Gov. Tim Walz on Tuesday signed two executive orders aimed at educating the public on existing Minnesota gun safety policies and laying the groundwork for future gun control legislation.

The orders do not make any immediate changes to state gun control policy and come after months of frustration for the governor, who has been pushing for new gun laws.

Walz had pledged to take significant action on guns following the August shooting at Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis, but so far, state leaders have failed to reach any deal.

Walz and almost all Democratic-Farmer-Labor lawmakers support a ban on so-called assault weapons. But with no Republican support and DFL holdouts, prospects of such bills passing remain uncertain.

“I do not have the capacity as governor to issue an executive order to get rid of those, but what I do have the ability to do is to start to move in a direction,” the governor said at a news conference at the state Capitol with gun control advocates and other DFL elected officials.

“These actions today don’t limit your freedoms at all,” Walz said later in his remarks. “Being shot dead in your school certainly does.”

In the face of what DFLers called Republican “stalling” and “stonewalling” on guns, Walz’s orders on guns work within his limited powers as governor.

They direct new insurance data collection, the creation of a “statewide safety council,” and the expansion of education on extreme risk protection orders and safe gun storage.

GOP: Some DFLers also oppose new gun control

Republicans pointed out Tuesday that some DFL lawmakers also are holdouts on new gun control.

Even though the GOP is tied with the DFL in the House, gun bills still wouldn’t pass in the Senate, where the DFL has a one-seat majority. Some DFL senators from rural districts have resisted gun control bills.

“Once the Governor saw that even his own legislators weren’t on board with his gun bans, he pivoted to political rallies and insulting Republicans for suggesting bipartisan ways to keep students safe,” House Speaker Lisa Demuth said in a statement. “Now, he’s pushing an advisory council and PSA campaigns for laws we already have.”

Republicans have backed boosting funding for school security and mental health services rather than new gun restrictions as ways to prevent future violence.

What do the orders do?

The statewide safety council will be tasked with developing a “blueprint” for preventing mass violence, domestic terrorism and politically motivated attacks. It’ll have members from law enforcement, education, mental health and community organizations.

A separate executive order directs data collection and new education initiatives.

Insurance companies will have to provide the state data related to “firearm-related claims,” something the governor’s office says would help its efforts to understand the social and financial impacts of guns in Minnesota.

The Minnesota Department of Commerce would collect the data, which would be used in future efforts to push for new gun control and “hold gun manufacturers accountable,” said Walz, who told insurance companies to “get your lawyers” if they do not want to provide information.

Insurance group waits for more information from state

The Insurance Federation of Minnesota, which represents about 50 insurance companies, said it’s still waiting for more information from the state.

“The Insurance Federation of Minnesota was not contacted in advance of today’s announcement by the Walz administration and will review the data call once issued by the Department of Commerce,” the group said in a statement.

On the education side, the Department of Public Safety will do more to spread the word about the state’s extreme risk protection orders or “red flag” law, which allows a court to remove firearm rights from people deemed a serious risk to themselves or others.

The Department of Education and local schools will work to provide safe gun storage education, gun locks, and gun safes to families with the aim of reducing injuries and deaths.

Kristen Neville, a parent of children at Annunciation School in Minneapolis, where a shooting claimed the lives of an 8- and 10-year-old and injured 30 others, calls for stronger gun control measures during a news conference at the Minnesota Capitol in St. Paul on Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2025. She is flanked by Minnesota attorney general Keith Ellison, left, and Gov. Tim Walz. (Alex Derosier / Pioneer Press)

Kristen Neville, a parent of children at Annunciation School in Minneapolis, said she welcomed the new measures.

“Protecting Minnesotans from gun violence is not about blame. It’s about responsibility. It’s about making sure families, schools and communities have the tools and resources they need before tragedy happens, as well as the support they need afterward,” she said. “We are encouraged by the focus of today’s executive actions.”

Gun rights advocates were skeptical of the impact of Walz’s order.

“What we got today were low-impact orders that serve more as political cover than meaningful policy,” said Bryan Strawser, chair of the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus. “It’s a distraction from the fact that the governor couldn’t build support for his agenda within his own party.”

While the Gun Owners Caucus was dismissive of the overall effects of the executive orders, the group raised concerns about the advisory council.

“Like similar advisory panels in the past, it appears designed to deliver predetermined recommendations aligned with the Governor’s policy goals rather than to provide balanced input or genuine stakeholder engagement,” the group said in a news release.

Related Articles

Tuesday special primary will pick DFL candidates for vacant MN House seats

Gov. Tim Walz appoints former BCA chief as state fraud czar

Joe Spencer: St. Paul’s budget signals bold push for a stronger downtown

7 candidates vie for vacant St. Paul House seat; DFL primary on Tuesday

Minnesota projects $2.5B surplus for now, $3B shortfall later in decade

By MANUEL RUEDA, Associated Press

BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) — The Trump administration on Tuesday designated another Latin American drug cartel as a foreign terrorist organization, increasing financial pressure on its members and opening the door to potential military action against them.

The U.S. State Department said Clan del Golfo, which is based in Colombia, has been listed both as a foreign and a global terrorist group, calling it a “violent and powerful criminal organization” that uses cocaine trafficking to fund violent activities.

“Clan del Golfo is responsible for terrorist attacks against public officials, law enforcement and military personnel, and civilians in Colombia,” the statement said.

The designation comes after the Trump administration in September added Colombia to a list of nations failing to cooperate in the drug war for the first time in almost 30 years. It was a stinging rebuke to a traditional U.S. ally that reflects a recent surge in cocaine production and fraying ties between the White House and the country’s leftist president, Gustavo Petro.

The United States also sanctioned Petro in October over accusations that he had allowed drug cartels in the South American nation to “flourish” and export cocaine to the U.S. — accusations that he vehemently denied, arguing that Colombia is intercepting record levels of cocaine shipments without killing suspected smugglers.

With an estimated 9,000 fighters, Clan del Golfo is one of Colombia’s most powerful armed groups. Also known by its Spanish acronym AGC, the group evolved from right-wing paramilitary squads that fought Marxist guerillas in Colombia in the 1990s and 2000s.

A report published last year by the Human Rights Defender’s Office, a public agency, said that AGC is present in about a third of Colombia’s 1,103 municipalities, where it extorts local businesses and has also been accused of recruiting children.

Clan del Golfo has been involved in peace talks with Colombia’s government since September, which could lead to the disarmament of its fighters in exchange for reduced sentences for its leadership.

Earlier this month, the Colombian government and the AGC signed an agreement in Qatar, under which the group’s fighters as of next March will be allowed to gather in specially designated zones in northern and western Colombia where they will be free from prosecution, as peace talks continue. The agreement also states that the Colombian government will suspend any extradition of AGC leaders to the U.S. during negotiations.

Elizabeth Dickinson, a Colombia analyst at the International Crisis Group, said Tuesday’s designation could be a message to the Colombian government to take a tougher stance against the group.

“The tensions between Colombia and Washington are at historic levels,” Dickinson said.

She added that while terrorist designations are usually meant to stop third parties from doing business with targeted groups, the designation against AGC could be more “symbolic” — and it will “give pause to Colombian authorities … going forward.”

Related Articles

States sue Trump administration again over billions in withheld electric vehicle charging funds

Trump expands travel ban, adding 5 more countries and imposing new limits on others

Trump will go to Delaware for the dignified transfer of the 2 National Guard members killed in Syria

Sen. Mark Kelly calls Pentagon investigation into his remarks a move to chill military dissent

US Capitol statue of teen civil rights leader Barbara Rose Johns to fill Robert E. Lee’s place

Colombia has also recently held peace talks with the National Liberation Army, also an organization designated as a terrorist group by the U.S., and in the past it struck a peace deal with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, while it was still designated as a terrorist group.

The designation does not provide the U.S. government with the immediate authority to conduct military strikes, although it enhances the legal framework for attacks against targeted groups to be carried out.

Earlier this year, the Trump administration designated Venezuelan gangs Tren de Aragua and Cartel de los Soles as foreign terrorist organizations, before launching strikes against alleged drug smuggling boats off the coast of Venezuela, whose legality has been questioned by U.S. lawmakers.

The Trump administration has also accused Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro of sending drug shipments to the U.S.

And last week, Trump said Petro has been “fairly hostile” to the U.S. and that he was “going to have himself some big problems if he doesn’t wise up.”

A woman admitted to aggressively handling children at a Blaine daycare center where she worked and will receive a month in jail and probation as part of a plea agreement.

Chloe Kaye Johnson, 25, of Andover pleaded guilty Monday in Anoka County District Court to felony malicious punishment of a child in connection with the abuse at Small World Learning Center last year.

Chloe Kaye Johnson (Courtesy of the Anoka County Sheriff’s Office)

The plea deal reached with prosecutors calls for a 30-day jail sentence and five years of probation. Johnson’s attorney can argue for electronic home monitoring or work release at sentencing, which is scheduled for Feb. 27. Five other charges, including third-degree assault, will be dismissed.

Co-defendant Elizabeth Augusta Wiemerslage, 24, of Coon Rapids, was sentenced to 90 days in jail and five years’ probation in May after pleading guilty to aiding and abetting third-degree assault and aiding and abetting malicious punishment of a child. She also reached a plea deal.

According to the criminal complaints, the parents of a 5-month-old reported alleged abuse July 16 after taking the infant to Children’s Hospital in Minneapolis after finding bruising on her thighs, groin, buttocks and legs.

Daycare surveillance video showed Johnson grabbing the infant by her lower body and “violently” flipping the child onto her back on a floor mat, the complaints say. The infant’s face hit the mat repeatedly during the incident, with Wiemerslage just a few feet away.

Police identified two other victims and contacted their parents.

In another video, Johnson picked up a second infant and held a cloth to the baby’s mouth and nose for several seconds while the child was crying. Johnson then gripped the child by the neck and shoved a bottle repeatedly in and out of the baby’s mouth. Later, Wiemerslage picked up the child and allegedly “violently slammed” her down on a support pillow, the charges say.

Elizabeth Augusta Wiemerslage Courtesy of the Anoka County Sheriff’s Office)

At another time, Wiemerslage picked up a third infant and “aggressively” shoved the child down onto a changing table. Later, Wiemerslage “violently” picked up the infant by the arm and “aggressively” moved the child around on a mat as Johnson watched.

Johnson initially told officers she was helping the infants learn how to roll over, but ultimately admitted she was “too rough, and admitted her behavior could have caused the (5-month old’s) bruising,” the complaint states. “(Wiemerslage) also admitted to her behavior and that it was wrong.”

Medical examinations showed the 5-month-old girl had bruising in nine areas that were consistent with a “grip injury” or “squeeze‐type injury,” while another infant was found to have a healing leg fracture “suspicious for nonaccidental trauma,” the complaint says. Bruising was found on three other infants who were in the care of Wiemerslage and Johnson.

The daughter of Rep. Nolan West, R-Blaine, was one of the victims of the abuse, and he later introduced legislation to require childcare centers with active maltreatment violations to retain video footage for 60 days and have cameras in their infant and toddler rooms.

Related Articles

Own a Hyundai or Kia? Here’s what you need to know about anti-theft settlement.

Minneapolis man is third convicted in Coon Rapids triple murder

‘Ringleader’ of vast real estate fraud scheme sentenced to prison

St. Paul man gets 17 years in prison for 2 rapes 12 years apart

Ex-Oakdale officer found guilty of misconduct, not guilty of harassment for calls to surveillance subject

The Ramsey County board unanimously approved its 2026 tax levy and 2026-2027 operating budget Tuesday, both decreases from previously proposals.

The board passed an 8.25% 2026 tax levy – down from the proposed maximum tax levy of 9.75% – and a 2026 operating budget of $924,063,479 and 2027 operating budget of $962,473,868.

An earlier proposed operating budget for 2026 was $929.25 million and the 2027 proposed operating budget was $968.45 million.

The reductions come following budget shifts and reductions in levy-supported spending. Community members who shared their feedback and concerns with the budget helped shape it, county officials said.

Flexibility

Still, there were difficult tradeoffs, they said.

One of the reasons the most recent cuts were previously not brought forward was to provide the county some flexibility to do its work, said County Manager Ling Becker during a November board workshop.

Cost shifts to the county from the federal level have negatively impacted the county’s safety net, said District 6 Commissioner Mai Chong Xiong.

“This budget reflects the reality, and that the board has made intentional choices to reduce that impact as much as possible,” Chong Xiong said.

About 46% of the county’s budget is funded through property taxes and county officials have cited rising costs, limited revenue growth, increasing demand for services, as well as uncertainty on the federal and state level as budget pressures. County officials on Tuesday also cited increasing state and federal mandates for services that counties are required to provide.

Budget cuts

Budget cuts include reductions to state-mandated burial assistance funding for low-income residents for 2026, the Ramsey County Sheriff’s newly proposed community engagement funding, county contributions to Ramsey County Historical Society and other funds.

“And I just want to say … this is just spread across the enterprise, it’s things like cuts in IT, cuts in our CEO Next cohort that is going to be delayed, it’s cuts in some of the different staffing and programs and services,” said District 1 Commissioner Tara Jebens-Singh. “We heard folks who were feeling the pain about shifts in services that were happening within their staffing units, within their community. So those are very real. They weren’t taken light-heartedly.”

Nonprofits

County officials also addressed comments from residents on county spending with non-profit partners brought up during the county’s truth in taxation hearing on Dec. 11. That spending represented around 4% of the county budget in 2024 and is not the primary driver of cost increases, which largely come from cost shifts, personnel costs and increased service demands, according to Becker.

“Ramsey County does not provide unrestricted donations. It funds nonprofits through contracts to deliver specific, often state-mandated, services,” Becker said.

She added: “County staff conduct regular invoice reviews and ongoing performance monitoring to ensure that services are delivered as intended and funds are used appropriately. These efforts are aligned across departments and reviewed regularly to prevent fraud, waste and abuse. In addition, the county’s chief compliance and ethics officer who oversees the internal auditor provides independent oversight to strengthen accountability and to ensure consistent adherence to county policies and all legal requirements.”

For further information on county budget changes discussed on Tuesday, go to tinyurl.com/3sjr5uz2.

Related Articles

How Ramsey County is making its ice rinks smarter and greener

Rafael Ortega won’t seek reelection to Ramsey County Board

Rebecca Noecker officially announces for Ramsey County Board

St. Paul City Council President Rebecca Noecker to run for Ramsey County Board

Ramsey County to pay $875,000 to Little Canada foster parents in data practices dispute