One Tech Tip: Keeping up with your Halloween trick-or-treaters with these tricks

posted in: All news | 0

By SHAWN CHEN

NEW YORK (AP) — For little ghosts, witches, KPop Demon Hunters and superheroes, Halloween is one of the most exciting nights of the year. But it’s also one of the busiest for parents as they try to keep track of their trick-or-treaters, give out candy and watch over their homes.

Related Articles


Como Park Zoo & Conservatory issues last call for Mold-A-Rama magic


Immersive event in Minneapolis marks 50th anniversary of Vietnam War’s end


Cambodia opens a new $2 billion airport to serve Phnom Penh


A new book takes a stab at explaining how ‘Scream’ changed horror films


Eye-opening apples: 3 recipes explore our favorite fruit’s savory side

Fortunately, there are some tech tricks out there that can help families stay safe this Halloween, and have a little more fun too.

Keeping tabs on your kids

If your children are outfitted with Apple or Google-branded smart phones or watches or tracking tags, you can use the Find My or Family Link apps to keep tabs on them as they embark on their candy journeys. But don’t think of these apps as basic. Because branded peripherals — like Apple Air Tags or Pixel smartwatches — are built to be used with Apple and Google platforms, their tracking platforms can be more reliable than some third-party services.

One trick I discovered last Halloween is that I can set up a geofence with Find My. This gave my kids a little more freedom to navigate a set trick-or-treating area while I struggled to keep up with them. If anyone broke from the pack and left the designated area, I would get a notification. Here’s how to set it up:

Go to the Find My app on your iPhone. Scroll and tap on the name of the person or device you want to be notified about. Below notifications, tap “Add,” then “Notify me.” Continue through the menu options until you get to a location option. Choose “New Location” and you will be given the option to set a location radius. Then you will be asked how often you wish to be notified if the tracked individual leaves the area.

Next is a critical step if you wish to set a recurring notification. Unless it’s an air tag, your child must give a one-time authorization to the request. They will receive an alert asking for approval when they arrive at or leave the location you chose for the first time.

Google users have a similar geofencing option. First, you need to set up a new Family Location in the Family Link app. Then select your child in the main menu of the app and tap Family Locations, add the place you just created and select how often you’d like to be notified when they enter or exit the area.

Spookier doorbells

If you have a smart doorbell installed on your front door, you can have a little extra fun with visiting trick-or-treaters by adding spooky messages and specialized chimes.

For Ring doorbell users, head to your app and go to Menu-Devices. Select your doorbell. Then tap Smart Responses-Quick Replies-Quick Reply Message. You may need to toggle on Quick Replies if you hadn’t before, but you will see a list of Halloween-themed replies. Ours is set to “I’ll be right there to eat… I mean greet you!”

For those with Eufy Doorbells, navigate to your app and select your doorbell. A Voice Response list should include selectable Halloween-themed effects and chimes. You can also take advantage of a message recording function in more recent doorbell models to create your own, hopefully scary, response.

Nest and Google home users should be able to use their app to select a Halloween setting under Doorbell Themes (Google was updating Nest in October so your menu may be different from mine).

One unrelated tip for smart doorbell users, you may want to lower your motion sensitivity just for Halloween. If your device isn’t hardwired, the extra motion from trick-or-treaters could drain your doorbell’s batteries quickly (as I discovered). You can also avoid a flood of notifications if you do so.

Don’t forget the lights

Smart phones have flashlights, sure, but they’re not the brightest nor are they the best option if you’re carrying jackets, candy baskets, water bottles or costume parts. Instead, give yourself or your children more portable lumens so they can see (and be seen) easily in the dark.

There are plenty of options for all budget ranges, but I’m partial to lights that you can clip onto jackets or costumes to keep your hands free.

The nation’s community health centers face money troubles

posted in: All news | 0

Shalina Chatlani, Stateline.org

NEW YORK — On a busy street in Queens, New York, just around the corner from a halal hot chicken sandwich restaurant and a barber shop, the Long Island City Health Center welcomes its patients into a brightly lit waiting room, painted baby blue and filled with soft white and gray seats.

Related Articles


How do you know if you have a gambling problem?


How many steps do you need? Researchers found 4,000 steps led to benefits for older group


Contaminated meat was linked to 1 in 5 UTIs, according to a study


Private Medicare, Medicaid plans exaggerate in-network mental health options, watchdogs say


‘Chemtrail’ theories warn of health dangers from contrails. The idea takes wing at Kennedy’s HHS

A woman working behind the desk on a recent weekday answered one patient’s questions in Spanish. Other patients came dressed in hijabs, kurtas or other traditional clothing from countries around the globe. A caseworker assigned to the center rolled one woman, wheelchair-bound because of a stroke, toward an examination room.

The Long Island City Health Center is part of a national network of more than 1,300 community health centers, safety-net clinics that served more than 31 million patients in 2023, according to KFF, a health research nonprofit. The clinics are located in areas where there aren’t many doctors or hospitals, and they provide care to all patients, regardless of their ability to pay.

Thanks largely to their broad reach, the centers have long enjoyed bipartisan support. But the federal government shutdown, freezes to federal grants, looming cuts to Medicaid and new Trump administration policies barring some immigrants from receiving care at the centers have put them under financial stress.

Community health centers disproportionately serve low-income people, people of color and rural residents. In 2023, 90% of patients had incomes at or below 200% of the federal poverty level, according to KFF. Forty percent of patients were Hispanic, 17% were Black and 31% were rural residents.

More than 80% of patients were insured, and about half of all patients were covered by Medicaid.

The health centers are funded by the payments they get from Medicaid, Medicare and private insurers, plus federal and state grants. Money is always tight, but between 2010 and 2023, average operating margins remained in the black. That changed last year, as the average margin dipped to -2.1%, according to an audit conducted by the National Association of Community Health Centers.

Half of community health centers have fewer than 90 days of cash on hand, and one-quarter operate with margins below -4%, according to the audit.

When the Trump administration froze some federal grants in February, it forced some clinics, particularly in rural areas, to reduce hours or shut down. The broad domestic policy law President Donald Trump signed July 4 is projected to increase the number of uninsured patients seeking care at the health centers. And the ranks of the uninsured would grow further if Affordable Care Act insurance plans get much more expensive at the end of this year, as would happen if Congress fails to extend tax credits that have kept prices down.

Meanwhile, the government shutdown has prevented Congress from renewing the Community Health Center Fund, which expired on Sept. 30 and provides about 70% of the centers’ federal funding. And the centers worry that a new Trump administration policy barring them from providing care to some immigrants would force them to dedicate scarce resources to verifying patients’ legal status. A federal judge has temporarily blocked the change.

Andrew G. Nixon, director of communications for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, told Stateline that the administration is “fully committed to protecting America’s community health centers, which play a vital role in serving millions of families nationwide.”

“The Trump Administration is working to reopen the government and restore full funding, while also ensuring that federal resources are prioritized for American citizens and lawful residents in accordance with the law,” Nixon said in an emailed statement.

This year, some states— including Connecticut, Illinois and Minnesota — approved more money for community health centers. But Illinois and Minnesota also have scaled back or ended health care programs that served low-income people regardless of their immigration status, which might prompt more of those patients to seek care at the centers. And California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom in June signed a state budget that bars immigrants who are here illegally from enrolling in the state’s Medicaid program.

“Historically, health centers have had bipartisan support, but we’re operating in a very different world now,” Feygele Jacobs, a professor of health policy and management at George Washington University, told Stateline.

Jacobs said health centers are a target for the Trump administration because they serve people of color, low-income residents, immigrants and the uninsured.

“It’s those very communities that are really being challenged right now by the administration,” Jacobs said. “So I don’t know that the focus is so much on health centers as entities, but really more on an administration whose views are antithetical to many of the people that health centers have historically cared for.”

But Chris Pope, a senior fellow at the conservative-leaning Manhattan Institute, questioned whether the Medicaid changes included in Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act would lead to a significant increase in the number of people without insurance or a dramatic reduction in the program’s finances.

Pope also noted that the law doesn’t take direct aim at the federal funding of community health centers.

“There’s no direct cut in terms of reimbursement for community centers,” Pope said. “It’s not the intent of the bill to slash and attack health center revenues.”

Welcoming culture

The first community health centers were created in 1965 in Mississippi and Massachusetts as federal demonstration projects under President Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty. The program became permanent in 1975.

Doctors at the Long Island City Health Center describe it as a one-stop shop for patients. In addition to providing primary care and mental health services, the center has an in-house pharmacy and provides laboratory tests, vaccinations, drug treatment, HIV/AIDS treatment, and support for transgender patients and their families. Including its dozen medical residents, the center has doctors who can speak French, Tamil, Kru, Ibo, Yoruba, Spanish, Hindi, Nepali, Russian and Tagalog, among other languages.

Dr. Libby Brubaker, an attending physician at the Long Island City Health Center, told Stateline that providing a welcoming atmosphere for everybody is at the core of the center’s mission.

“Our social workers go to bat for our patients and help them get access to housing. … We write letters to allow our patients with asthma to be able to have air conditioners inside their apartments,” Brubaker said.

“Really what we’re providing for our patients is all encompassing, and that sets us apart,” she added. “Hospitals don’t do all of those things. They do some, but being able to offer that breadth of services in an outpatient setting is invaluable.”

Sandra Tapía visits the Long Island City Health Center. She likes this clinic because she can speak in her native Spanish. (Shalina Chatlani/Stateline/TNS)

Sandra Tapía, a Long Island City resident from Bogotá, Colombia, walked into the clinic on a Friday to see her nutritionist for the first time. She’s been in the U.S. for seven years, is a green card holder and has Medicaid. She said she likes the center because “it’s close and it’s safe.”

Tapía said she can’t imagine not being able to have access to health care, and values being able to speak to her provider in her native Spanish.

“Here, they offer really great services,” Tapía said. “I don’t want people without as many resources, like me, to be punished.”

The idea of cuts frightens patients such as Olga Scott, 65, who said she has been coming to Long Island City Health Center for years. Scott lives in the Bronx, but takes an hourlong subway ride to the center so she can see her favorite doctor.

“These community health services around the whole community of these five boroughs are needed — it’s really needed,” she said. “I just hope that they don’t do too much cutbacks, because we need every service we can get.”

Dr. Sindhura Manubolu, director of the family medicine program at the center, said she’s sensing “a lot of anxiety” from her patients, especially those who rely on Medicaid.

Dr. Sindhura Manubolu is the director of the family medicine program at the Community Healthcare Network’s Long Island City Health Center. (Shalina Chatlani/Stateline/TNS)

“Most of the questions from our patients have been around, ‘Oh, will we lose coverage?’” said Manubolu, who is an immigrant from India. “For someone to be here in an advanced country like America, and then not being able to access the health care that probably is even available to a person in a less developed country is not acceptable.”

Bipartisan support

On Capitol Hill, community health centers are an increasingly rare example of bipartisan agreement.

In May, Republican U.S. Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi and Democratic U.S. Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island wrote a joint letter to the chairperson and ranking member of the Senate health appropriations subcommittee, urging them “to provide robust funding” for community health centers, describing them as “a bipartisan solution to keeping Americans healthy and saving taxpayer dollars.”

Wicker and Reed argued in the letter that the centers save the overall health care system billions of dollars by reducing the burden of chronic disease through prevention and early intervention, and lower long-term Medicaid and Medicare spending by curbing expensive emergency department visits, hospital admissions and invasive procedures. The senators also noted that the centers employ more than 310,000 people and generate more than $118 billion in economic activity.

“Republicans in particular have always argued that one of the reasons for not pushing for more insurance coverage was the fact that we have these centers,” said Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, which advocates for broader health care access.

Benjamin noted that the centers’ importance to rural, mostly Republican communities has heightened their broad-based appeal. He said draining money from them “is not a rational decision.”

“The administration has a nonsensical and uncoordinated health policy overall,” Benjamin said. “These important things that keep people alive and keep them healthy are getting caught in this very bad public policy time we’re having.”

But Robert Hayes, president and CEO of the Community Healthcare Network, the largest network of community health centers in New York City, said the centers there are determined to do what they have always done, regardless of the current challenges.

“We are secure. We’re obeying the law. We’re doing the right thing,” Hayes said. “I don’t mean to dismiss the anxiety that is around health care for the vulnerable these days, but our job is to not let it distract us from what we have to do, which is important and very hard to do: [provide] the most fundamental and primary and preventative health care for people who are basically excluded from the health care system.”

Stateline reporter Shalina Chatlani can be reached at schatlani@stateline.org.

Stateline is part of States Newsroom, a national nonprofit news organization focused on state policy.

©2025 States Newsroom. Visit at stateline.org. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Working Strategies: Job search best practices require discipline

posted in: All news | 0

Amy Lindgren

Today’s job market is deeply challenging for those seeking work, requiring job seekers to be more efficient and effective than ever before. Here are my top 10 best practices for job search, updated for a tight market.

1. Know your target. When you’re searching for something, it helps to know what it is. The most effective job search target includes a title or work area, an employer type (large, small, nonprofit, etc.) and an initial list of organizations known to employ people in roles like the one you want.

2. Know your audience. As a general rule, the person who would be your boss is your audience. What does this person need? You may not know the specifics, but you can make educated guesses and then highlight that information in your materials and interview answers. (Don’t forget about your relevant soft skills.)

3. Balance your approach. Or, more directly, limit your online applications. You already know why: Some postings aren’t real, some systems won’t recognize your materials, some jobs attract hordes of applicants … if you’ve already sent out dozens or hundreds of applications without effect, you’ve run the experiment. It’s time to mix in a higher percentage (at least 50-50) of person-to-person contact.

4. Keep good records. If you meet someone through networking, will you remember later who introduced you or what branch of their company the new contact works in? You probably won’t, particularly if you’re talking to multiple people a week. Best-practice recordkeeping retains those details, giving you the tools to follow up and build relationships.

5. Capture the posting. Keeping the posting itself is the gold standard for tracking online applications, whether that’s via hard copy, copy-and-paste, or a screen shot. If you rely on copying only the URL, the link could be broken by the time you’re invited for an interview — in which case, you’ll be interviewing “cold,” with no record of what the employer requested.

6. Track your numbers. Job search is best measured by output, not time. Job seekers often report searching for months or years, but without knowing how many applications or contacts they made, the metric is hollow.

7. Focus on employer conversations. With very few exceptions, no one gets hired without talking to their potential boss first. Thus, the goal of every outreach is to find and connect with the person who would be your boss in any particular organization. Misunderstanding this principle is why networking can sometimes feel fruitless. When it comes to direct outreach, you’re probably not expediting your search unless you’re focused on meeting the boss or someone who can lead you to the boss.

8. Analyze your numbers. Data only helps if you use it. In job search, that means a monthly review to see which methods are sparking meetings with potential employers. The lower the number, the more you need to improve either the quantity or the quality of your outreaches. In the latter case, the idea is to improve the process until you hit on something that results in those conversations.

9. Search every day. An hour each weekday is better than five hours once a week. Best yet is starting at the same time every day. Why? Because consistent, daily effort builds momentum, helps create a job search mindset, and improves your sense of control. As a bonus, limiting to only an hour or two each session will also make you more efficient.

10. Set an end date. Job search should be a project, not a life sentence. If you’re unemployed now, set a three-month deadline for your search. Then, increase your daily regimen to three hours while checking your numbers every two weeks instead of monthly.

If you’re not seeing an increase in the number of quality conversations by the third check-in (six weeks), you need outside assistance and a fresh perspective. You may end up changing your approach or shifting your job goal, rather than doing more of the same.

If this kind of focused, deadline-driven job search sounds intense, you’re right. But it’s still easier than an unfocused search lacking checkpoints or data. The former is a best practice because it allows (demands) action based on real-time results and keeps you moving forward on a daily basis. The latter process is soul-sapping because it consigns job seekers to endless rounds of online applications without control or measurable success.

Come back next week and we’ll take a deeper dive into finding contacts and potential employers offline, which is the key to a best-practices job search.

Related Articles


Working Strategies: Customize cover letters, but there are shortcuts


Working Strategies: Job search over 60: “purpose” vs. paycheck


Working Strategies: Making the most of college internships


Working Strategies: Making the case for bachelor degrees


Working Strategies: Lessons from building walls, watching movies and riding bikes

Amy Lindgren owns a career consulting firm in St. Paul. She can be reached at alindgren@prototypecareerservice.com.

Surreal estate: How hauntings affect home sales

posted in: All news | 0

You visit an open house for a stately old Victorian on a quiet street. It has a wraparound front porch and all kinds of vintage charm … but you can’t help but wonder if that sudden cold draft is the result of poor insulation, or a past occupant dropping by. And the lights on that stunning chandelier are flickering in a way that might foretell an expensive visit from an electrician — or an exorcist.

Related Articles


Working Strategies: Job search best practices require discipline


Como Park Zoo & Conservatory issues last call for Mold-A-Rama magic


JPMorgan Chase wants out of paying $115M legal tab for convicted fraudsters


New Samsung retail store at the MOA acts a lot like Apple


Developer asks St. Paul for $3.5 million loan for housing, retail at Grand and Victoria

You want to ask the listing agent if they’ve heard about any paranormal activity on the property. But do they actually have to tell you?

That depends on where you’re house hunting. In most states, the seller doesn’t have to disclose anything. For example, according to Massachusetts state law, whether the home “has been the site of an alleged parapsychological or supernatural phenomenon” is not a material fact that has to be mentioned in a real estate transaction. However, the seller or agent are also not allowed to lie about it.

Minnesota has a similar code, which says that sellers don’t have a duty to disclose whether the home “was the site of a suicide, accidental death, natural death, or perceived paranormal activity.”

Still, a disturbing history like murder can affect the value of a home, said Ryan Dossey, co-founder of the house-buying service SoldFast in San Diego, in an online exchange. He points to search services like DiedInHouse as an example of how prospective borrowers can research a home’s past, uncovering details that a seller might have chosen not to divulge.

A gruesome case of buyer’s remorse

One such incident led to the 1983 court case Reed v. King. Dorris Reed purchased her California house from Robert King, who did not disclose that a woman and her four children were murdered in the home ten years prior. King had even requested that a neighbor not tell Reed about the killings. Reed’s attorneys claimed that while she had paid $76,000 for the home, it was really worth $65,000 because its history seriously damaged its value and desirability.

The courts ruled in Reed’s favor, finding that the home’s reputation affected its property value. Such homes are sometimes called “stigmatized properties.”

For some, a colorful history is a selling point

Not every buyer feels as Reed did. While an oversized skeleton decoration in the front yard is about as creepy as some home buyers are willing to get, others are drawn to the novelty and mystique of certain listings.

“A lot of buyers I’ve worked with love when there’s a deep or haunting history,” said Joe Luciano in an online exchange. Luciano is a Massachusetts Realtor who has shown historic homes in Salem.

For instance, one couple bought a house next to a funeral home. “They pretty much always wore all black, and the first thing they did when they moved in was paint the inside a deep purple color. This home was also right near the Salem Witch House, which, truthfully, was a selling point.”

So you bought a “haunted” house. Now what?

Let’s say you’re not afraid of things that go bump in the night and bought a stigmatized property. Even if you’re not worried about poltergeists, you still may have to contend with human reactions.

“Unbeknownst to me, I bought a ‘murder’ house back in 2021 as a flip that was the site of a homicide inside the property,” Ryan Dossey said.

“We encountered issues with the contractors,” he said, after neighbors mentioned the home’s history. From that point on, the contractors refused to be alone at the property. “It took considerable effort to persuade them to complete the renovation.”

Believer or skeptic, home buyer or seller, it’s important to know your rights when it comes to marketing a stigmatized home, as well as your legal responsibilities. Talk with your real estate agent, be honest with all parties involved, and check your state’s law if it’s relevant.

It’s perfectly reasonable to worry about the effect that such a history could have on your home’s value, but don’t be too discouraged. While some would never dream of buying a home that has a creepy past (real or imagined), you never know when Gomez Addams is prowling the market.

Taylor Getler writes for NerdWallet. Email: tgetler@nerdwallet.com.