As Emmy hosts, Eugene and Dan Levy want to make the show a ‘light and bright’ night

posted in: News | 0

Robert Lloyd | (TNS) Los Angeles Times

LOS ANGELES — In 2020, the sixth and final season of “Schitt’s Creek,” which had finally made its way into popular consciousness after Netflix picked it up from Pop, its basic-cable home, swept the Emmys. This unprecedented and likely never-to-be-repeated sitcom shutout saw acting wins for Catherine O’Hara, Eugene Levy, Dan Levy and Annie Murphy, writing and directing awards for Dan and a best comedy award for the series itself, co-created by the father and son Levys.

Now, in a sort of sequel, or a belated victory lap, Dan and Eugene return not exactly to the scene of their former glory — 2020 was the COVID year, and the “Schitt’s” cast accepted their honors from a tent in Canada — as hosts of the 76th Emmy Awards. This is as exciting to me, as a fan from first to last — before that, even, if we want to add “SCTV,” where O’Hara and Eugene Levy first made their mark on television — as anything else that might conceivably, or inconceivably, happen during the ceremony, which will be broadcast Sunday on ABC from the Peacock Theater at L.A. Live in Los Angeles.

I spoke to the Levys by Zoom, for a look back and a look forward. These are edited excerpts from that conversation.

Q: Take me back to 2020.

Eugene: Well, that’s a good starting place, 2020. It’s kind of burned into our memory. That was a pretty exceptionally outstanding night, the kind of night you don’t have too many times in your life. It was a fun night, considering COVID had taken over the world. It was odd and wonderful.

Dan: It’s a night that literally nobody had had before. It was incredible. I remember walking to the tent we had rigged to house us all, walking with Annie and sort of glancing over at her and having a flash to our first day on set. I told her that I was picturing our first day and how strange and wonderful our path was. We had broken through at that point, and that was the big deal for us, simply having the nominations, and the fact that we were all nominated as actors for the first time. We had a little moment before walking into the tent of just how wonderful it all was, expecting nothing. Then the night unfolded the way that it did. I don’t think any of us genuinely saw that coming.

Eugene: And how about the fact that they lumped all the comedy categories together right off the top of the show? I don’t think I’d ever seen that before. So it was a Gatling gun of wins, just one after another. It’s the kind of thing you dream about — “What if we just take every category?” You don’t even think that. It doesn’t even register. To be honest, I thought Catherine O’Hara, if she doesn’t win, then there’s something wrong. To me that was the only sure win. And then the second win, and then I won, and then Daniel won.

Dan: The last award of our section was Annie’s award. Everyone else had won at that point, and I looked over at Annie and she gave me a face like, “I’m sorry if I f— this up, I’m sorry if I stand in the way of this streak.” Then she won, and I think I lost my mind more than she did. Mainly because of the conversation we had had earlier that day and the process of finding this actress in a haystack of auditions and instantly knowing her potential and then seeing her recognized and rewarded at the highest level of television — it was one of the most exciting moments for me certainly of that night. Very little of my excitement that night actually had to do with myself. It was looking at all the people we had essentially built this show with, with no expectations, ’cause no one was watching for the entire run of our show. So it did catch up to you in that moment — this strange thing of, “What is happening now?” We’d gone four seasons with nothing, fifth season with a couple of nominations, and by the time our sixth season was recognized, we had come to terms with the fact that the show would always be this kind of niche cult thing that people loved but wasn’t mainstream.

Eugene: It’s an odd thing to say but COVID kind of came into play, because nobody was going out. I think there was a big discovery of our show with people looking for something somewhat uplifting they could be watching. The whole night was so surreal because we’re all masked up and half the people we invited we had to disinvite because the Ontario government came down with a new law the night before the Emmys where the number of people for an outdoor event, which was at 50, was cut down to 25. It was a very bizarre night but just crazy, crazy exciting.

Q: When you were still mostly based in Canada, did the Emmys loom large in your imagination?

Eugene: Yeah, the Emmys were the Emmys — it’s like the Oscars are the Oscars. That’s the top of the heap. We had certainly experienced our share of Canadian awards at Canadian award shows, but the Emmys, my God, they’re still unbelievable. I remember “SCTV,” when we were nominated for writing back in the early ’80s, incredibly exciting, not only to be nominated but to be there and to be nominated. That doesn’t go away.

Q: So you went to the awards?

Eugene: Yeah, we were at the awards that night, the writers. It was the ’82 Emmys, and when our show came up, the clip they showed was a piece I had written called “Perry Como: Still Alive,” and it went over so well in the theater, got huge laughs. And then when they announced the winner, we didn’t win, there was an audible groan from the crowd.

Q: How did the invitation to host come your way?

Dan: We were asked before and it didn’t feel like the right time for whatever reason. Then we were asked again this year, and I think ran out of reasons not to do it. It seemed like a fun little challenge — not little, quite huge actually.

Eugene: We were both obviously kind of nervous, because it’s kind of a tough thing to do — you’re letting yourself out there and whatever, whatever, is it worth it ? We could coast into the fall quite easily without doing this and have a fun time watching it on TV. But I guess something was drawing us into it — like, we could do it, it could be fun. We opened the SAG Awards a few years ago, and we had a ball doing it, and also it turned out really well; it seemed to work, and we got a taste of what that’s like. So we jumped in and said yes. And what can happen, really?

Q: Have you done other things together since the end of “Schitt’s Creek”?

Eugene: Well, we did some presenting. I know we presented at the SAG Awards two years ago.

Dan: You and Catherine did that, no?

Eugene: No, as a cast. You, me, Annie and Catherine. It was when the teleprompter wasn’t on, and we had that thing —

Dan: That was the Emmys.

Eugene: That was the Emmys.

Dan: You said the SAG Awards.

Eugene: No, I said the Emmys. I think. But working together, not since the show.

Q: Was there any feeling of deflation after you wrapped “Schitt’s Creek” and thought, “We’re not coming back next year to do this again.”

Dan: None of us wanted to end the show. It just had to end because that’s when the story ended. We got a fifth season pickup after the fourth season, and that felt like, “OK, I can finish the story in two seasons.” Any more and we would risk being one of those shows that stayed a little too long. All the shows I return to, to rewatch and rewatch and rewatch, are shows that left at just the right time. They left me wanting more. It was important for all of us, I think, to leave the audiences we respected so much — they are the reason that we got to this point, [the] people finding it on Netflix and sharing it and sharing the memes and sharing the gifs and all the sort of virality of it. It’s a show that succeeded outwardly by way of the fans, so it was important to not get them to where they thought, “Eh.” We wanted every season to beat the last one. I think that our last episode is one of the best we’d ever done. How lucky.

Q: The 2020 Emmys were kind of like a bonus episode.

Dan: Yeah, the irony of Moira Rose never having an Emmy win and then all of us getting it felt like a really nice maraschino on top of everything. But listen, I fall asleep at least once every couple of weeks thinking, wishing, praying that an idea comes that would bring us all back together. It just hasn’t happened yet. Despite what the media — every time you say, “Well, maybe,” it’s a whole headline thing — reunion! But it’s not for a lack of love, that’s for sure.

Q: But “deflation” like the last day of high school?

Eugene: Oh my God, yes.

Dan: I cried for 24 straight hours.

Eugene: The tears were going through the entire last week of the shoot. Every time you reached a final something — final scene in our motel room, final scene with the family — it was just heart-wrenching. Because it was ending, and nobody really wanted it emotionally to end. By the time we shot the wedding sequence, my God, there wasn’t enough Kleenex in the studio.

Q: How have you been preparing for this upcoming job?

Dan: A lot of writing, that’s for sure. We have a very tiny team of writers who are working with us. It really comes down to wanting it to feel celebratory, not wanting it to be too hard but still wanting a bit of an edge. People, from what I’ve been told, are kind of excited that we’re not hard-edged comics, that there will be a kind of warmth to the room. It’s trying to marry all of those things without being boring, ultimately. But we’re getting there.

Eugene: And [it’s] also just paying tribute to television, certainly the nominees, but to the medium that gave us both our starts. It’s always hit me in a funny way when jokes are done at the expense of people who are nominated — they’ve put in the work, and it’s their night, really, and you have to have enough respect for the awards show itself. Otherwise, why are we here? You want it to be funny, but it’s maybe a kinder, gentler approach. It’s true, we’re not comedians, but we’re kind of funny working together. It’s a relationship that was forged on “Schitt’s Creek,” and it seems to continue. It really works for both of us, and I guess for whoever said, “Come on and do it.”

Q: So you’ll be doing a version of David and Johnny or Dan and Eugene?

Dan: I think in certain ways they’re sort of interwoven; one is an extension of the other. So yeah, there’s a nice little rhythm. We’re going to keep it light and bright, there’s still two weeks left, anything can happen, but that’s the goal.

Q: How does the pressure of being nominated compare to the pressure of running this three-hour ship?

Dan: Ultimately you just want to get through the monologue, and everything else will be an easier walk.

Eugene: You’re setting a tone, and it’s our tone. It is what it is. It’s kind of tricky when you’re in the weeds, but ultimately we have to be ourselves and go with what we think is funny. We’re working with some really good people and we’re actually having fun in the process. Listen, it’s a first, and it is a big show; I think the key is just don’t think about that, ’cause that could take you down. So, get in, get out, dodge the bullets, say goodnight and God bless.

Related Articles

Movies & TV |


‘Wise Guy: David Chase and The Sopranos’ review: A legendary show’s origins are examined

Movies & TV |


As Trump and Harris spar, ABC’s moderators grapple with conducting a debate in a polarized country

Movies & TV |


Will the Emmys be the ‘Shogun’ show? What to expect on Sunday

Movies & TV |


Meet the Harris-Trump debate moderators: ABC News’ David Muir and Linsey Davis

Movies & TV |


JonBenét Ramsey TV series to feature Melissa McCarthy, Clive Owen on Paramount+

©2024 Los Angeles Times. Visit latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

The 10 best casino hotels in the U.S.

posted in: News | 0

Las Vegas isn’t the only destination with luxe casino resorts — although with more than 150 casinos, Sin City is bound to shine in that respect. Turns out, there are some pretty extraordinary casino resorts in cities across the nation.

USA Today’s 10Best recently asked readers to choose the nation’s top casino hotels — “top” being defined as “top-notch gaming and excellent amenities” — winnowing down a list of 20 possibilities nominated by travel experts to a top 10. Las Vegas accounted for two, and Atlantic City had three. The rest were spread across the country, from Connecticut to Mississippi and California.

An hour east of Los Angeles, Yaamava’ took the No. 2 spot with shout-outs for its 20 restaurants and bars, expansive pool deck and a diverse entertainment lineup that ranges from Ice Cube to Dan + Shay, Flogging Molly and Andrea Bocelli. Closer to home, Sonoma County’s Graton Resort & Casino came in at No. 9 for its upscale guest rooms, restaurants and entertainers — Billy Ocean and 98 Degrees will be appearing in October.

The Boathouse Asian Eatery is one of several restaurant options at Graton Resort & Casino in Rohnert Park. (Jane Tyska/Bay Area News Group File)

Here’s the list. Find more details at https://10best.usatoday.com.

Related Articles

Travel |


A comfortable contrast: In Saratoga Springs, high-stakes horse racing blends with healing springs

Travel |


10 ‘second cities’ you should consider visiting this fall

Travel |


Here’s your fall travel cheat sheet including cheapest flights and top destinations

Travel |


A southern Idaho road trip offers hot springs, quirky museums and more

Travel |


Can travel transform your life? This author says yes

10 best casino hotels in the U.S.

1 Mohegan Sun, Uncasville, Connecticut

2 Yaamava’ Resort & Casino at San Manuel, Highland, California

3 Caesars Palace, Las Vegas, Nevada

4 Ocean Casino Resort, Atlantic City, New Jersey

5 Beau Rivage Resort & Casino, Biloxi, Mississippi

6 Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa, Atlantic City

7 Mount Airy Casino Resort, Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania

8 Resorts Casino Hotel, Atlantic City

9 Graton Resort & Casino, Rohnert Park, California

10 ARIA Resort & Casino, Las Vegas

‘Wise Guy: David Chase and The Sopranos’ review: A legendary show’s origins are examined

posted in: News | 0

“For years, everybody told me that I had to write something about my mother,” David Chase says, but chances are they never imagined he would find a way to do that in a television show about … the New Jersey mob? In the HBO documentary “Wise Guy: David Chase and The Sopranos” (streaming on Max), director Alex Gibney puts all of it under the microscope.

The series premiered 25 years ago, which is as good an excuse as any to look back at a pop cultural phenomenon that not only reshaped Hollywood gangster stories, but ideas about what TV could even be.

“The Sopranos” was among the earliest examples of “prestige” and Gibney’s documentary is aiming for something prestige-adjacent. It’s on the self-serious side, but maybe jokily so? Their interview takes place on a set that’s a replica of Dr. Melfi’s office, where the psychiatrist and Tony Soprano held their therapy sessions. There’s something funny in the idea of putting Chase in the very same hot seat he created, but it’s a surprisingly flat visual motif meant to underscore the idea that he’s here to spill his guts. He claims to be a reluctant participant, then talks his head off. Make of that what you will, but the parallels to Tony’s mixed feelings about his own psychoanalysis aren’t as interesting as Gibney might have hoped. Even so, if you liked the show, this is an enjoyable revisit through the eyes of key talent.

It’s the kind of behind-the-scenes material that used to be featured as a DVD extra, and it’s satisfying on those terms. But in today’s landscape, it can only exist as a stand-alone project, which creates more portent around it than it probably warrants. The first 10 minutes are saddled with nervous, chaotic, overlapping editing that speeds through Chase’s biography to better focus on the show itself. Once the documentary takes a breath and starts telling a story, it suddenly becomes watchable. But “Wise Guy” ends by mimicking the show’s divisively abrupt final note, which leaves the impression that there’s a deficit of original ideas animating this endeavor.

Split into two episodes, it includes interviews from writers, cast members and HBO executives who talk about the show’s origins, evolution and struggles. There are grainy clips from audition tapes, plus old photos of Chase when he was young, and you realize he has always had what one colleague describes as resting dour face. Is that innate or shaped by a taxing relationship with his mother, Norma?

He spent much of his childhood in the same New Jersey town where the show was filmed, and when he got married in 1968, “a couple of my uncles took me aside and said, ‘You’ve got to get out of here. You’re not going to stay married if you stay here.’ Because they knew what my parents were like and they were really talking about my mother. My wife would not have been able to take it. My mom was just nuts. So we left the night of our wedding and started for California.”

Related Articles


As Emmy hosts, Eugene and Dan Levy want to make the show a ‘light and bright’ night


As Trump and Harris spar, ABC’s moderators grapple with conducting a debate in a polarized country


Will the Emmys be the ‘Shogun’ show? What to expect on Sunday


Meet the Harris-Trump debate moderators: ABC News’ David Muir and Linsey Davis


JonBenét Ramsey TV series to feature Melissa McCarthy, Clive Owen on Paramount+

The show’s success meant he and his wife would ultimately be able to buy a house in France. It’s a brief aside but it stands out, because many Hollywood writers and showrunners today are struggling to achieve the same financial windfalls. One hit show isn’t enough to hit the jackpot anymore.

But it was for Chase. Other name-brand producers with similar levels of success have used that to build a TV empire for themselves. Not Chase, which makes him unique. He misses the problem-solving involved in running a TV series, but I would have also liked to hear his thoughts about the kinds of shows that followed in the wake of “The Sopranos,” or what he makes of the depleted state of network TV. He says he found the latter too confining (his credits include “The Rockford Files” and “Northern Exposure”) but everyone in Hollywood is stressed at the moment and the old school broadcast shows remain the most stable and remunerative for people both in front of and behind the camera. Chase isn’t fighting those battles anymore, which presumably frees him up to have some public opinions about the state of television today. Too bad we don’t hear about any of that.

He’s so obviously proud that “The Sopranos” was a representation of his Italian American heritage. Gibney doesn’t ask about Italian Americans who pushed back on that portrayal. Does Chase have myopic view of things? Maybe. Storytellers are allowed that. But isn’t it more interesting in hindsight to explore some of those anxieties through conversion? That was one of the show’s strengths — tackling discordant ideas about who we are and how we want to live. What’s the point of building a set to look like “The Sopranos” if you’re not trying to broach some of the show’s more ambitious conversations about life?

Every character who had a relationship with Tony was making a deal with the devil. Are there parallels to Chase in there? Gibney only glancingly acknowledges the tension that existed in the writers room (which one writer calls toxic). “Let’s put it this way,” Chase says obliquely, “I used to get very angry because no one was coming up with anything. And then since those days I’ve thought, yeah, maybe that’s because you said no to everything, so they stopped.”

Tony made a deal with the devil too, he adds. “He’s really the devil’s representative. But he wasn’t happy with his deal, was he? That’s what I often felt. People said, ‘Oh, he should have been punished!’ and my response was, ‘He was punished every day, this guy — you didn’t see him being miserable for all these years?’”

“Wise Guy: David Chase and The Sopranos” — 2.5 stars (out of 4)

Where to watch: Max

Nina Metz is a Tribune critic.

Study finds toxic metals in tampons: FDA launches investigation

posted in: News | 0

Helena Oliviero | The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (TNS)

The Food and Drug Administration announced it has started a research project examining the possible effects of toxic metals in tampons, sparking concerns about products used by millions of women in the U.S.

A recent study found a variety of metals — including mercury, arsenic and lead — in more than a dozen brands of tampons.

The FDA said the study will help better understand the potential impact and whether the metals are causing harm to women. The need to understand this is of critical importance: Up to 80% of girls and women who menstruate use tampons for nearly a week every month for decades of their lives.

The FDA said Tuesday while the study, led by a UC Berkeley researcher and published in July, found metals in some tampons, the study “did not test whether metals are released from tampons when used.”

“It also did not test for metals being released, absorbed into the vaginal lining, and getting into the bloodstream during tampon use. The FDA has therefore commissioned an independent literature review and initiated an internal bench laboratory study to evaluate metals in tampons,” the FDA said in a statement.

One of the key questions will be determining how much, if any, of the metals leach out of the tampons and are absorbed by the body.

The recent study, published in the journal Environment International, evaluated levels of 16 metals in tampons: arsenic, barium, calcium, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, copper, iron, manganese, mercury, nickel, lead, selenium, strontium, vanadium and zinc. They looked at 30 tampons from 14 different brands sold in the U.S. and Europe. They included organic and nonorganic tampons, name brands and generic store brands.

The brands tested were not named in the report, but researchers found metals were present in all types of tampons studied. Lead concentrations were higher in nonorganic tampons but arsenic was higher in organic tampons.

Researchers noted more investigation is needed to better understand the risk posed to women.

The findings are particularly concerning because the vagina has a higher potential for chemical absorption than skin elsewhere on the body, and can result in systemwide exposure. Chronic exposure to metals have been found to increase the risk of a wide variety of health woes including heart disease, dementia, infertility, diabetes and cancer. In addition, metals can harm maternal health and fetal development.

Given the potential for a major health concern, it’s an area of surprisingly little research.

Lead author Jenni A. Shearston, a postdoctoral scholar at the UC Berkeley School of Public Health and UC Berkeley’s Department of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management said she thought her research was the first to measure metals in tampons.

Researchers noted metals could make their way into tampons a number of ways: The cotton material could have absorbed the metals from water, air, soil, through a nearby contaminant (for example, if a cotton field was near a lead smelter) or some might be added intentionally during manufacturing as part of a pigment, whitener, antibacterial agent or some other production process.

After the study was released Dr. Cherie Hill, an Emory Healthcare gynecologist and obstetrician told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution she was very surprised to learn these findings were only coming to light now.

Related Articles

Health |


The best cleaning caddies for organizing your supplies

Health |


ACA enrollment platforms suspended over alleged foreign access to consumer data

Health |


US uninsured rate was stable in 2023, even as states’ Medicaid purge began

Health |


More women had their tubes tied after Roe v. Wade was overturned

Health |


Errors in Deloitte-run Medicaid systems can cost millions and take years to fix

“We’ve heard about heavy metals in other sources like water and clothing, and I was just like, ‘Why wouldn’t we have looked at tampons previously?’” she said.

Hill said she doesn’t think women should “throw out all of their tampons,” but there were some alarming findings in the study that could give some women pause about the continued use of tampons. She said more research is critically needed to know the impact.

“We need to know what is going into our bodies and we need to know how that will impact our health,” she said.

“The paper talks about lead present in all of (the tampons) and we don’t know if there’s a safe level of lead that should ever be in your body,” she said. “Some people may say ‘Because I don’t know the impact, I want to avoid it.’”

But even alternatives, including silicone menstrual cups and period underwear, have questions about their safety and more research is needed on those products too, she said. Many brands of menstrual pads contain elevated levels of chemicals linked to developmental and reproductive harm, according to a 2019 study in the journal Reproductive Toxicology.

Concerns about tampons go back decades. In 1980 scientists confirmed concerns that super-absorbent tampons were associated with toxic shock syndrome.

The FDA didn’t give a timeline to release its findings.

©2024 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Visit at ajc.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.