Which induction cookware set is best?

Induction burners work very differently than traditional burners. Instead of heating a pan using a flame or radiant heat, they use powerful magnets to cause the pan itself to generate heat. The pros of induction heating include extremely short warming times, increased efficiency and significantly easier cleaning. One of the few downsides of induction burners is that they require specially designed pans to work properly.

If you’re looking for a quality induction cookware set, the Le Creuset Toughened Nonstick Pro Cookware Set is about as good as they get. This six-pan set comes from a renowned cookware manufacturer and is built to last a lifetime.

What to know before you buy an induction cookware set

How induction pans are different

To put it simply, only pans with magnetic bases work with induction burners. This includes some more traditional cookware like cast iron skillets, but for the most part, you’ll have the best success with cookware that’s specifically designed for induction burners. Not all induction-focused pots and pans are made entirely from magnetic alloys, but even those made from hard-anodized aluminum, for example, have a layer of magnetic metal in the base.

Flat and rigid pan bottoms

For reliable high-speed heating, it’s important that a pan maintains even and consistent contact with the induction burner. For this reason, most people avoid using any old pans they happen to have in the cupboard, even if they’re made from a magnetic alloy. Pots and pans designed specifically for induction burners tend to have reinforced bottoms made from durable materials that should resist warping for many years, if not a lifetime.

Number of pieces

One thing to keep in mind when looking for any cookware set is that manufacturers and marketers will do everything they can to make their products look better. As a consumer, this adds a little wrinkle to the buying process. When a cookware set is advertised as having 10 pieces, that number almost always includes the lids. It’s not really a big red flag, as it’s such a common practice these days, but it is something to be aware of.

What to look for in a quality induction cookware set

Heavyweight pots and pans

Induction ranges have one thing in common with gas and radiant electric ranges: they’re most effective with thick, heavy pans that can conduct a lot of heat. Luckily, most cookware sets that are engineered for use with induction burners are designed with dense, thick bases at the very least.

Nonstick vs. stainless steel and other materials

Nonstick pans and their convenient surfaces are more durable and longer-lasting than ever before. Unlike the original Teflon pans from years past, many nonstick surfaces can even withstand contact with metal utensils, although it’s still recommended to stick with silicone or wooden cooking tools with nonstick pans.

On the other hand, not everyone prefers nonstick pans. This shouldn’t be a problem while searching for the right cookware set for you, as there is a huge variety of stainless steel pots and pans from quality manufacturers, and most of them have the flat, rigid bases needed for induction cooking.

Tempered glass lids

The quality of glass used in a pan’s lid is a decent indicator of a cookware set’s overall quality. Non-tempered glass will, over time, develop a significant risk of breakage, which would ruin a meal and could possibly injure a home cook. Make sure to select a cookware set with tempered glass lids.

How much you can expect to spend on an induction cookware set

The most affordable induction cookware sets cost around $100, and you can spend nearly $1,000 on a truly premium set with a wide variety of frying pans, sauce pots and other pieces.

Induction cookware set FAQ

Can I use induction-ready cookware on a normal stove?

A. Absolutely. If you only have a single or double standalone induction burner and a traditional range for the bulk of the cooking, an induction-ready cookware set is the perfect choice. Neither a gas range nor a radiant electric cooktop will damage induction-ready pans or alter their performance in any way.

Are nonstick coatings safe?

A. At regular cooking temperatures, nonstick coatings are 100% safe for humans. If you overheat a nonstick pan (that is, to temperatures around 600 degrees or higher), the coating can break down, and if you inhale the resulting vapors, you can exhibit flu-like symptoms that should pass after a few hours.

There is one important caveat. Even though off-gassing happens only at extremely high temperatures, even small amounts can be dangerous and even fatal for birds. If you have any pet birds, the best practice is to avoid purchasing or using nonstick cookware that uses the common PTFE coating.

What are the best induction cookware sets to buy?

Top induction cookware set

Le Creuset Toughened Nonstick Pro Cookware Set

What you need to know: This premium nonstick cookware set comes from one of the most well-known manufacturers on the market.

What you’ll love: Its thick and durable construction retains plenty of heat and is highly resistant to scratches. With proper care, it can last for years. It comes with a pair of frying pans, two saucepans, a braising pan and a stock pot.

What you should consider: Its only real drawback is that it’s quite expensive.

Top induction cookware set for the money

T-fal Professional Nonstick Cookware Set

What you need to know: Like many of T-fal’s products, this set offers plenty of functionality at a reasonable price.

What you’ll love: A total of seven pans gives you the ability to whip up large and complex meals without having to do much washing up during the process. The bottoms are flat, rigid and effective on any type of stove. It even comes with a nonmarring spatula and a cooking spoon.

What you should consider: The pans aren’t quite as heavy as others, which makes them easy to move around but also means they don’t retain heat very well.

Worth checking out

Cuisinart MCP-12N Multiclad Pro Stainless Steel Cookware Set

What you need to know: For fans of stainless steel, it’s hard to find a better value than this 12-piece set.

What you’ll love: If, for whatever reason, you prefer to avoid nonstick cookware, this set offers premium construction at a reasonable price. It’s especially durable, shined to practically a mirror finish and includes a pasta straining and steaming insert for the stock pot.

What you should consider: The stainless steel finish is more difficult to keep clean, especially if you do a lot of pan-frying.

Prices listed reflect time and date of publication and are subject to change.

Check out our Daily Deals for the best products at the best prices and sign up here to receive the BestReviews weekly newsletter full of shopping inspo and sales.

BestReviews spends thousands of hours researching, analyzing and testing products to recommend the best picks for most consumers. BestReviews and its newspaper partners may earn a commission if you purchase a product through one of our links.

Honeybee officials are raising the alarm about severe colony losses over the past few months. The extent of the bee deaths is still being tallied, but one estimate suggests more than a million colonies have died.

“No one is aware of the massive nature of this year’s die-off,” said Steve Ellis, a Minnesota beekeeper. “It is unprecedented.”

Over the past 20 years commercial beekeepers have often lost nearly 50% of their bees over the winter. But Ellis, who is also president of the national Pollinator Stewardship Council, said he’s hearing from beekeepers who have losses ranging from 70 to 100% this year. One immediate repercussion is that there aren’t enough bees to fully pollinate California’s almond crop.

“The almond crop will be impacted due to a shortage of bees in a way that has never happened before,” said Ellis who takes his bees to California to pollinate almond orchards.

In a statement earlier this month, the Almond Board of California said it was aware of “alarming reports of nationwide honeybee colony losses” as beekeepers prepared for the almond pollination season.

Honeybee organizations are collecting data to determine the extent of the losses. A voluntary online survey conducted by Project Apis m., named for the Apis mellifera honeybee, found “severe and sudden” colony losses, according to a recent news release. The nonprofit estimates nearly 1.25 million colonies have been lost since June 2024.

“Initial survey results of colony losses suggest that commercial beekeepers may have lost in excess of 60 percent of their bees. The scale of these losses is completely unsustainable,” said Zac Browning, a fourth-generation commercial beekeeper from North Dakota and board chairman of Project Apis m.

Researchers are collecting dead bees to look for a cause of the die-off.

Commercial beekeepers have struggled with bee losses for about 20 years since a widespread sudden die-off was labeled Colony Collapse Disorder. Researchers believe exposure to pesticides, loss of flowering habitat and pathogens all contributed to past losses.

In its news release, Project Apis m. said the trends of this die-off resemble past Colony Collapse Disorder events “and may impact pollination services and food security.”

Related Articles

After this Australian town burned down, experts warned against rebuilding. Nobody listened

Ancient deity, pet and endangered species. Why is axolotl Mexico’s most beloved amphibian?

Experts give up hope for 157 false killer whales stranded on a beach in Australia’s Tasmania state

Trump’s cuts to federal wildfire crews could have ‘scary’ consequences

Tale of 5 smuggled spider monkeys shows the difficulties of combating illegal wildlife trade

WASHINGTON — Several Trump-appointed agency leaders urged federal workers not to comply with Elon Musk’s order to summarize their accomplishments for the past week or be removed from their positions, even as Musk doubled down on his demand over the weekend.

Their instructions in effect countermanded Musk’s order across much of the government, challenging the broad authority President Donald Trump has given to the world’s richest man to make drastic changes to the federal bureaucracy. The standoff serves as one of the first significant tests of how far Musk’s power will extend.

As the directive ricocheted across the federal government, officials at some agencies, including the FBI, the office coordinating country’s intelligence agencies and the departments of Defense, State, Energy, Health and Human Services, and Homeland Security, told their employees not to respond.

Musk’s email had even reached the inboxes of sitting federal judges — who are in the judicial branch, not the executive branch. The administrative office for the federal courts advised judges and staff that “this email did not originate from the judiciary or the administrative office and we suggest that no action be taken.”

The public pushback reflects a growing unease — and, in some cases, alarm — behind the scenes across the Trump administration about the perception of Musk’s unchecked power.

The unease runs from lower staff to some Cabinet secretaries, who have tired of having to justify specific intricacies of agency policy and having to scramble to address unforeseen controversies that Musk has ignited.

Those officials are aware that he has influence over Trump privately, and they fear Musk using X, the social media website he owns, to single out people he views as obstructing him, according to one senior administration official.

Hours after a senior Defense Department official publicly and firmly pushed back on Musk’s directive Sunday afternoon, Musk singled him out for retribution, saying on X that “anyone with the attitude of that Pentagon official needs to look for a new job.”

One person who was quiet about the controversy throughout much of the weekend was Trump; after posting on social media Saturday morning that he wanted Musk to be more “aggressive” and then bragging about the purge of federal workers in a speech hours later, the president had remained mute on the subject for much of Sunday.

That afternoon, however, Trump posted a meme, which he said came from Musk, mocking federal workers who had to explain their duties and accomplishments, but he did not weigh in on the internal government conflict between his appointees.

Musk’s public statements about his cost-cutting effort, known as the Department of Government Efficiency, have often expressed an open contempt for the federal workforce, which includes some of Trump’s supporters.

By Sunday afternoon, some of the pushback against Musk from administration officials — coming in large part from the national security apparatus and law enforcement agencies — had become public and explicit.

“The Department of Defense is responsible for reviewing the performance of its personnel and it will conduct any review in accordance with its own procedures,” Darin S. Selnick, the acting Pentagon official in charge of personnel, said in a statement, instructing Pentagon employees to “for now, please pause any response.”

Tulsi Gabbard, director of the office of national intelligence, ordered all intelligence community officers not to respond, in a message to intelligence officials reviewed by The New York Times.

“Given the inherently sensitive and classified nature of our work, IC employees should not respond to the OPM email,” Gabbard wrote.

FBI Director Kash Patel wrote in an email to employees that “the FBI, through the office of the director, is in charge of all our review processes,” telling workers that they should “for now, please pause any responses.”

Senior personnel officials at the State and Homeland Security departments also instructed their employees to not respond to the email.

At the Justice Department and FBI, the threatening signals from Musk were met with a mix of anger and amazement that anyone would issue such a blanket demand without consideration for sensitive areas such as criminal investigations, legal confidentiality or grand jury material.

Some law enforcement supervisors quickly told employees to wait for more guidance from managers Monday before responding to the demand, according to current and former officials.

Other departments gave conflicting guidance. The Department of Health and Human Services told its employees Sunday morning to follow the directive. An hour later, an email from the Trump-appointed acting director of the National Institutes of Health, a subordinate agency, told employees to hold off on responding. Hours later, the health department told all employees to “pause” responses to the ultimatum.

On Saturday, Musk posted a demand for government employees to summarize their accomplishments for the week, warning that failure to do so would be taken as a resignation. Soon after, the Office of Personnel Management, which manages the federal workforce, sent an email asking civil servants for a list of accomplishments, but it did not include the threat of removal for not complying.

Unions representing federal workers suggested that Musk’s order was not valid. They advised their members to follow guidance from their supervisors on how, and whether, to respond to the email.

In a scathing letter Sunday, Everett B. Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees — the largest federal employee union — told the acting director of the Office of Personnel Management that the email sent to federal employees was “plainly unlawful” and “thoughtless.”

(BEGIN OPTIONAL TRIM.)

Kelley demanded that the order be retracted, and noted, “By allowing the unelected and unhinged Elon Musk to dictate OPM’s actions, you have demonstrated a lack of regard for the integrity of federal employees and their critical work.”

(END OPTIONAL TRIM.)

Multiple intelligence agencies, including the National Security Agency, had warned employees that responding could risk inadvertently disclosing classified work.

Although Musk’s original email told employees not to include classified material, current and former intelligence officials said that if an adversary gained access to thousands of unclassified accounts of intelligence officers’ work that it would be able to piece together sensitive details or learn about projects that were supposed to remain secret.

Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., whose seat may be among the most fiercely contested in 2026, raised doubt about the order even as he gave broader support to Musk’s cost-cutting effort.

“I don’t know how that’s necessarily feasible,” Lawler said of the ultimatum. “Obviously, a lot of federal employees are under union contract.”

(STORY CAN END HERE. OPTIONAL MATERIAL FOLLOWS.)

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, also criticized Musk’s order.

“Our public workforce deserves to be treated with dignity and respect for the unheralded jobs they perform,” she wrote in a statement on social media. “The absurd weekend email to justify their existence wasn’t it.”

It is unclear what legal basis Musk would have to justify mass firings based on responses to the email, and the White House and the Office of Personnel Management did not immediately answer questions about the threat of removal.

But Musk — who made similar unconventional demands during his takeover of Twitter, now known as X — insisted Sunday morning that the order amounted to “a very basic pulse check.”

In a series of posts, Musk also promoted baseless claims of wage fraud — that a significant number of “nonexistent” or dead people were employed in the federal workforce, and that criminals were using the fake employees to collect government paychecks.

“They are covering immense fraud,” Musk said in response to a post by a supporter that said that “the left is flipping out about a simple email.”

His claims echo a similar one that tens of millions of dead people may be receiving fraudulent Social Security payments. A recent report by the Social Security Administration’s inspector general — a watchdog that investigates the program for waste, fraud and abuse — found that “almost none” of the people in the agency’s database who had likely died were receiving payments.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.