Which tagine is best?

Tagines are two-piece, slow-cooking vessels consisting of a cone-shaped top and a wide bowl of a base. Vegetables, meat and spices are layered and covered with liquid, and the whole dish cooks slowly in the oven for hours, filling your home with enticing flavors. The best tagines are the original slow-cookers, producing delicious dishes that are mostly hands-off.

The Kamsah Handmade and Hand-Painted Tagine Pot is traditional ceramic and is the best tagine to start with if you’re looking for an authentic kitchen tool.

What to know before you buy a tagine

Tagines are deeply rooted in North African cuisine but are making their way across the globe as people look for different ways to create delicious food. It helps to know a little bit more about this traditional cooking vessel before you buy.

Hole in the top vs. sealed

A sealed tagine is traditional. This keeps everything inside the cooking vessel moist as it cooks for a long period. Some updated tagines come with a hole in the top, but make sure you have plenty of liquid when you cook if you choose this style.

Size

Size matters when you are cooking for a family. Look for a larger tagine that can make six or more servings for a crowd. You might also consider getting a larger tagine so that the food is not crowded inside the pot. This allows for more liquid and prevents the tagine from cracking during baking.

Unglazed vs. glazed

Again, if you are going for a more traditional tagine style, choose an unglazed clay pot. This requires a close eye on the level of liquid as you cook, and it does need to be seasoned before its first use.

 If you prefer less fuss, look for a glazed clay tagine. Or skip the clay altogether and go for cast-iron or enameled cast-iron.

How you’ll use it

Some traditional tagines are meant for cooking, while others are only for serving. If you have a tagine that is only for serving, the inside may be beautifully painted. Cooking tagines are usually plain on the inside, with the only painted design on the outside.

What to look for in a quality tagine

Lead-free

In the past, traditional tagines from North Africa had trace levels of lead. If you choose a clay tagine, look for any indication that it is manufactured lead-free.

Tight lid

A tight-fitting lid means that moisture stays in your food and does not escape into your kitchen. The lid will not seal, but it should nest securely in the base.

Quality materials

The best tagine for you is the one that fits your cooking style. Although clay is traditional, you can also choose tagines in other materials, including cast iron, enameled cast iron and aluminum.

How much you can expect to spend on a tagine

Workers in North Africa traditionally bring their individual lunch to work in a $5 aluminum tagine. In the U.S., expect to spend $60-$300 for a sturdier, family-sized tagine.

Tagine FAQ

What is a tagine used for?

A. Tagines are a staple kitchen tool in Moroccan cuisine, but many cultures worldwide can benefit from their design. The slow, even cooking of a tagine and the subtle mineral flavors imparted by the clay mean that even the toughest cuts of meat will slowly become tender and flavorful when cooked in this pot style.

Other dishes that are delectable when cooked in a tagine include:

Soups and stews
Rice-based dishes
Shakshuka
Meatballs
Vegetarian dishes flavored with harissa

How do you care for a tagine?

A. The specific care instructions will vary depending on the type of tagine you have. When in doubt, consult your owner’s manual for care instructions.

If you have a clay tagine, you will need to season it before its first use. This not only makes the clay stronger and less likely to break, but it also removes a lingering taste of clay. Start by soaking your tagine in water for at least two hours. Once dry, brush both the lid and the base with olive oil and bake in a 300-degree oven for two hours. Turn off the heat and keep the oven door closed, allowing the tagine to cool completely.

To clean your clay tagine after baking, handwash only and allow it to dry before brushing with a thin coat of olive oil.

A cast-iron tagine without enamel needs to be seasoned as a cast iron pot would. This means brushing a neutral oil or vegetable shortening on the cast iron and baking it upside down in a 375-degree oven.

Cast iron should only be scrubbed clean with hot water and maybe a little salt if there is stuck-on food. Re-season as needed when you notice that it is no longer nonstick.

What’s the best tagine to buy?

Top tagine

Kamsah Handmade and Hand-Painted Tagine Pot

What you need to know: This traditional tagine is handmade and hand-painted, so each is unique.

What you’ll love: This is perfect for slow cooking at low temperatures in this traditional cooking style. The base and lid are of glazed ceramic. Although it’s best used for oven cooking, you can use it on a cooktop.

What you should consider: It has to be soaked in cold water before using it for the first time. It is also temperature sensitive, so do not place a hot tagine on a cold surface.

Top tagine for the money

Kook Moroccan Tagine

What you need to know: This beautiful enameled tagine is a great place to start for delicious Moroccan stews.

What you’ll love: This tagine does not need to be seasoned before its first use. It’s made from heavy cast iron and enameled to be nonstick. The ceramic lid is perfect for steam basting, and this tagine is freezer safe.

What you should consider: The lid is looser than some other tagines, and cast iron is a nontraditional material.

Worth checking out

Emile Henry Flame Tagine

What you need to know: This tagine is beautiful and designed to handle changes in temperature that other tagines can’t.

What you’ll love: This tagine is versatile and can be used on a variety of cooktops, including grills. It’s freezer safe and can go from the freezer to a hot oven. It’s oven safe to 500 degrees Fahrenheit and you can wash it in the dishwasher.

What you should consider: This is very expensive, and many buyers reported that the tagine arrived broken due to improper packaging.

Prices listed reflect time and date of publication and are subject to change.

Check out our Daily Deals for the best products at the best prices and sign up here to receive the BestReviews weekly newsletter full of shopping inspo and sales.

BestReviews spends thousands of hours researching, analyzing and testing products to recommend the best picks for most consumers. BestReviews and its newspaper partners may earn a commission if you purchase a product through one of our links.

By DIDI TANG

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Communications Commission on Monday said it would ban new foreign-made drones, a move that will keep new Chinese-made drones such as those from DJI and Autel out of the U.S. market.

The announcement came a year after Congress passed a defense bill that raised national security concerns about Chinese-made drones, which have become a dominant player in the U.S., widely used in farming, mapping, law enforcement and filmmaking.

The bill called for stopping the two Chinese companies from selling new drones in the U.S. if a review found they posed a risk to American national security. The deadline for the review was Dec. 23.

The FCC said Monday the review found that all drones and critical components produced in foreign countries, not just by the two Chinese companies, posed “unacceptable risks to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of U.S. persons.” But it said specific drones or components would be exempt if the Pentagon or Department of Homeland Security determined they did not pose such risks.

The FCC cited upcoming major events, such as the 2026 World Cup, America250 celebrations and the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, as reasons to address potential drone threats posed by “criminals, hostile foreign actors, and terrorists.”

Michael Robbins, president and chief executive officer of AUVSI, the Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International, said in a statement that the industry group welcomes the decision. He said it’s time for the U.S. not only to reduce its dependence on China but build its own drones.

“Recent history underscores why the United States must increase domestic drone production and secure its supply chains,” Robbins said, citing Beijing’s willingness to restrict critical supplies such as rare earth magnets to serve its strategic interests.

DJI said it was disappointed by the FCC decision. “While DJI was not singled out, no information has been released regarding what information was used by the Executive Branch in reaching its determination,” it said in a statement.

“Concerns about DJI’s data security have not been grounded in evidence and instead reflect protectionism, contrary to the principles of an open market,” the company said.

In Texas, Gene Robinson has a fleet of nine DJI drones that he uses for law enforcement training and forensic analyses. He said the new restrictions would hurt him and many others who have come to rely on the Chinese drones because of their versatility, high performance and affordable prices.

But he said he understands the decision and lamented that the U.S. had outsourced the manufacturing to China. “Now, we are paying the price,” Robinson said. “To get back to where we had the independence, there will be some growing pains. We need to suck it up, and let’s not have it happen again.”

Also in Texas, Arthur Erickson, chief executive officer and co-founder of the drone-making company Hylio, said the departure of DJI would provide much-needed room for American companies like his to grow. New investments are pouring in to help him ramp up production of spray drones, which farmers use to fertilize their fields, and it will bring down prices, Erickson said.

But he also called it “crazy” and “unexpected” that the FCC should expand the scope to all foreign-made drones and drone components. “The way it’s written is a blanket statement,” Erickson said. “There’s a global allied supply chain. I hope they will clarify that.”

Related Articles

The Trump administration is suing the District of Columbia over its gun laws

White House rebuffs Catholic bishops’ appeal for a Christmas pause in immigration enforcement

US signs new health deals with 9 African countries that mirror Trump’s priorities

21 Democratic-led states sue White House over consumer protection bureau funding

Trump announces plans for new Navy ‘battleship’

By JONEL ALECCIA

U.S. regulators on Monday gave the green light to a pill version of the blockbuster weight-loss drug Wegovy, the first daily oral medication to treat obesity.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval handed drugmaker Novo Nordisk an edge over rival Eli Lilly in the race to market an obesity pill. Lilly’s oral drug, orforglipron, is still under review.

Both pills are GLP-1 drugs that work like widely used injectables to mimic a natural hormone that controls appetite and feelings of fullness.

In recent years, Novo Nordisk’s injectable Wegovy and Lilly’s Zepbound have revolutionized obesity treatment globally and in the U.S., where 100 million people have the chronic disease.

The Wegovy pills are expected to be available within weeks, company officials said. Availability of oral pills to treat obesity could expand the booming market for obesity treatments by broadening access and reducing costs, experts said.

About 1 in 8 Americans have used injectable GLP-1 drugs, according to a survey from KFF, a nonprofit health policy research group. But many more have trouble affording the costly shots.

“There’s an entire demographic that can benefit from the pills,” said Dr. Fatima Cody Stanford, a Massachusetts General Hospital obesity expert. “For me, it’s not just about who gets it across the finish line first. It’s about having these options available to patients.”

The Novo Nordisk obesity pill contains 25 milligrams of semaglutide. That’s the same ingredient in injectables Wegovy and Ozempic and in Rybelsus, a lower-dose pill approved to treat diabetes in 2019.

In a clinical trial, participants who took oral Wegovy lost 13.6% of their total body weight on average over about 15 months, compared with a 2.2% loss if they took a placebo, or dummy pill. That’s nearly the same as injectable Wegovy, with an average weight loss of about 15%.

Chris Mertens, 35, a pediatric lung doctor in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, joined the Novo Nordisk trial in 2022 and lost about 40 pounds using the Wegovy pill. The daily medication worked to decrease his appetite and invasive thoughts of food, he said.

“If there were days where I missed a meal, I almost didn’t realize it,” Mertens said.

Participants in a clinical trial who took the highest dose of Lilly’s orforglipron lost 11.2% of their total body weight on average over nearly 17 months, compared with a 2.1% loss in those who took a placebo.

Both pills resulted in less weight loss than the average achieved with Lilly’s Zepbound, or tirzepatide, which targets two gut hormones, GLP-1 and GIP, and led to a 21% average weight loss.

All the GLP-1 drugs, oral or injectable, have similar side effects, including nausea and diarrhea.

Both daily pills promise convenience, but the Wegovy pill must be taken with a sip of water in the morning on an empty stomach, with a 30-minute break before eating or drinking.

That’s because Novo Nordisk had to design the pill in a way that prevented the drug from being broken down in the stomach before it could be absorbed by the bloodstream. The drugmaker added an ingredient that protects the medication for about 30 minutes in the gut and makes it easier to take effect.

By contrast, Lilly’s orforglipron has no dosing restrictions. That drug is being considered under the FDA’s new priority voucher program aimed at cutting drug approval times. A decision is expected by spring.

Producing pills is generally cheaper than making drugs delivered via injections, so the cost for the new oral medications could be lower. The Trump administration earlier this year said officials had worked with drugmakers to negotiate lower prices for the GLP-1 drugs, which can cost upwards of $1,000 a month.

The company said the starting dose would be available for $149 per month from some providers. Additional information on cost will be available in January.

It’s not clear whether daily pills or weekly injections will be preferred by patients. Although some patients dislike needles, others don’t seem to mind the weekly injections, obesity experts said. Mertens turned to injectable Zepbound when he regained weight after the end of the Wegovy pill clinical trial.

He said he liked the discipline of the daily pill.

“It was a little bit of an intentional routine and a reminder of today I’m taking this so that I know my choices are going to be affected for the day,” he said.

Dr. Angela Fitch, an obesity expert and chief medical officer of knownwell, a health care company, said whatever the format, the biggest benefit will be in making weight-loss medications more widely accessible and affordable.

“It’s all about the price,” she said. “Just give me a drug at $100 a month that is relatively effective.”

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Related Articles

To find living donors for kidney transplants, a pilot program turns to social networks

Worried about health insurance costs? There may be cheaper options — but with trade-offs

Out-of-pocket pain from high-deductible plans means skimping on care

Flu season could get a lot worse in the coming weeks, experts say

How delays and bankruptcy let a nursing home chain avoid paying settlements for injuries and deaths

Federal prosecutors have asked a judge to order the ringleader of the $250 million Feeding Our Future scandal, the largest known pandemic-era fraud scheme in Minnesota, to pay millions of dollars in restitution.

Aimee Bock, 45, should pay $5.2 million for her involvement in the scheme, prosecutors said in a Dec. 19 court filing requesting a judge to issue a forfeiture order. Most of the money prosecutors are seeking is in a $3.5 million Bank of America account seized by the government during its investigation.

Bock was convicted earlier this year for stealing federal money from the state through fraudulent meal reimbursement claims to the Minnesota Department of Education. The money was supposed to provide meals to children in need during the COVID-19 crisis.

Bock and 77 others were accused of claiming nearly a quarter-billion dollars in reimbursements for millions of meals they never served. More than 50 defendants have been convicted as of mid-December, but less than half of the money has been recovered.

“As the Director and sole person in control of FOF, Bock was the indispensable leader of the food program fraud scheme and conspiracy,” FBI forensic accountant Pauline Roase wrote in the forfeiture filing. “She submitted all or nearly all of the claims that caused those payments to be made.”

Bock, co-defendant, remain in custody

Bock and codefendant Salim Ahmed Said, co-owner of the now-closed Safari Restaurant in Minneapolis, which was one of the main locations for fraudulent claims, were convicted in March.

Bock and Said, who was 36 at the time of his conviction in March, have not yet been sentenced and remain in custody.

The remainder of the $5.2 million restitution request against Bock seeks payments for various deposits and payments made to entities tied to the scheme as well as “bribes and kickbacks” related to fraud.

At trial this year, prosecutors said Bock had pocketed about $2 million.

Recovering funds

There has been some progress in recovering stolen money since the first charges in the Feeding Our Future case in September 2022.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson, who has been leading the federal prosecutions in Minnesota fraud cases, said on Thursday that approximately $60 million to $70 million had been recovered so far.

Of that amount, around $30 million is cash from bank accounts, Thompson said. The remainder is in real estate and vehicles.

“We seize assets from many people if they have money in bank accounts. We’re very aggressive in seizing those funds if they purchase real estate, especially if they purchased it without financing,” he told reporters at a news conference announcing charges in Medicaid fraud cases. “There’s many multimillion-dollar properties that were purchased outright with no financing, no mortgage. And so we’re going to get a considerable amount back on that.”

The overall recovery estimate amount is up from $50 million in October 2024.

Unclear how much money will be recovered

It’s unclear just how much of the money the federal government will be able to recover from the Feeding Our Future defendants or those charged in the Medicaid-related schemes this year.

Some of the Feeding Our Future defendants’ circumstances illustrate the challenge.

Mohamed Jama Ismail, convicted at trial last year on charges of wire fraud conspiracy and money laundering, took about $2 million, according to federal prosecutors.

Ismail was sentenced Tuesday to 12 years in prison and was ordered by the judge to pay restitution. But at least $850,000 may never be recovered because it’s out of the reach of U.S. authorities in Chinese investments and real estate in Kenya and Somalia.

“He has never agreed to return the federal child nutrition program funds he sent abroad back to the United States,” prosecutors wrote in a sentencing memo. “Because of his crime, he will leave prison a wealthy man.”

In another case, defendants Said Ereg and his wife, Najmo Ahmed, operators of Evergreen Grocery and Deli in South Minneapolis, got more than $4.2 million in reimbursements and sent $2.5 million to accounts controlled by foreign companies, according to prosecutors.

New fraud cases

Last week, federal prosecutors announced six new charges in alleged schemes tied to state-administered Medicaid programs. Thompson described fraud in Minnesota as “industrial scale” and estimated half or more of the $18 billion paid out since 2018 in 14 “high-risk” programs could have been lost to fraud.

Gov. Tim Walz, who has come under increasing pressure to address fraud in government programs, said he hadn’t seen any evidence of that scale of theft.

Officials with the state Department of Human Services continued to push back against Thompson’s estimate at a Monday briefing, saying the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services had never raised concerns about that level of fraud.

Related Articles

Q&A with outgoing St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter

Suburban police speak out on immigration enforcement amid ICE activity

Gov. Tim Walz, DHS say they don’t have evidence to suggest fraud could reach $9 billion

New law inspired by fallen St. Paul fire captain will expand first responder benefits nationwide

St. Paul: Swearing in for Mayor-Elect Kaohly Her on Jan. 2

“I could see potentially there being hundreds of millions of dollars of fraud in our programs if you stretch that out through several years,” said DHS Inspector General James Clark.

“No one at DHS has previously heard anything from our federal partners at CMS or otherwise even remotely approaching the $9 billion figure.”