Twins place starting pitcher Chris Paddack on injured list with shoulder fatigue

posted in: News | 0

PHOENIX — After pitcher Chris Paddack missed nearly all of the past two seasons recovering from his second Tommy John surgery, the Twins knew they were going to need to manage his workload carefully.

The time has now come for the starting pitcher to take a break after he has mentioned multiple times publicly that he has been experiencing some dead arm. The Twins placed Paddack on the injured list Tuesday with right shoulder fatigue, calling up reliever Ronny Henriquez from Triple-A St. Paul to take his spot on the roster for the time being.

Days earlier, manager Rocco Baldelli said the Twins would take a day or two to assess how Paddack was feeling before making any decisions, but he noted that there was nothing acute going on.

“There are going to be ups and downs in everyone’s season, especially his, coming back from what he’s coming back from,” Baldelli said.

Paddack described the ball as feeling like a dumbbell during his last start and said his body has felt “just a little heavy” since the beginning of June.

His pitch velocity took a big dip in his last start, with the four-seam fastball two miles per hour slower than his season average. Since the beginning of the month, Paddack has a 7.79 earned-run average, giving up 15 runs in 17 1/3 innings.

“I’ve had a rough four weeks,” he said. “You can prepare all offseason, all spring training, but a man that hasn’t bene able to throw this many innings in three years now due to injury, you can’t do enough to prepare for this. We knew coming in that there was going to be a rollercoaster of events — up, down — with the body and the mind.”

Paddack was listed as Thursday’s scheduled starter against the Arizona Diamondbacks. Henriquez is a reliever, meaning the Twins are likely to call someone else up on Thursday to fill his spot in the starting rotation. Top pitching prospect David Festa, who is off to a strong start at Triple-A, is an option.

Related Articles

Minnesota Twins |


With just a couple of weeks until rosters are revealed, who could Twins’ all-stars be?

Minnesota Twins |


Pablo López dominates as Twins shut out Athletics

Minnesota Twins |


Bay Area native Twins bid farewell to Oakland Coliseum

Minnesota Twins |


Twins starter Chris Paddack battles through dead arm period

Minnesota Twins |


Bailey Ober throws complete game as Twins wipe out Athletics

Jace Frederick: Help-now player(s) in NBA Draft make sense for championship-contending Timberwolves

posted in: News | 0

The Timberwolves moved up last year in the second round of the NBA draft to take a stab at a player with a lot of potential in Leonard Miller.

As a teenager, the lengthy Miller showed he could score in the NBA G-League, while also rebounding at an elite level. His potential is limitless.

Later in the second round, Minnesota nabbed Jaylen Clark, the then-reigning collegiate defensive player of the year who was fresh off a ruptured Achilles.

Neither player was expected to contribute last season for either health or developmental reasons, and that’s how it played out.

But there’s strong reason to suggest a different approach should be taken into this week’s NBA draft — now a two-day affair, with the first round slated for Wednesday and the second round on Thursday.

What’s more certain now than it was this time last year is the Timberwolves are a true championship contender. The Wolves are close to lifting the Larry O’Brien trophy. Their roster is talented and deep.

That might be considered a reason to continue to take developmental project players who can work on their games in the practice facility and down in Iowa in the minor leagues with an eye on the future while the current core battles it out for championships.

But the Western Conference Finals proved Minnesota’s current rotation isn’t quite complete. There are holes — not gaping, but certainly evident and exploitable. The Wolves could use a backup point guard coach Chris Finch trusts wholeheartedly to take some burden off veteran Mike Conley during the regular season and also play some sort of meaningful role in the playoffs.

The lack of proven shooting was a weakness Dallas picked at time and time again. The Wolves sport one of the most versatile rosters in the NBA in terms of defense, which led to them being historically good on that end of the floor.

But, offensively, there is some duplicity on the wings. Jaden McDaniels, Nickeil Alexander-Walker and Kyle Anderson all are capable of doing multiple things on offense and certainly show flashes of excellence on that end of the floor.

But when you have to account for so many other things in Minnesota’s offense, it’s an easy copout for opponents to leave those guys open on the perimeter for 3-point looks that, on a game-to-game, stretch-to-stretch basis, may not always be counted on to go down.

When Dallas heavily packed the paint against Anthony Edwards in the West Finals, and stuck to Karl-Anthony Towns — who also picked a bad time to not be able to make a jumper — like glue, Minnesota didn’t have other places to find offense.

The ability to insert a legitimate shooter who can reliable knock down open three-point shots at a 40 to 45 percent clip would give Finch an additional offensive look to turn to when an offensive spark is needed.

Edwards may not be a point guard, but he showed some playmaking chops this season. And the more shooting Minnesota can surround the young star wing with, the easy his job becomes. Note how simple Jayson Tatum’s passes were at times for the Celtics during the NBA Finals with nothing but legitimate offensive weapons surrounding him.

Ideally, the Wolves could address those needs via trade or free agency. Title contenders would much prefer to rely on proven talent to contribute in May and, hopefully, June.

But the Wolves’ salary cap crunch doesn’t necessarily afford them the ability to swing much in either department. What they do have is two top-40 picks in this draft — No. 27 and No. 37.

And while you won’t find sure-thing stars in that portion of the draft, you can at least take shots and see what you have. Additional COVID years added to college eligibility and led to older prospects in the past couple of seasons, and this draft is no exception. But the fortunate thing for the Wolves is those players may better align with the windows of players like Edwards, McDaniels and Naz Reid.

And those guys may be better equipped to help this team in the here and now. Not in big ways — the current core is certainly set with little opportunity for anyone else to break through. But the Wolves are so close to reaching their ultimate goal, a guy who may be able to come in and knock down a pair of second-quarter triples to tip the scales in a playoff game could prove to be the difference between ending their season in the middle of June, and not.

Minnesota’s chips are so clearly pushed to the middle at the moment for the upcoming season that it would almost seem silly to not do everything in the team’s power to give Finch and Co. as many possible cards to play over the next calendar year.

There’s a chance to add to the deck this week.

Related Articles

Minnesota Timberwolves |


Timberwolves ink coach Chris Finch to four-year extension

Minnesota Timberwolves |


NBA draft: Looking at a few players who could fill Timberwolves’ needs

Minnesota Timberwolves |


Next NBA season starts now

Minnesota Timberwolves |


Jerry West, a 3-time Hall of Fame selection and the inspiration for the NBA logo, dies at 86

Minnesota Timberwolves |


Anthony Edwards needs more postseason stamina for Timberwolves. He knows it. But how can he achieve it?

This week’s televised debate is crucial for Biden and Trump — and for CNN as well

posted in: News | 0

By DAVID BAUDER AP Media Writer

NEW YORK (AP) — Joe Biden and Donald Trump won’t be alone at Thursday’s debate. Moderators Dana Bash and Jake Tapper of CNN will be on camera, too, and there’s a lot on the line for their network as it fights for relevance in a changing media environment.

CNN has hosted dozens of town halls and political forums through the years, but never a general election presidential debate, let alone one so early in a campaign. No network has.

“This is a huge moment for CNN,” said former CNN Washington bureau chief Frank Sesno, now a media and public affairs professor at George Washington University. “CNN has to reassert itself. It has to show that it led a revolution in news before and can do it again.”

As a television network, CNN is struggling at a time many consumers are cutting off cable and most news outlets wonder if the campaign will ignite consumer interest.

Those that remain have expressed a clear preference for opinion programming. Fox News Channel has averaged 2.14 million viewers in prime time this month, with MSNBC at 1.22 million and CNN at 525,000, according to the Nielsen company. That’s down 17% from last June for CNN.

CNN’s chairman and CEO, Mark Thompson, has been with the company for less than a year and has spoken more about the internet than television as an opportunity for growth. Yet it means something that both campaigns chose CNN for the first debate. A well-run, illuminating event can open some eyes and remind people of CNN’s legacy as the first all-news television network. If it goes off the rails, that’s a stain that could take years to wash away.

“This is a hugely consequential moment in this campaign,” said David Chalian, CNN’s vice president and political director. “It’s the earliest presidential debate ever. It’s obviously a huge privilege and a huge responsibility for CNN to host it.”

Looking hard for more viewers

It’s possible — even likely — that CNN won’t even have the biggest American audience on Thursday.

Choosing public service over pure profit, CNN offered to let other networks carry the debate feed; ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox News Channel, MSNBC, PBS and C-SPAN will all do so. The other networks also have the right to sell their own ad time during the two commercial breaks.

The networks had to agree to CNN’s rules — they must keep CNN’s insignia onscreen and can’t interrupt with their own commentators while the debate airs. Internationally, only CNN is carrying it.

The event, in an Atlanta studio, won’t have a live audience. That was important to the Biden campaign but also to CNN. The network’s town hall with Trump in 2023 was panned in large part because of the presence of Trump partisans.

CNN will also control a mute button, to turn a candidate’s microphone off when his opponent is talking. That’s also reactive; Biden and many viewers were frustrated by Trump’s frequent interruptions during the first of two debates between them in 2020.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Is Trump shielded from criminal charges as an ex-president? A nation awaits word from Supreme Court

National Politics |


‘Everything is at stake’ for reproductive rights in 2024, Harris says as Biden-Trump debate nears

National Politics |


Biden announces hundreds of debate watch parties while Trump hits the trail

National Politics |


In one affluent Atlanta suburb, Biden and Trump work to win over wary Georgia voters

National Politics |


Candidates seen ‘out of touch’ by young voters

When he conducted an unscientific poll among listeners to his SiriusXM radio show, Michael Smerconish said that 90% were in favor of the “mute” button. But Smerconish, who also hosts a weekend show on CNN, counts himself among the 10% who don’t like the idea.

“You run the risk that the debate will become an antiseptic experience,” missing some good give-and-take, Smerconish said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Stay tuned, though. Chalian, who would not say who would be in control of the mute button, said an opponent’s voice may still be picked up if he pipes up. It just won’t be the dominant voice.

The network will not attempt to fact-check the candidates in real time, he said.

“Obviously, if there is some egregious fact that needs to be checked or the record needs to be made clear, Jake and Dana can do that,” he said. “But that’s not their role. They are not here to participate in this debate. They are here to facilitate a debate between Trump and Biden.”

Will CNN offer a fair forum?

Well before the debate, Trump and his supporters have been putting forward the notion that because of CNN’s presence, it won’t be a fair fight. At a campaign rally where he denounced “fake Tapper,” Trump said that he would be debating three people instead of one — even though his campaign agreed in advance to the rules and moderators.

On CNN Monday, the network’s Kasie Hunt cut off an interview with Trump press aide Karoline Leavitt after she repeatedly attacked the moderators.

“Our side has zero expectations that this is going to be a fair debate,” said Tim Graham, director of media analysis at the conservative Media Research Center. “When you watch Tapper and Bash anchor, you get the distinct impression that you’re not going to get a fair debate.”

What Graham will be watching for: How many times will the moderators interrupt Trump and how many times do they stop Biden?

To a large extent, the attitude speaks to how CNN is boxed in commercially. Egged on by Trump, many of his supporters perceive CNN as biased against them, not as a network that follows the facts. And if you oppose Trump and want to see your view reflected, MSNBC is a more satisfying destination.

“Our job is simply to make sure that we are best prepared to facilitate and moderate the debate between the candidates,” Chalian said. “That is our focus. I really try not to pay too much attention to the pre-spin or post-spin. I’m really focused on the debate itself.”

Days before the event, a keep-your-head-down-and-work attitude seems to be how he’s dealing with a pressure-filled event that could choke you if you let it.

“Let’s be clear,” he said. “The stakes are highest for Donald Trump and Joe Biden. They’re the participants in this debate.”

Oklahoma Supreme Court rules publicly funded religious charter school is unconstitutional

posted in: News | 0

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — An Oklahoma board’s approval of what would be the nation’s first publicly funded religious school is unconstitutional and must be rescinded, the state Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday.

The high court determined the Statewide Virtual Charter School Board’s 3-2 vote last year to approve the application by the Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma for the St. Isidore of Seville Virtual Charter School violates both the Oklahoma and U.S. constitutions, as well as state law.

“Under Oklahoma law, a charter school is a public school,” the court wrote. “As such, a charter school must be nonsectarian.

“However, St. Isidore will evangelize the Catholic school curriculum while sponsored by the state.”

The online public charter school would have been open to students across the state in kindergarten through grade 12, and part of its mission would have been to evangelize its students in the Catholic faith.

The case is being closely watched because supporters of the school believe recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions have indicated the court is more open to public funds going to religious entities.

A group of parents, faith leaders and a public education nonprofit sued to stop the establishment of the school.

Oklahoma’s Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt and State Superintendent Ryan Walters supported the board’s approval of the school.