“Once again, the needs of the poor have been especially shut out of the state’s moral conscience, with our government refusing to include an increase to cash assistance grants in the budget.”

Adi Talwar

A since-shuttered public benefits office in the Bronx.

CityViews are readers’ opinions, not those of City Limits. Add your voice today!

The New York State Budget for Fiscal Year 2025 arrives as New Yorkers across all incomes are struggling to afford necessities like rent, food, and childcare. Once again, the needs of the poor have been especially shut out of the state’s moral conscience, with our government refusing to include an increase to cash assistance grants in the budget. This is the grant that covers what we would more commonly refer to as “public assistance” or “welfare.”

Representing a membership of nearly 170 faith and community-based organizations across New York, we at FPWA say it’s time to uphold our state’s values of equity and justice. We must confront pervasive stereotypes, including the racist “welfare queen” trope from the 1970s and the offensive “workfare” notions of the 1990s, which perpetuate harmful attitudes towards the poor. It’s time to reshape the narrative around cash assistance and who is deemed deserving of help.

Cash assistance provides direct cash aid to over 600,000 New York individuals and families with the lowest incomes—many with disabilities, health challenges, or caregiving responsibilities. Often, New Yorkers turn to cash assistance as a last resort after hardships like separation, domestic violence, homelessness, illness, or losing a family member.

Having grown up in a family that relied on cash assistance, I know this reality all too well. Shortly after my birth, my father lost his job as a NYC Transit police officer and left our family a few years later. My mother, left to raise three children on an unlivable income as a family day care provider, went on public assistance so that we could survive as a family.

Before we went on public assistance, my sisters attended “Prep for Prep”—a program dedicated to moving underserved children from public to independent schools. They received scholarships to attend a very prestigious private school. After we went on assistance, I received financial aid to attend the same school. For my mother, having all three of her children graduate from private school was an opportunity for economic advancement.

Unfortunately, the small amount of tuition she was asked to contribute to our education put us at risk of losing our public assistance. My mother made the difficult decision to prioritize our education, a choice that had a devastating financial impact on our family for many years but ultimately yielded lasting economic and social benefits.

My story may seem unique. Yet it echoes what we at FPWA hear from many cash assistance recipients today. We hear about the impossible choices recipients face, who feel “stuck” between pursuing full-time employment and losing their benefits. They want to open businesses, pursue higher education, and give back to families like theirs, but face real barriers from a system meant to provide support.

Archaic eligibility criteria and endless administrative hurdles make it difficult to access these benefits, which remain completely detached from economic reality. The maximum benefit for a New York City family of three, for example, is just $789 a month. A true cost of living measure will reveal how far below economic security this falls. Clearly, it’s insufficient for a family to survive on, much less live with dignity.

In March, statewide advocates anticipated movement on this issue when the Assembly proposed a partial grant increase in their budget, raising the monthly basic needs subsidy from $389 to $614 for a family of three. While not fully tackling economic deprivation, it would have helped alleviate deep poverty and assist New Yorkers in need.

The benefits not only fall short of stabilizing families but also fail to meet basic needs. We’ve heard countless stories of recipients going without food and essentials. For instance, a mother had to quit her job due to unaffordable childcare for her disabled son, often skipping meals and going without basic hygiene items to ensure he’s fed. A formerly homeless 27-year-old, grappling with PTSD and depression, explained the challenges of making ends meet even with careful budgeting, often having to skip meals when funds run low. Similarly, a mother of two teenage girls, a survivor of domestic violence currently residing in an emergency shelter, described the difficulty of providing enough food for her growing children, illustrating the harsh reality faced by many cash assistance recipients.

Like mine, these are stories of resilience. Despite the narratives perpetuated in political discourse and the media, cash assistance recipients aren’t exploiting others’ efforts. They’re our friends, neighbors, parents, children, aspiring professionals, and future leaders striving to improve their lives and those of their families.

In one of the richest states in one of the richest countries in the world, it is morally unjustifiable for so many to struggle meeting basic needs. We have the power to eradicate deep poverty and provide all New Yorkers with the means to attain economic security, pursue aspirations, and live with dignity. It’s past time for the state budget to reflect this vision.

That’s why FPWA has launched an ambitious new project to amplify the voices of those marginalized by media and public perception. Through our Cash Assistance Story Collection Series, we’ll spotlight recipients’ experiences, shedding light on the impact of our moral shortcomings in aiding the poor. It also presents an opportunity to hear stories of strength, dreams, and progress.

We hope that this work will catalyze change, urging our state to fulfill the promise of its motto— “Excelsior,” or ever upward—for all its residents.

Rev. Dominique C. Atchison is FPWA’s director of membership and strategic partnerships.

SARASOTA, Fla. (AP) — Trump Media and Technology Group, the owner of former President Donald Trump’s social networking site Truth Social, lost more than $300 million last quarter, according to its first earnings report as a publicly traded company.

For the three-month period that ended March 31, the company posted a loss of $327.6 million, which it said included $311 million in non-cash expenses related to its merger with a company called Digital World Acquisition Corp., which was essentially a pile of cash looking for a target to merge with. It’s an example of what’s called a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC, which can give young companies quicker and easier routes to getting their shares trading publicly.

A year earlier, Trump Media posted a loss of $210,300.

Trump Media said collected $770,500 in revenue in the first quarter, largely from its “nascent advertising initiative.” That was down from $1.1 million a year earlier.

“At this early stage in the Company’s development, TMTG remains focused on long-term product development, rather than quarterly revenue,” Trump Media said in its earnings news release.

Earlier this month, the company fired an auditor that federal regulators recently charged with “massive fraud.” The former president’s media company dismissed BF Borgers as its independent public accounting firm on May 3, delaying the filing of the quarterly earnings report, according to a securities filings.

Trump Media had previously cycled through at least two other auditors — one that resigned in July 2023, and another that was terminated its the board in March, just as it was re-hiring BF Borgers.

Shares of Trump Media climbed 36 cents to $48.74 in after-hours trading. The stock, which trades under the ticker symbol “DJT,” began trading on Nasdaq in March and peaked at nearly $80 in late March.

By MARK THIESSEN (Associated Press)

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — A 70-year-old Alaska man who was attempting to take photos of two newborn moose calves was attacked and killed by their mother, authorities said Monday.

The man killed Sunday was identified as Dale Chorman of Homer, said Austin McDaniel, a spokesperson for the Alaska Department of Public Safety.

The female moose had recently given birth to the calves in Homer.

“As they were walking through the brush looking for the moose, that’s when the cow moose attacked Dale,” McDaniel said.

The attack happened as the two were running away, he said. The second man, who has not been publicly identified, was uninjured.

That person did not witness the attack, so authorities cannot say if the moose killed Chorman by kicking or stomping him, or a combination.

Medics pronounced Chorman dead at the scene. The cow moose left the area, Alaska State Troopers said in an online post.

In 1995, a moose stomped a 71-year-old man to death when he was trying to enter a building on the campus of the University of Alaska Anchorage. Witnesses said students had been throwing snowballs and harassing the moose and its calf for hours, and the animals were agitated when the man tried to walk past them.

There are up to 200,000 moose in Alaska, a state with a human population of about 737,000.

The animals are not normally aggressive, but can become so if provoked, according to the state Department of Fish and Game’s website.

A cow moose will become very protective over young calves and will attack humans who come too close, the department says.

“Calving season for moose is the time when you definitely want to give them extra space,” McDaniel said. “Cow moose with calves are going to be some of the more aggressive moose you’re going to come in contact with.”

People should not spook the animals or get between a mother and her calves, he said.

“Those moose will become unpredictable and work to protect their calves at any cost,” McDaniel said.

The largest of the deer family, a small adult female moose can weigh up to 800 pounds (363 kilograms), while a large adult male can weigh twice that, according to Fish and Game. The animals can stand almost 6 feet (1.8 meters) tall.