Free agent Michael Boxall had other options, but Minnesota United had a stronger pull

posted in: News | 0

Michael Boxall found it “kind of funny.”

“At this age (36), it was a time where I’ve had the most calls from other teams,” Boxall told reporters Tuesday. “I mean, there were options.”

But the longest-tenured Minnesota United player will not enter free agency at the end of the season and instead signed a one-year contract with the Loons for 2025, with a club option for 2026, the team said Tuesday.

Boxall said the decision was not a particularly difficult one. The New Zealand native and MNUFC leader in MLS appearances (215 since 2017) has started a family in Minnesota, with his wife Libby, daughter and son.

“For me and my family, we’re pretty happy to stay here,” Boxall explained. “My kids love it here. Wife loves it here as well. So yeah, they’re delighted to stay on.”

Playing for the Loons, of course, was another driver for Boxall to remain in Minnesota.

“Through that whole process, I think if I was to go anywhere else, it would feel like I’d be going (for) a job,” Boxall said. “It would feel like a job, whereas here, it doesn’t. It feels like more than that.”

Boxall’s standing has led to a level of ownership in the product and he spoke about unfinished business with the Loons under first-year head coach Eric Ramsay. The club has worked to get significantly younger under new Chief Soccer Officer Khaled El-Ahmad this year, and that will continue going into next season.

But the goal is to sprinkle the youth movement in with impact veterans in leadership positions. Boxall epitomizes that, having worn the captain’s armband in 28 of 30 MLS matches this season.

Boxall has played a team-high 2,565 minutes this season and while there have been some lean games, he was huge in the 2-0 win over Sporting Kansas City on Saturday. After the Loons defense as a whole struggled in the 2-1 loss to FC Cincinnati last Wednesday, he tallied 12 clearances in Kansas.

“It was a real captain’s performance,” Ramsay said about Saturday’s match. “I think it is pretty symbolic in a sense. Someone, of course, really happy that he’s going to be around for the coming couple of years, because Boxy is someone who sets a standard with how he looks after himself, how he trains, and in those games, in particular, he’s a gladiator.”

Diaz down, but not out

Center back Jefferson Diaz exited the Kansas City win with an adductor injury, but an MRI showed no structural damage and his absence from Tuesday’s training session was deemed precautionary.

“He should be in good shape for the weekend,” Ramsay said. “Something that’s he’s just trying to work out, whether it’s pain that he can manage, or whether it’s something more serious. The fact that he’s had it scanned and it shows nothing is a really good sign.”

Tapias scuffling, but not out

The Loons have relied on center back Micky Tapias in 24 matches this season, but after a poor game in the 2-1 loss to FC Cincinnati, he was taken out of the starting XI against Sporting. He cam back in for the final 13 minutes after Diaz got hurt.

It didn’t go well as his foul in the 18-yard box led to a SKC penalty kick, which Willy Agada put off the woodwork.

“We just got to get (Tapias) to rediscover some of that conviction that he played with,” Ramsay said. “And I think he’s been, in some sense, unfortunate to be repeatedly involved with goals, and they’re not necessarily clean-cut errors, but perhaps a little bit of indecision, perhaps a little bit of lacking cohesion in the back line. So he’s been a victim of that. But I know deep down, he’s a very good player at this level.”

Briefly

After Saturday’s home game against Colorado Rapids, MNUFC will travel Monday to Salt Lake for Wednesday’s match in Utah and stay on the road through Saturday’s match at Vancouver. … Fullbacks DJ Taylor (hamstring) and Zarek Valentin (lower leg) remained sidelined Tuesday.

Drug-resistant germs will kill millions more people in coming decades, researchers warn

posted in: News | 0

Corinne Purtill | (TNS) Los Angeles Times

Since the dawn of the antibiotic age, opportunistic pathogens have evolved defenses faster than humans can develop drugs to combat them.

At the same time, humans have unwittingly given the bugs an advantage through the overuse of antibiotics, allowing pathogens that survive their exposure to pass on their resistant traits.

Now, a new report finds that unless officials take action to develop new medications, “superbug” infections could kill nearly 2 million people a year in 2050 — a 67.5% increase from the 1.14 million lives lost this way in 2021.

An additional 8.22 million will die of causes related to those infections in 2050, according to a study from the Global Research on Antimicrobial Resistance Project published this week in the Lancet, a medical journal.

GRAM is a joint project of the University of Oxford and the University of Washington School of Medicine’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. The report is the most comprehensive assessment yet of the risk of antimicrobial resistance, or AMR, which the World Health Organization has long identified as one of the top 10 threats to global public health.

It was released in advance of a United Nations General Assembly meeting later this month on drug-resistant pathogens.

“The numbers in the Lancet paper represent a staggering and unacceptable level of human suffering,” said Henry Skinner, chief executive of the AMR Action Fund, a public-private partnership that invests in new antibiotic development, who was not involved in the study. “A continued failure of governments to meet their moral obligations to protect and care for their people, as this paper shows, will doom millions of people to needless deaths.”

Roughly two-thirds of AMR deaths in 2050 will be among people ages 70 years or older, the report estimated. Older people are already at greater risk for drug-resistant infections, which are often acquired in hospitals and care facilities.

Between 1990 and 2021, the report noted, deaths due to AMR increased by more than 80% for people ages 70 and older.

Across all ages, the mortality rate from resistant pathogens is projected to be highest in South Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean.

New antibiotic development has been painfully slow, especially when compared with drugs with better financial incentives for producers. Vital as they are, antibiotics aren’t meant to be taken over the long term like medications for chronic conditions. The most powerful have to be used as rarely as possible, to give bacteria fewer opportunities to develop resistance.

In June, the World Health Organization warned that far too few new antibiotics are currently in the global development pipeline, and the ones that are there fall far short of the innovation required to vanquish the most dangerous microbes.

Of the 32 antibiotics under development against bugs on the WHO’s 2024 bacterial priority pathogen list, the organization noted, only 12 took nontraditional approaches, which is vital for staving off the rise of drug resistance. And of those 12, only four were active against pathogens that WHO identified as the most critical threat to public health.

The scenario laid out in the GRAM report is grim, its authors noted, but not inevitable. Improvements in vaccine distribution and access to clean drinking water and sanitation have helped halve AMR-related deaths among children younger than 5 between 1990 and 2021, even as superbugs proliferated.

With better infection control measures and accelerated drug development, the report found, up to 92 million lives could be saved between 2025 and 2050.

“The data shows that if we take action toward better stewardship practices, improved access in low- and middle-income countries, and new investments to bolster the antibiotic pipeline, then we can save tens of millions of lives,” said James Anderson, chair of the AMR Industry Alliance.

___

©2024 Los Angeles Times. Visit at latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Bismarck diocese sues federal government over abortion, IVF and gender-based rights

posted in: Society | 0

BISMARCK — The Catholic Diocese of Bismarck and the Catholic Benefits Association are suing the federal government over recent regulations that increase protections for transgender workers and those seeking reproductive health care.

The complaint points to parts of the The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, signed into law by President Joe Biden in 2022, that outline federal protections for workers seeking abortions and fertility treatments.

It also mentions the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s new workplace harassment guidelines, which additionally provide transgender workers rights related to pronoun usage, bathroom access and gender-affirming health care.

The Catholic Diocese of Bismarck is a member of the Catholic Benefits Association. Together, the entities contend the new mandates “ran roughshod” over their rights as religious employers by ruling some of the church’s teachings — which reject abortion, in vitro fertilization and “transgender ideology” — as unlawful workplace conduct.

“Betrayal” is how the complaint describes the rule’s adoption after pro-life groups supported the PWFA allegedly before it mentioned abortion.

“The EEOC’s rulemaking has betrayed the firm understanding that the PWFA exists to protect pregnant women, postpartum mothers, and their babies — not force religious employers to provide material support for and engage in speech supportive of abortions or immoral fertility treatments,” the complaint states.

It is emphasized that the diocese “does not and will not” accommodate employees who obtain or direct abortion, ”immoral fertility treatment” or transgender affirmation. Such affirmations include the usage of “false pronouns” and the allowance of “improper access to single sex spaces” — like bathrooms.

It argues that the rule puts religious employers at a crossroads of having to either comply with the standards and cast aside their beliefs, or to uphold their ideals and fall vulnerable to penalties.

The Catholic Diocese of Bismarck and Catholic Benefits Association further argue the new interpretations of sex-based discrimination do not protect their religious freedoms and are contradictory to the original purpose of Title VII outlined in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlaws workplace discrimination.

Based on court documents, the EEOC’s defense aligns with its responses to related concerns raised in a fall 2023 public comment period.

The commission said the idea that discussions of religious perspectives related to aforementioned topics would be considered unlawful harassment is a false interpretation. It states that such conduct would be penalized only if it creates a “hostile work environment,” which the commission would interpret on a case-by-case basis.

It also said religious exemptions are still allowed in accordance with Title VII, and as such, the EEOC would evaluate religious exemption requests on a case-by-case basis as well.

In a memorandum, EEOC Chair Charlotte Burrows wrote that the motion to suspend the rules, set forth by the Catholic Diocese of Bismarck and Catholic Benefits Association, should be denied. Burrows said the entities lack standing because they cannot demonstrate harm or confusion resulting from the rules, nor can they prove that the EEOC’s discretionary approach is unlawful.

Attorneys representing the Catholic Diocese of Bismarck and the Catholic Benefits Association have asked U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Traynor to temporarily suspend enforcement of the regulations while the lawsuit takes place.

Related Articles

News |


‘She should be alive today’ — Harris spotlights woman’s death to blast abortion bans and Trump

News |


Now a Roe advocate, woman raped by stepfather as a child tells her story in Harris campaign ad

News |


In ‘You Must Stand Up,’ Amanda Becker captures the scramble after Dobbs

News |


More women had their tubes tied after Roe v. Wade was overturned

News |


Kamala Harris gives abortion rights advocates the debate answer they’ve longed for in Philadelphia

Department of Justice sues Visa, alleges the card issuer monopolizes debit card markets

posted in: News | 0

By MAE ANDERSON

NEW YORK (AP) — The U.S. Justice Department has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Visa, alleging that the financial services behemoth uses its size and dominance to stifle competition in the debit card market, costing consumers and businesses billions of dollars.

The complaint filed Tuesday says Visa penalizes merchants and banks who don’t use Visa’s own payment processing technology to process debit transactions, even though alternatives exist. Visa earns an incremental fee from every transaction processed on its network.

According to the DOJ’s complaint, 60% of debit transactions in the United States run on Visa’s debit network, allowing it to charge over $7 billion in fees each year for processing those transactions.

“We allege that Visa has unlawfully amassed the power to extract fees that far exceed what it could charge in a competitive market,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland in a statement. “Merchants and banks pass along those costs to consumers, either by raising prices or reducing quality or service. As a result, Visa’s unlawful conduct affects not just the price of one thing – but the price of nearly everything.”

The Biden administration has aggressively gone after U.S. companies that it says act like middlemen, such as Ticketmaster parent Live Nation and the real estate software company RealPage, accusing them of burdening Americans with nonsensical fees and anticompetitive behavior. The administration has also brought charges of monopolistic behavior against technology giants such as Apple and Google.

According to the DOJ complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Visa leverages the vast number of transactions on its network to impose volume commitments on merchants and their banks, as well as on financial institutions that issue debit cards. That makes it difficult for merchants to use alternatives, such as lower-cost or smaller payment processors, instead of Visa’s payment processing technology, without incurring what DOJ described as “disloyalty penalties” from Visa.

The DOJ said Visa also stifled competition by paying to enter into partnership agreements with potential competitors.

In 2020, the DOJ sued to block the company’s $5.3 billion purchase of financial technology startup Plaid, calling it a monopolistic takeover of a potential competitor to Visa’s ubiquitous payments network. That acquisition was eventually later called off.

Visa previously disclosed the Justice Department was investigating the company in 2021, saying in a regulatory filing it was cooperating with a DOJ investigation into its debit practices.

Since the pandemic, more consumers globally have been shopping online for goods and services, which has translated into more revenue for Visa in the form of fees. Even traditionally cash-heavy businesses like bars, barbers and coffee shops have started accepting credit or debit cards as a form of payment, often via smartphones.

KBW analyst Sanjay Sahrani said in a note to investors that he estimates that U.S. debit revenue is likely at most about 10% of Visa revenue.

“Some subset of that may be lost if there is a financial impact,” he said. Visa’s “U.S. consumer payments business is the slowest growing piece of the aggregate business, and to the extent its contribution is affected, it is likely to have a very limited impact on revenue growth.”

He added the lawsuit could stretch out for years if it isn’t settled and goes to trial.

Visa processed $3.325 trillion in transactions on its network during the quarter ended June 30, up 7.4% from a year earlier. U.S. payments grew by 5.1%, which is faster than U.S. economic growth.

Visa, based in San Francisco, did not immediately have a comment. Visa shares fell $13.53, or 4.7%, to $275.10 in afternoon trading.