Defensores de inquilinos celebran victoria de Mamdani en elecciones primarias

posted in: All news | 0

“Los arrendatarios son mayoría en Nueva York. Zohran Mamdani lo entiende y nos ha dado algo por lo que votar”, afirmó Cea Weaver, directora del New York State Tenant Bloc, sobre el candidato y nominado demócrata, que basó su campaña en la congelación de alquileres para los arrendatarios con renta estabilizada.

Zohran Mamdani en un mítin de campaña en la Terminal 5 el 15 de junio. (Facebook/ZohranKMamdani)

Este artículo se publicó originalmente en inglés el 25 de junio. Traducido por Victoria Moran Garcia. Read the English version here.

Zohran Mamdani, un asambleísta de Queens que realizó una campaña que promete congelar los alquileres para los arrendatarios con renta estabilizada y hacer la ciudad más asequible, es es el candidato demócrata en las elecciones generales de noviembre para la alcaldía, lo que los defensores de la vivienda dicen que es una victoria para los inquilinos. 

El exgobernador Andrew Cuomo admitió su derrota el 24 de junio por la noche. Los más reciente resultados de la Board of Elections (Junta electoral) de la cuidad muestran que Mamdani obtuvo una ventaja de 12 puntos sobre Cuomo y ganó las primarias con el 56 por ciento de los votos, frente al 44 por ciento del exgobernador.

“Los arrendatarios son mayoría en Nueva York. Zohran Mamdani lo entiende y nos ha dado algo por lo que votar”, afirmó Cea Weaver, directora del New York State Tenant Bloc, en una declaración el martes por la noche.

Durante meses el grupo ha estado organizado a miles de personas para apoyar a los candidatos demócratas que apoyan la congelación de los alquileres para los aproximadamente 2 millones de inquilinos en apartamentos de renta estabilizada de la ciudad.

La Junta de Directrices sobre Alquileres de la ciudad de Nueva York (RGB por sus siglas en inglés), compuesto por miembros nombrados por el alcalde, vota cada año sobre los cambios permitidos en los alquileres de estas viviendas. La junta aprobó un aumento del 3 por ciento en contratos de alquiler de un año y 4.5 por ciento en contratos de alquiler de dos años.

Mamdani se comprometió a congelar el alquiler durante los cuatro años de su mandato si es elegido. El RGB congeló el alquiler tres veces bajo el alcalde Bill de Blasio, aumentándolo un 5 por ciento en total en ocho años. Sus miembros han subido el alquiler un 9 por ciento en tres años bajo el alcalde Eric Adams.

Cuomo, quien ha recibido millones de donaciones del sector inmobiliario directamente y a través del apoyo indirecto del Super PAC (comité de acción política independiente), dijo que la junta debe operar de forma independiente y votar basándose en datos y en las condiciones económicas a las que se enfrentan los inquilinos y los propietarios de edificios.

Los grupos de propietarios y arrendadores están de acuerdo. Según ellos, la congelación de los alquileres perjudicaría aún más a los edificios que ya están luchando con el mantenimiento atrasado y el aumento de los costos operativos. Especialmente en el caso de los edificios con alquileres regulados al cien por ciento, que, según ellos, se deteriorarán aún más sin aumentos más sustanciales de los alquileres.

“Una congelación premeditada de los alquileres es ilegal”, dijo Kenny Burgos, director de New York Apartment Association, que representa a los propietarios de edificios con rentas estabilizadas, en una publicación en las redes sociales

“El alcalde nombra a los miembros de la RGB al igual que nombra a los miembros de la Junta de Financiación de Campañas y la Junta de Conflictos de Intereses”, escribió. “Estas juntas se crearon para ser independientes y deben seguir siéndolo”.

Escenas de la votación de la Junta de Directrices sobre Alquileres en 2023. Foto de Adi Talwar.

Pero los defensores de la vivienda dicen que la RGB lleva mucho tiempo votando a favor del alcalde de turno, muchos de ellos han optado por subir los alquileres año tras año, mientras los salarios de los inquilinos siguen estancados. La mayoría de los hogares que rentan en la ciudad gastan más de un tercio de sus ingresos en vivienda, lo cual significa que están sobrecargados financieramente con el alquiler.  

“Los resultados de esta noche envían un mensaje claro a los políticos apoyados por los propietarios como Andrew Cuomo: su tiempo ha terminado”, dijo Weaver en una declaración el martes por la noche. “Hemos terminado con el status quo. Estamos hartos de luchar por permanecer en la ciudad que mantenemos mientras los beneficios de los propietarios se disparan”.

El mensaje de Mamdani pareció resonar entre los votantes de las primarias, muchos de los cuales declararon a City Limits que el coste de la vivienda es una de sus principales prioridades para elegir al próximo alcalde.

“Aquí es difícil para la gente que intenta ganarse la vida. Creo que cualquier cosa que pudiera estabilizar el alquiler sería genial”, dijo Kevin Rutledge, de 23 años, vigilante de un parque de Manhattan, quien dijo que iba a votar a Mamdani.

Además de su promesa de congelar los alquileres, el plan de vivienda de Mamdani propone construir 200,000 “viviendas subvencionadas públicamente, asequibles, construidas por los sindicatos y de alquiler estabilizado” en los próximos 10 años. Él dice que ampliaría el número de unidades producidas a través de los programas de asequibilidad existentes para las personas mayores y los hogares con ingresos extremadamente bajos (que ganan menos de $72.000 dólares al año para una familia de cuatro personas), y que “financiaría plenamente y dotaría de personal” a las agencias de vivienda de la ciudad.

Dice que pagaría por su plan recaudando $70 millones de dólares a través de bonos municipales y reuniendo fondos de programas de ayuda al alquiler (como CityFHEPS) para financiar proyectos de vivienda asequible y solidaria.

“Lucharé por una cuidad que  trabaje para ti, que sea asequible para ti, que sea segura para ti”, dijo el legislador de Queens en un discurso el martes por la noche.

Cuomo aún puede presentarse como independiente en las elecciones generales del 4 de noviembre. El actual alcalde, Eric Adams, también se presenta como independiente, al igual que el abogado Jim Walden. El fundador de Guardian Angels, Curtis Sliwa, se presenta como republicano.

Con reportería de Patrick Spauster y Tareq Saghie.

Para comunicarse con la editora, escriba a Jeanmarie@citylimits.org.

The post Defensores de inquilinos celebran victoria de Mamdani en elecciones primarias appeared first on City Limits.

Microsoft announces another mass layoff, thousands of workers affected

posted in: All news | 0

REDMOND, Wash. (AP) — Microsoft is firing thousands of workers, its second mass layoff in months.

The tech giant began sending out layoff notices Wednesday.

Related Articles


Sean “Diddy” Combs acquitted of most serious charges, convicted of a prostitution-related offense


Wisconsin Supreme Court’s liberal majority strikes down 176-year-old abortion ban


Wall Street futures mixed ahead of crucial US jobs data and looming tariff deadline


Explosion at a California fireworks warehouse sets off fires and forces evacuations


Today in History: July 2, Civil Rights Act signed into law

The company declined to say how many people would be laid off but said that it will comprise less than 4% of the workforce it had a year ago.

Microsoft said the cuts will affect multiple teams around the world, including its sales division and its Xbox video game business.

“We continue to implement organizational changes necessary to best position the company and teams for success in a dynamic marketplace,” it said in a statement.

Microsoft employed 228,000 full-time workers as of last June, the last time it reported its annual headcount. The company said Wednesday that its latest layoffs would cut close to 4% of that workforce, which would be about 9,000 people. But it has already had at least three layoffs this year.

Until now, at least, the biggest was in May, when Microsoft began laying off about 6,000 workers, nearly 3% of its global workforce and its largest job cuts in more than two years as the company spent heavily on artificial intelligence.

Microsoft also cut another 300 workers based out of its Redmond, Washington headquarters in June, on top of nearly 2,000 who lost their jobs in the Puget Sound region in May, according to notices it sent to Washington state employment officials.

Ford recalls more than 200,000 vehicles over malfunctioning rearview camera

posted in: All news | 0

Ford Motor Co. is recalling more than 200,000 vehicles because a software defect can cause the rearview camera to fail, increasing the risk of a crash and injury.

Related Articles


Sean “Diddy” Combs acquitted of most serious charges, convicted of a prostitution-related offense


Wisconsin Supreme Court’s liberal majority strikes down 176-year-old abortion ban


Wall Street futures mixed ahead of crucial US jobs data and looming tariff deadline


Explosion at a California fireworks warehouse sets off fires and forces evacuations


Today in History: July 2, Civil Rights Act signed into law

Ford told U.S. highway safety regulators that the camera can either display a blank image or that the image may remain on the display after the driver finishes backing up, causing a distraction.

Dealerships will eventually update the camera software free of charge. Owner notification letters are expected to be mailed by July 28.

Ford’s number for this recall is 25S72 and owners may call Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration vehicle safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-888-275-9171), or go to www.nhtsa.gov.

The recall covers 200,061 vehicles, including the following makes and models:

Ford:

Bronco Sport, model years 2021-2024
EcoSport, model years 2020-2021
Edge, model years 2019-2020
Escape, model years 2020-2022
Expedition, model years 2020-2021
Explorer, model years 2020-2024
F-150, model years 2019-2020
F-250 SD, model years 2020-2022
Fusion, model years 2019-2020
Maverick, model years 2022-2024
Mustang, model years 2019-2023
Ranger, model years 2019-2023
Transit, model years 2020-2023
Transit Connect, model years 2018-2022

Lincoln:

Aviator, model years 2020-2023
Continental, model years 2019-2020
Corsair, model years 2020-2022
MK2, model years 2019-2020
Nautilus, model years 2019-2020
Navigator, model years 2020-2021

What Would Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Mean for New York’s Green Transition?

posted in: All news | 0

The legislation would get rid of Biden-era federal tax incentives that made solar and wind projects more affordable, and kills residential tax incentives for homeowners making energy efficiency upgrades.

Trump at a press briefing last week. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

President Donald Trump’s long awaited “Big Beautiful Bill,” which passed the U.S. Senate on a narrow 51-to-50 margin on Tuesday and now seeks the House’s approval, could have ugly repercussions for New York’s clean energy transition, experts say. 

Starting in 2027, the legislation would get rid of Biden-era federal tax incentives that made it more affordable for companies to generate clean energy out of solar and wind projects in New York.

The bill also nixes a consumer tax credit that makes it cheaper to buy electric vehicles, and kills residential tax incentives that drive down electricity bills for homeowners by subsidizing energy efficiency upgrades.

Environmental advocates see the bill as yet another roadblock imposed by the Trump administration to stall the state’s attempts to build out its green economy. Trump already tried to derail the construction of a New York-based offshore wind project and suspended new leasing and permitting for wind projects altogether

“This bill could blow a hole through the heart of [New York’s] clean energy economy,” said Robert Freudenberg, vice president of the Regional Plan Association’s energy and environmental programs.

Solar power panels on the roof of a co-op building in the Bronx. (Photo by Adi Talwar)

What’s in the bill?

Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” which slashes taxes and social safety net programs, mainly targets Medicaid and food stamps

But it also includes provisions to get rid of environmental tax incentives specifically targeted at the wind and solar industry, which the president has repeatedly expressed a personal disdain for. 

He has complained over the years that wind turbines ruined the view from his golf course in Scotland and told a room full of oil and gas executives on the campaign trail that he “hates” wind. Trump made similar comments about solar, claiming the panels are “ugly as hell.”

Trump’s bill gets rid of the $500 billion package known as the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that the Biden administration put in place to, among other things, bolster the green economy and tackle global warming. The IRA’s environmental fund, most of which has already been spent, was referred to by former vice president Kamala Harris as “largest investment ever to take on the climate crisis.”  

The residential tax credits baked into the IRA helped reduce the carbon footprint of individual buildings by giving homeowners funds for weatherization, or a wide variety of environmentally friendly upgades to their homes. That includes putting up solar panels, buying heat pumps, electric stoves or insulating properties to retain energy instead of wasting it. 

“By encouraging people to do these upgrades they lowered their energy usage, which put more energy on the grid and drove down the costs of their utility bills,” said Matt Salton, federal policy manager at the New York League of Conservation Voters (NYLCV).

In 2022, over 150,000 New Yorkers took advantage of the residential tax credits and a year later nearly 200,000 used the incentive, according to the environmental group. 

If Trump’s bill makes it through, these credits will end starting in 2026. 

The “Big Beautiful Bill” also makes it harder for companies to build out clean energy capacity, axing a federal tax incentive that made constructing solar and wind projects more affordable.

“These tax credits going away will make those projects exponentially more expensive,” said Rob Rains, an energy and environmental policy analyst at the D.C-based firm Washington Analysis.

If it becomes too costly and uncertain to invest in solar and wind in New York, developers could pull out of ongoing projects and new investors could shy away from building out renewables in the state, Rains explains. 

While the bill removes the federal tax credits for wind and solar projects starting in 2027, it does include some caveats, experts who analyzed the bill told City Limits. 

Wind and solar projects that start construction within one year of the bill becoming law can still claim the tax cuts, but have up to four years to complete construction. For companies that begin construction after that, their projects must be placed in service by the end of 2027 to use the credits.

Gov. Kathy Hochul at a 2022 press conference, marking start of construction of New York’s first offshore wind project. (NYS Governor’s Office)

Another obstacle

Regardless of the caveats, environmental advocates agree the bill would be another setback for New York’s shift to cleaner energy. Trump already enacted a series of measures this year that stall the transition away from fossil fuels. 

The administration suspended new leasing and permitting for wind projects across the United States. Trump has also pushed to revive fossil fuel projects that New York previously rejected, like the Constitution Pipeline, a major venture by the Williams company to transport planet-warming fracked gas from Pennsylvania to New York City.

But even before Trump took office, New York was failing to keep up with the ambitious goals set by the state’s landmark climate law. 

Benchmarks laid out in the Climate Leadership and Protection Act (CLCPA)—which requires the state to mostly phase out the use of fossil fuels by 2030—have already been pushed back by three years. 

“Despite New York enacting among the most aggressive decarbonization policies in the nation, clean energy buildout in the Empire State has historically been slow,” said Timothy Fox, managing director at the consulting firm Clear View Energy.

Although the clock is ticking to reach the CLCPA’s targets, only about 29 percent of the Empire State’s electricity currently comes from renewable sources. 

The “Big Beautiful Bill” does include carve outs for developers that want to generate zero-emission electricity like nuclear, geothermal or hydropower. But energy experts say leaving out other sources of renewable energy will knee cap progress already underway for over a decade. 

“Billions of dollars have been spent to build out wind and solar. So this [bill] is basically tilting the scales against building out more clean energy,” Freudenberg pointed out. 

“It threatens the multiple benefits of the clean energy industry including cleaner air, more good paying jobs and reducing the impacts of climate change,” he added.

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Mariana@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

The post What Would Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Mean for New York’s Green Transition? appeared first on City Limits.