The uptick in offensive production from center Taylor Heise has been clearly evident. So, too, has the standout goaltending from Maddie Rooney and Nicole Hensley.

But one underlying factor not to be overlooked that has brought Minnesota to within two wins of becoming the first Professional Women’s Hockey League champion has been the team defense that has forwards, defenders and goaltenders working as one cohesive unit to shut down opponents.

Minnesota registered its third shutout in its past five playoff games on Tuesday to even its best-of-five PWHL finals series with Boston at 1-1. It has gained home-ice advantage in the series heading into Game 3 on Friday night at Xcel Energy Center behind a united front that is all about effort, commitment and communication.

“Our entire team has refocused on what is the strength of our team, which is not giving up a ton of goals,” Minnesota center Kelly Pannek said. “That extends to every person, not just the goalies. When we’re playing the right way we’re on the proper side of pucks.

“The last handful of games we’ve done a really good job of relying on each other and trusting each other when appropriate. And when we’ve needed a big play we’ve gotten it.”

Pannek, Heise, Grace Zumwinkle and Kendall Coyne Schofield — among others — have been conspicuous in making strong plays on the backcheck in recent games to shut down a potential scoring threat.

“It’s the difference in games this time of year,” Pannek said. “Every little play matters; you never know when that extra stride you take catches you up to someone. And if that bounce or stick play or that backcheck can be the difference in the game.

“You have to get excited for those small-detail plays. They are plays that happen all the time all over the ice, but sometimes they get overlooked by the goals or the assists or the massive saves by our goaltenders.”

Minnesota coach Ken Klee said the team has focused all season on playing well away from the puck and gave credit to the players for buying into that approach.

“At this level we know the habits we need to play with,” Coyne Schofield said. “We know the detail our game has to have to be on the right side at the end of the game. Whether it’s on a backcheck, a 50-50 battle, being on the right side of the puck, it’s those little things that you come back to the room and ask yourself if you did all those things.

Minnesota goalie Nicole Hensley (29) watches as defender Lee Stecklein (2) and Boston forward Lexie Adzija (8) chase the puck during the second period of Game 2 of a PWHL hockey championship series, Tuesday, May 21, 2024, in Lowell, Mass. (Mark Stockwell / Associated Press)

“In playoff hockey, when one of those boxes aren’t checked you usually aren’t on the right side. We’ve been doing all those little things well, finding that extra gear.”

Minnesota coaches and players alike rave about the role defender Lee Stecklein has played in the team’s defensive success. The 30-year-old Roseville native routinely leads Minnesota in minutes played and is called on to play in every situation.

“She’s the ultimate leader and obviously a great hockey player,” Klee said. “The girls gravitate to her — how hard so works, the way she takes care of herself. When she’s on the ice the entire team has more confidence.

“We call her the ‘Big Unit’ for a reason, because she can control the play.”

Coyne Schofield considers Stecklein to be “the backbone” of the team.

“She holds the crew together on and off the ice,” Coyne Schfield said. “The minutes she plays each night and the way she plays those minutes. You’re not seeing headlines about No. 2, but in our room you are. We know we’re not having success without her.”

Related Articles

Minnesota bounces back to take PWHL finals Game 2 in Boston

PWHL Finals: Boston holds off Minnesota in Game 1

For Minnesota, a short turnaround to PWHL Final

Minnesota completes comeback in PWHL playoffs with 4-1 win against Toronto to advance to finals

PWHL: Minnesota has momentum for decisive Game 5 in Toronto

Five generations of the Cooper family have worked the aisles of Cooper’s Foods in St. Paul and Chaska, but the legacy has come to an end. The Coopers, who closed their 107-year-old Chaska store in early March, announced this week that their last store on St. Paul’s West Seventh Street will soon shutter.

“With a heavy heart I am sharing that our family will be closing our last remaining grocery store,” wrote Sara Cooper, in a May 19 Facebook post. “We have been honored to serve the West Seventh community since 1992.”

An official closing date was not announced.

The grocery’s departure from the West Seventh location, between St. Clair Avenue and Michigan Street, leaves the surrounding neighborhood with limited options for fresh produce, at least in convenient walking distance. A downtown Lunds and Byerlys grocery on 10th Street is about two miles away, and the Mississippi Market grocery co-op on East Seventh Street is three miles away. The site kept late-night hours.

Cooper’s Foods’ Highland Park location in the Sibley Plaza strip mall on West Seventh closed in 2017, though an Aldi supermarket opened there following a major remodeling of the strip mall two years later.

Interviewed shortly before the Sibley Plaza location shuttered, Gary Cooper said shrinking sales, difficult union negotiations, record-keeping related to the city’s then-new sick-leave mandate, the decline in strip mall tenancies and the store’s pension liabilities were of no help.

“I’m a 71-year-old man,” he said at the time. “If I can figure out a way to help somebody get in there and keep that store operating, I’ll do it.”

In an interview this February with Southwest News Media, Gary Cooper said competition from big box stores had taken a bite out of sales in the Chaska location, which closed March 2.

St. Paul City Council Member Rebecca Noecker posted to social media Thursday that she was saddened by the grocery’s departure from West Seventh Street and had contacted the city’s economic development team.

“We are ready to assist in making sure this part of W. 7th Street remains vibrant and provides amenities the neighborhood needs,” Noecker wrote. “For me and for so many community members, Cooper’s has been not only a lifeline for fresh food but also somewhere you’d always connect with a friendly face.”

Related Articles

Pioneer Press 2024 patio guide has something for everyone

Here are readers’ picks for 2024’s best patios

St. Paul City Council, mayor’s office still wrangling with special event costs

Northern Iron & Machine pulls out of community meeting for foundry’s air emissions

Charges: St. Paul school put on lockdown after man tried to get inside, threatened staff with machete

BY GARY FIELDS, LISA MASCARO and FARNOUSH AMIRI (Associated Press)

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is embroiled in a second flag controversy in as many weeks, this time over a banner that in recent years has come to symbolize sympathies with the Christian nationalist movement and the false claim that the 2020 presidential election was stolen.

An “Appeal to Heaven” flag was flown last summer outside Alito’s beach vacation home in New Jersey, according to The New York Times, which obtained several images showing it on different dates in July and September 2023. The Times previously reported that an upside down American flag — a sign of distress — had flown outside Alito’s Alexandria, Virginia, home less than two weeks after the violent Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by supporters of former President Donald Trump.

Some of the rioters carried the inverted American flag or the “Appeal to Heaven” flag, which shows a green pine tree on a white field. The revelations have escalated concerns over Alito’s impartiality and his ability to objectively decide cases currently before the court that relate to the Jan. 6 attackers and Trump’s attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Alito has not commented on the flag at his summer home.

Here is the history and current symbolism of the “Appeal to Heaven” flag.

WHAT ARE ITS ORIGINS?

Ted Kaye, secretary for the North American Vexillological Association, which studies flags and their meaning, said the “Appeal to Heaven” banner dates to the Revolutionary War.

Six schooners outfitted by George Washington to intercept British vessels at sea flew the flag in 1775 as they sailed under his command. It became the maritime flag of Massachusetts in 1776 and remained so until 1971, he said.

According to Americanflags.com the pine tree on the flag symbolized strength and resilience in the New England colonies while the words “Appeal to Heaven” stemmed from the belief that God would deliver the colonists from tyranny.

HOW HAS ITS SYMBOLISM CHANGED?

There are a few different reasons people fly “Appeal to Heaven” flags today, said Jared Holt, a senior analyst at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a London-based think tank that tracks online hate, disinformation and extremism.

Some fans of it identify with a “patriot” movement that obsesses over the Founding Fathers and the American Revolution, he said. Others adhere to a Christian nationalist worldview that seeks to elevate Christianity in public life.

“It’s not abundantly clear which of those reasons would be accurate” in this situation, Holt said. But he called the display outside Alito’s home “alarming,” saying those who do fly the flag are often advocating for “more intolerant and restrictive forms of government aligned with a specific religious philosophy.”

The “Appeal to Heaven” flag was among several banners carried by the Jan. 6 rioters, who also favored religious banners symbolizing the white Christian nationalist movement., the Confederate flag and the yellow Gadsden flag, with its rattlesnake and “Don’t Tread on Me” message, said Bradley Onishi, author of “Preparing for War: The Extremist History of White Christian Nationalism.”

“That’s the family,” he said.

WHAT ABOUT MIKE JOHNSON?

House Speaker Mike Johnson displays the flag in the hallway outside his office next to the flag of his home state, Louisiana. He said he has flown it “for as long as I can remember.”

Johnson, a Republican, told The Associated Press he did not know the flag had come to represent the “Stop the Steal” movement.

“Never heard that before,” he said.

The speaker, who led one of Trump’s legal challenges to the 2020 election, defended the flag and its continued use despite the modern-day symbolism around it.

“I have always used that flag for as long as I can remember, because I was so enamored with the fact that Washington used it,” Johnson said. “The Appeal to Heaven flag is a critical, important part of American history. It’s something that I’ve always revered since I’ve been a young man.”

He added: “People misuse our symbols all the time. It doesn’t mean we don’t use the symbols anymore.”

Johnson said he had never flown the U.S. flag upside in distress, as Alito did, and he declined to assess the justice’s situation and whether raising the flags at his home was appropriate.

But he called the criticism of the “Appeal to Heaven” flag “contrived.”

“It’s nonsense,” he said. “It’s part of our history. We don’t remove statues and we don’t cover up things that are so essential to who we are as a country.”

SHOULD ALITO RECUSE?

House Democratic Whip, Katherine Clark of Massachusetts said in a statement that the display of the “Appeal to Heaven” flag at an Alito home was “not just another example of extremism that has overtaken conservatism. This is a threat to the rule of law and a serious breach of ethics, integrity and Justice Alito’s oath of office.”

She called for Alito to recuse himself from any cases related to Jan. 6 and the former president.

There’s a clear difference between the House speaker displaying the flag outside his office and a Supreme Court justice flying it and the upside down American flag outside his homes as the court is deciding cases involving issues those flags have come to symbolize, said Alicia Bannon director of the Judiciary Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University.

Alito’s actions don’t “just cross the line,” she said. “They take you out of the stadium and out of the parking lot.”

Alito and the court declined to respond to requests for comment on how the “Appeal to Heaven” flag came to be flying and what it was intended to express.

Alito has said the upside down American flag was briefly flown by his wife during a dispute with neighbors and that he had no part in it.

ANOTHER BLOW TO THE COURT’S REPUTATION

The Supreme Court already was under fire as it considers unprecedented cases against Trump and some of those charged for the attack on the Capitol.

An issue at the center of the controversy is that the high court does not have to adhere to the same ethics codes that guide other federal judges. The Supreme Court had long gone without its own code of ethics, but it adopted one in November 2023 in the face of sustained criticism over undisclosed trips and gifts from wealthy benefactors to some justices, including Alito. The code lacks a means of enforcement, however.

The federal code of judicial ethics does not universally prohibit judges from involvement in nonpartisan or religious activity off the bench. But it does say that a judge “should not participate in extrajudicial activities that detract from the dignity of the judge’s office, interfere with the performance of the judge’s official duties” or “reflect adversely on the judge’s impartiality.”

Jeremy Fogel, executive director of the Berkeley Judicial Institute at the University of California, Berkeley Law School, said the flag revelations lead to questions about whether Alito can be impartial in any case related to Jan. 6 or Trump.

“Displaying those particular flags creates the appearance at least that the justice is signifying agreement with those viewpoints at a time when there are cases before the court where those viewpoints are relevant,” he said.

A March AP/NORC poll found that only about one-quarter of Americans think the Supreme Court is doing a somewhat or very good job upholding democratic values. About 45% think it’s doing a somewhat or very bad job.

Tony Carrk, executive director of Accountable.US, a progressive watchdog organization, said the controversy shows that further steps are needed to put teeth into the court’s ethics code.

“There’s a reason why the confidence in credibility among the American people for the Supreme Court has plummeted to an all-time low,” he said.

___

Associated Press writer Ali Swenson in New York contributed to this report.