Trump draws criticism with AI image of himself as the pope ahead of the papal conclave

posted in: All news | 0

By NICOLE WINFIELD and JILL COLVIN

NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump posted an artificial intelligence-generated image of himself dressed as pope as the mourning of Pope Francis continues and just days before the conclave to elect his successor is set to begin. Trump’s action drew rebukes from a group representing Catholic bishops in New York and among Italians.

The image, shared Friday night on Trump’s Truth Social site and later reposted by the White House on its official X account, raised eyebrows on social media and at the Vatican, which is still in the period of nine days of official mourning following Francis’ death on April 21. Catholic cardinals have been celebrating daily Masses in his memory and are due to open the conclave to elect his successor on Wednesday.

The death of a pope and election of another is a matter of utmost solemnity for Catholics, for whom the pope is Christ’s vicar on Earth. That is all the more true in Italy, where the papacy is held in high esteem even by nonreligious Italians.

The image featuring Trump in a white cassock and pointed miter, or bishop’s hat, was the topic of several questions during the Vatican’s daily conclave briefing Saturday. Italian and Spanish news reports lamented its poor taste and said it was offensive, given that the period of official mourning is still underway.

Left-leaning former Premier Matteo Renzi said the image was shameful. “This is an image that offends believers, insults institutions and shows that the leader of the right-wing world enjoys clowning around,” Renzi wrote on X. “Meanwhile, the U.S. economy risks recession and the dollar loses value. The sovereignists are doing damage, everywhere.”

The Vatican spokesman, Matteo Bruni, declined to comment.

In the United States, the New York State Catholic Conference, which represents the bishops of the state in working with government, accused Trump of mockery.

“There is nothing clever or funny about this image, Mr. President,” they wrote. “We just buried our beloved Pope Francis and the cardinals are about to enter a solemn conclave to elect a new successor of St. Peter. Do not mock us.”

Italy’s left-leaning La Repubblica also featured the image on its homepage Saturday with a commentary accusing Trump of “pathological megalomania.”

Asked to respond to the criticism, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that, “President Trump flew to Italy to pay his respects for Pope Francis and attend his funeral, and he has been a staunch champion for Catholics and religious liberty.”

Jack Posobiec, a prominent far-right influencer and Trump ally who recently participated in a Catholic prayer event in March at Trump’s Florida resort, also defended the president.

“I’m Catholic. We’ve all been making jokes about the upcoming Pope selection all week. It’s called a sense of humor,” he wrote on X.

The episode comes after Trump joked last week about his interest in the vacancy. “I’d like to be pope. That would be my number one choice,” the thrice married president, who is not Catholic, told reporters.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a close Trump ally, piled on.

“I was excited to hear that President Trump is open to the idea of being the next Pope. This would truly be a dark horse candidate, but I would ask the papal conclave and Catholic faithful to keep an open mind about this possibility!” Graham, R-S.C., wrote on X. “The first Pope-U.S. President combination has many upsides. Watching for white smoke…. Trump MMXXVIII!”

Vice President JD Vance, who is Catholic and was one of the last foreign officials to meet with Francis before the pope died, also joked about Secretary of State Marco Rubio becoming pope, suggesting Rubio could add it to the long list of titles he holds, including national security adviser and acting archivist.

Beyond floating himself for the job, Trump also has put in a plug for Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the archbishop of New York.

“I have no preference. I must say, we have a cardinal that happens to be out a place called New York who’s very good. So we’ll see what happens,” he said.

Dolan, 75, is one of 10 U.S. cardinals who will be voting in the conclave, but Trump’s pitch might have cost Dolan support.

The reason conclaves are held in secrecy, with cardinals sequestered for the duration, is to prevent outside secular powers from influencing their choice, as occurred in centuries past.

There is an old saying about campaigning for the job of pope or of being promoted excessively, especially by outsiders: If you “enter a conclave as pope, you leave as a cardinal.”

While Trump attended Francis’ funeral, he and Vance have clashed with U.S. bishops in general and Francis in particular over the administration’s hard line stance on immigration and its efforts to deport migrants en masse. Right before he was hospitalized in February for pneumonia, Francis issued a strong rebuke of the administration’s mass deportation plans and Vance’s theological justification of it.

Over 12 years as pope, Francis tried to remake the U.S. Catholic hierarchy more in his image, elevating pastors who prioritized social justice and migration issues over culture warriors who were more favored by his more doctrinaire predecessors St. John Paul II and Benedict XVI. A new pope who is more conservative could reverse that effort.

Trump has nominated as his ambassador to the Holy See Brian Burch, whose Catholicvote.org has been aggressively covering the pre-conclave days at the Vatican. It was one of the main disseminators in English-speaking media of a report, flatly and officially denied by the Vatican, that Cardinal Pietro Parolin had had a health scare this past week that required medical attention.

Parolin was the secretary of state under Francis and is seen as a leading contender to be pope. He is also the main architect of the Vatican’s China policy and its controversial 2018 deal with Beijing over bishop nominations — a deal that the was sharply criticized by the first Trump administration.

___ Winfield reported from Vatican City.

Debate on unemployment benefits for school workers derails key MN budget piece

posted in: All news | 0

Education continues to be one the biggest points of contention for Minnesota lawmakers putting the new state budget together, and a disagreement over unemployment insurance for hourly school workers has derailed progress with just two weeks left in the session.

This past week, it appeared that Democratic-Farmer-Labor and Republican House members found agreement to end a newly created unemployment benefit for hourly workers in 2028 — despite pressure from labor groups and the DFL’s progressive wing.

Historically, school staff like bus drivers, cafeteria staff and paraprofessionals did not qualify for unemployment insurance in the summer or other breaks in the school year. Backers of extending the benefit argued that it’s unfair to exclude those workers from unemployment.

DFL-controlled Legislature granted hourly school workers unemployment insurance in 2023, and while the state was set to fund it through 2027, school districts would eventually have to pick up the cost. Critics have said it’s an unfunded mandate for school districts and local taxpayers.

Change of course

A compromise education budget proposal ending the mandate, which had been signed by House Education Finance Co-Chairs Cheryl Youakim, DFL-Hopkins, and Ron Kresha, appeared to be headed toward the House floor this past week.

But the DFL changed course Wednesday in the House Rules Committee.

“We as Democrats are going to stand up for workers,” said Rep. Luke Frederick, DFL-Mankato. “We’re going to stand up for Minnesotans to make sure the best bills that get passed off the floor of the House are going to be the best that they can be. And this bill is not that.”

DFLers blocked the bill from moving forward in what would have been the bill’s final stop before a floor vote. The state House is presently tied 67-67 between the parties, so committees are split down the middle. The education finance bill stalled in committee in an 8-8 vote on Wednesday.

GOP response

Republicans said they were frustrated with the DFL making an about-face on an apparent deal as time left in the regular session dwindles. Rep. Peggy Scott, R-Andover, noted lawmakers only have a few weeks to pass the budget or they’ll have to return to the Capitol for a special session.

She also asked DFLers what else they might change in the education finance bill to reduce the burden of state mandates on local schools if they wanted to keep the unemployment insurance for hourly workers.

“If you’re going to stick that one back in what other mandates are you going to roll back so our school districts don’t continue to be in a deficit position, where they’re going to have to pass that down to the property taxpayers?” she said.

A flashpoint in negotiations

Unemployment insurance for hourly workers is not a significant portion of the state’s multibillion-dollar education budget. The 2023 bill provided around $135 million to cover the program for four years, though the state has already burned through most of that money at this point.

But even though it isn’t a huge portion of the budget, its emerged as flashpoint in negotiations on one of the biggest pieces of state spending.

Scott and other Republicans decried what they called DFL obstruction, though Rep. Michael Richard, DFL-Richfield, called the debate over unemployment insurance a policy matter, not a funding matter.

“The obstacle is Republicans insisting on extreme policy that harms workers,” he said. “The provision in question, to take away unemployment insurance for paraprofessionals, for our school bus drivers for workers making $17 an hour, is not necessary to pass our state budget.”

The sides haven’t given up on a deal. On Thursday, the Rules Committee moved to place the education finance bill on the calendar for a House floor vote on Monday, pending a new deal on education. A compromise hadn’t been publicly approved as of Friday evening.

Budget bills

A stream of budget bills continues to move through the Senate and House, though human services and education — the biggest spending areas in the current two-year state budget of a bit over $70 million — remain the biggest snags for lawmakers.

On the human services side, Republicans have been trying to cut state-funded health care benefits for people in the country illegally, which the DFL-controlled government also approved in 2023. There are also talks about cuts to the DFL-created paid family and medical leave program set to go live in January 2026.

There will be cuts this year, though just how big they’ll be and where they’ll happen is up for discussion as the clock continues to tick. Minnesota is set to have a $456 million surplus for the next two years, but that’ll give way to a $5 billion deficit in 2028-2029.

Walz proposed in his $66 billion two-year budget big cutes to long-term disability reimbursements and nursing home aid, as well as reimbursements for special education.

The regular session ends on May 19, and lawmakers have to pass a two-year budget by the end of June 30 or the state government shuts down. In the last decade, there’s been a special session every time control of government is split between the parties.

Related Articles


St. Paul, MN Wild trim Xcel Center’s state request from $400M to $50M


Minnesota loosens distance exemption on state employee return to office order


Minnesota Senate OKs liquor bill with ‘social districts’ provision


MN House passes bill recognizing Hmong, Lao veterans of ‘Secret War’


Disability funding, taxes at issue as MN Legislature crafts state budget

How Anthony Edwards cracked the NBA’s codes: ‘I think he’s a genius’

posted in: All news | 0

Anthony Edwards was bamboozled during Minnesota’s Game 2 loss in the first round to the Lakers.

The guard finished with 25 points and six assists, but the team’s ball movement stunk and its superstar contributed to the cause. Nothing flowed as easily as it did in a Game 1 victory, and Edwards’ decisiveness took a precipitous dip between the two battles.

“It seemed like every time I caught the ball, (the defense) kind of went like in a zone, in a sense,” Edwards said after the game. “So, it was kind of confusing at times.”

Edwards noted a lack of defensive attention paid to cutters, and while Timberwolves coach Chris Finch said the Lakers didn’t change anything from Game 1 to Game 2, the guard’s befuddlement was clear. He needed answers, and he knew where to look.

“When I go back and watch the film,” Edwards said, “I should be able to find things.”

Indeed, with a little help from a trusted ally.

Minnesota won the next three games of the series to close the Lakers out, with Edwards especially taking center stage as the best player on a star-studded Target Center court for Games 3 and 4. The Wolves are in the second round for consecutive seasons for the first time in franchise history. They’ll open the conference semifinals on Tuesday against either Houston or Golden State.

Against the Lakers, Edwards averaged 26.8 points, 6.2 assists and just 1.2 turnovers. His assist-to-turnover ratio (5.2) is easily the best among all high-usage players in these playoffs.

Chris Hines is Minnesota’s director of player development. Edwards is one of his assigned players. Part of the job entails hours of film work spent between player and coach.

One thing Hines has discovered about Edwards is that the guard is mentally at his best in the dead of the night. So, in the wee hours one morning between Game 2 and Game 3 — Edwards estimates it was around 4 a.m. — the guard received a call from Hines.

“He called me like, ‘You woke?’ ” Edwards recalled. “ ‘I’m seeing stuff.’ ”

They went over a number of things that defined what the Lakers were doing defensively and how Edwards and his teammates could better approach the scheme. Edwards fired off a couple clips to forward Julius Randle.

The wheels were turning. The results were instant.

The last five minutes of Game 3 marked Edwards’ best end-of-game offensive performance of the season. He was a surgeon, dissecting the Lakers’ defense to get good offense for himself and others. Los Angeles was helpless. The play of the night came with Minnesota leading by three with three minutes to play. Edwards started to … well, just let him explain it.

“I think we ran an action to get Luka (Doncic) to switch (onto me), and they didn’t switch. I seen them about to double me, so I just tried to attack Luka,” Edwards said. “I got to the baseline and … since the first game (of the series), they’ve been taking away the corners. I didn’t have to look at the wing, I knew somebody was on the wing, whether it was Naz (Reid) or Donte (DiVincenzo). I really couldn’t even see him. I just threw it to the wing, because I knew somebody was going to be there.”

Sure enough, there was Reid. The forward cashed the open, catch-and-shoot triple to blow the lid off Target Center. It was Edwards who entered the launch code for liftoff.

‘A genius’

Folks used to ask Justin Holland, Edwards’ business manager, who trained the guard on the court for years, “How much more do you think he has in the tank?” Holland always answered that Edwards was only about 60% of the player he could eventually be.

“When he got into the league, he was just a pure athlete, and he was doing well just off his God-given ability, but not really thinking the game and reading the game.” Holland said. “This is exactly what I was talking about: understanding the game, making the right reads.”

He’s cracking new codes on a near nightly basis.

“He has gone from being super frustrated for not being able to play the kind of game he has wanted to play to embracing it, figuring it out in the moment a lot better. It used to take him a while,” Finch said. “Now, I see him directing his teammates where he wants them in certain situations, which is really good, because now he’s thinking a pass or two ahead.”

Early in his rookie season, Edwards was asked where his seemingly advanced “feel” for the game was born.

“I’m smarter than a lot of people think,” he said.

The general public knows Edwards is an insanely competitive, remarkable athlete with high-end leadership skills, a magnetic charisma and sense of humor. It’s possible the latter, along with his often curse-filled vernacular, cloak his intellect.

“But honestly,” Holland said, “if you really dig into his humor, it’s very witty.”

The funniest people know exactly what to say in every set of circumstances. That’s Edwards.

“He’s one of the smartest humans I’ve ever been around,” Holland said.

Holland noted you don’t navigate life the way Edwards has — going from someone who everyone counted out as a kid to the top of the professional sports world — without being brilliant. Hines took it a step further.

“I think he’s a genius,” he said.

Hines likened Edwards’ memory to that of an elephant. The coach will mention something in passing, and weeks later Edwards will not only recount it, but apply it appropriately on the floor or in film.

“He retains a lot of information,” Hines said. “Not only visually, but within readings, within scripts, within player movement and body movement, within repetitive movement on the court. … He can translate information, take it, but still be himself within that.”

Holland believes that’s been a major aid in Edwards’ development.

“He’s one of the few guys that gets better every year, because he picks up things so fast,” Holland said. “(With) his ability to internalize what’s being said to him, him being a visual learner. If he sees something, he can mimic it almost instantly.”

Accept ‘the bad’

Finch has long lauded Edwards’ willingness to be coached, an attribute has helped set the tone for the organization as a whole. For Edwards, it stems from a passion for learning, and his need to be great.

“When he says, ‘I can do everything good,’ he really believes it,” Holland said. “And if he can’t do everything good, then he makes sure that he gets to the point that he’s really good at it. That’s just all the way around in his life.”

From a silly game on his phone to ping pong or spades. Holland noted Edwards was not good at the latter two when he first picked them up. That’s since changed.

“He’s like, ‘I have to master this game,’ ” Holland said.

But the path to earning your black belt in basketball is not clearly defined. Rules and rosters change. Even the things that seem simple at the surface likely have multiple hidden layers beneath. Obstacles on the road to greatness appear all over the place.

Edwards’ initial instinct is to run right through them.

It rarely works, but that’s almost part of Minnesota’s blueprint at this point. On a recent episode of the podcast ‘Pardon My Take,’ Finch noted that while the Wolves have always held Edwards accountable and coached him hard, they’ve also given the guard “an incredible amount of freedom to figure it out.”

“I think that was the only way he was going to learn,” Finch said. “If he went into a super overly structured, patterned environment, I’m not sure that would’ve benefitted him early on. If he went into a system where there was a ton of off-ball movement and cutting and reading, all that stuff, I’m not sure that would’ve benefited him early on.”

Fans have watched in awe as Edwards has defied the boundaries of physics for years. It’s part of his allure, but it can also be his Kryptonite. There are times in prep where Hines will explain “the right play” to Edwards — which is often to get off the ball — and the guard counters by pointing out a sliver of space he believes he can attack.

His physical gifts have generated this off-the-charts confidence that is a massive asset, but can also blur the line between fearless and foolish. Dipping his toe into the bad end of that pool has led to some frustrating performances and even the occasional cringe-worthy postgame comment.

Hines refers to those instances as Edwards “bumping his head” against the wall.

“That’s where he has to say, OK, is he being smart within himself, or is he fighting the game? There’s two sides to it,” Hines said. “And he has lost. He’ll say, ‘I can get through that hole,’ and he can’t do it, and he’s like, ‘(Shoot, coach) was right, get off it early.’ ”

It often is that quick of a revelation.

‘The biggest thing I’ve seen is during ‘down times’ throughout the year of him not necessarily making the right play is he’s learned from it and come back from it,” Wolves guard Donte DiVincenzo said.

Insane, Edwards is not. His failures are rarely repeated over extended periods of time. Some of his biggest leaps are born from struggles.

“The thing about watching film is you got to be willing to accept the bad. I think most people, they only want to watch it when it’s good,” Edwards said. “I want to watch the games when I play bad … like, what could I have done better? And I think that’s the perspective that helped me change as far as my playmaking and seeing the floor. I want to see what I can do better.”

Until his better is the best.

Defying limits

Minnesota’s loose leash with Edwards is two-fold. Yes, it’s provided the room for failure that induces growth. But it’s also helped the Timberwolves redefine what’s possible. Because while Edwards often “bumps his head” when pushing a boundary, there are also moments when he breaks through.

For instance, everything you know about basketball suggests attacking a double team with the dribble is a bad idea. But that pass to Reid for the 3-pointer at the end of Game 3 came after Edwards raced around two defenders and drew in a third opponent before he got off the ball.

In last year’s conference semifinal victory over Denver, it was common practice for Edwards to beat multiple guys to the edge, turn the corner and score at the rim.

“I’m like, ‘Oh (shoot), you are fast that way. OK, cool, so how do we develop that and get it to the highest level?” Hines said. “When it comes to coaching, everybody looks at it like, ‘Hey, he’s a coach, he should have all the answers. He’s the guy.’ (But) players are intelligent, too. The player actually tells you what they see, and then you have to go back and evaluate it.”

The Timberwolves’ offensive process has evolved into a constant collaboration. At halftime of Game 1 against the Lakers, it was Edwards who explained to his teammates and coaches how he wanted the floor spaced to exploit the way Los Angeles was tilting its defense heavily toward Edwards and Randle.

Minnesota scored 35 points in the third quarter to pull away.

“That’s what you want,” Finch said. “It’s got to be a relationship.”

One rooted in trust. Edwards firmly believes Finch, Hines and Co. have a strong understanding of his strengths and weaknesses, and are scheming with his best interests in mind. Meanwhile, the coaching staff is confident Edwards has seen, comprehends and can handle every defensive look in the book.

Hines “loves” the dynamic that has been established between all parties within the organization. The results speak for themselves.

“We’re at that stage now where he’s provided a lot of great feedback on things that he sees, things that he understands now that maybe he didn’t even a year ago, certainly before that,” Finch said. “I’ve always talked about having left and right bumpers for him, and giving him a ton of freedom. I think he thrives in that, and now it’s just (to) keep moving those bumpers out a bit as he grows and understands more about the game.”

Related Articles


Julius Randle looks like the Timberwolves’ perfect Robin


Five reasons the Timberwolves beat the Lakers in five games


Narrative-busting Timberwolves knock out Lakers, advance to West semifinals


Frederick: Anthony Edwards is NBA’s next must-see star, whether he likes it or not


Is this lineup the Timberwolves’ clutch-time solution?

Daniel Moss: Is America alone? Not yet, but it’s trying

posted in: All news | 0

This trade war is no ordinary crisis of the kind that buffeted capitalism periodically in the past few generations. It’s less a storm, Singapore’s deputy premier asserts, and more like “a tidal wave.” When leaders of a successful, trade-dependent nation talk this way, it demands attention.

And yet … for all its power, the analogy doesn’t quite capture the shift in mood since Donald Trump returned to the White House. There’s more to the sense of dislocation than mere tariffs — it’s the undergraduate way they were unveiled and then suspended. The independence of the Federal Reserve faces renewed threats. The bullishness with which U.S. markets were regarded has dissipated; the dollar has been hammered, stocks are down, recession fears are up. And government bonds, not usually prone to sharp fluctuations, have gyrated in troubling ways.

Finance ministers in Washington for International Monetary Fund and World Bank meetings must have felt like they landed on another planet. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent pledged qualified support for the two institutions, which were born under U.S. auspices as World War II neared an end. That this was greeted with relief shows how much crockery has been broken.

The turmoil forces some uncomfortable questions, which, though not entirely new, tended to be considered something for another day. Suddenly, the primacy of the dollar, and even the relative safety of U.S. securities, are open to debate. The wisdom of relying on Washington’s guarantees, in both the economic and diplomatic fields, is getting fresh scrutiny.

“Nothing is long-run anymore,” Markus K. Brunnermeier, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, told a symposium last week. “Everybody will just be more flexible.” Assets perceived to be safe now look shaky. To not have a Plan B, other than looking to the U.S. for salvation, as during the 2008 subprime meltdown and the outbreak of COVID-19, is to court poor outcomes.

The gathering’s somber tone seems an important marker for assessing Trump’s second term. In December, as investors were trying to get a handle on how it might differ from his first, Peterson and the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy convened a conference in Singapore. One session posed what then seemed like a provocative question: What would a world without the U.S. look like? It felt a bit premature, and there were no reassuring conclusions. American power wasn’t going away.

If Washington’s credibility is diminished, it’s entirely on the president. He has deliberately taken an ax to a pre-requisite for influence: dependability. The disruption Trump has wrought is testimony to the sway America still has. But this demonstration of clout, deployed to cause harm to both ally and opponent, might contain the seeds of diminishment.

Discussions at last month’s event showed the slippage. Warwick McKibbin, a professor at the Australian National University who sat on the board of the Reserve Bank, floated how much additional protection investors might require to buy Treasuries. Would an extra yield of 100 basis points do the trick?

My attention was really grabbed when the Asian Monetary Fund got a mention. That was a concept I hadn’t heard about in years. The fund was an attempt in the late 1990s to develop a rescue reserve among the region’s governments. The idea was that they not be so dependent for emergency loans on the International Monetary Fund and its biggest shareholder, the U.S. Treasury. Japan was to play a big role and the plan had a number of boosters, including Malaysian leader Mahathir Mohamad. But without American support, the venture foundered.

Its struggles ultimately showed how hard it was to develop a meaningful architecture in the face of U.S. resistance. Hurdles would remain today, not least that the dollar, for all its flaws, has to be part of the arrangement. Even China doesn’t want a divorce. As long as the yuan isn’t traded freely, there will be considerable limits to just how much it will challenge the greenback, assuming Beijing even really wants that.

The world is still the dollar’s, and by implication America’s, to lose. It’s disconcerting that the alternatives are getting a hearing. America isn’t yet alone, though that’s not for want of trying. Singapore, with its huge container port and world class airport, is right to be very worried. In this, the city-state has plenty of company.

Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously, he was executive editor for economics at Bloomberg News.

Related Articles


Sheldon H. Jacobson: TSA isn’t perfect, but it’s way better than the alternatives


Lee Fang: Is your favorite influencer’s opinion bought and sold?


Javier Blas: It’s electricity realism, not climate denialism


Solomon D. Stevens: Want to do something about polarized society? Stop shouting slogans


Merrill, Grayson: Let states take the lead on voter verification