“New York needs a governor who respects the will of the vast majority of voters who want climate action, and whose elected representatives already passed climate laws on their behalf.”

Climate activists rallying earlier this week against Hochul’s approval of the NESE pipeline project. (via Climate Families NYC)

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul has positioned herself as fighting Donald Trump’s lawlessness to defend New York. And some people are buying it: Time Magazine even featured her in their “Climate 100” list.

But as a climate organizer who has spent years pushing the governor to lead on climate, I know the truth: When it comes to climate in 2025, Hochul is no better than Trump, showing herself willing to violate state law, ignore the will of voters and cave to his demands for more destructive, expensive fossil fuel pipelines.

Throughout the past year, Gov. Hochul has openly shared her intention to subvert the state’s democratically passed landmark climate law, the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA), even explicitly talking about “changing the law.”  In practice, she is ignoring it: She has refused to release most of the regulations required to kickstart the Cap and Invest program recommended for implementation of the CLCPA.

Indeed, an Ulster County Supreme Court judge recently ruled that Hochul was in violation of the CLCPA by failing to release regulations to implement the law. Hochul announced plans to appeal the ruling in response. Meanwhile, the governor has also signaled her openness to delaying implementation of the All Electric Buildings Act, passed in 2022, a key pathway to meeting the emissions reduction targets in the CLCPA. 

As if violating the CLCPA and delaying implementation of legislation that already passed wasn’t bad enough, Hochul still has not signed a 2025 bill repealing the “100 foot rule” and just last week approved the Williams-NESE pipeline at Trump’s behest. This pipeline already went through a legal, democratic review process and was rejected in 2020. Thousands of New Yorkers submitted comments against the pipeline, and New Yorkers have shown up at rallies and marches across the city calling on her to reject it. 

But from her backtrack on congestion pricing (even before Trump attacked it) to her willingness to greenlight Trump’s pipelines and ignore state law, Hochul has shown she doesn’t care what voters in New York State want or think, nor does she care about following the laws enacted by our representatives. It is outrageous that she pretends to fight Trumpism while deciding she herself is above the law. 

Hochul backtracks, delays and hedges under the guise of “affordability,” but a recent report from the New York State Comptroller’s office outlined how much the climate crisis will cost New Yorkers, making clear that adhering to the state’s climate law and implementing the Cap and Invest program to make major corporate polluters pay for their damage is an affordability imperative. (The state’s own modeling and outside studies show that most families would see lower energy bills from Cap and Invest.) Moreover, the Williams Pipeline will cost ratepayers in New York City more than a billion dollars, while hurting beachfront communities that rely on summer tourism and business. 

With the United Nations warning the world is on track to breach the 1.5 degree warming limit set in the Paris Agreement with “devastating consequences,” New York needs a governor who respects the will of the vast majority of voters who want climate action, and whose elected representatives already passed climate laws on their behalf. Clearly Gov. Hochul is not the climate leader we need. 

Liat Olenick is a co-founder or and organizer with Climate Families NYC. She lives in Brooklyn.

The post Opinion: When it Comes to Climate, Hochul is No Better Than Trump appeared first on City Limits.

An upcoming road project on the boundary between Oakdale and Lake Elmo aims to improve pavement conditions while addressing safety issues for all users.

The Ideal Avenue Improvement Project covers a section of Ideal Avenue, also known as Washington County Road 13, between Stillwater Boulevard and 34th Street North. Expected elements of the project include widening shoulders and adding turn lanes at intersections, improving pedestrian and bike accommodations, improving drainage and planning for future growth and development, according to a Washington County project announcement.

An open house to inform people about the project is scheduled for 4-6 p.m. Wednesday, Nov. 19, at the Oakdale Discovery Center, 4444 Hadley Ave. N.

The goal of the open house is to present several proposed design concepts and gather feedback from community members, said Tina Elam, a Washington County communications manager. People can review project alternatives and share comments on the proposed designs.

People also can provide feedback Nov. 19 to Dec. 10 at washingtoncountymn.gov/IdealAve.

The estimated cost of the project is $7.8 million and is expected to start in spring 2029, Elam said. Funding for this project will come from Washington County’s transportation sales tax, the Minnesota Transportation Advancement Account and the cities of Lake Elmo and Oakdale.

Related Articles

Retired longtime Woodbury Police Chief Bill Hering dies at 76

Cottage Grove City Council OKs environmental statement for proposed mine in Mississippi River bed

Stillwater City Council denies cannabis shop permit near rec center

3 charged in $500K immigration fraud scheme targeting Spanish-speaking churchgoers in Woodbury, Inver Grove Heights

Xcel pares Wisconsin solar farm project, adds battery backup 

Fairview Health Services have reached a 10-year partnership with University of Minnesota Physicians to fund the state’s medical school. State Attorney General Keith Ellison praised the deal — announced Wednesday — as a “strong step forward.”

The agreement appears to have frozen out university administration.

In a letter to Ellison’s office earlier this week, U administrators opposed the partnership, saying “The Minnesota Attorney General, Fairview and (University of Minnesota Physicians) have announced a proposed deal that would have a profoundly negative impact on the University of Minnesota Medical School and Minnesota.” They say the arrangement came without input from U administration or the Board of Regents.

“The University rejects this proposed agreement in its current form,” the letter reads.

In a statement Wednesday, university officials said the agreement “represents a hostile takeover of the University of Minnesota Medical School. It puts the interests of a single regional provider and a physician group above Minnesotans, and handcuffs the University’s ability to provide medical education and conduct life-saving research.”

According to Fairview’s announcement they and U Physicians “have executed a binding agreement which includes a detailed term sheet and expect to complete a definitive agreement by the end of 2025.”

U Physicians is a group practice for the faculty of the U’s medical school, including more than 1,200 doctors.

“This is about doing what’s right for our patients and for Minnesotans,” said James Hereford, president and CEO of Fairview Health Services, in a statement. “Our shared success depends on putting patients first, supporting physicians and advanced practice providers, and ensuring that Minnesota’s academic health system remains strong and sustainable. We’re grateful to M Physicians for their partnership and to our teams who — together — have proven the power of this collaboration for nearly three decades.”

Current agreement set to expire

The move comes as an agreement between the U and Fairview is set to expire in 2026. Fairview owns health care facilities on the university’s metropolitan campus, including the teaching hospital for the medical school.

Ellison, who has pushed the U and Fairview to reach an agreement, said in a statement Wednesday the new partnership will “ensure continuity of care and academic partnership” at the U’s medical center.

“I welcome the stability agreement framework that Fairview Health Services and University of Minnesota Physicians have announced today as a strong step forward in the process of securing the future of health care across Minnesota with the University of Minnesota,” Ellison said.

He added that Fairview and the U must still deal with issues dealing with provisions for graduate medical education and joint branding.

“They have important work to accomplish for the entire state of Minnesota, and I look forward to supporting this process,” Ellison said.

The new partnership

Dr. Greg Beilman, interim chief executive officer of M Physicians, said the agreement allows his group to focus on patients, education and health care while retaining Fairview as a partner.

“M Physicians is the preeminent faculty practice for the academic physicians at the University of Minnesota Medical School, and Fairview remains an essential partner in our statewide mission,” Beilman said in a statement. “Together, we opened one of the nation’s first COVID hospitals and we continue to advance our region’s complex primary and specialty care. This next chapter builds on that shared history and affirms what’s possible when we focus on what truly matters: patients, learners, and the future of health care.”

The partnership framework includes a $1 billion commitment from Fairview to continue investment in the medical center as well as the Masonic Children’s Hospital and other academic sites, according to the announcement.

It also will “support faculty physicians, researchers, and trainees through commitments to academic funding and opportunities to increase investment through shared goals for growth and efficiency.” And, it includes efforts to deal with rural health care challenges.

Related Articles

Essentia exits talks with UMN, Fairview on ‘All-Minnesota’ health solution

University of Minnesota, Essentia Health announce partnership, nonprofit

Fairview, Sanford end merger talks; Sanford cites lack of support from ‘certain MN stakeholders’

Fairview Health opposes merger with UMN, Essentia

Previous efforts at extending existing partnership

A deal to extend the partnership between the university and Fairview has proven elusive.

Since February 2024, the university and Fairview have been in conversations about a new model of care agreement. The U medical center, which educates some 70% of the doctors and nurses in Minnesota, was originally sold to Fairview in 1997.

In September, Duluth-based Essentia Health exited talks with the U and Fairview to form a nonprofit “All-Minnesota Health Systems Solution” alliance. The proposal for a new health entity, was made by the university and Essentia in January with the goal of aligning resources across the systems for education, training and delivery of clinical care. It was hailed at the time as “a new path forward” by U President Rebecca Cunningham.

Prior to that, Fairview failed to persuade U officials to back a proposed merger with Sanford Health, based out of state in Sioux Falls, S.D., and the largest rural health care system in the country.

Sanford had proposed combining their 58 hospitals, but announced in July 2023 that the deal withered under pushback from key stakeholders and regulators, including the state Attorney General’s Office.

Join Citizens Committee for Children and the Family Homelessness Coalition Wednesday for an online panel discussion, moderated by City Limits, on policy-based solutions to New York’s housing crisis.

A family outside the city’s congregate shelter for immigrants at Floyd Bennett Field (now closed) at the end of November 2023. (Adi Talwar/City Limits)

On Jan. 1, Zohran Mamdani will be sworn in as the city’s next mayor, ushering in a new era of leadership at City Hall, and at the agencies that carry out the work of city government.

The incoming administration faces familiar—but pressing—challenges. More than 100,000 people sleep in the city’s shelter system each month, the majority of whom are families and children. Many more face housing insecurity: nearly half of all renter households are rent burdened, and evictions are rising again to approach pre-pandemic levels.

On Wednesday, Citizens Committee for Children* and the Family Homelessness Coalition will host a webinar on these issues and how the city’s next leaders can solve them. The event, “Safeguarding Well-Being: Supports for Families Experiencing Housing Instability” will include a panel discussion moderated by City Limits’ Executive Editor Jeanmarie Evelly.

Speakers will include:

Alice Bufkin, associate executive director for data and policy, Citizens’ Committee for Children

Gina Cappuccitti, senior director of housing access and stability services for New Destiny Housing

Kadisha Davis, narrative change lead at the Family Homelessness Coalition’s Family Action Board

Vangie Gonzales, policy lead at the Family Homelessness Coalition’s Family Action Board

Maya Jasinska, director of policy and research for Win NYC

Jennifer Pringle, director of Project LIT at Advocates for Children

Joscelyn Truitt, vice president of empowerment with Riseboro

The program will kick off Wednesday at noon. You can register for free here.

*CCC is among City Limits’ funders.

The post TUNE IN 11/13: How The Next Administration Can Support Families Experiencing Housing Instability appeared first on City Limits.