Blake Masters announces House bid in Arizona, forgoing another run for Senate

posted in: News | 0

Former Republican Senate candidate Blake Masters announced Thursday that he would run for an open congressional seat in the Phoenix suburbs, changing course from a planned second run for Senate in 2024.

“I’m running for Congress, to fight for Arizona’s 8th.,” Masters tweeted Thursday, along with a video featuring his family. “Biden has failed. We need Trump back. We need to stop inflation, Build the Wall, avoid WW3, and secure Arizona’s water future. We need to fight for our families.”

Masters, who ran against Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) in a marquee Senate race in the 2022 midterm elections and lost by nearly 5 percentage points, had been hailed by conservative figures like Tucker Carlson as the “future of the Republican Party.” He has also received financial support from tech billionaire Peter Thiel.

Masters received considerable attention during the 2022 campaign for his views on abortion and his flirtations with “the great replacement,” a racist conspiracy theory promoted by white nationalists that contends elites — and in some cases Jews and Democrats — plan to use nonwhite immigrants to radically change the country’s demographics.

He had previously planned to make another run for Senate, this time against incumbent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.). Masters’ entry could have kicked off a tough and expensive primary against Pinal County Sheriff Mark Lamb and former gubernatorial candidate and television reporter Kari Lake.

The safely Republican district, which encompasses many of the northern and western suburbs of Phoenix, went for former President Donald Trump by 13 points in 2020 and has been represented by outgoing Rep. Debbie Lesko, a Republican, since 2018.

Lesko announced earlier this month that she would retire in 2024, saying in a statement that “I want to spend more time with my husband, my 94-year-old mother, my three children, and my five grandchildren.”

Masters will face off against Abraham Hamadeh, a former prosecutor and candidate for Arizona attorney general in 2022, in the Republican primary. Hamadeh has been endorsed by Lake and other Republicans in the state.

The Hamadeh campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Massachusetts cannabis businesses challenge constitutionality of federal drug laws

posted in: Politics | 0

A group of Massachusetts weed businesses have filed a lawsuit seeking to bar the government from enforcing federal drug laws against state-regulated cannabis companies.

They’re represented by the powerhouse law firm of David Boies, best known for high-profile litigation seeking the breakup of Microsoft, representing former Vice President Al Gore in the contested 2000 presidential election and defending disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein.

The legal landscape for state-regulated marijuana markets has changed dramatically since the U.S. Supreme Court last weighed in on the issue in 2005, when it ruled against medical marijuana patients in California, even though the state’s legal market was limited to within its borders.

“What was once a single-minded federal crusade against the cannabis plant has been replaced with an ambivalent set of inconsistent policies, some aimed at reducing federal interference with state efforts to regulate marijuana,” the complaint states.

The plaintiffs: The lawsuit was filed by Canna Provisions, which has two dispensaries in the state, Gyasi Sellers, one of the earliest licensees in Massachusetts’ social equity program, cannabis cultivator Wiseacre Farm and Chicago-based Verano Holdings, which has cannabis operations in more than a dozen states.

Their argument: The cannabis companies outline a variety of ways that federal drug laws harm their businesses, including lack of access to financial services, punitive federal tax rates and an inability to secure federally subsidized grants and loans.

Times have changed, the plaintiffs argue, since the Supreme Court last weighed in on state-legal cannabis in 2005 with Gonzales v. Raich. At that time, the justices ruled that the federal government can crack down on state-legal medical marijuana patients because their actions bolstered the market for illicit marijuana.

They further argue the federal government has abandoned efforts to “eradicate” marijuana with Congress’ appropriations riders preventing enforcement of federal drug laws against state medical marijuana programs, as well as Justice Department policies of non-enforcement in state-legal cannabis markets.

The 38 state-regulated marijuana markets have contributed to a decline in the illicit marijuana trade, the complaint says.

“From 2012 to 2022, the amount of illicit marijuana seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection declined by almost 95 [percent],” according to the complaint. “Marijuana consumers are getting their marijuana less and less from the interstate channels that Congress sought to prohibit, and more from regulated intrastate retailers.”

Furthermore, cannabis products available on Massachusetts’ regulated market are distinguishable from illicit cannabis, the complaint argues, thanks to the state’s stringent regulations on lab testing and seed-to-sale tracking.

What they want: The plaintiffs are asking the court to declare that the Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional as applied to state-regulated marijuana markets and to block the federal government from enforcing the federal drug law that’s been on the books since 1970.

Just seeing a sick person can trigger your immune system, Chapman professor finds

posted in: Society | 0

You’re in an elevator with someone sneezing and dripping and hacking and coughing. You back into a far corner, horror on your face and revulsion in your gut.

That’s normal!

As cold, flu and COVID season sets in, we chatted with Chapman University’s Patricia Lopes, an assistant professor of biology, who studies how sick individuals impact those around them. It’s not as clear-cut as it may seem. Turns out that simply observing a sick individual triggers not only that familiar behavioral response — get away! — but a complex biological response as well.

“The really interesting aspect is, it also changes your physiology,” she said.

Her own experiments and reviews of scientific studies find that, when healthy animals interact with animals showing symptoms of illness, molecular pathways related to immune responses activate. Egg composition changes. And all without those animals actually being sick themselves, as if their bodies are prepping for a fight.

Consider one of the experiments that galvanized Lopes’ curiosity: People watched a slideshow. Their blood composition was measured before and after. After folks saw images of sickness — coughing, sneezing, blisters on the skin, etc. — their blood showed an increased level of molecules that could help respond to infection.

The slideshow was repeated with threatening images of a different sort — such as guns pointed at the viewer — and the blood did not show elevated levels of infection-fighting molecules after viewing.

“So I became really interested and I started reading and trying to understand how generalized this is,” Lopes said. “Is it just in humans? Throughout animal kingdom? I did find that, for a lot of species, from fruit flies to birds to other mammals, we see examples of this.”

When female mice were exposed to sick mice during pregnancy, their babies rebounded from the same sickness more quickly down the line.

But the physiological response to nearby sickness might not always be a positive one. Female Japanese quail housed with sickly-looking animals laid eggs containing more stress hormones, which could have an impact on their offspring.

Lopes has a three-year, $600,000 grant from the National Science Foundation to probe this under-studied phenomenon.

Canaries at a pet bird exhibition in 2017.  (KHALIL MAZRAAWI/AFP via Getty Images)

“The objective for this proposal is to study how exposure to disease risk affects the physiology and reproductive investment of uninfected animals, as well as their own responses upon infection,” her abstract for the NSF says. “To accomplish this goal, a host-parasite system (canary – Mycoplasma gallisepticum) will be used, where responses to disease risk have already been demonstrated to occur.

“To quantify how observation of infected symptomatic birds … relative to observation of healthy birds affects animals, the project will 1) use a transcriptomic approach (studying all RNA molecules) to address how multiple organs respond to disease risk over time, 2) evaluate whether and how disease risk information modifies the damage and the time course imposed by a subsequent infection, and 3) quantify changes in reproductive behavior and investment imposed by the presence of disease risk.”

Lopes hopes to have some results starting next summer.

“The interesting thing to me is that it really shows the mind-body connection,” Lopes said. “You’re receiving this signal — watching, smelling, hearing sickness symptoms — and then your immune system changes. This nervous system changing the immune system is a very interesting avenue of research — that your nervous system has this power to change your immune cells and immune response.”

It’s not at all clear how long these responses last, so folks shouldn’t count on them to ward off illness. Vaccination is the way to go as we enter peak cold, flu and COVID season, she said.

This makes me recall with agonizing clarity that episode when my eldest was barely 2, feverish, coughing, runny nose, the whole shebang. I was changing her diaper, standing her up on the dressing table to pull up her jammy pants, when she Exorcist-vomited into my face.

I had managed to escape sickness until then, but was certain my luck had finally run out. Miraculously, though, I didn’t get sick. Maybe this helps explain why.

Lopes says her research aims to unveil the hidden ripple effects of infections. When one individual falls ill, it’s not just their problem — it’s a complex story that can impact the health and behavior of many others.

Related Articles

News |


Quick genetic test offers hope for sick, undiagnosed kids. But few insurers offer to pay

News |


Abortion coverage is limited or unavailable at a quarter of large workplaces

News |


Health care ‘game-changer’? Feds boost care for homeless Americans

News |


Biden launches 31 technology hubs nationally, including St. Paul

News |


You don’t lose if you (hit) snooze, study says

Georgia’s congressional map violates Voting Rights Act, court finds

posted in: News | 0

A federal court on Thursday found that Georgia’s congressional map violates the Voting Rights Act, the latest Southern state to have its map struck down for discriminating against Black voters.

A judge ordered the state legislature to redraw the lines by early December. The ruling will likely be appealed by Georgia Republicans. It could lead to the creation of an additional majority-Black district in the state — although the immediate partisan effects aren’t clear.

“Georgia has made great strides since 1965 towards equality in voting,” district court Judge Steve C. Jones, a Barack Obama appointee, said in his decision. “However, the evidence before this Court shows that Georgia has not reached the point where the political process has equal openness and equal opportunity for everyone.”

Jones’ lengthy opinion said Black voters’ power had been diluted following extensive population growth in the state that has been disproportionately powered by Black residents. The remedy, he ordered, should involve the creation of “an additional majority-Black congressional district in west-metro Atlanta.”

He gave the GOP-controlled state legislature until Dec. 8 to enact a new map that complies with the Voting Rights Act by giving more power to Black voters there. If the state “is unable or unwilling to” do so, the court will draw the lines.

The state’s current delegation has 9 Republicans and 5 Democrats after the latest round of redistricting. That was a one-seat GOP gain from before the decennial redistricting process, in which Republican mapmakers effectively dismantled two rapidly diversifying suburban Atlanta seats to make one safe Democratic seat based in Gwinnett County and a deep-red district to its north.

It wasn’t immediately clear whether the creation of a new majority-Black district would create an additional Democratic one; four out of the five Democratic districts are currently majority-Black, but Rep. Lucy McBath’s (D-Ga.) is not. (McBath is Black.) It may be possible to make another majority-Black district west of Atlanta without shifting the overall partisan balance of the state’s districts.

“While the outcome of the process remains unclear, one thing is certain: Rep. McBath will not be letting Republicans in the state legislature determine when her work serving Georgians is done,” Jake Orvis, McBath’s campaign manager, said in a statement following the ruling.

Jones also ruled that the state House and state Senate map also violated the Voting Rights Act, saying they too must be redrawn.

The order is just the latest finding that a Southern state’s Republican-drawn congressional map illegally weakened the power of Black voters. The Supreme Court affirmed a lower court order earlier this year that found that Alabama needed to create a second predominantly Black district. A court-drawn map was imposed there earlier this month after the GOP-dominated legislature refused to draw lines that would do so.

A similar challenge to Louisiana’s map is ongoing and may resolve before the 2024 election.

Earlier this week, North Carolina Republicans redrew their congressional lines in a particularly efficient partisan gerrymander that could flip as many as four seats there. Immediately following its passage, Democrats suggested that it, too, was a racial gerrymander and that they would challenge it. But it isn’t clear how successful their case would be — and any challenge to those lines would be unlikely to resolve before the 2024 election.

Nicholas Wu and Ally Mutnick contributed to this report.