Other voices: Budget gimmick: Uncle Sam simply waves away unpaid interest

posted in: News | 0

It’s a dirty job, but someone has to tell you about the federal government’s budget tricks. The latest is exposed in a new Congressional Budget Office report that shows how the 2010 Democratic takeover of student debt has created a new and vast entitlement.

CBO examined a sample of federal student loans that entered repayment between July 2009 and June 2013 to measure the extent borrowers were making progress on repaying their debt before the three-and-a-half years of pandemic forbearance. Short conclusion: They weren’t.

During the first six years after borrowers were supposed to begin making payments, CBO estimates that loans were in repayment status for only 45% of the time—about 32 months. Borrowers weren’t making payments for most of that time because they were either in default, forbearance or deferment.

It gets worse. CBO says “borrowers made payments greater than $10 in only 38 percent of the months” in which a payment was due. That means that even most borrowers who were making payments were doing so inconsistently and often in token amounts.

One reason is that the Democrats’ 2010 income-based repayment plans capped payments at 10% of discretionary income—i.e., income exceeding 150% of the poverty line—and canceled debt after 10 to 20 years. As a result, many borrowers had negligible required payments. But then their loan balances ballooned as they accrued interest.

After six years in repayment, the typical borrower owed 8% more than his beginning balance. A quarter of borrowers owed 30% or more debt. More than 75% of those in income-driven repayment plans had rising balances. Borrowers in such plans made payments of more than $10 a month in only about a third of the months.

Democrats say the student debt “crisis” is caused by for-profit colleges. But CBO shows that many students at nonprofit and public colleges are failing to repay their loans. After six years, the typical borrower who attended a nonprofit or four-year public college had paid down only 1% or 2% of his starting balance.

Unlike private lenders, the government has no incentive to ensure borrowers are making payments. The political imperative is to conceal the taxpayer losses on student loans by reducing defaults while effectively turning the program into a new entitlement.

This is what President Biden’s SAVE debt-forgiveness plan does. It eliminates payments for millions of borrowers while reducing them for most others to negligible amounts. Uncle Sam simply waives away unpaid interest. Wouldn’t it be nice if your credit card company did the same?

This accounting trick prevents the government’s $1.6 trillion in student debt from ballooning as borrowers fail to pay down their loans. Mr. Biden’s SAVE plan is estimated to cost $475 billion over a decade, which is on top of hundreds of billions that were already set to be written off.

To sum up: Democrats conned taxpayers by claiming their student loan takeover would save the government money. Now they’re trying to obfuscate the cost of their entitlement by expanding it. And they wonder why Americans don’t trust government?

— The Wall Street Journal

Related Articles

Opinion |


Jonathan Zimmerman: How the University of Pennsylvania lost its way on free speech

Opinion |


Thomas Friedman: America’s role in the world is hard, getting harder. Add others’ strength to our own

Opinion |


Other voices: Could AI create deadly biological weapons? Let’s not find out

Opinion |


F.D. Flam: AI can debunk conspiracy theories better than humans

Opinion |


David Fickling: Breaking our plastics habit is easier said than done

Jonathan Zimmerman: How the University of Pennsylvania lost its way on free speech

posted in: All news | 0

I teach at the University of Pennsylvania, which is an equal-opportunity censor. It suppresses voices on the right and the left, even as it proclaims its commitment to free and open dialogue.

That’s the sad takeaway of last week’s report by the Philadelphia-based Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which ranked Penn 248th out of 251 schools in its annual college free speech ranking. Conservative students are especially reluctant to speak their minds, the report found, lest they incur the wrath of liberal peers and faculty members. And after last spring’s campus protests against Israel, Penn established new speech restrictions that targeted demonstrators on the left.

Yes, you read that correctly. The right wing was afraid to speak, so we slapped constraints on the left wing as well. And that’s a bad deal for all of us.

Start with the sobering data from the same group on self-censorship, which showed that more than three-quarters of Penn students said they were “somewhat uncomfortable” or “very uncomfortable” publicly disagreeing with a professor. Nearly 60% said they were uncomfortable expressing a controversial political opinion during a discussion with fellow students outside of class.

The wariest students are conservatives, who are outnumbered on campus. But after the Israel-Hamas war began, critics of Israel — who are mostly on the left — expressed increasing fears as well. “When I am speaking about any pro-Palestinian sentiments, I must be careful with who I speak with as many are quick to hail them as ‘antisemitic,’” one Penn student in the FIRE survey wrote.

That’s unacceptable. We bring people to campus so they can learn from each other. And that won’t work if they’re biting their tongues.

Now Penn has made it worse, by promulgating a temporary set of guidelines on open expression that actually close it off. The rules require students to reserve space for protests at least 48 hours in advance; for some heavily trafficked parts of campus, two weeks’ notice will be necessary.

So let’s suppose an all-out war starts along Israel’s northern border, where Israel and Hezbollah have already exchanged heavy rounds of rocket fire. Under the new rules, students might have to wait 14 days before they can protest on the campus’ main thoroughfare. How can anyone who believes in open expression be OK with that?

There’s also a ban on using spray chalk and other “semi-permanent” substances on “any university surface.” Come on. College campuses were made for chalk protests, or so we used to think. What are we so afraid of?

We all know the answer. Last spring, protesters erected encampments — which are also prohibited under the new rules — and chanted phrases such as “From the river to the sea, Palestine should be free” and “Globalize the intifada.” Some people interpret those statements as demands for the elimination of Israel, or even of Jews. I’m Jewish, and I sometimes hear the chants the same way.

But that doesn’t mean we should ban them. The most troubling part of the new guidelines is their prohibition on protests that “threaten or advocate violence” against “individuals or groups” on the basis of their race, religion, national origin or sexual orientation.

That’s a near-echo of the 1988 speech code at the University of Michigan, which barred “any physical or verbal behavior” that stigmatizes or victimizes people based on a similar set of characteristics as the Penn guidelines. Over the 18 months that followed its adoption, before a federal court struck down the Michigan rule as unconstitutional, white students charged Black students with violating it in 20 instances. One Black student was disciplined for using the term “white trash.”

Get it? When you establish a speech rule to protect a group of people, it will be weaponized against them. And if you think otherwise, you just haven’t been listening.

If war breaks out between Israel and Hezbollah, will Penn invoke its ban on “violent” speech to muzzle pro-Israel voices who want to bomb targets in Lebanon? How about Ukrainians who support an expanded attack on Russia? Sounds pretty violent to me.

All of this new rulemaking empowers university officials, of course, who get to define acceptable speech. And it demeans students, who should be making these calls on their own.

That’s why I’m also worried about Penn’s new Office of Religious and Ethnic Inclusion, which promises to investigate complaints about derogatory and intolerant statements. At first glance, that seems great. Who wants more intolerance? I certainly don’t. But these efforts patronize students in the guise of protecting them.

To see why, imagine that a Muslim student tells a gay student, “Same-sex love is an offense to my religion.” In reply, the gay student says, “Then you have a bad religion.” What then? I can easily understand why both students might feel insulted by this exchange. But I can’t understand why we would want a school official to adjudicate between them. They’re adults, not children. They can work it out themselves.

Of course, the university can and should prohibit direct threats of personal harm as well as sexual harassment, which are already barred under state and federal law. But all other speech should be free.

At Penn, alas, it isn’t. Whatever our political differences, we need to stand up for the right to express them. Anything less will diminish us all.

Jonathan Zimmerman teaches education and history at the University of Pennsylvania. He is the author (with cartoonist Signe Wilkinson) of “Free Speech and Why You Should Give a Damn” and eight other books. He wrote this column for the Chicago Tribune.

Related Articles

Opinion |


Thomas Friedman: America’s role in the world is hard, getting harder. Add others’ strength to our own

Opinion |


Other voices: Could AI create deadly biological weapons? Let’s not find out

Opinion |


F.D. Flam: AI can debunk conspiracy theories better than humans

Opinion |


David Fickling: Breaking our plastics habit is easier said than done

Opinion |


Katja Hoyer: Germany has gotten more conservative, not more radical

Today in History: September 20, Billie Jean King wins “Battle of the Sexes”

posted in: News | 0

Today is Friday, Sept. 20, the 264th day of 2024. There are 102 days left in the year.

Today in history:

On Sept. 20, 1973, in their so-called “Battle of the Sexes,” tennis star Billie Jean King defeated Bobby Riggs in straight sets, 6-4, 6-3, 6-3, in the Houston Astrodome.

Also on this date:

In 1519, Portuguese explorer Ferdinand Magellan and his crew set out from Spain on five ships to find a western passage to the Spice Islands. (Magellan was killed en route, but one of his ships completed the first circumnavigation of the globe three years later.)

Related Articles


Today in History: September 19, state funeral of Queen Elizabeth II


Today in History: September 18, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies


St. Paul Athletic Club at 340 Cedar St. fails to sell at auction


Author Jim Lammers headlines Washington County Historical Society meeting


Today in History: September 17, Occupy Wall Street movement begins

In 1946, the first Cannes Film Festival, lasting 16 days, opened in France.

In 1962, James Meredith, a Black student, was blocked from enrolling at the University of Mississippi by Democratic Gov. Ross R. Barnett.

In 1964, The Beatles concluded their first full-fledged U.S. tour by performing in a charity concert at the Paramount Theater in New York.

In 1967, the Cunard liner Queen Elizabeth 2 was christened by Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II in Clydebank, Scotland.

In 2011, the repeal of the U.S. military’s 18-year-old “don’t ask, don’t tell” compromise took effect, allowing gay and lesbian service members to serve openly.

In 2017, Hurricane Maria, the strongest storm to hit Puerto Rico in more than 80 years, struck the island, wiping out as much as 75 percent of power distribution lines and causing an island-wide blackout.

In 2019, Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania, the 1979 site of the nation’s worst commercial nuclear power accident, was shut down by its owner after producing electricity for 45 years.

Today’s Birthdays:

Actor Sophia Loren is 90.
Author George R. R. Martin is 76.
Actor Gary Cole is 68.
TV news correspondent Deborah Roberts is 64.
Actor Maggie Cheung is 60.
Actor Kristen Johnston is 57.
Rock singers Gunnar and Matthew Nelson are 57.
Race car driver Juan Pablo Montoya is 49.
Actor Jon Bernthal is 48.
Actor Aldis Hodge is 38.
Mixed martial artist Khabib Nurmagomedov is 36.
Singer-songwriter Phillip Phillips is 34.

Severino ties Saints’ single-season homer record as St. Paul beats Indianapolis

posted in: News | 0

After being stuck on 20 home runs for 12 games, Yunior Severino finally hit his St. Paul Saints’ record-tying 21st homer of the season on Thursday.

Severino hit one of three home runs for St. Paul in an 8-3 win against Indianapolis, tying the Saints’ single-season home run mark to equal the 20 from Chris Williams and Jair Camargo from last year.

Payton Eeles had a leadoff homer in the bottom of the first inning — the second time in four games for him — and Williams added his 15th of the year. Eeles and DaShawn Keirsey Jr. each had a pair of hits.

The Saints scored at least once in four of the first five innings, capped with a three-run fifth that included Severino’s two-run homer and an RBI single from Patrick Winkel.

Starter Cory Lewis (1-0) allowed two runs on seven hits and three walks in five innings in his first game of the season for the Saints.

Aaron Rozek pitched two scoreless innings in relief. Diego Castillo gave up a run in one inning and Jorge Alcala allowed one hit and got two strikeouts in one inning.

Related Articles

Sports |


Saints take down Indianapolis inch by inch

Sports |


Letters: ‘Sustainable’ aviation fuel? Two reasons why it isn’t

Sports |


Saints lose at Columbus in final road game of season

Sports |


Saints drop fourth to Clippers on the road

Sports |


Severino sets RBI record but Saints fall to Columbus Clippers