Mounds View police looking for ‘armed and dangerous’ shooting suspect

posted in: All news | 0

Mounds View police asked for the public’s help Thursday night to find a man suspected in a shooting that injured another man.

The afternoon shooting led to a SWAT response, a search and “a shelter in place” issued.

Officers were called to the 2100 block of Buckingham Lane in Mounds View about 12:05 p.m. Thursday on a report that a male had just been shot and the suspect ran away. Officers found the victim with a gunshot wound to the leg, and he was taken to Hennepin County Medical Center in Minneapolis for treatment.

Alex Robert Quevedo-Holmes (Courtesy of Mounds View Police Department)

The Minnesota State Patrol, New Brighton Department of Public Safety and the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office assisted Mounds View police with setting up a perimeter and searching.

Through the investigation, law enforcement identified the suspect as Alex Robert Quevedo-Holmes. The 20-year-old is about 6 feet 2 inches tall, 168 pounds, and has brown hair and brown eyes, according to Mounds View police.

Investigators are processing multiple scenes and found a firearm. Quevedo-Holmes hadn’t been located as of Thursday night and Police Chief Ben Zender said “he is considered armed and dangerous, so do not approach.” Police ask anyone who sees him to call 911.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Jury acquits man in Apple Valley shootout that killed his mother, who was caught in crossfire

Crime & Public Safety |


Feds get final guilty plea in smuggling ring that mailed fentanyl to the Twin Cities in stuffed animals

Crime & Public Safety |


Former Texas megachurch pastor indicted in Oklahoma on child sexual abuse charges

Crime & Public Safety |


Pentagon leaker Jack Teixeira pleads guilty to obstructing justice, calls himself a ‘proud patriot’

Crime & Public Safety |


Charges: Man’s BAC was 3 times the legal limit to drive in Anoka crash that killed woman

Boys basketball section roundup: Harding earns first trip to state; CDH ends Tartan’s perfect season

posted in: All news | 0

St. Paul Harding 66, St. Thomas Academy 65

Trailing 58-50 with roughly 6 minutes to play, Harding rallied to secure its first-ever boys basketball state tournament appearance by winning the Class 3A, Section 3 title at St. Thomas Academy.

The Knights were trailing 63-61 in the final minute when Ai’Jhon Douglas got a steal, drove the length of the floor in transition and scored an and-1 basket to put Harding on top.

St. Thomas Academy split a pair of free throws on its ensuing possession to knot the game. Douglas then drove back down the floor, got into the teeth of the defense and drilled a mid-range jumper to put the Knights up two.

The Cadets again split free throws, leaving them down one and forced to foul Harding. After a pair of Knights missed free throws, St. Thomas Academy called timeout with 5 seconds to play, needing to go the length of the floor and score to win.

Instead, Harding forced a turnover, chucked the ball to the heavens as the clock expired and fans stormed the court to celebrate program history. Harding is the first St. Paul public school to qualify for the boys state basketball tournament since 2015.

Watch a free replay of the game here.

The Class 3A quarterfinals will be played Tuesday at Williams Arena. Brackets will be determined on Saturday.

Cretin-Derham Hall 73, Tartan 68

Cretin-Derham Hall rallied from a 13-point halftime deficit to end Tartan’s perfect season and advance to the Class 4A state tournament via Thursday’s Section 4 title game victory in St. Paul.

The Raiders scored 10 of the first 12 second-half points to trim its deficit to five and get back into the game.

Tartan’s lead was six with eight minutes to go, but the Titans went cold at the wrong time, scoring just two points over the next 6 1/2 minutes while Cretin-Derham Hall (27-1) did damage from the free-throw line.

The Raiders were led by 23 points from Jojo Mitchell. Tommy Ahneman added 21.

CJ Banks scored 26 points for the Titans (27-1), while KJ Wilson added 21.

DeLaSalle 74, St. Paul Johnson 65

DeLaSalle took a nine-point advantage into the break, a cushion it needed in a high-scoring second half.

The Governors (20-7) made numerous pushes in the second stanza, getting as close as four points on a pair of free throws from Jeramine Curtis, who scored 15 of his 17 points in the second half.

But every time Johnson made a run, the Islanders had an answer.

Rino Kamp scored 18 points to lead Johnson.

DeLaSalle (23-5) had five players score in double figures, led by 14 points from Dorian Pruitt.

Apple Valley 62, Eagan 54

Marcus Horton Jr., Camare Young and Trey Parker combined for 45 points as Apple Valley (23-6) controlled much of the Class 4A, Section 3 final on Thursday in Apple Valley.

Alex Schroepfer scored 27 to pace the Wildcats (17-12), who made a late charge to get within five points but couldn’t get over the hump.

Related Articles

High School Sports |


Girls basketball tournament: Eastview’s rally falls short in 4A semifinal loss to Hopkins

High School Sports |


Girls basketball tournament: Maple Grove pulls away from Lakeville North late in 4A semifinal

High School Sports |


Girls basketball tournament: Cretin-Derham Hall shows future is bright in semifinal loss to Marshall

High School Sports |


Girls basketball tournament roundup: Goodhue’s defense powers top seed to quarterfinal win

High School Sports |


Girls basketball tournament roundup: Mack scores 34 in Minnehaha’s quarterfinal win, Greenway logs triple-double in Providence Academy victory

Jury acquits man in Apple Valley shootout that killed his mother, who was caught in crossfire

posted in: All news | 0

A jury on Thursday acquitted a man of murder and all other charges in the killing of his mother, who was caught in the crossfire as he and her ex-boyfriend exchanged more than three dozen shots in an Apple Valley neighborhood nearly three years ago.

Dakota County jurors deliberated for about eight hours across two days before finding Billy Joe Pryor Jr. not guilty of second-degree intentional murder and four other charges in the death of 49-year-old Michelle McGill outside her home on July 10, 2022.

The verdict followed a four-day trial in which jurors saw video from a garage-mounted surveillance camera that captured part of the shootout in the 900 block of Oriole Drive, located just south of County Road 42 and east of Garden View Drive.

McGill was sitting in her car in her driveway when Pryor and Willie John Selmon argued, then engaged in a gun battle in which 38 bullets were fired in less than a minute. McGill suffered 10 gunshot wounds, while Selmon was shot in the face and Pryor took two bullets to the stomach.

“The two men responsible, the two men shooting with a fervor to kill each other, both walked away, while Michelle McGill did not,” Assistant Dakota County Attorney Evan Frazier said Wednesday in the state’s closing arguments. “Her last moments were spent caught in the crossfire between Mr. Selmon and the defendant.”

Selmon, 42, pleaded guilty to second-degree murder by drive-by shooting in June and three months later was sentenced to 10 years in prison, a downward departure from state sentencing guidelines. A second-degree intentional murder charge was dismissed as part of plea deal.

Willie John Selmon (Courtesy of the Dakota County Sheriff’s Office)

Selmon testified as a state witness during Pryor’s trial, telling jurors that Pryor fired first.

Pryor, 28, took the stand in his own defense, testifying that Selmon shot first.

Based on the jury instructions, the state had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Pryor did not act in self-defense or defense of others, his attorney, assistant public defender Sean Rinehart, said in his closing argument.

“If you think it’s reasonably possible that Mr. Selmon shot first, you have to find Mr. Pryor not guilty,” Rinehart said.

If Pryor did not shoot first, then “no single shot that he fired was illegal,” said Rinehart, who tried the case with colleague Gregory Sofio. “In these circumstances, he did not have a duty to retreat.”

Frazier argued that Pryor’s claim of self-defense and defense of others does not apply in the case because “the evidence shows beyond a reasonable doubt that (he) was the aggressor, the instigator of this firefight.”

In addition to the second-degree intentional murder charge, jurors found Pryor not guilty of second-degree murder by drive-by shooting, second-degree attempted murder with intent, drive-by shooting and second-degree assault.

Prosecutors initially charged Pryor and Selmon with second-degree assault; however, they said at the time that ballistic and forensic evidence would play a role in whether murder charges would be filed against one or both of the men. Murder charges were filed in April 2023.

Chaotic scene

Police responding to a 911 call on shots fired about 6:30 p.m. found McGill dead outside her car. She was shot in her thigh, chest and multiple times in her lower abdomen.

Pryor was at the scene, but wasn’t cooperative with police and later “provided false information to the people who were trying to solve his mother’s murder,” prosecutor Frazier told jurors. His Glock 45 9-mm handgun that he had tossed in a neighbor’s bushes was found five days after the shooting.

Selmon had driven himself to M Health Fairview Ridges Hospital in Burnsville in his SUV. He was transported to another hospital, where officers took a statement from him. He told investigators he’d been in a long-term relationship with McGill but they recently separated. He said they previously shared the Apple Valley home and that he went there to retrieve some of his property.

When he arrived, McGill and Pryor were in their cars in the driveway, Selmon said. So he parked his SUV behind McGill’s car, walked to the garage to grab some belongings and then back to his SUV.

Selmon said that Pryor backed his vehicle up so he was parked adjacent to his SUV and then made a statement about having a gun, according to the charges against them. He said Pryor then fired shots at him as they were both sitting in their vehicles.

Selmon said he got out of his SUV and ran to the front of McGill’s vehicle “believing Pryor would stop shooting if his mother was between them,” the charges said.

After Pryor exited his car and went to the passenger’s side, the two exchanged gunfire. It was during this volley of shots that McGill, who was still in her car situated between Pryor and Selmon, was fatally shot.

As Pryor ran from the home, Selmon followed and continued to fire shots at him, prosecutors told jurors Wednesday at closings. The final shots were from Selmon, who killed Pryor’s dog. He then then put his Girsan 9-mm handgun, which was outfitted with an extended magazine, next to McGill’s hand.

Defense reaction

Pryor has been out of custody since Aug. 8, 2022, after he posted a $50,000 bond on the initial assault charge.

After the verdict, the chief public defender for the First Judicial District, Lindsay Siolka, said Pryor’s attorneys were persistent that he was innocent, even when the state added three lesser charges on the first day of jury selection.

“And they really believe that the jury returned the right and just verdict this afternoon,” Siolka said, adding she was speaking on behalf of Rinehart and Sofio at their request. She added, “And we’re just happy for (Pryor) and his family that justice today was done.”

Dakota County Attorney Kathy Keena said in a statement that she is disappointed with the verdict, but respects the jury’s decision.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Mounds View police looking for ‘armed and dangerous’ shooting suspect

Crime & Public Safety |


Feds get final guilty plea in smuggling ring that mailed fentanyl to the Twin Cities in stuffed animals

Crime & Public Safety |


Former Texas megachurch pastor indicted in Oklahoma on child sexual abuse charges

Crime & Public Safety |


Pentagon leaker Jack Teixeira pleads guilty to obstructing justice, calls himself a ‘proud patriot’

Crime & Public Safety |


Charges: Man’s BAC was 3 times the legal limit to drive in Anoka crash that killed woman

Opinion: Standing Up for Supportive Housing

posted in: All news | 0

“Despite its success, the creation of supportive housing has fallen far short of the need—in large part because of fierce resistance by local residents.”

Adi Talwar

A sign on a Bronx lawn in opposition to a proposed local supportive housing project.

CityViews are readers’ opinions, not those of City Limits. Add your voice today!

A recent report released by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) revealed that homelessness grew by an alarming 18 percent over the past year, and ought to have us all hanging our heads in shame.

A record three quarters of a million homeless individuals across the country doesn’t happen by accident. It is the result of decades of policy choices at the local, state, and federal levels—including choices that have empowered self-interested not-in-my-backyard voices to block the creation of supportive housing that is critical to preventing homelessness.

In New York, the news is worse. State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli followed up on the HUD report with a report of his own showing that in the Empire State, homelessness grew by 53.1 percent from January 2023 to January 2024, more than four times the rest of the nation. From 2022 to 2024, the number of homeless children grew by more than 30,000 to 50,773, the DiNapoli report said. Now, nearly one of every three of New York’s homeless are children, one of highest shares in the nation. 

Affordable supportive housing—a proven model that pairs permanent, affordable homes with services like job training, mental health counseling, and addiction treatment—has been a game-changer for addressing chronic homelessness. Studies have shown that supportive housing reduces homelessness, saves taxpayer dollars by cutting reliance on emergency services, and improves quality of life for some of our most vulnerable neighbors.

But despite its success, the creation of supportive housing has fallen far short of the need—in large part because of fierce resistance by local residents.

NIMBYism isn’t new and not specific to supportive housing. The “not in my backyard” mentality has been an obstacle to the creation of housing of all types. But when it comes to affordable supportive housing, the pushback is especially intense. Projects meant to serve formerly homeless individuals or those with mental health conditions, substance use disorders, or histories of incarceration often face intense opposition from residents who express fears about things like safety, property values, and neighborhood character.

These fears are often based on misconceptions rather than reality. For example, a recent study by Furman Center for Real Estate & Urban Policy at NYU found that supporting housing development does not hurt property values in the long term. 

However, this pushback carries weight with local officials who are wary of political backlash. As a result, supportive housing projects are routinely delayed, downsized, or scrapped altogether, perpetuating cycles of homelessness that harm individuals and burden communities.

If homelessness is to be addressed at scale, we need a coordinated effort to break down the barriers to supportive housing development. Part of that is changing the narrative about the people supportive housing serves and how it benefits not just the individuals who move in, but neighborhoods and our society.

It’s easy to view homelessness as a byproduct of drivers like job loss and mental illness, but the reality is more complex: a lack of stable housing also makes it more difficult to find employment and exacerbates mental health and substance use challenges. This maintains a cycle that is very difficult to break.

Supportive housing is an upstream investment that helps stabilize the lives of its residents, reducing the need for expensive emergency interventions like hospitalizations, shelter stays, and incarcerations that strain public resources. Further, it is permanent housing that is designed to integrate seamlessly into neighborhoods. Most supportive housing developments are indistinguishable from other residential buildings, blending into the fabric of the community while providing residents with a safe, dignified, stable place to live.

Overcoming these challenges will also require leadership from elected officials. Mayor Eric Adams’ City of Yes plan removed some of the barriers that give veto power to anti-housing voices. But we must build on that progress by further streamlining approval processes, creating financial incentives for communities that welcome supportive housing, and launching public education campaigns to dispel myths and build broader understanding of the issue.

This means calling out the hypocrisy of saying we want to solve homelessness while refusing to create the very solutions that will make a meaningful difference, and standing up to NIMBY resistance when supportive housing developments do still require public approval.

It’s time to stop viewing supportive housing as something to resist and start seeing it for what it truly is: a solution that saves lives, strengthens communities, and gives everyone a chance to thrive. The path forward requires courage, compassion, and a willingness to put facts above fear. 

Sherry Tucker is the CEO of WellLife Network, which provides supportive housing services in New York City and Long Island. 

The post Opinion: Standing Up for Supportive Housing appeared first on City Limits.