What is Manhattanhenge and when can you see it?

posted in: All news | 0

NEW YORK (AP) — Twice a year, New Yorkers and visitors are treated to a phenomenon known as Manhattanhenge, when the setting sun aligns with the Manhattan street grid and sinks below the horizon framed in a canyon of skyscrapers.

The event is a favorite of photographers and often brings people out onto sidewalks on spring and summer evenings to watch this unique sunset.

The first Manhattanhenge of the year takes place Wednesday at 8:13 p.m., with a slight variation happening again Thursday at 8:12 p.m. It will occur again on July 11 and 12.

Some background on the phenomenon:

Where does the name Manhattanhenge come from?

Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson coined the term in a 1997 article in the magazine Natural History. Tyson, the director of the Hayden Planetarium at New York’s American Museum of Natural History, said he was inspired by a visit to Stonehenge as a teenager.

The future host of TV shows such as PBS’ “Nova ScienceNow” was part of an expedition led by Gerald Hawkins, the scientist who first theorized that Stonehenge’s mysterious megaliths were an ancient astronomical observatory.

It struck Tyson, a native New Yorker, that the setting sun framed by Manhattan’s high-rises could be compared to the sun’s rays striking the center of the Stonehenge circle on the solstice.

Unlike the Neolithic Stonehenge builders, the planners who laid out Manhattan did not mean to channel the sun. It just worked out that way.

When is Manhattanhenge?

Manhattanhenge does not take place on the summer solstice itself, which is June 20 this year. Instead, it happens about three weeks before and after the solstice. That’s when the sun aligns itself perfectly with the Manhattan grid’s east-west streets.

Related Articles


Missouri Supreme Court has opened the door to abortions being halted again


California changes competition rules for track and field finals amid controversy over trans athlete


New Orleans jail escapees caught following car chase in Texas; 2 inmates still on the run


US prosecutors won’t seek death penalty for son of Mexican drug cartel leader ‘El Chapo’


Kansas community holds private memorial for Israeli Embassy staffer killed in DC ambush

Viewers get two different versions of the phenomenon to choose from.

On May 28 and July 12, half the sun will be above the horizon and half below it at the moment of alignment with Manhattan’s streets, according to the Hayden Planetarium.

On May 29 and July 11, the whole sun will appear to hover between buildings just before sinking into the New Jersey horizon across the Hudson River.

Where can you see Manhattanhenge?

The traditional viewing spots are along the city’s broad east-west thoroughfares: 14th Street, 23rd Street, 34th Street, 42nd Street and 57th Street.

The farther east you go, the more dramatic the vista as the sun’s rays hit building facades on either side. It is also possible to see Manhattanhenge across the East River in the Long Island City section of Queens.

Is Manhattanhenge an organized event?

Manhattanhenge viewing parties are not unknown, but it is mostly a DIY affair. People gather on east-west streets a half-hour or so before sunset and snap photo after photo as dusk approaches. That’s if the weather is fine. There’s no visible Manhattanhenge on rainy or cloudy days, and both are unfortunately in the forecast this week.

Do other cities have ‘henges’?

Similar effects occur in other cities with uniform street grids. Chicagohenge and Baltimorehenge happen when the setting sun lines up with the grid systems in those cities in March and September, around the spring and fall equinoxes. Torontohenge occurs in February and October.

But Manhattanhenge is particularly striking because of the height of the buildings and the unobstructed path to the Hudson.

Frederick: Anthony Edwards wasn’t good enough in Game 4. It has nothing to do with points

posted in: All news | 0

Much of the national discourse surrounding Anthony Edwards in the aftermath of Minnesota’s Game 4 loss to Oklahoma City centered on the guard’s lack of scoring aggression.

Which feels a little ludicrous.

The Timberwolves scored 126 points — including 41 in the final frame — against a historically good defense on Monday in Minneapolis.

The box score suggests Edwards didn’t contribute much to the offensive cause. The 23-year-old guard finished with 16 points after taking just two shots in the first half. But that was largely a product of the defensive attention the Thunder paid to Edwards, which he parlayed into open shots for his teammates by making the “right play.”

“I thought Ant did a great job of letting the game dictate what he needed to do,” Wolves guard Mike Conley said. “He got downhill, he made the right plays, he shot it when he had opportunities.”

Could there be ways for Edwards to adjust offensively to create more opportunities for himself? Certainly.

Everyone noted postgame that Oklahoma City was eliminating top-of-the-floor actions. So, Conley and Finch suggested Edwards — and, just as important, Julius Randle, who truly provided Minnesota with nothing offensively in Game 4 — need to be intentional about running the court to get deeper into the floor to open up other potential actions in Game 5 on Wednesday.

Minnesota used some of those to get Edwards more chances to be aggressive over the final two frames on Monday, but in general, Edwards’ offensive performance in Game 4 was solid.

It was the other areas of the game where he left much to be desired. Minnesota’s superstar set a distinct tone at the start of Saturday’s game, which the Wolves went on to win by 42 points. He, by himself, outscored the Thunder, 16-14, in the first quarter.

On Monday, Edwards’ start was less impressive. He grabbed one rebound, got blown by on a drive by Jalen Williams and surrendered an open triple to Williams — who finished the game with 34 points — after taking a dumbfounding route around a screen.

In the fourth quarter, Edwards lost Alex Caruso on a cut that resulted in an open layup and paid no mind to a cutting Chet Holmgren off an offensive rebound created another easy finish. Those are the types of plays Conley called the “non-negotiables.”

Yes, Minnesota scored 41 in the fourth quarter, but the Thunder scored 38.

“How we won (Game 3) was everything small, we did,” Conley said. “Tonight it was like everything small, we did not do.”

Minnesota feeds off its best player. Defensive tracking data — which can, admittedly, oftentimes be shaky — had Thunder players shooting 8 for 12 from the field when guarded by Edwards in Game 4 after going 1 for 4 against him two days prior.

It sure felt like the lack of involvement in terms of shooting the ball, which the young guard worked around offensively, affected the luster with which Edwards attacked the other portions of the game. He was a ball-pressuring menace on Saturday who battled for every available board; on Monday, he was more of a bystander for large segments of the contest.

That can’t happen for Minnesota, not against Oklahoma City. Conley noted after Game 3 that Edwards is asked to do a lot for the Wolves. He bears a heavy burden.

“So, it’s really hard for him to give the energy all the time that he can defensively,” Conley said. “But, my God, if he can do it four, five, six straight possessions, we’re a completely different team — and he knows that. So, I think this next couple games is going to be big to find ways to impact the game in the same way.”

The reality is, Edwards didn’t. Not in Game 4, and it has nothing to do with how many points he scored or shots he took. The good news for the guard? He gets a chance to try again Wednesday to be the player he needs to be for Minnesota to slay the Western Conference’s new dragon.

But he has to be that elite two-way guard who impacts the game in every phase. And now, he has to do it in three consecutive games. If not, he’ll have to try again next year.

Head coach Chris Finch and Anthony Edwards #5 of the Minnesota Timberwolves argue with referee Zach Zarba #15 against the Oklahoma City Thunder during the second quarter in Game Four of the Western Conference Finals of the 2025 NBA Playoffs at Target Center on May 26, 2025 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)
Minnesota Timberwolves guard Anthony Edwards (5) shoots against Oklahoma City Thunder forward Chet Holmgren, bottom right, during the second half of Game 4 of the Western Conference finals of the NBA basketball playoffs Monday, May 26, 2025, in Minneapolis. (AP Photo/Abbie Parr)

Related Articles


Mizutani: When Timberwolves needed them most, Anthony Edwards and Julius Randle didn’t show up


Timberwolves’ depth delivers, execution does not in Game 4 loss to Thunder


Thunder bounce back to beat T-wolves 128-126 to take 3-1 lead behind SGA’s 40-point game


Terrence Shannon Jr. is ready for the Timberwolves, now and in the future


Timberwolves ditch zone defenses for their ‘fastball’ — aggressive man to man

Missouri Supreme Court has opened the door to abortions being halted again

posted in: All news | 0

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — The Missouri Supreme Court opened the door Tuesday to abortions being halted again in a tumultuous legal saga after voters struck down the state’s abortion ban last November.

The state’s top court ruled that a district judge applied the wrong standard in rulings in December and February that allowed abortions to resume in the state for the first time since they were nearly completely halted under a ban that took effect after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.

Related Articles


What is Manhattanhenge and when can you see it?


California changes competition rules for track and field finals amid controversy over trans athlete


New Orleans jail escapees caught following car chase in Texas; 2 inmates still on the run


US prosecutors won’t seek death penalty for son of Mexican drug cartel leader ‘El Chapo’


Kansas community holds private memorial for Israeli Embassy staffer killed in DC ambush

In Tuesday’s two-page ruling, the court ordered Judge Jerri Zhang to vacate her earlier orders and re-evaluate the case using the standards the court laid out.

The state emphasized in their petition filed to the state Supreme Court in March that Planned Parenthood didn’t sufficiently prove women were harmed without the temporary blocks on the broad swath of laws and regulations on abortion services and providers. On the contrary, the state said Zhang’s decisions left abortion facilities “functionally unregulated” and women with “no guarantee of health and safety.”

Sam Lee, director of Campaign Life Missouri, said he was “extremely excited” by the Supreme Court order.

“This means that our pro-life laws, which include many health and safety protections for women, will remain in place,” Lee said. “How long they will remain we will have to see. But for right now, we would expect that Planned Parenthood would stop doing any abortions until the court rules otherwise.”

Opinion: Lenox Hill Hospital Expansion is About Profits, Not Care

posted in: All news | 0

“Let’s be clear: a 436-foot medical tower has no place in Lenox Hill or any residential neighborhood. This is a community defined by its human-scale architecture, its walkability, and its residential character.”

An illustration of the proposed redevelopment. (Image via Northwell Health)

As a long-time resident of the Upper East Side, I’ve watched with growing concern as Northwell Health pushes forward a controversial proposal to redevelop Lenox Hill Hospital into a monstrous 436-foot tower in a residential neighborhood—a Midtown office building on a residential block!

While the hospital markets this as a much-needed modernization effort, the reality is starkly different. This project is not about better patient care—it’s about maximizing profits at the expense of a community’s quality of life. It is a corporate ego trip and a market share move that is overwhelmingly opposed by our community.

I am a member of the Committee to Protect Our Lenox Hill Neighborhood, a group formed to stand against this outsized and inappropriate development. Our concerns aren’t abstract—they are immediate and real. Northwell’s proposal would lead to a decade of heavy construction in a densely populated residential neighborhood. Families, toddlers, students, seniors in wheelchairs and walkers will face constant noise, dust pollution, traffic chaos, and pose serious safety concerns. The livability of Lenox Hill would be irreparably damaged by a massive tower—forever.

Our opposition isn’t isolated. Manhattan Community Board 8 has voted “no” to Northwell’s proposal by a margin of 2:1, rejecting the zoning changes that call for 250 to 500 percent zoning increases in what is allowed today by carefully thought out and long standing zoning laws. The precedent Northwell wants to establish would allow 12.5 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) zoning that is only found in Midtown and Hudson Yard office areas—never in residential neighborhoods. What does that mean for your neighborhood?

Another Perspective: Investing in New York’s Healthcare Future is a Sacred Duty (Opinion)

Now, we’re asking for broader public support to ensure that the City Planning Commission and the City Council listen to the people most directly affected and consider the larger healthcare equity needs across the entire city. Over 6,000 people have signed our petition against this project and more than 400 people turn out for every local meeting on it—a huge show of anger, frustration and fear of what we are facing. 

Let’s be clear: a 436-foot medical tower has no place in Lenox Hill or any residential neighborhood. This is a community defined by its human-scale architecture, its walkability, and its residential character. Allowing a structure of this magnitude would not only overwhelm the area, but it would set a dangerous precedent for overdevelopment across the city. It threatens to turn our community, and possibly yours next, into a corridor of corporate campuses.

And here’s the irony: Lenox Hill doesn’t need this kind of expansion. The East Side is already surrounded by world-class institutions: New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell, Memorial Sloan Kettering, HSS, and Mount Sinai. What the city needs is smarter, more equitable healthcare planning.

Why not consider areas that are actually underserved? The Upper East Side—or “Bedpan Alley”—has 10 beds per every 1,000 residents, while the Lower East Side has .5 beds/1,000. Does that make sense to you? We read daily about hospital closings and medical deserts throughout our city, yet Northwell wants to spend $2 billion to create just 25 more beds in one of the most concentrated hospital areas. That is madness!

Ultimately, this is about priorities. New York’s healthcare system should be shaped by public need, not developer ambition. City officials must stop rubber-stamping glossy proposals. They must ask harder questions: Who benefits? Who is burdened? And what kind of city are we building?

No one should be steamrolled by huge corporations for their profit at our expense.

Andrew Gaspar is an Upper East Side resident and a member of the Committee to Protect Our Lenox Hill Neighborhood.

The post Opinion: Lenox Hill Hospital Expansion is About Profits, Not Care appeared first on City Limits.