St. Paul begins to grapple with rules for cannabis retailers

posted in: News | 0

St. Paul planning staff have proposed altering city zoning codes to regulate future cannabis retailers, prohibiting them within 300 feet of schools. Retailers spanning more than 15,000 square feet would be required to obtain a conditional use permit unless they’re in an industrial zone. Lower-potency, hemp-derived products could still be sold at bars and restaurants citywide.

The Union Park District Council and the Association for Nonsmokers-MN have called for more stringent rules, while individual retail owners have emphasized that the industry is growing and limiting their sales will simply force them to open shop in other cities.

Jeanne Weigum, president of the Association for Nonsmokers-MN, has urged the city to adopt a 1,000-foot separation requirement from schools and other sensitive uses — the maximum allowed by state law — and then loosen those distance requirements down the line, if desired. Getting stricter with time is unrealistic, she said.

“You can always go back and say, ‘Gee, we don’t have enough of these places’ … but once you have these businesses in place, it’s very difficult to get them out,” said Weigum, addressing the St. Paul Planning Commission on June 7. “Look at tobacco shops. … It’s easy to get it bigger. It’s very difficult to make the number smaller.”

When the state of Minnesota legalized the retail sales of cannabis last year, it left it up to individual cities to figure out the appropriate zoning. Should tobacco shops and other retailers selling adult-use cannabis products be limited to 300 feet, 500 feet or 1,000 feet from day cares, parks, schools and other sensitive uses? How about no separation requirement at all?

The state — which plans to license 13 different types of cannabis retail and manufacturing operations — has mandated that cities cannot prohibit cannabis retailers outright, but they can limit them to no less than one registration for every 12,500 residents, and up to 1,000 feet from schools and other particular types of neighbors.

After studying the experience of 29 cities that have already legalized sales, the St. Paul Planning Commission recently held a public hearing on its findings. The most prohibitive distance requirement possible — 1,000 feet — would leave about 63% of the city off-limits, concentrating cannabis retailers in just a handful of neighborhoods, most of them industrial areas like Energy Park Drive and some areas along Seventh Street. Sales would be prohibited from most major commercial corridors.

“You’re not going to attract any businesses here with the data that was just shown if you go with 1,000 feet,” said Anthony Wilson, a prospective cannabis retailer who grew up in St. Paul, during the recent public hearing.

A 300-foot requirement

City planning staff said they preferred a much looser standard — a 300-foot separation requirement from schools alone, enforced everywhere throughout the city except downtown, which would be exempt. That would leave about 10% of the city off-limits, otherwise opening up retail opportunities citywide.

To date, 178 St. Paul restaurants, bars and other sellers have registered to sell lower-potency, hemp-derived edible products. The city found three complaints against registered sellers, and sent customers under the age of 21 in as planted buyers. Two locations passed inspection and one failed, according to city staff. More complaints focused on non-registered sellers, according to city staff.

Additional proposed zoning rules would govern manufacture and cultivation of cannabis. Up to 15,000 square feet of indoor cultivation would be allowed on most commercial corridors. Over that size, growers would be limited to industrial areas. For outdoor cultivation — which is less likely in an urban area — a conditional use permit would be required, no matter the size of the plot.

Still other rules will govern cannabis testing facilities, product transport between two cannabis businesses, accessory uses such as breweries that produce cannabis drinks, and bike parking for cannabis retail. A zoning amendment on the horizon would govern cannabis cultivated for research within universities located in residential areas.

Another staff presentation to the Planning Commission is likely on July 19. Once approved by the Planning Commission, the proposed zoning changes would likely come before the City Council in August for implementation in September.

Related Articles

Local News |


Swenson, Shah: The mental health of new dads needs attention, too

Local News |


Top high school graduates for 2024

Local News |


New president elected for Tri-State Conference of the NAACP

Local News |


St. Paul family-run locksmith looks back on 100 years in business

Local News |


Joe Soucheray: St. Thomas arena? It’s hard to pick a winner in this first-world problem

Fatal ATV crashes surging in Minnesota so far this year

posted in: Society | 0

All-terrain vehicle crashes in Minnesota have claimed 14 lives so far this year, with deaths on pace to surpass last year’s toll of 15.

The most recent was a 52-year-old Becker man, who was a passenger on an ATV that left the road and overturned on June 8 in Garrison.

A common factor in the majority of fatal ATV crashes has been a lack of safety training, said Jennifer Mueller, southwest regional training officer for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.

“The one piece that really sticks out in our fatalities over the last couple years is the majority of them don’t have that ATV safety certificate,” Mueller said.

The training is required for all ATV riders born after July 1, 1987, and who are 12 years or older, but it’s recommended for everyone, she said.

ATV riders should take other precautions, she said, including wearing a helmet, staying on designated trails and riding at a safe speed. Avoiding alcohol is also important, Mueller said.

Some of the fatal crashes have involved side-by-side vehicles traveling on roads and colliding with vehicles. Mueller said ATVs were designed to be off-road vehicles and aren’t meant to be driven at high speeds on the highway.

All ATV riders under age 18 are required to wear a helmet. Those under 15 are not allowed to drive a wider Class 2 vehicle or side by side.

Young riders under 16 are required to have their parents’ permission and supervision to operate an ATV, Mueller said.

“While they may be able to start and stop that ATV, they just lack that experience to respond to something unexpected,” she said. “So it’s super important for parents to still continue to monitor their youth.”

Mueller said it’s also important young riders have an ATV that fits them properly.

As ATVs have grown in both popularity and size, Minnesota authorities say they’re seeing more young riders operating machines too big and too fast for them to control. Rollovers are a serious danger when children are driving vehicles that are too large for them.

The deadliest year in recent memory was 2022, when 22 people died in Minnesota ATV crashes, including four children under age 18.

Related Articles

Local News |


Bomb threat made against weekend Pride event in Grand Marais

Local News |


Swenson, Shah: The mental health of new dads needs attention, too

Local News |


David McGrath: An only child times eight

Local News |


Tornadoes touched down in Minnesota amid Wednesday’s storms, National Weather Service confirms

Local News |


Minnesota Secretary of State visits Faribault prison to talk about voting rights

Bomb threat made against weekend Pride event in Grand Marais

posted in: Society | 0

The Cook County Sheriff’s Office reported that a bomb threat was directed at Saturday’s Pride Month event in Grand Marais.

According to a news release from the sheriff’s office, the threat was reported at approximately 10:30 a.m., directed at attendees of the Cook County Pride Celebration, an event celebrating the local LGBTQ community in the popular North Shore tourist destination.

Sheriff’s office personnel responded immediately and conducted a precautionary sweep that determined no active threat of harm. Cook County personnel also consulted the Crow Wing County Bomb Squad, which determined that deputies on the scene did what the bomb squad would have done. The sheriff’s office has determined there is no indication of an active threat or harm to anyone.

The schedule for the Pride event included yoga, crafts, a drag queen story hour, live music, a rally and march, and a free dinner and social hour.

Further investigation will be conducted by the Cook County Sheriff’s Office under the direction of Sheriff Pat Eliasen.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


As Pope makes G-7 debut, a spat unfolds over LGBTQ rights

Crime & Public Safety |


Report: Differences between gay and straight spouses disappear after legalization of gay marriage

Crime & Public Safety |


Federal judge rules unconstitutional Florida’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors

Crime & Public Safety |


‘Eternally grateful for the kindness’: Russian transgender refugee reunited with husband at MSP Airport

Crime & Public Safety |


Q&A: These researchers examined 20 years of data same-sex marriage. They didn’t find any harms

BCA identifies 3 Minneapolis officers involved in fatal shooting

posted in: Society | 0

The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension has identified the three Minneapolis police officers who fired their guns during a fatal shooting Wednesday that left one man dead.

According to investigators, officers Enoch Langford, Abdirizaq Mumin and Chaz Wilson fired their weapons during the confrontation, which ended near the intersection of 34th Street and Hiawatha Avenue in Minneapolis.

The Hennepin County medical examiner has identified the deceased man as 39-year-old Michael Warren Ristow of Bloomington. Ristow died from multiple gunshot wounds.

BCA investigators say the officers responded to a 911 call from a person who said they were threatened by a man with a gun. At the scene, officers tried to make contact with the man later determined to be Ristow, but investigators say Ristow fled from officers.

After a foot chase, investigators say the officers fired when Ristow “turned toward officers with a gun in his hand.”

The preliminary findings do not say if Ristow pointed the gun at officers or fired.

Police Chief Brian O’Hara has said the man’s gun appeared to have “jammed.”

The officers are on leave as the BCA investigation continues.