This grief therapist draws on her own experience with loss to help others

posted in: News | 0

Claire Bidwell Smith is no stranger to grief. She lost both of her parents to cancer at a young age — her mother when she was 18, and her father when she was 25.

“I entered into my adult life with a lot of grief and was just trying to figure out everything that had happened to me. After my mom died, everybody was like ‘You’ll be fine. You’re an adult, just go forward into your life.’ And I wasn’t fine. It was really, really hard.”

While struggling with anxiety and grief in her 20s, Smith also stoked her passion for writing.

“I’ve always been a writer. I worked for magazines and newspapers, and wanted to write books someday. But my parents’ deaths skewed me into a different direction. When I began to come through it, I ended up getting my master’s degree in clinical psychology.”

Based in Santa Monica, Smith initially worked in hospice before starting a private practice as a grief therapist, now facilitating online grief support groups and in-person retreats. And she never stopped writing. Smith has published three nonfiction books about grief; her new book, “Conscious Grieving,” comes out in March 2024.

Where did the idea of conscious grieving come from?

The idea behind conscious grieving is about leaning into grief, embracing it, really working with it. It’s something that we all go through, we will all experience grief and loss — we do throughout our lifetimes, whether it’s for moves, divorces, illnesses, pandemics, loss of people, pets. And when we can lean into it and learn from it, I think we can really grow from it. The problem is we resist it, because it’s hard. But when we can work with it, I think a lot of transformation is possible.

Why did you decide to write “Conscious Grieving”?

“Conscious Grieving” is like the synthesis of everything I’ve learned about grief. And it has been hard-won, because we live in a grief-illiterate society. When I was younger, and going through it myself, I had to piece a lot of things together, undoing a lot of messages I received. I had a lot of trauma from my parents being sick all through my high school years; their losses were huge. And I had to work to understand my own grief process and heal from it. But then, as I began to work with others, I saw grief in such a big three-dimensional way that I hadn’t understood. I’ve written about pieces of the grief journey in my other books; the afterlife, anxiety, my own story.

You mentioned a “grief-illiterate society.” How does the way we deal with grief as a society differ from other cultures?

We don’t honor it as much as other cultures. And we don’t respect people’s time and space around loss as much. We have a lot of toxic positivity in this country, which I think lends to people being like, “Oh, you’re okay, could be worse.” Well no, let’s just validate and honor that this person is grieving.

With that in mind, what is the best way to support someone who is grieving?

I like to say if we’re grief-illiterate, let’s try to be grief-curious instead. Meet that person with some kind of curiosity, with an openness to listen and to hold space for what they’re going through. We can’t know. Often, people trip up when they’re around somebody who’s grieving because they’re worried they’re going to say the wrong thing. But then they end up not saying anything at all, which I think is more hurtful. And so just show up and hold that space. It’s a hard space to hold, because it’s painful for us. We like to fix things for people and grief is not something we can fix.

What is one of the most surprising things about grief that you have discovered?

I think grief can really be transformative, like in a beautiful way. There’s this idea of post-traumatic growth, and I think there’s something similar within grief. There’s a growth that happens. It takes a while to get there. But grief asks so much of us, it asks us to really evaluate what matters. What’s meaningful to us? What people do we want in our lives? What kind of life do we want to live? Because so much doesn’t matter after we lose one of our most important people. And there’s this amazing opportunity to live a more meaningful life than you ever did before, in light of that loss.

More ‘Vitality Now’

7 things I’ve learned about how to live happily in retirement
12 things to help you find community and combat loneliness
What some caregivers have learned caring for ill loved ones
Here’s help for deciding who should make end-of-life healthcare decisions
Read more ‘Vitality Now ’
More SCNG Premium content

Related Articles

Health |


MDH to host virtual hearing on Allina moving adolescent mental health beds from St. Paul to Minneapolis

Health |


Nurse shortages are set to get even worse with mass US visa delays

Health |


Here’s help for deciding who should make end-of-life healthcare decisions

Health |


Many would-be kidney donors are ineligible because of their weight or smoking habits. This project helps them qualify

Health |


Desperate families seek affordable home care

Will the Chicago White Sox trade Dylan Cease? How’s the backstop depth? 3 questions about the team’s pitching and catching.

posted in: News | 0

Dylan Cease has been at the center of nonstop trade speculation this offseason.

Will he be dealt or will the Chicago White Sox hold on to the right-hander who finished second in American League Cy Young Award voting in 2022?

“Dylan obviously is an established major-league starter, he’s got front-end ability and there isn’t a team that wouldn’t want Dylan Cease on their roster,” Sox general manager Chris Getz said Nov. 7. “Those types of moves are under consideration, they are. If we feel like we can multiply or strengthen our group both presently and in the future, then we’re going to look at that.”

Cease won’t become a free agent until after the 2025 season, so any potential suitor would be in line for two years of his services.

Cease went 7-9 with a 4.58 ERA in 33 starts in 2023. He was fifth in the American League with 214 strikeouts.

The Sox, like every team this time of year, are looking for pitching help — both in the rotation and bullpen. They also could be on the search for catching depth.

With the MLB winter meetings set to begin Monday in Nashville, Tenn., here are three more questions facing the Sox on the mound and behind the plate.

1. How is the rotation shaping up?

Two options for the rotation were included in the team’s first major deal this offseason when the Sox acquired Michael Soroka and Jared Shuster as part of the six-player trade that sent reliever Aaron Bummer to the Atlanta Braves.

Getz envisions “one or both” will be in the rotation.

Soroka, 26, went 2-2 with a 6.40 ERA and 29 strikeouts in seven games (six starts) with the Braves in 2023. He spent most of the season at Triple A as he returned after tearing and then retearing his right Achilles tendon, which led to the right-hander missing the 2021 and 2022 seasons.

“Getting around and meeting some people and knowing a couple of guys on the team already has been good, to come into a situation where it’s different but I feel comfortable already,” Soroka said during a Nov. 20 videoconference call. “You get a chance to work with different people, hear different opinions.

“I’m in a process of learning some new things mechanically and (it) just seems like a great spot to do that and I can’t wait to get to work.”

Shuster, 25, went 4-3 with a 5.81 ERA and 30 strikeouts in 11 starts with the Braves.

Cease and Michael Kopech are the only pitchers still on the roster to make at least 20 starts for the Sox in 2023. Kopech went 5-12 with a 5.43 ERA in 30 appearances (27 starts). He underwent surgery in late September to remove a cyst from his right knee.

“Michael did have a successful stretch last year,” Getz said. “Yes, he didn’t finish the way that he would have liked, I know it’s going to be really important for him moving forward to really have a consistent offseason. That’s why we had the procedure when we did at the end of the year so he could head home being a healthy player and start his training and work toward being a starter next year.

“We believe in Michael Kopech. We’ve seen him be a productive starter, we’ve seen him be a productive reliever. He and (senior adviser to pitching) Brian Bannister have a strong relationship that goes back to Boston. They are continuing to take advantage of that built-in rapport.”

Touki Toussaint and Jesse Scholtens made multiple starts after the team traded Lucas Giolito and Lance Lynn in separate moves in July. Combined with Mike Clevinger being a free agent, the Sox rotation will have a much different look than it did at the beginning of 2023 regardless of which direction the team decides to go with Cease.

2. What could the bullpen look like?

Getz said it was a little premature to label anyone as the closer when the topic of the bullpen came up at the GM meetings.

“It’s more than anything, we’ve got to put together a sound starting staff and certainly our relievers will come together at the right time,” he said.

Gregory Santos is “trending in the right direction,” Getz said after the righty’s season ended Sept. 20 because of a flexor strain. He had a 3.39 ERA and five saves as the team’s most consistent reliever in 2023.

“He’s continuing to rehab and he feels good,” Getz said.

As for the bullpen in general, Jordan Leasure could be a name to watch. Acquired from the Los Angeles Dodgers near the trade deadline in July, Getz said the right-hander was “arguably the best reliever” in the Arizona Fall League after recording a 1.08 ERA in eight appearances.

2020 first-round draft pick Garrett Crochet, who returned from Tommy John surgery but missed time with left shoulder inflammation, is preparing for different roles.

“I want him to be a multi-inning pitcher — if that means it’s going to work toward a starter, so be it,” Getz said. “Primarily we’re going to prioritize his health, and he’s off and running this offseason, and I know he’s excited for whatever opportunity’s given to him next year.”

3. Will the Sox look for more help at catcher?

Korey Lee displayed a strong arm while getting an opportunity to catch down the stretch. He’ll look to make adjustments in the batter’s box after going 5-for-65 (.077) in his 24 games after being acquired in a trade with the Houston Astros.

“He’s got catching and throwing skills,” Getz said. “Our pitchers did like throwing to him. He understands the position. With Korey, it’s really about not only continuing to progress in those areas but his offensive game as well.

“He’s got to make some adjustments and certainly understand how pitchers are going to attack him at the major-league level. There were a lot of positives. I know (manager) Pedro (Grifol) and the staff was really happy with Korey and the potential he brings to the table.”

Lee took over for Yasmani Grandal, who is a free agent. The Sox potentially could add a veteran catcher to the mix.

“We’ll look at ways to strengthen that position to allow (Lee) to feel like we’re putting him in a position to succeed,” Getz said. “He’s certainly going to get his opportunities at the major-league level. That doesn’t mean we’re not going to look to improve the position as a whole.”

()

Israel and US are at odds over conflicting visions for postwar Gaza

posted in: Politics | 0

By JOSEF FEDERMAN and SAMY MAGDY (Associated Press)

JERUSALEM (AP) — The United States has offered strong support to Israel in its war against Hamas, which rules the Gaza Strip. But the allies are increasingly at odds over what will happen to Gaza once the war winds down.

Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, this week announced that Israel would retain an open-ended security presence in Gaza. Israeli officials talk of imposing a buffer zone to keep Palestinians away from the Israeli border. They rule out any role for the Palestinian Authority, which was ousted from Gaza by Hamas in 2007 but governs semi-autonomous areas of the occupied West Bank. Hamas has been designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, Canada and the European Union.

The United States has laid out a much different vision. Top officials have said they will not allow Israel to reoccupy Gaza or further shrink its already small territory. They have repeatedly called for a return of the internationally recognized Palestinian Authority and the resumption of peace talks aimed at establishing a Palestinian state alongside Israel.

These conflicting visions have set the stage for difficult discussions between Israel and the U.S.

Here’s a closer look at the issues.

SHAKY COMMON GROUND

Israel declared war on Hamas after the Islamic group burst across its southern border on Oct. 7, slaughtering some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and kidnapping more than 240 others. President Joe Biden quickly flew to Israel on a solidarity mission, and his administration has strongly backed Israel’s right to defend itself while providing weapons and military assistance.

Israel has said its goal is to destroy Hamas —- a difficult task given the group’s deep roots in Palestinian society.

The U.S., which along with other Western countries considers Hamas a terrorist group, has embraced this goal. But as the war drags on, it has expressed misgivings about the dire humanitarian conditions and mounting civilian death toll in Gaza, where health authorities report over 16,000 dead, at least two-thirds of them women and children. Israel says Hamas is to blame by using civilians as human shields.

Over the weekend, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said it is critical that Israel protect Gaza’s civilians.

“If you drive them into the arms of the enemy, you replace a tactical victory with a strategic defeat,” he said. “So I have repeatedly made clear to Israel’s leaders that protecting civilians in Gaza is both a moral responsibility and a strategic imperative.”

On Thursday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken went even farther, telling Israel that “civilian casualties remain too high and that Israel must step up its efforts to reduce them,” his office said. Blinken also called on Israel to increase the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza.

DIFFERENT VISIONS

The biggest differences between the allies have emerged over the longer-term vision for Gaza.

Netanyahu has offered only glimpses of what he plans.

On Tuesday, he said the military would retain open-ended security control over the Gaza Strip long after the war ends, suggesting a form of extended Israeli occupation.

Netanyahu ruled out the idea of foreign peacekeepers, saying only the Israeli army could ensure that Gaza remains demilitarized. Netanyahu has also rejected a return of the Palestinian Authority, saying its leader, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas cannot be trusted.

“After destroying Hamas, Gaza will be demilitarized and de-radicalized so that no threat will be posed to Israel from Gaza,” said Ophir Falk, an adviser to Netanyahu. “The buffer zone may be part of the demilitarization. That’s the plan.”

Israel told Western allies and regional neighbors about the buffer zone plans as recently as last week, without offering a detailed proposal, according to Egyptians officials and Arab and Western diplomats, who insisted on anonymity to discuss the topic.

The officials said countries informed of the proposal include Egypt, Qatar, Jordan, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Two Egyptian officials said it appears that Israel doesn’t have a detailed workable plan for such a zone, including its width.

“They just say, ‘it would be a temporary buffer zone,’” one of the officials said. “But when we asked for details, they don’t have answers.”

While no decisions have been taken, these ideas appear to put Israel at odds with the White House.

Biden and other top officials have repeatedly said that a “revitalized” Palestinian Authority must play a role in postwar Gaza and that Israel must seek a two-state solution involving the PA. They have ruled out a long-term re-occupation or redrawing of Gaza’s borders.

Vice President Kamala Harris laid out perhaps the clearest U.S. vision during an address in Dubai last weekend.

“Five principles guide our approach for post-conflict Gaza: no forcible displacement, no re-occupation, no siege or blockade, no reduction in territory, and no use of Gaza as a platform for terrorism,” she said. “We want to see a unified Gaza and West Bank under the Palestinian Authority, and Palestinian voices and aspirations must be at the center of this work.”

Frustration with Netanyahu may not be limited to the U.S.

Amos Harel, the military affairs columnist for the Haaretz daily, said Israeli army commanders believe Netanyahu is motivated by domestic political considerations and refusing to deal with the Palestinian Authority “due to coalition constructions from his far-right partners.” Netanyahu and his hardline coalition partners oppose Palestinian independence.

HOW SERIOUS ARE THE DISPUTES?

For now, both sides seem to be focused on the shared goal of destroying Hamas.

“It’s important for them that Israel achieve the military goals because this is the starting point for any changes that can happen the day after,” said Eldad Shavit, a former high-ranking Israeli intelligence official.

He said U.S. pressure in the short term will be on immediate issues — such as pressure to minimize civilian casualties and to allow more deliveries of humanitarian aid.

The U.S. has indicated that it will show some patience after the fighting subsides.

State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said the U.S. understands “there will have to be some kind of transition period after the end of major combat operations.” He declined to say how long that would take.

But as the death toll in Gaza continues to rise, conditions deteriorate, and Biden enters an election year with significant portions of his Democratic base pushing for an end to Israel’s offensive, these differences are likely to grow in the absence of a clear endgame.

Shavit said that tensions could rise if the U.S. at some point concludes that Israel is dragging its feet or ignoring American demands. But for now, “the Americans want Israel to succeed,” he said.

Daniel Levy, a former Israeli peace negotiator who is president of the U.S./Middle East Project, a policy institute that studies the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, said the Americans are unlikely to put their foot down.

He cited what he described as a tepid American response to heavy civilian casualties in southern Gaza as an indicator of what lies ahead.

“Israelis have a sense that their road to run is not endless, but they still feel they have lots of road to run,” he said.

___

Magdy reported from Cairo.

NFL evaluators praise J.J. McCarthy’s ‘unbelievable mind.’ Would the Chicago Bears target the Michigan QB and local product?

posted in: News | 0

Facing third-and-10 at the Ohio State 22-yard line in the second quarter Saturday, Michigan quarterback J.J. McCarthy had wide receiver Cornelius Johnson split wide to the right as his primary read.

Ohio State had a safety over the top of the left side, and McCarthy liked the matchup for Johnson, who was running a go route and hoped to shake Davison Igbinosun with a stutter step, maybe convincing the cornerback he was breaking off his route near the line to gain.

The Wolverines were thinking touchdown — not first down.

Igbinosun didn’t take the bait and Johnson was covered. McCarthy didn’t have a lot of time to react. Buckeyes defensive tackle Mike Hall Jr. collapsed the pocket with a bull rush. From McCarthy’s blind side, defensive end J.T. Tuimoloau beat left tackle LaDarius Henderson with a spin move. The escape hatch was closing.

McCarthy kept his eyes on Johnson, hoping to hold safety Malik Hartford to the right side as wide receiver Roman Wilson crossed from the left with cornerback Denzel Burke in close coverage. Just before Tuimoloau hit him, McCarthy zipped a pass across the middle — his release is compact and fast — somehow threading the ball between Burke and Hartford and into Wilson’s hands.

Wilson caught the ball at the 5-yard line and squirted into the end zone, putting the Wolverines ahead 14-3 in a game they won 30-24 to improve to 12-0 as delirious fans stormed the field at Michigan Stadium afterward.

It was the kind of big-time throw — McCarthy didn’t stride into it with Tuimoloau bearing down on him — that’s a wow moment for NFL evaluators considering McCarthy at or near the top of a talented crop of quarterbacks for the 2024 draft.

That’s if the junior from LaGrange Park decides to enter the draft after Michigan’s season ends. The Wolverines play Iowa in the Big Ten championship game Saturday at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis (7 p.m., Fox-32). A 22-point favorite, second-ranked Michigan is a shoo-in for its third straight College Football Playoff berth with a victory.

McCarthy has a lot to contemplate, including the future of the Michigan program with the NCAA investigating coach Jim Harbaugh for an alleged scheme to illegally scout future opponents in person. Harbaugh will return Saturday from a three-game Big Ten suspension.

In the time being, McCarthy has meaningful games to prepare for with the Wolverines hunting their first national title since 1997. And for now he can talk about the throw to Wilson, a highlight-reel play for McCarthy, whose passing production was limited in the games Harbaugh was banned from the sidelines.

“I had a good one-on-one on the outside,” McCarthy said, “and he didn’t win. We had a crossing route coming across, so I knew if I kept my eyes on the single receiver (Johnson) that (Hartford) might move over and open up a little space for Roman.”

Rewatch the play a handful of times and you will see Hartford budged only slightly. But McCarthy’s eyes held him long enough to keep that little window cracked open.

“Then I’ve just got to put it in a can of cola, honestly,” McCarthy said.

The touchdown pass to Wilson wasn’t the only big play McCarthy made. Three plays before the score, Michigan put it in his hands on fourth-and-1 from the Buckeyes 29 with a play fake that resulted in a quick throw to tight end Colston Loveland for 7 yards.

McCarthy’s final numbers were not overwhelming — he completed 16 of 20 passes for 148 yards and ran four times for 17 yards — but that has been the case most of the season as the Wolverines are heavily committed to running the ball and haven’t often needed to air it out.

Michigan ranks 122nd out of 133 FBS schools in passing-play percentage (39.5%). That’s one layer to evaluating McCarthy against USC’s Caleb Williams, North Carolina’s Drake Maye and LSU’s Jayden Daniels when considering how the quarterback class will stack up. None has declared for the NFL draft, though Daniels is out of college eligibility. All could be top-10 picks.

The Bears have been doing their homework on college quarterbacks in the event they elect to move on from Justin Fields. Owning the Carolina Panthers’ first-round pick — which, based on current standings, would be No. 1 — as well as their own, currently No. 4, puts general manager Ryan Poles in a position to control the direction of the QB class.

Imagine if a local kid — McCarthy was a five-star recruit at Nazareth before finishing his high school career at IMG Academy in Florida during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 — was drafted to be the savior for the local franchise.

It’s possible Bears fans who were glued to Saturday’s game to watch Ohio State wide receiver Marvin Harrison Jr. (118 yards, one touchdown) — and dream about what he could accomplish at Soldier Field — were watching the team’s future quarterback.

Standing out in the class

Assuming Williams, Maye and McCarthy declare for the draft and join Daniels, it will be fascinating to watch the scouting process play out between now and April 25.

Williams entered this season as the presumptive No. 1 pick, and while he still might wind up in that spot, he endured a bumpy season for the 7-5 Trojans, who lost five of their final six games. The defense, offensive line and skill-position players surrounding the 2022 Heisman Trophy winner were badly exposed at times.

“I love McCarthy,” one veteran NFL executive said. “He may not have enough juice to get him over Williams, but there is something about J.J.”

Maye and the Tar Heels (8-4) also hit a late-season swoon, losing four of their final six games, as he played about half the season with an ankle injury. Like Williams, Maye didn’t have the best line in front of him, and he had only one high-level skill player in wide receiver Tez Walker.

Daniels led the No. 1 scoring offense in the FBS (46.4 points per game) while throwing for 3,812 yards with 40 touchdowns and only four interceptions and rushing for another 1,134 yards. Losses to Alabama and Ole Miss kept the Tigers (9-3) from reaching the SEC title game, and they also fell in the season opener to Florida State. Daniels benefited from elite receiving talent.

The first thing that jumps out when lumping the four quarterbacks together is that McCarthy’s statistics, other than his 74.3% completion rate, are outliers. He has attempted only 257 passes while the other three average 257 completions. McCarthy’s 2,483 yards are more than 1,100 fewer than the other three have. He has 19 touchdown passes against four interceptions.

After winning their first nine games by an average of 34 points, Michigan went to State College, Pa., on Nov. 11 for a matchup against then-No. 9 Penn State. NFL folks were curious to see how McCarthy would respond against a better opponent.

The Wolverines got out to a 14-9 halftime lead and ran the ball on their final 32 offensive plays. Amid that onslaught of ground-and-pound, McCarthy had a keeper on a designed rollout for a throw that didn’t materialize, and a pass interference penalty against the Nittany Lions wiped out an attempt. Other than that, it was run after run after run to put away a 24-15 victory.

McCarthy finished 7 of 8 for 60 yards, and the large collection of scouts at the game was left to wait for another week to dig in on him as a passer. It was apparent from the outset the Wolverines were ill-prepared to block Penn State defensive end Chop Robinson, and with the Nittany Lions offense stuck in the mud, Michigan was able to punt and play defense without much threat.

“Would have loved to see him throw more than eight (expletive) times,” one scout who attended the game texted as he left the stadium.

One question worth addressing is why Harbaugh and his coaching staff have not put more on McCarthy’s shoulders if they believe he is an elite quarterback.

“That’s Harbaugh,” one NFL general manager replied. “He’s going to do what he does. I give that kid credit. A lot of kids crumble there.”

When the game at Penn State ended and the Wolverines were two wins from reaching the Big Ten title game, something caught the attention of another evaluator who was present.

“The thing I liked, he knew there were a ton of scouts there and he threw it eight times,” he said. “Yet after the game, J.J. was celebrating. He didn’t give a (hoot). You saw him running all over. Tells me loud and clear he is a team guy.”

Rewind to mid-September and a 31-6 win over Bowling Green. McCarthy was 8 of 13 passing for 143 yards with a career-high three interceptions and said afterward he forced too many throws.

“He’s definitely athletic enough in the pocket,” said a national scout with Michigan in his territory. “He’s got all the necessary arm talent. He’s accurate enough. I like his confidence. There’s that fine line of taking risks and not being stupid, and usually he’s at that line. For whatever reason, there’s been a few games this year he’s been crossing that line.

“He’s a legit first-round contender based on what I’ve seen. I’m optimistic about what he can be. I don’t have a strong conviction at this point.”

Schematic advantage?

McCarthy did put up big numbers last year in the 51-45 CFP semifinal loss to TCU in the Fiesta Bowl. Yes, the Horned Frogs returned two interceptions for touchdowns, but he was under consistent pressure from blitzing linebackers and passed for 343 yards and two touchdowns, nearly leading the Wolverines back from a 15-point halftime deficit.

It was the kind of wide-open game that caught the attention of scouts pointing toward his junior season, and that leads into another Harbaugh-related topic of whether Michigan’s system better equips the quarterback for the NFL based on what he’s asked to do.

“Yes,” said a general manager who has seen McCarthy play this season. “Because he’s running a more pro-style attack. He is in a different offense than all these other guys getting all of the stats.

“Now, he’s in shotgun a lot, too, but he’ll get under center. You can see him work through progressions. He still needs some work at that. He’s accurate but misses throws like they all do. But it’s more of a pro style with what they’re doing with Harbaugh. They run the hell out of it, which helps the quarterback with the play action. He’s an interesting guy.”

That gives McCarthy somewhat of a base, whenever he does enter the league, for understanding how footwork and timing need to match up in an NFL passing offense. The Wolverines identity is to control the line of scrimmage and tempo with their running game, as opposed to some of the offenses producing quarterback talent that are more spread-based, relying on half-field reads.

For an NFL team considering McCarthy, that makes what type of offense the team runs a key factor.

Does it become a difference maker in the evaluation process? Probably not. But it’s part of the calculus, and three years of experience playing for a coach who has won as an NFL head coach and played quarterback in the league creates additional value.

A head for football

The comparison game is always dangerous. You wind up trying to draw parallels between college players and guys who performed similarly and then reached the highest levels of accomplishment in the NFL, which has a way of chewing up and spitting out highly drafted quarterbacks in rapid succession.

“You hate to compare, right?” Harbaugh told Michigan media at the start of the season about McCarthy. “But very much like Andrew Luck. Once in a generation. I knew it first with Luck (whom Harbaugh coached at Stanford). Just the way he took the field for practice as a true freshman. Just the presence they have when they walk on the field and the first time you give them the quarterback position.

“There it is with J.J. First day he walked out on the practice field here at Michigan, that’s what came to mind. It was very Andrew Luck-like, the presence and the demeanor — the everything. Yeah, (it’s) well-documented J.J. McCarthy’s as much of a generation quarterback here at Michigan or anywhere.”

What set apart Luck — a four-time Pro Bowl selection in seven years with the Indianapolis Colts before his abrupt retirement in the 2019 preseason — was elite processing ability and a high football IQ. That’s what scouts are hinting at when raving about McCarthy, who turns 21 next month.

Those pounding the table for McCarthy believe that, from the shoulders up, he’s built to play in the NFL at a high level, even if his 6-foot-3, 202-pound frame is a little on the slender side.

He doesn’t run like Daniels and isn’t as elusive as Williams and might not win a foot race against Maye, but he’s slippery enough in the pocket and can make second-reaction plays. He throws with good velocity and accuracy, and the quick release is a big plus. He can operate from all sorts of platforms.

It remains to be seen how the Bears will order the quarterback prospects when evaluating them and then comparing them with what they have in Fields, who is under contract through 2024 with a fifth-year club option for 2025.

Poles was part of a Kansas City Chiefs organization that zigged for Patrick Mahomes in 2017 when most of the league zagged, ranking Deshaun Watson tops at the position. The Bears, of course, went in another direction altogether by drafting Mitch Trubisky at No. 2 ahead of Mahomes and Watson.

The Chiefs, who had a successful veteran at the time in Alex Smith, were able to see through the inherent challenges an Air Raid system thrower like Mahomes would face and clearly evaluate what he could become under coach Andy Reid.

Does that mean Poles will lead a different wave of thinking at Halas Hall in the offseason? Who knows. But he will be able to draw from that process and the notebooks of questions that were asked and answered along the way to a decision that, in retrospect, was as stunning as it was brilliant.

Listening to McCarthy describe how he processed his choices on the touchdown pass to Wilson against the Buckeyes, it was evident he has been trained to assimilate reads from presnap to the split seconds that follow the snap and then act.

“Unbelievable mind,” one high-level evaluator said. “Can’t make any judgment on him until they play (more) high-level teams.”

A win over the Hawkeyes would thrust Michigan into the CFP again, giving McCarthy one or two of those opportunities. The NFL will be watching.

()