ICE says agents have arrested 12 people in Minneapolis as part of immigration operation

posted in: All news | 0

By SARAH RAZA, Associated Press

Federal agents have arrested a dozen people in Minneapolis since launching an enforcement operation this week primarily focused on Somali immigrants living unlawfully in the U.S., but fewer than half of those detained are Somali.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said Thursday that agents had arrested 12 people. Of those, six are Mexican nationals, five are from Somalia and one is from El Salvador.

Protesters gather at a rally for immigrants and workers outside Signature Aviation near the Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport, Wednesday, Dec 3, 2025, in Minneapolis. (AP Photo/Tom Baker)

Minneapolis-St. Paul, which has the nation’s largest Somali community, is the latest area targeted by the Trump administration for mass deportations, following operations in Chicago, Los Angeles and Charlotte, North Carolina. This week, immigration authorities have also arrived in New Orleans, where officials said they intend to arrest up to 5,000 people.

In a statement, ICE called the 12 people arrested some of the “worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens.” Eight of them had been charged or convicted of crimes, including assault, fraud, domestic violence and driving under the influence, according to ICE.

Related Articles


Frank Gehry, the most celebrated architect of his time, dies at 96


The Supreme Court will decide whether Trump’s birthright citizenship order violates the Constitution


Grand jury transcripts from abandoned Epstein investigation in Florida can be released, judge rules


Day 4 of Luigi Mangione’s pretrial hearing is postponed because he’s sick, judge says


What Netflix’s acquisition of Warner Bros. means for the movies

President Donald Trump recently targeted Somali immigrants in public remarks, calling them “ garbage ” and saying “they contribute nothing.” He also blamed Democratic Gov. Tim Walz for allowing alleged fraud in government programs to happen on his watch, which a conservative publication claimed was funneling money to a Somali militant group.

The crackdown has drawn intense criticism from local and state officials who have denounced Trump’s rhetoric and pledged to protect the Somali community. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said city police would not participate in federal immigration enforcement.

In the ICE statement, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin accused Frey and Walz of not enforcing immigration laws and endangering citizens.

Frank Gehry, the most celebrated architect of his time, dies at 96

posted in: All news | 0

By JOHN ROGERS

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Frank Gehry, who designed some of most imaginative buildings ever constructed and achieved a level of worldwide acclaim seldom afforded any architect, has died. He was 96.

Related Articles


ICE says agents have arrested 12 people in Minneapolis as part of immigration operation


The Supreme Court will decide whether Trump’s birthright citizenship order violates the Constitution


Grand jury transcripts from abandoned Epstein investigation in Florida can be released, judge rules


Day 4 of Luigi Mangione’s pretrial hearing is postponed because he’s sick, judge says


What Netflix’s acquisition of Warner Bros. means for the movies

Gehry died Friday in his home in Santa Monica after a brief respiratory illness, said Meaghan Lloyd, chief of staff at Gehry Partners LLP.

Gehry won every major prize that architecture has to offer.

Gehry’s fascination with modern pop art led to the creation of some of the most wildly imaginative buildings ever constructed and brought him a measure of worldwide acclaim seldom afforded any architect.

Among his many masterpieces are the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain; The Walt Disney Concert Hall in Los Angeles and Berlin’s DZ Bank Building.

FILE – The Louis Vuitton Foundation building designed by American architect Frank Gehry is pictured before the presentation of Louis Vuitton’s Spring/Summer 2015 ready-to-wear fashion collection in Paris, Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2014. (AP Photo/Francois Mori, File)
LOS ANGELES – OCTOBER 23: (TABS OUT) The Concert Hall Exterior at the Walt Disney Concert Hall opening gala, day one of three, October 23, 2003 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Frazer Harrison/Getty Images for LAPA)
Pedestrians walk past Guggenheim museum, under a cloudy sky, in Bilbao, on June 27, 2023. (Photo by Marco BERTORELLO / AFP) (Photo by MARCO BERTORELLO/AFP via Getty Images)

Gehry was awarded every major prize architecture has to offer, including the field’s top honor, the Pritzker Prize, for what has been described as “refreshingly original and totally American” work.

Other honors include the Royal Institute of British Architects gold medal, the Americans for the Arts lifetime achievement award, and his native country’s highest honor, the Companion of the Order of Canada.

Years after he stopped designing ordinary looking buildings, word surfaced in 2006 that the pedestrian Santa Monica mall project that had led to his career epiphany might be headed for the wrecking ball. Gehry admirers were aghast, but the man himself was amused.

“They’re going to tear it down now and build the kind of original idea I had,” he said with a laugh.

Eventually Santa Monica Place was remodeled, giving it a more contemporary, airy outdoor look. Still, it’s no Gehry masterpiece.

Gehry, meanwhile, continued to work well into his 80s, turning out heralded buildings that remade skylines around the world.

The headquarters of InerActiveCorp, known as the IAC Building, took the shape of a shimmering beehive when it was completed in New York City’s Chelsea district in 2007. The 76-story New York By Gehry building, one of the world’s tallest residential structures, was a stunning addition to the Lower Manhattan skyline when it opened in 2011.

That same year, Gehry joined the faculty of his alma mater, the University of Southern California, as a professor of architecture. He also taught at Yale and Columbia University over the years.

Not everyone was a fan of Gehry’s work. Some naysayers dismissed it as not much more than gigantic, lopsided reincarnations of the little scrap-wood cities he said he spent hours building when he was growing up in the mining town of Timmins, Ontario.

Princeton art critic Hal Foster dismissed many of his later efforts as “oppressive,” arguing they were designed primarily to be tourist attractions. Some denounced Disney Hall as looking like a collection of cardboard boxes that had been left out in the rain.

Still other critics included Dwight D. Eisenhower’s family, who objected to Gehry’s flamboyant proposal for a memorial honoring the nation’s 34th president. Although the family said it wanted a simple memorial and not the one Gehry had proposed, with its multiple statues and billowing metal tapestries depicting Eisenhower’s life, the architect declined to change his design significantly. As of 2014 the memorial remained unbuilt, with local planning officials again asking Gehry to make revisions.

Gehry did agree to tone down a proposed expansion for Facebook’s Northern California headquarters at the insistence of the company’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, who said he wanted a more anonymous look.

Opinion: The Socialist Roots of Latino Politics in New York

posted in: All news | 0

“The beginnings of Latino politics in New York largely embraced a brand of socialism and was principally the domain of Puerto Ricans,” the author writes. “This group organized an entire political movement focused on racial and social justice.”

Left: Bernardo Vega (center) with Jesus Colon and Raul Mendez in 1940. (The Center for Puerto Rican Studies at Hunter College). Right: Councilmember Alexa Avilés (Gerardo Romo / NYC Council Media Unit)

Councilmember Alexa Avilés is exploring a run for Congress in a bid to take on the current Congressman Dan Goldman. That she is doing so recalls the very beginnings of Latino politics in New York.

Like those early figures, Avilés is both Puerto Rican and a socialist. Is Avilés’ rise the continuation of a trend in New York City largely initiated by another Puerto Rican socialist—Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC)? Let me explain why it goes much deeper into our history than that.

The beginnings of Latino politics in New York largely embraced a brand of socialism and was principally the domain of Puerto Ricans. Avilés and AOC are heirs of a politics that goes back over a century. The election of AOC in 2018 began a new chapter in what we call “Latino” politics in New York, one that as I am indicating here, takes a page (whether consciously or not) from the embryonic phase of our people’s politics in the city.

The key early figures in Latino politics—Jesús Colón, Bernardo Vega, Matias Nieves, among others—were socialists through and through. They understood the principles of classical socialism as pivotal for the attainment of economic justice, particularly for marginalized groups like Puerto Ricans. The work of Colón and company followed that of a group of Puerto Rican and Cuban migrants in the late 19th century, whom historian Jeffrey Hoffnung-Garskof has called “migrant revolutionaries.”

This group organized an entire political movement focused on racial and social justice. Their work focused on what we now call Afro-Latinidad, and was intentionally coalitional in nature. Colón, Vega and company continued this work in the late 1910s and 1920s, though they particularly sought the amelioration of the economic plight of Puerto Rican Latinos and other impoverished groups.

Many of these early Puerto Rican socialists, and others who were integral members of the New York City labor movement, were cigar makers. Workers’ rights, fair wages, and fair labor practices formed the nucleus of their struggle. They organized strikes, wrote treatises, and (in the case of Vega) formed the first Puerto Rican chapter of the Socialist Party of New York, in so doing seeking political recognition in addition to economic justice for their people.

It is important to note that, at this point, there is no indication that Vega or others were particularly focused on political representation. These early organizing efforts emerged from a desire to alleviate poverty, improve working conditions, and secure more jobs for Puerto Ricans and other impoverished communities. For Vega, immersion in the socialist politics of the day was not driven merely by an attachment to a particular economic or political philosophy. Instead, it was shaped by his own impoverished circumstances.

Vega was a socialist not because it was fashionable, but because he saw in it a practical response to economic injustice—an injustice he was experiencing firsthand as a Puerto Rican living in New York. In his “Memoirs of Bernardo Vega,” he describes some of the struggles he endured during his early years in the city, writing: “…times were very bad. There simply was no work, and with every passing day I saw my situation grow bleaker and bleaker.”

Vega and other Puerto Ricans found a political home in the Socialist Party of New York. In his memoir, Vega describes a warm reception from many of the members of the party, including its leader, Morris Hillquit. Not only did they offer to help Vega find work and become important interlocutors, but the Socialist Party of New York offered Vega a model and an impetus to think about broader ways to fight for economic justice on behalf of Puerto Ricans and other Latinos. 

Vega, Jesús Colón, and others would form the Alianza Obrera Puertorriqueña, a movement that took on the fight for economic justice while effectively creating a bridge between New York’s Socialist Party and Puerto Rico’s own socialist party. Perhaps unbeknownst to them at the time, these pivotal early organizing efforts would pave the way for the election of the first Latino to win elected office in New York just 10 years later, with the 1937 election of Puerto Rican socialist Oscar García Rivera.

I expand on some of this history in two of my previously published essays on the topic, published here and here. The latter particularly shows that the development of Latino politics in New York eventually veered away from its early socialist sensibilities. And this is why I consider AOC’s victory and continued rise as the insertion of a new chapter in the continued development in Latino politics in New York. This is also why, although it is a new chapter, it is a reversion to our earliest roots.

This new chapter does not end with AOC but rather begins with her. The buzz which her electoral success created around the city was not just among those immersed in socialist politics, but also among younger Latina/o aspiring political and community leaders. Several months after AOC’s surprise victory, Julia Salazar, also a member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), defeated then long-time incumbent State Senator Martin Dilan. Salazar is of Colombian descent. 

In 2019, just a year after AOC became a national figure, Tiffany Cabán, another Puerto Rican Latina, embarked on what seemed to be a David vs. Goliath contest, taking on Melinda Katz for the district attorney position in Queens. Cabán, who had never before run for office and came into the race with virtually no name recognition, almost spurred another political earthquake. She lost to Katz by a mere 60 votes in a race in which over 90,000 voters participated.

In 2020, Jessica González-Rojas, also a DSA member, won election to the State Assembly. She is of Paraguayan and Puerto Rican descent. Avilés won in 2021, and in 2022 Kristen Gonzalez won election to the State Senate. Of Puerto Rican and Colombian descent, Gonzalez is likewise a member of the DSA. Claire Valdez, representing parts of Queens in the State Assembly, is another DSA member elected in 2024. These socialist elected officials are all Latinas. 

And there could be another addition to this list, provided that Diana Moreno is successful in her bid to replace Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani in the Assembly. Interestingly enough, another DSA member, Brian Romero, is seeking to replace his former boss, Jessica Gonzalez-Rojas, in the Assembly. He would essentially be the first DSA male Latino to win an elected office, provided his bid is successful.

As we can observe, this new era in Latino politics in Gotham has seen the rise and success of Latino (in this case, all Latinas) socialist political leaders with possible additions to the list. Will we have a second Puerto Rican socialist woman win a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives to continue the story?

Eli Valentin is a former Gotham Gazette contributor and currently serves as assistant dean of graduate and leadership studies at Virginia Union University’s Graduate Center in Harlem. His forthcoming book, “Politicking from the Barrio: Essays in Latino Politics in New York” (forthcoming from Wipf and Stock), chronicles the development of Latino politics in New York over the last decade.

The post Opinion: The Socialist Roots of Latino Politics in New York appeared first on City Limits.

The Supreme Court will decide whether Trump’s birthright citizenship order violates the Constitution

posted in: All news | 0

By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed Friday to take up the constitutionality of President Donald Trump’s order on birthright citizenship declaring that children born to parents who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens.

Related Articles


Indiana House Republicans pass Trump-backed map, setting up high-stakes Senate fight


Trump is meeting Mexican President Sheinbaum in person for the first time at World Cup draw


FIFA gives President Donald Trump a peace prize in a departure from its traditional focus on sport


Trump administration will expand travel ban to more than 30 countries, Noem says


Trump ventures deeper into anti-immigrant language by calling people from Somalia ‘garbage’

The justices will hear Trump’s appeal of a lower court ruling that struck down the citizenship restrictions. They have not taken effect anywhere in the country.

The case will be argued in the spring. A definitive ruling is expected by early summer.

The birthright citizenship order, which Trump signed Jan. 20, the first day of his second term, is part of his administration’s broad immigration crackdown. Other actions include immigration enforcement surges in several cities and the first peacetime invocation of the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act.

The Republican administration is facing multiple court challenges, and the high court has sent mixed signals in emergency orders it has issued. The justices effectively stopped the use of the Alien Enemies Act to rapidly deport alleged Venezuelan gang members without court hearings. But the Supreme Court allowed the resumption of sweeping immigration stops in the Los Angeles area after a lower court blocked the practice of stopping people solely based on their race, language, job or location.

The justices also are weighing the administration’s emergency appeal to be allowed to deploy National Guard troops in the Chicago area for immigration enforcement actions. A lower court has indefinitely prevented the deployment.

Birthright citizenship is the first Trump immigration-related policy to reach the court for a final ruling. His order would upend more than 125 years of understanding that the Constitution’s 14th Amendment confers citizenship on everyone born on American soil, with narrow exceptions for the children of foreign diplomats and those born to a foreign occupying force.

In a series of decisions, lower courts have struck down the executive order as unconstitutional, or likely so, even after a Supreme Court ruling in late June that limited judges’ use of nationwide injunctions.

The Supreme Court, however, did not rule out other court orders that could have nationwide effects, including in class-action lawsuits and those brought by states. The justices did not decide at that time whether the underlying citizenship order was constitutional.

Every lower court that has looked at the issue has concluded that Trump’s order violates or likely violates the 14th Amendment, which was intended to ensure that Black people, including former slaves, had citizenship. Birthright citizenship automatically makes anyone born in the United States an American citizen, including children born to mothers who are in the country illegally, under long-standing rules.

The case under review comes from New Hampshire. A federal judge in July blocked the citizenship order in a class-action lawsuit including all children who would be affected.

The administration had also asked the justices to review a ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. That court, also in July, ruled that a group of Democratic-led states that sued over Trump’s order needed a nationwide injunction to prevent the problems that would be caused by birthright citizenship being in effect in some states and not others. The justices took no action in the 9th circuit case.

The administration has asserted that children of noncitizens are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and therefore not entitled to citizenship.

“The Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause was adopted to grant citizenship to newly freed slaves and their children—not…to the children of aliens illegally or temporarily in the United States,” top administration top Supreme Court lawyer, D. John Sauer, wrote in urging the high court’s review.

Twenty-four Republican-led states and 27 Republican lawmakers, including Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, are backing the administration