At UT, a Day of Drag and Defiance

posted in: All news | 0

On an average school day, harried students at the University of Texas at Austin rush across Speedway to get to class, stopping only to dodge a dangerously fast Lime scooter. On Monday, however, several students made a pitstop to get their makeup done by one of over a dozen drag performers, each in vibrant outfits and elaborate makeup of their own. The students then continued to class, a little more colorful and sparkly than before. 

The performers showed up—some even calling out of their day jobs—for the student-run initiative called the Day of Drag, which encouraged students to show up to class in drag to protest the University of Texas System’s ban on drag performances. As university systems across the state have enacted similar bans and the Texas Legislature continues to attack LGBTQ+ rights, students are shouldering the weight of advocating for their rights. 

On March 18, the UT System Board of Regents said its universities cannot sponsor or host drag shows in their facilities The decision also followed a similar ban from the Texas A&M System Board of Regents on February 28 banning drag show events on campus. The Texas A&M resolution cited President Donald Trump and Governor Greg Abbott’s executive orders that prohibit using funding for “promoting gender ideology.” The resolution also said drag performances could “create or contribute to a hostile environment for women.” On March 28, the University of North Texas system followed suit and paused drag performances on its campuses. 

Texas A&M’s ban came just ahead of the scheduled date for Draggieland, an annual drag show hosted by student-led Queer Empowerment Council. After first hearing about the new policy, members of the Council, including Alex Gonce, the event chair and treasurer, began fielding questions from reporters and administrators about their event being banned. “We were completely blindsided,” Gonce told the Texas Observer. “It was very scary and all at once.”  

Within a week, the Council teamed up with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a civil libertarian legal group that advocates for free speech on college campuses, to sue A&M for infringing on their First Amendment rights. A federal judge temporarily blocked the university’s policy on March 24. In her ruling, Judge Lee Rosenthal suggested the students would prevail in their free speech claim and wrote: “Anyone who finds the performance or performers offensive has a simple remedy: don’t go.”  

Three days later, Draggieland went on as planned at the A&M campus in College Station. 

Gonce first joined the Council as a representative for a different student organization, Transcend. They said they enjoy being able to do more activism work as part of the Council, because Transcend focuses more internally on resources for its members. “Having a central place to go to make our voices heard has been really good,” Gonce said. 

At UT-Austin, Isabella Thomas, a government and Spanish junior, didn’t see any advocacy groups organizing after UT announced its own ban, so she took action by planning the Day of Drag. She later learned other groups tried to challenge the ban, but learned it would be more difficult to fight than A&M’s because the UT System did not publish a written resolution—Board Chairman Kevin Eltife merely announced the policy in a written statement.

Thomas decided to have students go to class in drag because the decision, while vague, did explicitly forbade the university from hosting drag performances, not drag altogether. “We’re definitely pushing the line a little bit,” Thomas told the Observer. “But we’re not actually crossing the line.” Thomas got the event approved by the Office of the Dean of Students, which handles requests for campus events. 

A steady stream of students came by to get glammed up by the artists, each with their own strong personal style. Some students walked away with faces donning pastel glitter and rhinestones, others with strong contours in deep blue or purple. Graduate student Savvy Cornett said they were looking forward to wearing their full face of makeup, complete with sparkly blue eyeshadow, to the animal physiology class they TA for. “I’ve always wanted to have my makeup done via a drag queen, so this is a dream come true, and I’m so excited to go to class later” Cornett said. 

Last session, Abbott signed Senate Bill 12, which would have criminalized “sexually oriented” drag performances performed in front of minors. A federal judge ruled the bill unconstitutional in September 2023. 

Thomas has found that sense of community and hope through drag performances. In particular, she said, she goes to drag queen Brigitte Bandit’s weekly “LegiSLAYtion & Liberation” show in downtown Austin, which makes her feel less alone. 

“I feel hopeful for a future, which is something that not a lot of people can say, and probably something that I wouldn’t say all the time,” Thomas said. But during the two-hour show each Tuesday,  “I feel hopeful. I feel like we are going to get past this.” 

Brigitte Bandit came to the event in pink, blue and white chaps—the color of the trans flag—danced to Chappell Roan’s “Pink Pony Club,” and read from drag icon Sasha Velour’s memoir, The Big Reveal, as part of a drag queen story hour. “Whenever they try to ban drag, we just put students in drag, bitch,” Brigitte Bandit said at the event. “Ain’t nothing illegal happening here. We’re just having fun.”

This session, the Senate passed Senate Bill 18, which would cut funding from public libraries that host events in which people “dressed as the opposite gender” read a story or book. Republican legislators have also targeted LGBTQ+ rights in higher education, building on last session’s passage of Senate Bill 17, which prohibited DEI offices and practices, and shut down spaces for queer students, like the Gender and Sexuality Center at UT-Austin.

Now, Thomas said there’s more pressure on students to take the lead. “I’m happy we haven’t given up,” Thomas said. “[But students are] having to take on this extra work to continue providing space for their community.” 

At A&M, Gonce said the Queer Empowerment Council had to take on several initiatives formerly hosted by its Pride Center, like Lavender Graduation, after SB 17 forced the Center to close. 

The Lege has also continued its crusade against “DEI” in higher ed. Senate Bill 37, authored by Republican Senator Brandon Creighton, would prohibit core curricula courses that “require or attempt to require a student to adopt a belief that any race, sex, or ethnicity or social, political or religious belief are inherently superior,” which would likely target gender and ethnic studies courses. 

Zoey Gonzales told her friend she didn’t care if she was late to class — she was getting her makeup, dramatic red and pink winged eyeshadow, done. “This is way more important than my classes right now,” Gonzales said. “If I myself as a trans person won’t be here to stand for my rights, then who will?” 

Arwyn Heilrayne, who helped organize the event, danced around in a “Moo Deng Says Trans Rights” shirt, with blue eyeshadow and deep pink blush and glitter on her cheeks. She said she contributes to student organizing with her energy. “It’s so hard in this world to have fun sometimes,” Heilrayne said. “Movements are only sustained through joy, So we have to have joy as much as possible.” 

Thomas, the Day of Drag organizer, says events like these are important to foster a sense of community. “Even though this is most likely going to be a one-off event, celebrating the artistic value of drag, just celebrating queerness on campus, we want students to continue to plug in with the queer community,” Thomas said. “Having support and knowing that there are other people like you that love you unconditionally is just so incredible.” 

The post At UT, a Day of Drag and Defiance appeared first on The Texas Observer.

Trump re-ups his threat to strip Harvard University’s tax-exempt status

posted in: All news | 0

By SEUNG MIN KIM, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Friday re-upped his threat to strip Harvard University of its tax-exempt status, escalating a showdown with the first major college that has defied the administration’s efforts to crack down on campus activism.

“We are going to be taking away Harvard’s Tax Exempt Status,” Trump wrote on his social media site Friday morning from Palm Beach, Florida, where he is spending the weekend. “It’s what they deserve!”

The president has questioned the fate of Harvard’s tax-exempt status — which a majority of U.S. colleges and universities have — ever since the school refused to comply with the administration’s demands for broad government and leadership changes, revisions to its admissions policy, and audits of how diversity is viewed on the campus. That prompted the administration to block more than $2 billion in federal grants to the Cambridge, Massachusetts, institution.

Related Articles


Americans see more overreach from the president than from judges, an AP-NORC poll finds


Trump signs executive order directing federal funding cuts to PBS and NPR


Trump denies disaster aid, tells states to do more


Did Donald Trump — or ABC News — choose who would interview the president? Why does it matter?


Army plans for a potential parade on Trump’s birthday call for 6,600 soldiers, AP learns

The Treasury Department directed a senior official at the Internal Revenue Service to begin the process of revoking Harvard’s tax-exempt status shortly after a social media post from Trump in mid-April questioning it, although the White House has suggested that the tax agency’s scrutiny of Harvard began before Trump’s public comments targeting the school.

The White House has also said any IRS actions will be conducted independently of the president. Federal tax law prohibits senior members of the executive branch from requesting that an IRS employee conduct or terminate an audit or investigation.

Democrats say Trump’s actions against Harvard are purely political. The Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, along with Massachusetts’ two Democratic senators, Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey, and the Senate Finance Committee chairman, Ron Wyden of Oregon, called for an inspector general investigation into Trump’s attempts to strip Harvard of its tax-exempt status.

Trump’s move “raises troubling constitutional questions, including whether the president is trying to squelch Harvard’s free speech rights and whether the revocation of its tax-exempt status will deprive the university of its due process rights,” the senators wrote in a letter Friday to Heather Hill, the acting Treasury inspector general for tax administration.

Trump’s battle against Harvard is part of a broader campaign the administration is framing as an effort to root out antisemitism on college campuses. But the White House also sees a political upside in the fight, framing it as a bigger war against elite institutions decried by Trump’s loyal supporters.

The “next chapter of the American story will not be written by The Harvard Crimson,” Trump said Thursday night in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, where he delivered the commencement address at the University of Alabama. “It will be written by you, the Crimson Tide.”

The Harvard Crimson is that school’s student newspaper. The Crimson Tide refers to the Alabama school’s football program.

In addition to threatening Harvard’s tax-exempt status and halting federal grants, the Trump administration wants to block Harvard from being able to enroll international students.

White House comes out with sharp spending cuts in Trump’s 2026 budget plan

posted in: All news | 0

By LISA MASCARO and JOSH BOAK, AP Congressional Correspondents

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump’s 2026 budget plan would slash non-defense domestic spending by $163 billion while increasing expenditures on national security, according to statements released by the White House on Friday.

Related Articles


Trump re-ups his threat to strip Harvard University’s tax-exempt status


Americans see more overreach from the president than from judges, an AP-NORC poll finds


China says it’s evaluating US overtures for trade talks, but tariffs remain an obstacle


Trump signs executive order directing federal funding cuts to PBS and NPR


Trump denies disaster aid, tells states to do more

The budget showed a desire to crack down on diversity programs and initiatives to address climate change. But the administration has yet to release detailed tables on what it wants income taxes, tariffs or the budget deficit to be — a sign of the political and financial challenge confronting Trump when he’s promising to cut taxes and repay the federal debt without doing major damage to economic growth.

Budgets do not become law but serve as a touchstone for the upcoming fiscal year debates. Often considered a statement of values, this first budget since Trump’s return to the White House carries the added weight of defining the Republican president’s second-term pursuits, alongside his party in Congress.

It also arrives as Trump has unilaterally imposed what could hundreds of billions of dollars in tax increases in the form of tariffs, setting off a trade war that has consumers, CEOs and foreign leaders worried about a possible economic downturn.

The White House’s Office of Management and Budget, headed by Russell Vought, a chief architect of Project 2025, provided contours of a so-called skinny version of topline numbers, with more details to come.

“Details soon,” Vought said during a Cabinet meeting this week at the White House.

The nation’s estimated $7 trillion-plus federal budget has been growing steadily, with annual deficits fast approaching $2 trillion and the annual interest payments on the debt almost $1 trillion. That’s thanks mostly to the spike in emergency COVID-19 pandemic spending, changes in the tax code and climbing costs of Medicare, Medicaid and other programs, largely to cover the nation’s health needs as people age. The nation’s debt load, at $36 trillion, is ballooning.

This year’s presidential budget request is expected to reflect cuts already made by Trump’s actions and adviser Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, including the slashing of the government workforce. It also could point to potential new revenue streams, possibly from Trump’s tariffs program.

Democrats are prepared to assail Trump’s budget as further evidence that the Republican administration is intent on gutting government programs that Americans depend on.

Congress is already deep into the slog of drafting of Trump’s big bill of tax breaks, spending cuts and bolstered funds for the administration’s mass deportation effort — a package that, unlike the budget plan, would carry the force of law.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, who spoke with Trump multiple times this week, is racing to have the president’s “big, beautiful bill” approved by the House by Memorial Day and sent on to the Senate.

“We had a very productive and encouraging meeting at the White House this morning, and the remaining pieces of ‘The One, Big Beautiful Bill!’ are coming together very well,” Johnson, R-La., said in a statement after Thursday’s meeting with Trump and various committee chairmen.

But deep differences remain among the Republicans, who are trying to pass that big bill over the objections of Democrats.

“We are awaiting some final calculations on a few of the tax components, and we expect to be able to complete that work on a very aggressive schedule,” Johnson said.

Meantime, Cabinet officials are expected to start trekking to Capitol Hill to testify about their various requests in the president’s budget.

It’s Congress, under its constitutional powers, that decides the spending plans, approves the bills that authorize federal programs and funds them through the appropriations process. Often, that system breaks down, forcing lawmakers to pass stopgap spending bills to keep the government funded and avoid federal shutdowns.

Vought is also expected on Capitol Hill in the weeks ahead as the Trump administration presses its case to Congress for funds.

Among the more skilled conservative budget hands in Washington, Vought has charted a career toward this moment. He served during the first Trump administration in the same role and, for Project 2025, wrote an extensive chapter about the remaking of the federal government.

Vought has separately been preparing a $9 billion package that would gut current 2025 funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which involves the Public Broadcasting Service and National Public Radio. Trump signed an executive order late Thursday that instructs the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and federal agencies to cease funding for PBS and NPR.

Vought has said that package of so-called budget rescissions would be a first of potentially more, as the Trump administration tests the appetite in Congress for lawmakers to go on record and vote to roll back the money.

Americans see more overreach from the president than from judges, an AP-NORC poll finds

posted in: All news | 0

By NICHOLAS RICCARDI and LINLEY SANDERS, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Donald Trump faces significant pushback from federal judges, a new poll shows U.S. adults are more likely to believe the president is the one overstepping his power rather than the courts — although Republicans largely think the opposite.

According to a poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, about half of Americans say the president has “too much” power in the way government operates these days. On the other hand, Americans are more likely to believe the federal courts have an appropriate amount of authority. Only about 3 in 10 U.S. adults say that federal judges have “too much” power.

Republicans see it the other way: Roughly half say the federal judiciary has too much power, and only about 2 in 10 say the president does.

The survey comes as Trump has issued a record number of executive orders and pushed the boundaries of presidential power, wresting from Congress its constitutional authority to determine spending levels and defying court orders on immigration. The Republican president has directed the Department of Justice to go after his enemies, pressured law firms he sees as antagonistic and used the threat of federal prosecution to coerce officials and others to support his agenda.

Related Articles


Trump signs executive order directing federal funding cuts to PBS and NPR


Trump denies disaster aid, tells states to do more


Did Donald Trump — or ABC News — choose who would interview the president? Why does it matter?


Army plans for a potential parade on Trump’s birthday call for 6,600 soldiers, AP learns


Hegseth orders Army to cut costs by merging some commands and slashing jobs

The courts have generally been the only branch of government to push back on Trump’s plans, while the GOP-controlled Congress has mostly deferred to him. Only about 3 in 10 Americans say Congress has too much power, and just 17% of Democrats say federal courts have excessive power. On the other hand, the conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court fares better with Republicans — only about one-quarter think it has too much power, while one-third of Democrats believe that.

About 6 in 10 U.S. adults say Trump has “gone too far” in using presidential power to achieve his goals, the survey found, but concerns over his power are centered among Democrats and independents. Among Republicans, only about one-quarter say Trump has “gone too far,” while about 6 in 10 feel his use of power has been “about right.” About 14% of Republicans feel Trump hasn’t gone far enough.

“He’s been able to do unprecedented things,” said Brie Horshaw, a 35-year-old Los Angeles esthetician and Democrat. “He’s got too much power. It goes beyond what a president would normally do.”

Democrats are largely united in their sense that Trump has “gone too far” in using presidential power, with about 9 in 10 saying this. About 6 in 10 independents feel that way.

The AP-NORC poll is only the latest of several surveys showing that Trump’s actions have sparked widespread anxiety.

A Pew Research Center poll found that about half of U.S. adults say Trump is setting too much policy by executive order, while about 3 in 10 say he’s doing about the right amount. A CNN-SSRS poll found that 46% of Americans have “a lot” or “some” confidence in Trump’s ability to use the power of the presidency responsibly, which is down from 54% in December.

The findings indicate a rising sense of panic among Democrats as Trump takes aggressive actions to implement his agenda. According to the AP-NORC poll, the share of U.S. adults who say the president has too much power in the way the U.S. government operates has jumped significantly since last year, when Democrat Joe Biden was in his final year in office. It has risen from 32% in a March 2024 AP-NORC poll.

Democrats are almost 70 percentage points more likely to say the president has too much power than they were last year, while independents are about 20 percentage points more likely.

Republicans, meanwhile, are less likely to say the president has too much power than they were in March 2024, when 46% believed it, double the 23% who do now. Linda Seck, a retired nurse, said Trump has the same tools Biden had.

“They both had the same power. They might choose to use it differently,” said Seck, 76, a Republican who feels Trump has been using the right amount of power.

The Michigan resident, who once worked for the Department of Veterans Affairs, has cheered Trump and billionaire adviser Elon Musk cutting deeply into the federal workforce without waiting for Congress’ approval. Overall, Seck compared Trump’s behavior to driving on a two-lane road: “I don’t think he’s going over the yellow line, but he’s right there beside it.”

Seck says she’s a believer in the constitutional system of checks and balances and thinks Trump’s power is not unlimited.

“He can’t declare war without consulting Congress. He can’t bully the Federal Reserve,” Seck said.

Seck, however, joins fellow Republicans in fearing individual federal judges have too much power.

“I don’t think a district judge should be able to overrule the federal government,” she said. “That’s the job of the Supreme Court.”

Other polls show that Americans are broadly more concerned about presidential than judicial overreach. A Fox News poll, for example, found that about half of Americans are more concerned about the president ignoring rulings from the judicial branch, while about 3 in 10 say they’re more worried about the judicial branch going beyond its authority.

And few think the president has the power to override the courts. The Fox News poll found that about two-thirds of Americans say the president can’t ignore the Supreme Court if the president thinks the justices are overstepping their constitutional authority, while about 2 in 10 say the president can and another 16% are uncertain.

The Pew Research Center poll found that most Americans — including two-thirds of Republicans — think if a federal court rules that a Trump administration action is illegal, the Republican administration would need to follow the court’s ruling.

Lynn Cohee, a 48-year-old database administrator and Democrat who lives south of Austin, Texas, is distressed in what he sees as the other branches of government not adequately checking Trump’s actions.

“There’s decisions he’s making where other branches should step in and say, ‘Hey, this isn’t the wisest choice,’” Cohee said. “‘Let’s get rid of all these people’ — well, lets talk about it first. The mass deportations, the foreign policy, the whole idea we’re going to take over the Gaza Strip.”

Cohee said he doesn’t follow politics closely, but he’s worried that the intense partisanship stops one part of the government from checking the other.

“With our political parties, it doesn’t become what’s best, but it becomes like sports and I want to see my team win,” he said.

Riccardi reported from Denver.

The AP-NORC poll of 1,260 adults was conducted April 17-21, using a sample drawn from NORC’s probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.