Ex-Florida GOP lawmaker who sponsored so-called ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill sentenced to prison

posted in: Politics | 0

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A federal judge on Thursday sentenced to prison a former Florida state legislator who catapulted to national attention for being the sponsor of a bill barring classroom instruction about sexual orientation and gender identity that was called by its critics the “Don’t Say Gay” bill.

Former Rep. Joe Harding (R-Williston), who plead guilty in March to one count each of wire fraud, money laundering and making false statements as part of a scheme to fraudulently obtain a $150,000 federal Covid-19 relief loan, was sentenced to four months in prison.

U.S. District Judge Allen Winsor, who was appointed to the bench by former President Donald Trump, also sentenced Harding to two years of supervised release following his prison sentence. Court records show that Harding is scheduled to surrender to authorities on Jan. 29.

“The theft of any amount of taxpayer funds is inexcusable,” said Jason Coody, the United States attorney for the Northern District of Florida, in a statement. “However, the defendant’s deceptive acts of diverting emergency financial assistance from small businesses during the pandemic is simply beyond the pale. Today’s sentence both punishes the defendant’s criminal conduct and should serve as a significant deterrent to others who would selfishly steal from their fellow citizens to unlawfully enrich themselves.”

Harding was first elected to the state House in 2020 from a north central Florida seat that includes parts of Marion County. He resigned from the Legislature last December, one day after a federal grand jury indictment against him was unsealed.

In an August sentencing memo to the judge, federal prosecutors said that Harding’s contributions to his community were “commendable” but added that “his intentional criminal acts while serving as an elected state representative signify a betrayal of the public’s trust.” Coody concluded that a variance from sentencing guidelines was warranted because Harding repaid the loan and confessed after he was caught but he argued that some prison time was still needed to act as a deterrence.

Authorities accused Harding of using false bank statements for two dormant small businesses to obtain loans from the Small Business Administration during the pandemic. Harding told the SBA that one of the companies, The Vak Shack, for the 12 months prior to Jan. 31, 2020, had four employees and $420,874 in revenue, while Harding Farms had two employees and $392,000 in revenue, according to authorities.

Ryan Chamberlin, a Republican from Belleview, replaced Harding in the state House after winning a five-way GOP primary and then the special election held in May.

Fatal drug overdoses remained high last year but plateaued, Minnesota Department of Health says

posted in: Society | 0

Drug overdose deaths in 2022 remained at historically high levels following several years of sharp spikes, but they held steady compared with 2021, the Minnesota Department of Health reported Thursday.

The annual report on drug-related mortality found a slight 0.8% decrease in overdose deaths from 2021 (1,354) to 2022 (1,343), based on preliminary death certificate data. The decrease in deaths is more noticeable in greater Minnesota, with a 5% reduction in fatal overdoses from 2021 to 2022.

Opioid-involved overdose deaths increased by 3% — from 977 to 1,002 — and MDH said that fentanyl was involved in 62% of all fatal drug overdoses in 2022. The potent, synthetic opioid contributed to 92% of the 1,002 opioid-involved overdose deaths in Minnesota.

Minnesota Department of Health

However, fatal overdoses from heroin, methadone and prescribed opioids decreased, with deaths from heroin reaching a 10-year low after falling 56% — from 103 to 45 deaths.

Psychostimulants (methamphetamine) and cocaine also contributed to the number of drug overdose deaths. Cocaine-involved deaths saw the largest increase of any drug category, increasing 27% — from 165 to 210 deaths.

“We are responding to the more deadly threat of fentanyl with several new tools for saving lives that were passed by the Legislature in 2023, such as expanding the availability of naloxone, and covering the costs of having it on hand, in school buildings, treatment programs, and during emergency and law enforcement calls,” Minnesota Commissioner of Health Brooke Cunningham said in a statement accompanying the annual report.

Nonfatal drug overdoses treated in Minnesota’s hospitals last year also decreased year-over-year from 17,792 to 16,934.

“In 2022, for every one overdose death, there were nearly 13 nonfatal overdoses,” the report said. “A majority of nonfatal overdoses were treated in the emergency department (69%) and were of unintentional (i.e., accidental) or undetermined intent (65%).”

The data update comes just a few months after Gov. Tim Walz and the DFL-controlled Minnesota Legislature approved $200 million in funding to address substance use prevention, harm reduction and recovery.

Also this year, naloxone, an opioid overdose reversal medication known by the brand name Narcan, was approved for over-the-counter purchase. Certain facilities and professionals, including schools and law enforcement officers, are required to carry naloxone.

Related Articles

Health |


Investigators work to determine which identical twin was driving in fatal crash with Amish buggy

Health |


State adds 8,000 jobs in Sept.; unemployment steady at 3.1%

Health |


Farmington teen killed in motorcycle collision in southern Minnesota

Health |


Aging U.S. power grid to get $3.5B update; Minnesota to share largest grant

Health |


Search warrant: Couple suspected of selling meth before 5 officers shot in Benton County

Ross Raihala: Here’s the story behind my Twitter feud with country superstar Luke Bryan

posted in: News | 0

One of the greatest things about my job is that for all the routine involved in it, I still find myself constantly surprised. And this week has proven to be a whopper in that department as I ended up in a Twitter feud with country superstar Luke Bryan that got national press coverage.

How did I get to this place? Let me explain.

Ross Raihala

Saturday night, I headed to Xcel Energy Center to review Bryan’s show. I’ve covered him since the start of his career back in 2007, when I wrote about his potential stardom in these very pages: “His amiable debut single ‘All My Friends Say’ is now out, with a full album due in June. His endearing down-home vibe lends credibility to lyrics such as: ‘I can grow my own groceries and salt-cure a ham/Hey baby, I’m a country man.’ ”

In the years that followed, I caught him several times as an opening act and was on hand in 2014 when he made his debut as a local arena headliner at the X. In my review, I called him out for his lack of originality, ridiculous lyrics and silly, party down demeanor. But at the same time, I could clearly see he was invested in what he was doing and the audience adored him. I praised his “approachability and charm” and made a bold prediction: “If Bryan can keep this up, he’ll be in the running with Jason Aldean and Zac Brown to become country’s next stadium-sized superstar.”

Turns out, I was spot on. In 2015, Bryan headlined the former TCF Bank Stadium and the following year he was the first musical act to play the then-new U.S. Bank Stadium. In 2018, Bryan moved to Target Field and became the first act to headline all three stadiums in the metro, a record he holds to this day.

So when I heard his next show was going to be back at the X, I was, well, surprised. He drew a total of just under 125,000 people to his trio of stadium concerts and here he was back at a hockey arena with a much lower capacity. What happened?

As I noted in my review of Saturday’s show, Bryan has enjoyed a remarkable run on country radio, with 28 straight Top 10 singles. But his three most recent efforts — “Up,” “Country On” and “But I Got a Beer in My Hand” — landed with a thud in comparison.

I don’t think it’s the actual songs that were the problem, as they fell in line with his previous smashes. The issue, I suspect, is Bryan’s age of 47. Country radio is notoriously brutal when it comes to playing artists once they hit a certain age (and it’s far worse for women).

Still, I was fully expecting Bryan to put on the same high-energy, upbeat show he always has. He did not and, as I do when I review live concerts, I wrote what I saw before me. The headline set the tone: “A distracted, slow-moving Luke Bryan phoned it in at the X.”

From there, I added that it was his smallest local crowd in nearly a decade and that “Bryan was far less animated and physical than previous shows … (and) came across as distracted — listless, even.” I also noted his strange audience interaction, which included making fun of the “car dealership owners” in the front row and complaining that it was already winter here in Minnesota when it was 49 degrees outside.

As often happens when I write a negative review, my social media blew up with people yelling at me. As someone who has spent the past 28 years, 19 of which have been at the Pioneer Press, getting paid to share my opinion, I realize that feedback comes with the territory.

I also don’t take any of it personally. It often comes from people who weren’t actually at the concert and most likely didn’t read beyond the headline. The level of nastiness varies from artist to artist, but for whatever reason there are people out there who are blindly devoted to a musical act and willing to attempt to shout down anyone who dares to question them.

Related Articles

Music and Concerts |


Concert review: A distracted, slow-moving Luke Bryan phoned it in at the X

Music and Concerts |


South African musician Abel Selaocoe is a dynamic partner with the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra

Music and Concerts |


Review: ‘Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour’ among greatest concert films of all time

Music and Concerts |


Jay-Z’s Champagne maker is planning an even more exclusive brand

Music and Concerts |


Review: Bob Dylan jukebox musical ‘Girl from the North Country’ is a grim dud

Yes, it often gets personal. I want to thank everyone who has called me bald, fat and old. I had no idea. But, really, how can I take this stuff seriously? It’s often people who have no idea who I am and are reacting based on a single review they probably didn’t read.

My feeds were filled with angry fans on Sunday and it spilled over into Monday. Multiple people accused me of hating country music and never giving good reviews, while some guy from Crystal summed it up as: “Ross hates music.” This sort of thing has happened countless times in my career and, generally speaking, I find it hilarious. Indeed, I’m known for sharing the meanest and most ridiculous feedback on Facebook and Twitter. (Yes, I know the owner of Twitter calls it something else.)

Usually, the furor dies down after a few days. But Tuesday morning, I woke up, looked at my phone and saw that Luke Bryan himself had retweeted my review of Saturday’s show. I immediately did a double take, thinking it was just some random account and surely not a superstar with more than nine million followers.

But it was Bryan. And this is what he tweeted, at 5:36 a.m.: “Wow. I’ve never received one positive review from y’all’s publication since I’ve been to the twin cities area in my whole career. The trend continues. The sold out crowd had a great time.”

I couldn’t believe it. I’ve heard from musicians in the past who were angry about what I had written, but it’s pretty rare. Given Bryan’s reputation in the industry as a nice guy, I never would have guessed I’d see this. I immediately took a screenshot, assuming he’d delete the tweet once he came to his senses.

A few hours later, I retweeted that screenshot along with links to my previous, more positive, Bryan reviews. WCCO Radio anchor Jason DeRusha retweeted Bryan and added: “When you’re one of the worlds best selling artists and you still keep score with @RossRaihala. Love the pettiness.” Local news outlets Axios and Bring Me the News wrote stories about the whole affair. Trolls kept up the digital screaming.

That afternoon, the blog Saving Country Music wrote up a lengthy piece with the headline “Critic Receives Criticism For Rightly Pointing Out Luke Bryan’s Decline.” The writer called Bryan’s tweet a “rather unprecedented move” and added “if Bryan was smart, he’d heed what this critic was saying.” Other national outlets also picked up on the story, including the Miami Herald, American Songwriter, Taste of Country and Whiskey Riff.

This was all amusing enough, but given this was day four, it sure seemed like time for everyone to move on. And yet, unbelievably, Bryan wasn’t done yet. Here’s the series of tweets he posted Wednesday afternoon, printed verbatim save for the expletives.

“You can kiss my a– too.”

“I have never phoned anything in my life. I’ll keep this s— going as long as y’all want. I sit back watch y’all chirp. Over it. Turn around and watch the crowd.”

“Either way. The phoned in thing got me me mad. Hell. Im 47. Some nights my d— knees hurt. However. Y’all gotta job too do. Got get some followers. Been 10 years since my last twitter war. Peace and I love everyone”

“Another thing. I played from 9:08 til. 11:05. No encore because I ran over the building codes. 10:40 would have been phoning it in. And you right. I did confuse another review from another publication. Check pollstar numbers if you think I’m in decline saving country dude”

To quote Bryan’s initial tweet to me, wow. I can’t wait for my next surprise.

Related Articles

Music and Concerts |


Concert review: A distracted, slow-moving Luke Bryan phoned it in at the X

Music and Concerts |


South African musician Abel Selaocoe is a dynamic partner with the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra

Music and Concerts |


Review: ‘Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour’ among greatest concert films of all time

Music and Concerts |


Concert review: Peter Gabriel plays by his own rules at Xcel Energy Center

Music and Concerts |


Foo Fighters to play first local show in nearly six years when they headline Target Field in July

Tim Scott proposal targets Harvard’s federal funding as students rally against Israel again

posted in: News | 0

A Republican presidential candidate is threatening to block Harvard from receiving federal funding as the school is seen as a “hotbed of antisemitism,” while pro-Palestinian student groups continue to rally on campus.

U.S. Sen. Tim Scott, of North Carolina, has introduced legislation that looks to prevent federal student aid from being funneled to Harvard and other colleges and universities that “facilitate events that promote violent antisemitism.”

“From Harvard to Columbia, Americans have watched our institutions of higher learning turn into hotbeds of antisemitism,” Scott posted on X, the former Twitter platform, Thursday morning. “I’m fighting to cut federal funding to any university that enables, excuses or provides cover for blatant and outrageous antisemitism.”

The proposed legislation, dubbed “The Stop Antisemitism on College Campuses Act,” would specifically block schools from being eligible for Title IV funds, which includes federal student aid.

It came to light hours before hundreds of Harvard students walked out of class Thursday afternoon to “stand in solidarity with Palestinians facing genocide.”

The rally, continuing a string of pro-Palestine demonstrations on campus, marched through the university’s science building, student center and Harvard Law School, with nonparticipants observing from the sidelines, some shaking their heads and turning away.

Student groups, the Harvard Undergraduate Palestine Solidarity Committee and Harvard Graduate Students 4 Palestine, organized the march. Both co-signed a scathing letter blaming Israel for the Hamas terror attack Oct. 7.

The fallout from that message, and the response by Harvard’s President Claudine Gay that critics are saying was weak, continues to reverberate on the Cambridge campus, making it more divided than in recent memory.

Hamas has been designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, Canada and the European Union, and it still holds 200-plus hostages.

A Jewish student who declined to provide his name to the Herald said he’s felt safe on campus, adding he knows that’s not necessarily the case for his classmates.

“I think rallies like this are absolutely insane following a murderous attack on civilians,” the student said. “I know there is a strong Jewish population on Harvard’s campus, and we all feel very strongly that this is very sad to see, that our colleagues believe what they believe.”

A release from Scott’s office highlighting “The Stop Antisemitism on College Campuses Act” blasts the responses from more than a handful of colleges and universities, including Harvard, Georgetown, and Columbia, among others, in the wake of the Israeli-Hamas war.

“According to the Anti-Defamation League,” the release states, “violent language and threats against the Jewish community and Israel increased 488% in the first 18 hours after Hamas’ attack on Israeli civilians.”

It continues, “Some examples include: Harvard University’s silence regarding over thirty Harvard student organizations releasing a statement blaming Israel for the Hamas terrorist attacks carried out against Israeli civilians.”

Dozens of Harvard professors, in an open letter to Gay on Tuesday, criticized her for not including “Palestine” in her communications with university affiliates, according to campus newspaper The Harvard Crimson.

“Indeed, the failure to even mention the words “Palestine” or “Palestinians” — except in one passing reference to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict—or to condemn the killing of Palestinian civilians, is to willfully ignore the fact that it is Palestinian and allied students who are being targeted on our campus,” part of the letter states.

Before Thursday’s rally, officials closed the gates to Harvard Yard, with students and academics being required to show security their university IDs to gain entrance. That meant prospective students on tours couldn’t gain access to the center of campus.

“I think everyone should be able to make their voices heard, and protest and rally,” said Emilio, a Cambridge native  who declined to provide his last name. “It is telling that they closed it off to people who don’t have a student ID.”

Protesters march through Harvard University chanting “Free, Free Palestine”. (Nancy Lane/Boston Herald)
The gates to Harvard Yard were closed as protesters march through Harvard University chanting “Free, Free Palestine”. (Nancy Lane/Boston Herald)
Protesters march through Harvard University chanting “Free, Free Palestine”. (Nancy Lane/Boston Herald)
The gates to Harvard yard were closed as protesters march through Harvard University chanting “Free,Free Palestine”. (Nancy Lane/Boston Herald)