Napster sold to tech commerce company for $207 million

posted in: All news | 0

NEW YORK (AP) — A brand that was notoriously connected to music piracy before reemerging as a subscription music service has been sold to Infinite Reality for $207 million.

The tech startup announced Tuesday it had bought Napster in hopes of transforming the streaming service into a social music platform where artists can connect with fans and better monetize off their work.

Related Articles


The Jonas Brothers to play career-spanning concert at Xcel Energy Center


Listening to Mozart might improve your health and daily functioning in numerous ways


A judge says Mariah Carey didn’t steal ‘All I Want For Christmas Is You’ from other writers


The Steve Miller Band to play the Minnesota State Fair Grandstand


Cellist Yo-Yo Ma and pianist Jon Kimura Parker among the guests for the Minnesota Orchestra’s summer and 2025-2026 seasons

“The internet has evolved from desktop to mobile, from mobile to social, and now we are entering the immersive era. Yet, music streaming has remained largely the same. It’s time to reimagine what’s possible,” said Napster CEO Jon Vlassopulos in a blog post.

Among its plans to update Napster, Infinite Reality said it will create virtual 3D spaces that will allow fans to attend concerts, and give musicians or labels the ability to sell digital and physical merchandise. Artists will also receive a wider range of metrics and analytics to better understand the behavior of platform users.

“We can think of no better use case for our technology than putting it in the hands of music artists who are constantly pushing the boundaries of what’s possible,” said Infinite Reality Chief Business Officer Amish Shah.

Napster was launched in 1999 by Shawn Fanning and Sean Parker and quickly became the first significant peer-to-peer file-sharing application. It shuttered in early 2000s after the record industry and popular rock band Metallica sued over copyright violations. Rhapsody later bought the brand in 2011 and relaunched it as a music streaming service.

J.J. McCarthy says Vikings haven’t told him he’s starting at quarterback

posted in: All news | 0

All signs point to J.J. McCarthy being the starting quarterback for the Vikings moving forward.

The situation got much more clear last week when multiple reports revealed that the Vikings were no longer pursuing Aaron Rodgers.

That said, McCarthy offered up an interesting nugget to television personality Kay Adams on Tuesday morning before his group teed off at NFLPA Classic in Mayakoba, Mexico. Asked during his appearance on the Up & Adams Show when he found out he was going to the starter, McCarthy replied, “They haven’t told me.”

“I’m happy they didn’t because I try to earn it every single day,” McCarthy added. “I never want that to be given to me. It’s such a privilege and opportunity for them to give me that chance. I’m just going to make the most of it.”

It’s not necessarily surprising that the Vikings haven’t committed to McCarthy as their starter next season considering he doesn’t have much experience under his belt.

Though he was selected with the No. 10 pick in the 2024 NFL Draft, and seemed to be trending in the right direction during training camp, McCarthy still hasn’t taken an official snap after suffering a torn meniscus during an exhibition game as a rookie.

As frustrating as the injury was for McCarthy at the time, he said he has found a silver lining in the fact that it grounded him and reminded him what was important in life.

“It was the ultimate blessing because it’s such a time of stillness,” McCarthy said. “It’s huge for young guys to find that routine that they can rely on and stay consistent with. So, I would say that was the biggest thing for me.”

It helped that McCarthy got to learn the ropes of the position from afar last season while Sam Darnold rewrote the narrative on his career while leading the Vikings to the playoffs. That should pay dividends whenever it’s time for McCarthy to take over under center.

Where is he at with the recovery process?

“I would say I’m 100 percent,” McCarthy said. “Just staying consistent with the rehab process and not wavering from that.

Related Articles


Why the Vikings reunited former Colts teammates Ryan Kelly and Will Fries


Dane Mizutani: Vikings commit to J.J. McCarthy. Thank goodness logic prevailed.


How is Jordan Mason approaching his opportunity with the Vikings?


Vikings agree to terms with receiver Rondale Moore


Vikings banking on Jonathan Allen and Javon Hargrave to improve interior pass rush

Letters: I have Trump Derangement Syndrome and here is the cause

posted in: All news | 0

Call me deranged, but …

Ah, thank you GOP for getting down to serious legislation by putting forth your recent bill about Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS).

As one who is afflicted with the syndrome, I’ll accept your definition, and here is the cause…

Watching people you know and love fall continually for a chronic liar, huckster, cheater, and grievance filled narcissist in the name of God and country … it really tests one’s mental acuity. Call me deranged but when a politician displays cruelty, callousness, revenge and arrogance, I really have a hard time acting “normal.”

I personally would tweak the definition of TDS to be “the acute onset of zealotry and adherence (of otherwise normal people) to the grievances and whims of Donald J. Trump. This creates an inability to distinguish between one’s own moral principles and those of a President whose petty impulses must be interpreted as serious policies to his ever subservient followers”

Jeff Zupfer, St. Paul

 

No shortage after all?

I read the Minnesota Republicans in our state legislative body want to add TDS to definitions of types of mental illness. I thought we had a shortage of mental health caregivers, but apparently Republicans are physicians as well. Run for the hills folks, they drank the Kool-Aid.

Martha Ruff, St. Paul

 

Give Trump a chance

As I read the Letters to the Editor from Sunday’s paper, I was surprised at how much hate there is in our community. Maybe the PP only published the negative letters to the editor, or maybe only “haters” sent in letters. I guess I can understand folks are upset with Donald Trump, Elon Musk and most all of government, but calm down. Give Trump the same time you gave Joe Biden, then let’s see where you’re at.

What I can’t understand though, is how tough everyone wants to be on teaching Russia a lesson. Rather than giving the Trump Administration a chance to find an acceptable resolution, people seem to accept a forceful resolution to Russia’s migration of parts of Ukraine, claiming Russia will not stop at Ukraine. That brings the question, whose children are you willing to risk life and limb to show Putin how to act? How many American lives are you willing to give?

I don’t want my grandkids over there fighting. And do you really think Putin will accept multiple nations sending their kids to fight? Do you believe, that if Putin is as terrible as you describe, and thousands of Russian soldiers are killed, will Ukraine be safe from a nuclear attack? Will he go even further? Give me a number of acceptable deaths you will be comfortable with that will be needed to teach Putin that lesson. Maybe you want to ruin Russia’s economy, will that make the Ukrainians safer?

Give Trump a chance.

Instead, focus on our homeland and pretend America is Ukraine, and other continents invaded our territory with 14 million migrants.

Mike Miller, St. Paul

 

Short-handed

This administration has gutted its DOJ so badly that it can no longer effectively press nor defend against the hundreds of lawsuits flying back and forth. Listen to this beauty of an exchange: Judge Theodore Chuang (District of Maryland): “Why do we get a declaration, but there’s really no documentation of anything there?”  Gardner (DOJ attorney): “We have about half the number of staff we had in November …”  Chuang: “You’re saying that the Justice Department isn’t taking this case seriously?”  Gardner: “It’s the opposite. I haven’t had a day off since January 20. We’re working day and night.”

Regina Purins, St. Paul

Related Articles


Letters: Maybe Minnesota should become Canada’s 11th province


Letters: How ’bout you start with your own budgets, budget-cutters?


Letters: The taxing cost of living in Minnesota


Letters: ‘It doesn’t cost anything to be nice to someone’


Letters: St. Paul’s West End has long had to fight for its character

Russell N. Myers: Volition: Women are changing the world

posted in: All news | 0

It is becoming apparent that women are changing the world. Individually and collectively, in ways quiet and loud, choices made by women over the past six decades are changing the institutions of human life. The impact of these decisions is being felt now and will become clearer in generations to come.

The issues are complex, with no single causative factor. Yet central to these changes is the role of volition – human agency. Women everywhere have made and are making their own decisions about what they want from life. In so doing, they are leading humanity into the future.

The evidence is unmistakable. Two examples will illustrate how the choices of women across the globe are fundamentally changing the course of life on earth.

One is the experience of organized religion. In the past 60 years we have seen a significant decline in church attendance and participation.

The other place where women’s decisions are altering the future is birthrates, which have fallen in every country since 1965. The result of decreased fertility is already an issue in some countries and will be more so in years to come. Elon Musk, JD Vance, Sean Duffy and others support more children and larger families, but they are late to the party.  It would take decades to affect population dynamics that have been unfolding for more than two generations.

What has been the role of women in these movements? Of the decline of the church, British scholar and Anglican priest Alan Billings writes that:

“By the 21st century it was commonplace to speak of the death of Christian Britain. Traditional forms of Christianity were in serious decline. … People were not so much hostile as indifferent; they walked away from organized religion. … One of the most serious defections from the 1960s onward was that of younger women. This generation felt liberated by the sexual revolution: they were able to control their own fertility, to decide when or whether to have a family, to have an education and a career.  But the issues these emancipated women wanted to talk about – artificial contraception, abortion, divorce, balancing career and family life, sexuality – were all matters that the predominantly male church leaders were only prepared to pronounce on, not debate. Women left the Church in large numbers, taking with them their husbands and children.  … Eventually most of the churches had shifted their position on some or all of these issues; but by then, damage had been done.”

While this is written from the perspective of the U.K., in my experience the same phenomenon applies to the American church. A component of the decline of organized religion can be attributed to decisions made by women, who grew weary of the inflexibility they encountered in their traditional places of spiritual expression. In the absence of meaningful dialogue on issues they cared about, they voted with their feet. Not coincidentally, Billings’ essay constitutes a chapter in “A Handbook of Chaplaincy Studies.” Many of the people who left the church now turn to chaplains for spiritual support, and many of my chaplain colleagues are women.

The issue of fertility rates has a more wide-ranging impact. Simply stated, many women around the globe do not want to have more children. One immediate effect is the lament of people who will never have grandchildren (“Longing for Grandchildren when Your Child Doesn’t Want Kids,” New York Times, Nov. 11, 2024). A handwritten note in a Christmas card included the observation that the writer has no grandchildren, and “the wife of my brother’s only son will not have children. So, our line is going away.”

In addition to the personal experience of the end of a family line, the decision of women over the past 60 years to limit the number of children will be societal, affecting economics, government, healthcare and national security. It is forecast to be felt in the U.S. by the end of this century, and into the future. A population decline six decades in the making is not easily turned around. Nicholas Eberstadt writes in Foreign Affairs:

“Although few yet see it coming, humans are about to enter a new era of history. Call it the “age of depopulation.” For the first time since the Black Death in the 1300s, the planetary population will decline. But whereas the last implosion was caused by a deadly disease borne by fleas, the coming one will be entirely due to choices made by people. …

“Global fertility has plunged since the population explosion in the 1960s. For over two generations, the world’s average childbearing levels have headed relentlessly downward, as one country after another joined in the decline. According to the UN Population Division, the total fertility rate for the planet was only half as high in 2015 as it was in 1965. By the UNPD’s reckoning, every country saw birth rates drop over that period.  … During the postwar period, a veritable library of research has been published on factors that might explain the decline in fertility that picked up pace in the twentieth century. … Eventually, in 1994, the economist Lant Pritchett discovered the most powerful national fertility factor ever detected. That decisive factor turned out to be simple: what women want.     …

“This finding underscored the central role of volition – of human agency – in fertility patterns.”

The point here is not to credit or blame women for big societal trends. Rather, it is to make the observation that, as Billings notes, dialogue is preferable to pronouncements. All voices need to be heard. We are all in this together.

At the same time, the evidence is clear. Whatever we think about it, and whatever we might want to do about it, the fact remains: Women are leading the world into the future by exercising their human agency to decide.  Men and women alike will have to accept, adapt to and work together to support one another in that reality.

Russell Myers recently retired after 31 years as a chaplain at Allina Health, serving United Hospital and Allina Health EMS. He is a Lutheran pastor and the author of “Because We Care: A Handbook for Chaplaincy in Emergency Medical Services.”