‘We are very scared’: Fear grips migrant families on both sides of the border over Trump deportations

posted in: News | 0

Perched outside one of the nearly 40 tents at a migrant shelter in Tijuana, Emir Mejía smiles as she gently rocks her 15-day-old granddaughter. This has been her family’s home for over six months as they await an appointment to seek asylum in the United States.

The night before, her joy at welcoming her seventh granddaughter quickly turned to concern as U.S. voters elected former President Donald Trump to a second term in the White House, where he has promised mass deportations.

The fear and uncertainty Mejia and her family now face is shared with many migrants waiting in shelters for their turn to present their cases to U.S. officials — but also with nearly 2 million already living in California.

“Maybe a lot of people don’t understand,” she said in Spanish. “We don’t want to cross (to the U.S.) for pleasure, but to protect our lives.”

Trump has always taken a tough stance on immigration — something that resonated with his supporters.

During his previous tenure, he replaced the old U.S.-Mexico border fence with a taller one and launched the Migrant Protection Protocols, a policy that sent asylum seekers back to Mexico to await their hearings. The Biden administration ended that practice.

During the height of the pandemic, the Trump administration also enacted a policy known as Title 42, which allowed officials to expel migrants without screening their asylum claims, on the grounds of preventing the spread of COVID-19. Although the policy remained in place for the first years of the Biden administration, it was lifted in May 2023.

This time Trump campaigned heavily on securing the border and mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. “We’re gonna have to seal up those borders,” Trump reiterated this week during his victory speech. “We want people to come back in, but we have to let them come back in. But they have to come in legally.”

Mejía, 45, said they “want to do things right” and have not considered other options to cross because they don’t want to put themselves in a risky situation.

Asylum hopes remain despite uncertainty

José María García, director of the Juventud 2000 migrant shelter in Tijuana, described the mood at the site as “a state of fear, anxiety and uncertainty.”

“They knew things were about to change,” he added, referring to Wednesday morning, when many found out about the outcome of the election.

Three miles away, at the Casa del Migrante shelter, it’s a similar scenario. People have been asking, “What’s going to happen?” since election night, said Pat Murphy, a priest who is the shelter’s director. “There’s a lot of questions,” he said.

Ramón Torres, 18, also from Michoacán, has been waiting for an appointment in Tijuana for three months.

Torres, who works for a construction company while he waits at the shelter with his family, said they are now considering the possibility of staying in Tijuana. “If we don’t get an appointment between now and January, we could explore the possibility of staying here,” he said. But he said their hope is to seek asylum in the U.S., and reunite with his father.

Both migrant shelters in Tijuana visited by the San Diego Union-Tribune said they’ve recently seen an increase in those arriving to the shelters after being deported.

In June the Biden administration implemented an executive order restricting asylum and imposed stricter consequences for those who cross without authorization.

As a result, migrant encounters decreased along the southwestern border by 55%, and deportations increased, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s latest data. From June through the end of September, the Department of Homeland Security removed or returned more than 160,000 individuals to over 145 countries.

The directors of both shelters also said they could expect more people to arrive at the U.S.-Mexico border in the weeks leading up to Trump’s inauguration. The Biden administration is already making contingency plans for a potential spike, according to an NBC News report.

A CBP spokesperson said Friday that “while border encounters remain at historic lows, CBP remains vigilant to constantly shifting migration patterns.”

“Migrants should not believe the lies of smugglers. The fact remains: The United States continues to enforce immigration law. Individuals who enter the U.S. unlawfully between ports of entry will continue to be quickly removed,” the spokesperson added.

Officials said that DHS leadership regularly holds meetings to discuss border operations, and these include ongoing contingency planning and preparedness.

Trump’s promise of mass deportation could potentially impact California more than any other state.

There were about 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. as of 2022, the latest year for which federal and Pew Research Center estimates are available. About 1.8 million of them lived in California, according to Pew, more than any other state — even though California’s share of the U.S.’s undocumented immigrant population has decreased in recent years.

Undocumented immigrants made up about 4.5% of the state’s total population and 17% of all California’s immigrants, according to Pew’s estimates. About 9% of K-12 students in California have at least one parent who is an undocumented immigrant.

The population of undocumented immigrants has likely grown since 2022, Pew researchers say, as the U.S. backlog of asylum cases has more than doubled from about 500,000 in mid-2022 to more than 1.1 million at the end of 2023. In the past two years the Biden administration has also allowed hundreds of thousands of immigrants from Ukraine, Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela to temporarily reside in the U.S. as parolees via humanitarian programs.

Many welcome Trump’s more strict immigration policy.

In mid-September, county Supervisor Jim Desmond told lawmakers on the House Homeland Security Committee in Washington that the arrival of so many migrants has strained the county’s resources and raised concerns about how people entering the country were being screened for security threats.

Now that Trump has been reelected, Desmond said those concerns will likely subside.

“I’m looking forward to not having hundreds of thousands of unchecked people from around the world being dropped in the streets of San Diego County,” he said Friday in a statement. “I’m looking forward to not having boats being driven up upon our beaches and dozens of unchecked people from around the world walking into our neighborhoods.”

‘We are very scared’

At Perkins K-8 in Barrio Logan, where 40% of the school’s more than 300 students speak a native language other than English, some parents are frightened.

In the past two years Perkins has seen an increase of families enrolling at the school who fled unrest and violence in their home countries in Central and South America, especially Venezuela. The school has been working not just to teach them English, but has supported them as they heal from the traumas they experienced on their journey here and helped them find housing, supplies and other resources.

Principal Fernando Hernández has heard from some Perkins families who are fearful of being deported or having their work permits revoked under a Trump administration.

Zulynel Ferrer, 28, is an asylum seeker from Venezuela awaiting her court date set for 2027. Her oldest daughter is 7 and attends Perkins. On Tuesday, she said several migrants living in a San Diego homeless shelter were monitoring the election results. “We are very scared,” Ferrer said.

She fled extortion and violence from Colombia, where she initially thought she would find a better life. Ferrer, her husband, and two daughters made it to the U.S. border in May after a treacherous trek that included passing bodies along their path.

Once in San Diego County, she and her family lived in a tent at Cesar Chavez Park for two months. The camp was later cleared by port authorities.

Ferrer has found some relief at Perkins. Her oldest daughter, who witnessed most of her family’s hardships, is finally settling in, making new friends, learning English and participating in school activities.

Ferrer said she is worried about losing the peace and safety she has just found for her daughters.

Carly Bresee, a special education teacher who has taught for six years at Perkins, worries how Trump’s promises of mass deportation will play out for her students.

“The uncertainty is overwhelming … nobody knows what’s going to happen,” Bresee said. “I just feel sad for our students and families who are trying to find pathways to citizenship. It will become more difficult for them. I’m sad for the families who have come so far and suffered so much to be facing the possibility of just being kicked out.”

Defending the rights of asylum seekers

Migrant and human rights organizations here and across the country are preparing to fight Trump’s policies.

“The Trump administration will face an immigrants’ rights movement that is stronger than ever before,” said Lindsay Toczylowski, CEO of the Los Angeles-based Immigrant Defenders Law Center, in a statement.

“We believe Trump when he promises to enact disastrous policies that aim to tear families apart, destabilize communities, and weaken our economy,” she said. “But the U.S. Constitution didn’t disappear overnight. We will use all the tools we have to protect and defend the rights of all immigrants and asylum seekers.”

Adriana Jasso, program coordinator for the U.S.-Mexico border program of the American Friends Service Committee, urged immigrant families in the country to get information about their rights. She said the organization is currently gathering and updating information with resources and legal orientation to assist the community.

“It’s natural that there’s uncertainty,” she said Wednesday as she stood in front of the U.S.-Mexico border fence where she and other volunteers have been offering assistance to migrants waiting to be picked up for processing by the Border Patrol.

But Jasso noted that “we’ve seen this movie before.”

“We’ve already been through four years (of the Trump administration),” she said. “The most important thing is that instead of panicking, people should get informed.”

But even then, the process to seek asylum will be more difficult.

Trump has said he plans to end the Biden administration’s cellphone app used by asylum seekers to schedule appointments to present themselves at ports of entry for asylum screening. From January 2023 to September 2024 about 852,000 people had used the app to schedule appointments, according to CBP.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Trump breaks GOP losing streak in nation’s largest majority-Arab city with a pivotal final week

National Politics |


Trump has vowed to kill offshore wind in the US. Will he succeed?

National Politics |


A look at those who could be on Trump’s health team short list

National Politics |


Trump names Stephen Miller to be deputy chief of policy in new administration

National Politics |


Trump chooses New York Rep. Elise Stefanik as ambassador to United Nations

The wait can be long, up to nine months, according to a recent report by the Strauss Center at the University of Texas at Austin. The long wait has led thousands of migrants to cross from areas between ports of entry and turn themselves in to the U.S. Border Patrol.

Back at the Tijuana shelter, Mejía is helping in the kitchen as she always does, preparing to serve meals to the 130 migrants currently waiting for an appointment.

Mejía shared that one of the other cooks used to live near her house in the same neighborhood in Michoacán, but they only met for the first time at the shelter in Tijuana.

It looks like a normal day with all of the chatter and laughter, but an undercurrent of fear and uncertainty pulse through the shelter.

Mejía and her family left Michoacán to escape the violence, and she said they can’t go back. “We all pray to God that there is a chance for us to be let in the U.S.,” she said.

(Staff writer Emily Alvarenga contributed to this report.)

When to catch the last supermoon of the year

posted in: News | 0

By MARCIA DUNN, AP Aerospace Writer

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) — Better catch this week’s supermoon. It will be a while until the next one.

This will be the year’s fourth and final supermoon, looking bigger and brighter than usual as it comes within about 225,000 miles (361,867 kilometers) of Earth on Thursday. It won’t reach its full lunar phase until Friday.

The supermoon rises after the peak of the Taurid meteor shower and before the Leonids are most active.

Last month’s supermoon was 2,800 miles (4,500 kilometers) closer, making it the year’s closest. The series started in August.

In 2025, expect three supermoons beginning in October.

What makes a moon so super?

More a popular term than a scientific one, a supermoon occurs when a full lunar phase syncs up with an especially close swing around Earth. This usually happens only three or four times a year and consecutively, given the moon’s constantly shifting, oval-shaped orbit.

A supermoon obviously isn’t bigger, but it can appear that way, although scientists say the difference can be barely perceptible.

How do supermoons compare?

This year features a quartet of supermoons.

The one in August was 224,917 miles (361,970 kilometers) away. September’s was 222,131 miles (357,486 kilometers) away. A partial lunar eclipse also unfolded that night, visible in much of the Americas, Africa and Europe as Earth’s shadow fell on the moon, resembling a small bite.

October’s supermoon was the year’s closest at 222,055 miles (357,364 kilometers) from Earth. This month’s supermoon will make its closest approach on Thursday with the full lunar phase the next day.

What’s in it for me?

Scientists point out that only the keenest observers can discern the subtle differences. It’s easier to detect the change in brightness — a supermoon can be 30% brighter than average.

With the U.S. and other countries ramping up lunar exploration with landers and eventually astronauts, the moon beckons brighter than ever.

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Trump has vowed to kill offshore wind in the US. Will he succeed?

posted in: Politics | 0

By WAYNE PARRY

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) — Opponents of offshore wind energy projects expect President-elect Donald Trump to kill an industry he has vowed to end on the first day he returns to the White House.

But it might not be that easy.

Many of the largest offshore wind companies put a brave face on the election results, pledging to work with Trump and Congress to build power projects and ignoring the incoming president’s oft-stated hostility to them.

In campaign appearances, Trump railed against offshore wind and promised to sign an executive order to block such projects.

“We are going to make sure that that ends on Day 1,” Trump said in a May speech. “I’m going to write it out in an executive order. It’s going to end on Day 1.”

“They destroy everything, they’re horrible, the most expensive energy there is,” Trump said. “They ruin the environment, they kill the birds, they kill the whales.”

Numerous federal and state scientific agencies say there is no evidence linking offshore wind preparation to a spate of whale deaths along the U.S. East Coast in recent years. Turbines have been known to kill shorebirds, but the industry and regulators say there are policies to mitigate harm to the environment.

Trump has railed against offshore wind turbines spoiling the view from a golf course he owns in Scotland. But numerous environmental groups say the real reason he opposes offshore wind is his support for the fossil fuel industry.

There is almost 65 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity under development in the U.S., enough to power more than 26 million homes, and some turbines are already spinning in several states, according to the American Clean Power Association.

Currently operating projects include the Block Island Wind Farm in Rhode Island, the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind pilot project and the South Fork Wind Farm about 35 miles (56 kilometers) east of Montauk Point on New York’s Long Island.

Trump is unlikely to end those projects but might have more leverage over ones still in the planning stage, those in the debate say.

Bob Stern, who headed an office in the U.S. Energy Department responsible for environmental protection during the Ford, Carter and Reagan administrations, said Trump can get Congress to reduce or eliminate tax credits for offshore wind that were granted in the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act. Those credits are an integral part of the finances of many offshore wind projects.

Stern, who leads the New Jersey anti-offshore wind group Save LBI, said Trump also could issue executive orders prohibiting further offshore leases and rescinding approval for ones already approved while pushing Congress to amend federal laws granting more protection for marine mammals.

The president-elect also can appoint leaders of agencies involved in offshore wind regulation who would be hostile to it or less supportive.

Opponents of offshore wind, many of them Republicans, were giddy following the election, saying they fully expect Trump to put an end to the industry.

“I believe this is a tipping point for the offshore wind industry in America,” said Robin Shaffer, president of Protect Our Coast NJ, one of the most vocal groups opposing offshore wind on the East Coast. “They have been given a glidepath by Democrat-run administrations at the federal and state level for many years. For this industry, (Tuesday’s) results will bring headwinds far greater than they have faced previously.”

But Tina Zappile, director of the Hughes Center for Public Policy at New Jersey’s Stockton University, noted that in 2018, Trump Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke voiced strong support for offshore wind. And even though the president-elect has bashed the technology, she predicted he won’t just make it go away.

“Offshore wind might appear to be on the chopping block — Trump’s explicitly said this was something he’d fix on the first day — but when the economics of offshore wind are in alignment with his overall strategies of returning manufacturing to America and becoming energy-independent, his administration is likely to back away slowly from this claim,” she said in an interview. “Offshore wind may be temporarily hampered, but its long-term prospects in the U.S. are unlikely to be hurt.”

Commercial fishermen in Maine said they hope the Trump administration will undo policies designed to help build and approve offshore wind projects, saying regulators attempted to “future-proof” the industry against political change. Jerry Leeman, CEO of the New England Fishermen’s Stewardship Association, called on Trump to reverse a commitment to deploy 30 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030.

The offshore wind industry is taking an optimistic stance, pledging to work with Trump his political allies. National and New Jersey wind industry groups, and several offshore wind developers including Atlantic Shores and Denmark-based Orsted, issued similarly worded statements highlighting terms likely to appeal to Republicans including job creation, economic development and national security.

“By combining the strengths of all domestic energy resources, the Trump administration can advance an economy that is dynamic, secure, and clean,” Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association, said in a statement. “We are committed to working with the Trump-Vance administration and the new Congress to continue this great American success story.”

But few Republicans were in a welcoming mood following the election. New Jersey Assemblyman Paul Kanitra listed the major offshore wind companies in a Facebook post, saying, “It’s time to pack your bags and get the hell away from the Jersey Shore, our marine life, fishing industry and beautiful beaches.”

Kanitra said he was looking forward “to your stock prices tanking.” And that was starting to happen.

Related Articles

National Politics |


A look at those who could be on Trump’s health team short list

National Politics |


Trump names Stephen Miller to be deputy chief of policy in new administration

National Politics |


Trump chooses New York Rep. Elise Stefanik as ambassador to United Nations

National Politics |


Kremlin rejects reports of a conversation last week between Putin and Trump

National Politics |


Trump announces Tom Homan, former director of immigration enforcement, will serve as ‘border czar’

The stock prices of European offshore wind companies, many of which are planning or building projects on the U.S. East Coast, plunged amid fears the new administration would seek to slow or end such projects. Orsted closed down nearly 14% on Wednesday and was down 11% over the past five days. Turbine manufacturer Vestas Wind Systems was down nearly 24% over that same period.

Rep. Jeff Van Drew, a New Jersey Republican, hosted Trump at a rally earlier this year at which Trump again vowed to kill offshore wind.

“We are currently working out the specifics of what that will look like once he takes office again this January,” VanDrew said. “President Trump is a good friend of New Jersey, and he understands the devastating impact these projects will have on our communities.”

Follow Wayne Parry on X.

A look at those who could be on Trump’s health team short list

posted in: Politics | 0

Ariel Cohen | (TNS) CQ-Roll Call

President-elect Donald Trump has pledged to involve anti-vaccine activist and conspiracy theorist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in his next administration in some capacity, but whoever else he picks to run the major health agencies will have a major impact on the GOP health agenda of the next four years.

Top posts require Senate confirmation, meaning Trump will need Senate buy-in too. Positions include Health and Human Services secretary, which requires Senate confirmation; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director, which will require Senate confirmation beginning in January 2025; Food and Drug Administration commissioner and National Institutes of Health director, which also require Senate confirmation.

Republican health priorities will likely include increased health care transparency and lowering drug costs, as well as limiting health care access for LGBTQ individuals and, potentially, further limiting access to abortion. This might look like rolling back Title X regulations, which are federal dollars for family planning, or the Mexico City policy, which blocks federal funding for nongovernmental organizations that provide abortion counseling or services.

It could also look like rollbacks of rules regarding nondiscrimination in health care, drug price negotiation interference or nursing home staffing mandates.

Here are some of the names being mentioned for future Trump health policy roles:

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Trump reiterated his pledge to involve RFK Jr. in his administration during his victory speech on Tuesday, but it’s unlikely he’ll be nominated to lead a major agency.

“He’s going to help make America healthy again. He’s a great guy and he really means it. He wants to do some things, and we’re going to let him go to it,” Trump told supporters at the West Palm Beach Convention Center during his victory speech Tuesday night.

In an MSNBC interview on Wednesday morning, Kennedy said he would clear out entire departments of the FDA, including the nutrition department, which was recently revamped as part of the agency’s effort to create a Human Foods Program.

Many experts say they imagine Kennedy will serve more as an informal adviser to Trump, because it could be difficult to get a majority of senators, even in a GOP-led chamber, to confirm him.

“I see someone like that a little more in kind of the Elon Musk type of role … somebody who is whispering in the ear of the administration,” said K&L Gates government affairs adviser and former RNC delegate Amy Carnevale.

Joseph A. Ladapo

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo is under consideration to lead HHS, ABC News first reported.

Like Kennedy, Ladapo is a vaccine skeptic.

Under his leadership, Florida skirted CDC pandemic guidelines regarding masks and social distancing, as well as vaccine requirements for children. In October 2022, he recommended that men between ages 18 and 39 avoid the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines because of a slightly increased risk for cardiac-related deaths. The study he referenced was widely criticized, and the FDA and CDC sent him a letter asking him to stop spreading disinformation.

Lapado was first appointed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis in 2021.

After Trump’s win, Ladapo tweeted on Wednesday that the “future of health freedom in America looked brighter.”

“Just as in Florida, it’s time to say ‘No’ to trampling on people’s rights, to gaslighting citizens about experimental vaccines that harm instead of help & to muzzling doctors who dissent with orthodoxy. Light triumphs over darkness,” he said.

Roger Severino

Roger Severino, the former director of the HHS Office of Civil Rights under Trump and current vice president of domestic policy at the Heritage Foundation, wrote the HHS portion of Project 2025.

Severino is one of the most vocal abortion opponents in the GOP. He has repeatedly said that the government should not treat abortion as health care and calls for reversing approval of medication abortion, codifying the Hyde amendment and removing the morning-after pill from the contraceptive mandate.

In Project 2025 he also encourages the NIH to stop promoting “junk gender science” and redefine the definition of sex so it does not include gender identity, among other things.

Brian Blase

Brian Blase, a former Trump special assistant to the president for economic policy at the White House’s National Economic Council and currently the president of Paragon Health Institute, could come back around for a second administration.

In his most recent email blast, Blase called Trump’s victory “an opportunity to build on the health care successes of his first term” — pointing mainly to policies that expanded the availability of short-term health plans, association health plans and price transparency.

During the Biden administration, Blase has been analyzing and promoting the expansion of health savings account plans. He has proposed providing lower-income exchange enrollees the option to receive a portion of their subsidy as a HSA deposit rather than a subsidy to the insurer.

He also argued against the Biden administration’s expansion of Medicaid during the COVID-19 public health emergency, and called for limiting the program’s scope to just the lowest-income and most vulnerable individuals.

Paul Mango

Mango, another former Trump administration official and an adviser at the Paragon Institute, served as HHS deputy chief of staff from 2019 through 2021 and served as HHS Secretary Alex Azar’s formal liaison to Operation Warp Speed. From 2018 to 2019, Mango served as chief of staff for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. His institutional knowledge of the department could be seen as an asset to an incoming Trump administration.

Eric Hargan

Another Trump administration alumni, Eric Hargan served as deputy HHS secretary under Trump and also as acting secretary. He also served on the board of Operation Warp Speed. Hargan oversaw the setup and launch of the pandemic-era Provider Relief Fund.

Hargan was also acting HHS deputy secretary under then-President George W. Bush.

These days he’s the founder and CEO of the Hargan Group, where he focuses on health care, government relations and public affairs.

Joe Grogan

Joe Grogan served as an assistant to Trump and director of his Domestic Policy Council. He also was a member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force in the early days of the pandemic. But Grogan didn’t stay in the administration the entirety of the first term and resigned in May 2020 to join Verde Technologies.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Trump names Stephen Miller to be deputy chief of policy in new administration

National Politics |


Trump chooses New York Rep. Elise Stefanik as ambassador to United Nations

National Politics |


Kremlin rejects reports of a conversation last week between Putin and Trump

National Politics |


Trump announces Tom Homan, former director of immigration enforcement, will serve as ‘border czar’

National Politics |


Young Black and Latino men say they chose Trump because of the economy and jobs. Here’s how and why

During his time in the White House, Grogan worked closely on efforts to lower drug costs, ban surprise medical bills and expand COVID-19 testing. He’s been a vocal opponent of the Biden administration’s policies to have Medicare negotiate drug costs, saying it would lead to less pharmaceutical innovation, and has repeatedly called for FDA reform to speed up the drug review and approval process.

These days Grogan is also at Paragon Health Institute where he serves as chairman of the board.

Bobby Jindal

The former Louisiana governor is now chair of the Center for a Healthy America, a wing of the America First Policy Institute, a conservative think tank advising Trump. Jindal’s focus on health policy isn’t new: he served as HHS assistant secretary under George W. Bush. Over the last few years he’s called for changes to the health care exchanges, increased price transparency measures and advocated against single-payer health care.

©2024 CQ-Roll Call, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Visit cqrollcall.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.