s major party status in February. Party leadership said they were pleased with the court’s decision to uphold a court referee’s March ruling in their favor.

“Major party status comes with major party responsibilities, and only the Minnesota DFL and Minnesota GOP have consistently met that standard,” DFL Chairman Ken Martin said in a Friday statement.

New rules for major party status

Legal Marijuana Now Party Chairman Dennis Schuller said the DFL was “frightened and trying to eliminate” his party, and alluded to a potential action in federal court.

Legal Marijuana Now became a minor party in 2014 and gained major party status in 2018. Another pro-legalization party, Grassroots – Legalize Cannabis Party, enjoyed major party status but lost it after failing to meet the 5% statewide vote threshold in 2022. Minnesota legalized marijuana in 2023.

Last year DFL and GOP lawmakers passed legislation to create new rules for major party status in Minnesota.

Opponents at the time, including former Gov. Jesse Ventura, who won as a third-party candidate in 1998, said the change would shut out alternative voices in state politics. The spiritual successor to Ventura’s Reform Party persists today as Minnesota’s Independence Alliance Party, albeit in a significantly diminished form.

Supporters said the changes would help combat electoral “shenanigans.” In the past, the GOP has been accused of backing “spoiler” candidates to siphon votes from Democrats, including those running for the legalization parties.

Since LMNP is no longer considered a major party, they will have to collect petition signatures during the candidate filing period between May 21 and June 4. The deadline for presidential candidates is Aug. 30.

Secretary of State Steve Simon’s office said the party will have to file notice that it no longer meets the requirements.

Legal Marijuana Now joins Grassroots – Legalize Cannabis, the Independence-Alliance Party and the Libertarian Party as the state’s fourth recognized minor political party.

Related Articles

Politics |


Minnesota Senate OKs stiffer gun straw purchase penalties, binary trigger ban

Politics |


GOP senator to get guidance on emailing ‘appropriately’ after sharing gender-transition surgery videos

Politics |


Senate ethics panel deadlocks on Mitchell complaint; next meeting will follow June court date

Politics |


Walz signs ‘Taylor Swift bill’ … at First Avenue nightclub in Minneapolis

Politics |


Minnesota ethics panel defers action on senator charged with burglary until after next court date

Other voices: Applying to college shouldn’t be so complicated

posted in: Society | 0

Although college isn’t for everyone, earning a degree still offers a pathway to success for many Americans. Yet each year, hundreds of thousands of low-income, college-ready students never actually enroll, partly because the application process prioritizes administrative busywork over academics. Policymakers should work to make it simpler.

Applying to college typically involves selecting from among hundreds of schools, verifying course requirements, submitting standardized test scores, requesting letters of recommendation and providing household financial data. Most students start the process months, even years, before the deadline for submission. More than 1,000 colleges use the Common App — a template for basic information — but applicants often must submit additional material, such as personal essays, tailored to each school.

According to a 2023 poll, 62% of students describe the experience as “very or somewhat challenging.” More than 60% of Black, Latino and Asian students say it’s more stressful than any other academic activity, 20 points higher than for white students; among would-be first-generation college students, only half say they managed to gather all the material necessary to apply, compared to 74% of those with college-educated parents.

Partly due to these challenges, large numbers of those qualified for college never end up applying. A study of 1.2 million students with Common App accounts found that about 25% of them started but didn’t complete any of their applications. Students from poor and less educated families were more likely to be “non-submitters” than their wealthier peers, despite having comparable academic credentials. Overall, as many as 1 million students who begin the application process never finish it.

Should this be of concern? Some students surely neglect to submit their applications due to laziness or procrastination. Others change their minds. Highly selective colleges also have an interest in making the process as demanding as possible, to screen unserious candidates.

Yet 56% of the country’s 15 million undergraduates attend four-year institutions that admit at least 75% of applicants, effectively meaning that anyone who meets minimal academic standards gets in. Some of these schools still ask students to itemize their extracurricular activities, list years of work experiences, and submit essays and personal statements, even though the vast majority are admitted on their transcripts alone.

It’s reasonable to expect students to put effort into their applications. But for less selective schools, requiring all this added material serves little academic purpose; in fact, it’s counterproductive. It diminishes the importance of objective criteria like test scores in favor of “holistic” measures that overwhelmingly benefit wealthier candidates. It also wastes taxpayer money, since public colleges end up employing vast numbers of administrators to review applications, resources that would be better spent on actual instruction. Worse, superfluous requirements can deter otherwise qualified candidates from applying.

Streamlining the process would help. Over the past decade, 10 states have started guaranteeing admission to qualified students to certain schools before they apply, based on their test scores and grade-point averages. Idaho’s program has increased enrollment by 7%. A similar effort by Common App has expanded to 28 states; it proactively notifies students of admission and requires a simplified application to confirm their acceptance. One study found that low-income students who received such offers were more likely to submit at least one application than those who didn’t.

Policymakers should encourage more colleges to participate in these programs, and to track how many of those admitted ultimately enroll and earn degrees. Participation from flagship public universities should be prioritized, which would ensure that more low-income high achievers can get financial and academic support. The federal government can help by notifying households of their eligibility for financial aid when they file tax returns and requiring greater transparency from colleges on the true costs of attendance.

A college education doesn’t guarantee success, but students deserve a fair chance to obtain one. Removing needless application obstacles would be a big step forward.

Related Articles

Editorials |


Lisa Jarvis: The bird flu outbreak has more questions than answers

Editorials |


Parmy Olson: If AI wrecks democracy, we may never know

Editorials |


Jamelle Bouie: The one thing Trump knows he wants in a running mate

Editorials |


Ivana Stradner: U.S. must stop Putin

Editorials |


F.D. Flam: If pigs get bird flu, we could be in for a real nightmare

Amidst office upheaval, vendors, business advocates, leaders weigh in on future of downtown St. Paul

posted in: News | 0

Weeks before the pandemic swept into Minnesota, Rico Thomas opened a ground-level ice cream shop in downtown St. Paul’s Alliance Bank Center on Wabasha Street, hopeful he’d soon be scooping cones to passersby at a rapid clip. Then the opposite happened. Office tenant after office tenant turned to remote work, forcing him to close down shop for a time while other vendors called it quits entirely.

The iconic “1st” sign atop First National Bank Building in downtown St. Paul. (Gabriel Sanchez / Pioneer Press)

Thomas, who later reopened Rico’s on Wabasha, has kept the faith, recently adding a wide variety of breakfast tacos, sandwiches and diner foods to his menu. With his best friend Redd Barnes manning his primary site, he’s even thinking of expanding into a second downtown location, if he can find one, and rolling an ice cream cart through downtown Pride events or partnering with the Minnesota Wild on food discounts.

Still, even Thomas was taken aback to learn in recent days that building owner Jim Crockarell — principal of Madison Equities — had died in January and that his widow has put the Alliance Center and five other office buildings on the market.

“Downtown St. Paul has a lot of potential, but I feel like the momentum is slipping,” said Thomas, a father of three young kids, eying the stark quiet of the hallway around him on Friday morning.

Diehard skyway vendors have expressed frustration with what some describe as off-again, on-again support from City Hall in light of a downtown office market shaken by the pandemic and the post-pandemic era of remote work.

Many state, city and county municipal offices — as well as the regional Metropolitan Council — have consolidated workspaces or gone fully remote, as much if not more so than their private-sector counterparts.

Bilal Salim, who has been cutting hair at multiple venues downtown for 20 years under the name Mr. B., mused Friday that he might look into relocating from the Alliance Center into the Town Square complex on Cedar Street.

Then Salim learned that within months, Town Square’s UBS Plaza will be losing a major tenant. Design and engineering firm TKDA announced Thursday it will leave St. Paulwhere it was founded in 1910 — and relocate to an existing office building on Old Shakopee Road in Bloomington in early 2025, taking some 300 downtown employees with it.

U.S. Bank recently announced a similar exit from the U.S. Bank Building downtown to St. Paul’s West Side.

“I don’t know how you’re going to bring the businesses back,” said Salim, who has advocated for greater law enforcement presence in the skyways. “We need to do something to bring downtown back — something.”

An ‘All In’ housing strategy

The amount of shifting in the downtown office market — as well as a series of multi-family apartment buildings downtown that just went up for sale — has been little short of startling for some observers. A year ago, Tina Gassman, president of the Greater St. Paul Building Owners and Managers Association, would have said that about 80% of the “competitive,” or private sector office space downtown was occupied.

Given the pending upheaval, these days, it’s anyone’s guess.

“I’ve been in this position for just under two years, and this is multiplied times 10 what I’ve seen in those two years,” said Gassman on Friday.

When asked about Mayor Melvin Carter’s reaction to TKDA leaving, the mayor’s office issued a written statement on Friday, attributed to the mayor:

“TDKA has played a pivotal role in the success of our downtown for over a century … We are grateful for our longstanding partnership, and we wish them well as they continue serving our community and communities across the nation.”

Still, Nicolle Goodman, the director of the city’s Department of Planning and Economic Development, recently talked up what the mayor has called his “All In” housing strategy. In his state-of-the-city address last March, Carter floated the possibility of filling dated, underused office space downtown with conversions to residences.

The mayor at the time raised the likelihood that the City Hall annex building on Fourth Street could be sold for housing, which would help fill in empty spaces elsewhere downtown with relocated city departments.

Developers and real estate lenders have noted that converting 50-year-old, 70-year-old and century-old office buildings is trickier and costlier than it sounds, in part because each housing unit will need its own bathroom. With the goal of preservation in mind, a bill at the state Legislature introduced in late March offers a tax credit covering up to 30% of the cost of an office-to-housing conversion, provided that the project retains about 75% of the existing structure.

The bill, sponsored by state Sen. Matt Klein, DFL-Mendota Heights, and state Sen. Scott Dibble, DFL-Minneapolis, was heard by the Senate committee on taxes in early April, but its chances of being approved before lawmakers adjourn are up in the air.

“We’re still hopeful,” said St. Paul Deputy Mayor Jaime Tincher, in an interview Friday. “That tax credit for office-to-housing conversions, that’s really critically needed from the state. To incentivize developers to look at those properties and take advantage of that opportunity, having the tax credit for that conversion would be helpful.”

The Downtown Alliance’s Downtown Investment Strategy

Still, new housing units on the market would find they have competition, as a flurry of residential buildings downtown have hit the market in the past month, most of them within the past 10 days. They include Madison Equities’ Lowry Apartments at Fourth and Wabasha streets, which is being marketed separately from the company’s commercial buildings, as well as The Lofts at 262 Fourth St. E. and the R7 Lofts at 133 E. Seventh St. Elsewhere in the city, the C&E Living Apartments at 2410 University Ave. W. in South St. Anthony Park are also up for sale.

Then there’s the difficult backdrop of high interest rates and the city’s projected population growth, which has slowed, as well as some St. Paul policy decisions unpopular with the private sector, such as rent control, which took effect in 2022 before a major revision took hold last year.

Joe Spencer, president of the St. Paul Downtown Alliance — a partnership between City Hall and major employers such as Securian and Ecolab — said the writing has been on the wall when it comes to commercial tenants itching to leave aged office space in the era of remote work.

A Downtown Investment Strategy unveiled by the alliance in March emphasizes the importance of three key strategies, including office-to-residential conversions and improving the pedestrian streetscape on a handful of key connecting corridors that cross downtown, such as Fifth Street, Kellogg Boulevard, Wabasha Avenue and Robert Street.

The 125-page strategy, prepared by a downtown steering committee with the help of New York-based consultants, also calls for “activating” the dead space around downtown Central Station, the future RiversEdge project along Kellogg Boulevard and the Xcel Energy Center with new public-facing development and amenities.

“Markets are cyclical,” Spencer said on Friday. “Buildings are going to trade. We’re hopeful the Downtown Investment Strategy will help guide what will happen.”

An expanded Downtown Improvement District?

The alliance oversees a Downtown Improvement District that offers street greeters, graffiti removal and other services within the core of downtown, though its coverage area was effectively gerrymandered to avoid Crockarell’s properties in and around Lowertown. That could soon change.

Amendments to state law last year now allow special service districts to assess membership fees to residential buildings, as opposed to just commercial ones. With Madison Equities no longer a key player, that raises the possibility that a future improvement district could encompass all of downtown “and deliver better, more effective programming,” Spencer said. “That creates an opportunity that we’re exploring.”

Perhaps the biggest impact of the improvement district has been on petty crime. Spencer noted that a comparison of crime trends from 2018 to 2020 and 2021 to 2023 found a sharp drop in quality-of-life calls for service within the improvement district, compared to a 25% increase in Lowertown, as well as a sizable uptick in what police dub the “north quadrant” around Wacouta Street.

“Crimes downtown as a whole were flat, but they dropped by 40% within the district,” Spencer said.

Through the brokerage firm CBRE, Madison Equities has made a public call for a single buyer to purchase six downtown office buildings, two parking ramps, the Selby Avenue restaurant The Handsome Hog and the vacant lot next it. Gassman, of the Building Owners and Managers Association, hopes that doesn’t come to pass.

“While that’s probably quicker and easier for them, it’s probably not going to be the most profitable for them,” Gassman said. “You’re going to get a much better deal piecemeal, and also it will be better for the city to get a variety of owners who can work with the city on that Downtown Investment Strategy.”

Related Articles

Business |


St. Paul: Degree of Honor Building, Seventh Place Apartments will not go on market at this time

Business |


Downtown St. Paul’s Lowry Apartments building, location of Gray Duck Tavern, for sale

Business |


A look at the 10 Madison Equities properties for sale in downtown St. Paul

Business |


St. Paul City Council votes 3-2 against rezoning for Marshall Avenue townhome project

Business |


Downtown developers, advocates weigh in on Madison Equities selling St. Paul properties

Open house for Riverview Corridor rapid bus, modern streetcar options on Tuesday

posted in: Society | 0

Planners and policy advisers with the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority are still at least a summer away from deciding whether to connect downtown St. Paul’s Union Depot to the Mall of America in Bloomington by installing bus rapid transit or a modern streetcar corridor.

To help inform their decision, the county will host an open house on Tuesday showcasing three different options.

The Riverview Corridor open house will be held from 5 to 7 p.m. at the Palace Community Center, 781 Palace Ave.

County officials plan to conduct public engagement over the spring and most of the summer, in advance of the next meeting of the policy advisory committee, likely to be held in or around September.

At that meeting, the county will ask the committee to make a choice between bus and streetcar along the 12-mile route

More information is online at tinyurl.com/Riverview2024.

Related Articles

Local News |


Uber, Lyft say they’d leave Minnesota under ‘compromise’ rideshare wage bill

Local News |


Amtrak to add second daily train between Twin Cities and Chicago, via Milwaukee

Local News |


St. Paul’s Union Depot to receive historic locomotive visitor on Final Spike Anniversary Steam Tour

Local News |


Forest Lake intersection where students were struck slated for safety update

Local News |


St. Paul City Council approves sweeping update to 2015 bike plan