People are buying pricey fertility drugs from strangers on the internet

posted in: News | 0

Kristen V. Brown | Bloomberg News (TNS)

After in vitro fertilization led to a miscarriage, Lindsay found herself with thousands of dollars’ worth of fertility drugs she could no longer use.

She was lucky: Insurance covered most of her costs. But for the majority of people, fertility care is not covered. So Lindsay didn’t want to waste her drugs.

“I knew people were paying a lot for these,” she said. “It seemed sort of criminal to throw them away.”

Lindsay and the other women living in the U.S. interviewed for this article asked that only their first names be used because it’s against federal law to possess or consume drugs not prescribed to you.

Lindsay looked for fellow fertility patients who might want her medications. She found them on social media. On Instagram, patients used hashtags to covertly signal they had fertility drugs for offer, or that they were in need. On Facebook, Listservs and Discord groups, people swapped (and sometimes sold) leftover medications.

As more women postpone having children until later in life, infertility has become a growing problem, with the World Health Organization estimating that about one in six people globally are now impacted. The global fertility market was worth about $35.2 billion last year and is expected to grow to $84 billion by 2028, according to market research firm Imarc. In the U.S., procedures like IVF and egg freezing have steadily risen each year save for a dip during the COVID lockdowns of 2020. Procedures rose more than 26% in 2021, the most recent year available.

Infertility treatments can be expensive. According to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, one round of IVF treatments averages more than $12,000 in the U.S. Medications alone can easily top $5,000. Yet only 43% of large U.S. employers offered IVF coverage in 2022 and most states do not require private insurers to offer fertility benefits.

It’s a quirk of fertility care that patients often wind up with leftover drugs. Treatments that ramp up egg production and prepare the body for pregnancy typically come via mail from special-order pharmacies. Doctors generally prescribe more than will likely be required so doses can be adjusted. Those patients who respond especially well to medication can easily wind up with twice as many drugs as they need.

When Lindsay, who was 37 when she started IVF, miscarried six and a half weeks into her pregnancy, she still had enough drugs to last at least another month. Through the course of three rounds of IVF, Lindsay estimates she shipped drugs to around 20 other women. Some required refrigeration, so she overnighted them in coolers. Occasionally she would include a small token, like candies or socks with pineapples, the unofficial symbol of IVF.

Laws forbidding the sharing of prescription drugs aren’t likely to be enforced when the medicines aren’t considered potentially abusive, said Hank Greely, a law professor at Stanford University. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration says fertility drugs, which are not considered controlled substances, do not fall under its purview.

There are, of course, inherent risks in buying drugs from strangers on the internet.

“You don’t know if the drugs were stored properly or that they are legitimate,” said Art Caplan, a bioethicist at New York University’s Grossman School of Medicine.

This warning was echoed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Treatments received outside the legitimate supply chain could “contain the wrong ingredients, contain too little, too much or no active ingredient at all, or contain other harmful ingredients, or otherwise be unsafe,” a spokesperson said.

Another patient, Hollee, underwent IVF after losing her fallopian tubes to cancer. Without fertility coverage, she and her husband were looking at about $30,000 in medical expenses, plus another $12,000 for prescriptions. She joined an IVF support group on Facebook where patients commonly sell and give away unneeded medications. One woman offered to sell two types of drugs for $680 — a bargain. But the drugs never came.

Many IVF groups carefully screen members to weed out scammers by requiring identification and proof that a person is undergoing fertility treatment. Some groups forbid the trade of drugs altogether; a moderator of one group told Bloomberg that scams are just too common. Eventually, Hollee, 37, and her husband bought medications from another group member. All in all, they spent about $3,500, still a fraction of the pharmacy cost.

“We still saved even though we got scammed,” said Hollee. “If we want to do IVF, we’re forced to do it this way.”

Certain fertility drugs require refrigeration to remain potent. Drugs that have been mishandled or are too old carry the risk of not working — jeopardizing the success of an expensive and often emotionally grueling IVF cycle. Rachel, 33, said her doctor advised her that medications were generally fine for six months after the expiration date. Rachel makes sure drugs she purchases on Facebook are still in their original packaging and sealed. She and other patients still take the second-hand drugs under the supervision of their doctors.

“It is a little scary when you’re taking any medication from a stranger,” she said.

She had taken a second job bartending to help pay for fertility treatments, but by sourcing drugs on Facebook, she was able to avoid taking out a loan. Many women interviewed said that strangers donating or selling deeply discounted drugs online are a lifeline.

“It’s like a sisterhood that nobody wants to be part of, but you want to help everyone that’s in it,” said Beth, 48, who received donated medications through an email Listserv of patients at her clinic, then donated drugs herself when she and her husband decided to adopt a child.

Drugmaker ​​EMD Serono, which makes fertility drugs including Gonal-f, said that it is aware of the trading practices and “advises patients to always obtain medications only from licensed distributors and pharmacies.” The company also suggested patients inspect packaging for evidence of tampering and advised against using expired products.

Insurers Aetna and UnitedHealth declined to comment on selling and donating fertility drugs. Other insurers didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Meta Platforms Inc., which operates both Facebook and Instagram, referred Bloomberg to its policies on restricted goods, which prohibit individual sale or donation of prescription drugs.

Resolve, the national infertility association, warned in a statement that sharing unused medication “can come with a myriad of risks,” adding “If you’re unsure of what to do with your leftover medications, it’s best to consult with your infertility practice to understand the local laws.”

Some clinics do informally support such practices. Beth, for example, said her clinic turned a blind eye to patients leaving leftovers in a coat closet. It’s hard for clinics and doctors to officially endorse the practice, though, because they have no way to assess the legitimacy or quality of the drugs.

“I understand why it happens, but I can’t advocate for it,” said Zev Williams, director of Columbia University Fertility Center.

Sometimes, he said, when patients are cost conscious, his group will start out prescribing smaller amounts of drugs, and order more if needed. Yet usually patients wind up with excess drugs, he said.

Caplan, the NYU bioethicist, said fertility doctors should discuss ways to legitimize leftovers.

“That doesn’t happen,” he said. “I think this area needs more attention.”

After Lindsay ending up moving and no longer had the insurance coverage she needed for IVF treatment, she wound up tapping the underground fertility market for donated drugs herself. Eventually she did get pregnant, and gave birth to a son, and later a daughter.

“It wasn’t like I wanted to be in this weird drug ring,” she said. “But infertility is just heartbreaking like that.”

___

©2023 Bloomberg News. Visit at bloomberg.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Washington County man sentenced for tax crimes, swindling short-term renters

posted in: News | 0

A Washington County man convicted of tax crimes and swindling customers of his short-term rental business was sentenced to serve an additional 52 days in jail and ordered to give back the money in question.

Jurors last month convicted Karl Evald Auleciems, 57, on 2021 charges that stemmed from him renting out his West Lakeland Township home and other properties for weddings and other events.

Karl Evald Auleciems (Courtesy of the Washington County Sheriff’s Office)

Auleciems entered into short-term rental contracts with people, but never paid the sales tax to the Minnesota Department of Revenue and failed to return some renters’ security deposits. He also didn’t disclose income on his tax returns.

Jurors deliberated for about four hours before convicting Auleciems of all 16 charges against him: eight counts of failing to pay or collect or remit sales tax between February 2018 and February 2020, six counts of filing a false or fraudulent return between October 2015 and February 2020 and two counts of theft by swindle for failing to return to customers damage deposits between December 2018 and October 2019.

Auleciems had faced 74 tax-related felonies, but the charges were reduced to 16 at the time of trial in “consideration of presumptive consequence upon conviction, judicial resources and judicial efficiency,” the attorney’s office said last month.

According to the criminal complaint, Auleciems operated an unregistered business, KEASons Enterprises, which he used as a conduit to rent out his properties to short-term renters via Airbnb, HomeAway, Vrbo and other websites.

An investigator with the Minnesota Department of Revenue began looking into alleged tax violations by Auleciems in July 2019.

The investigation found he filed false income tax returns by omitting the sale of rental property, omitting consignment business income, omitting substantial amounts of rental income, overstating mortgage interest and property taxes, omitting interest and dividends and creating fictitious net operating losses, the complaint says.

Meanwhile, rental agreements stated the nearly $2,000 security deposit would be refunded within 90 days of checkout, according to the complaint. But Auleciems failed to return security deposits amounting to nearly $18,000 “without explanation or proof of damage,” the complaint states.

Apology letters

Auleciems was sentenced last week.

His attorney, Robert Ambrose, asked Judge Douglas Meslow for a downward departure from state sentencing guidelines, saying he has no prior criminal history besides petty misdemeanors traffic offenses, and that he is remorseful for what he did.

As renters began to testify at trial, Auleciems began to show remorse to defense counsel, Ambrose wrote in a memo to the judge, adding that his client “genuinely feels bad about what happened.”

Auleciems has written out cashier checks and apology letters to the six renters who were awarded judgments in conciliation court and the one renter who testified at trial without a judgment, according to Ambrose.

Meslow granted the downward departure, giving Auleciems 97 days in jail — he gets credit for 45 days he already served — followed by five years of probation. He will begin serving the jail time July 1. Meslow also gave Auleciems 30 days to pay the renters and 90 days to pay the state.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Minnesota BCA details deadly domestic disturbance in Marshall that ended with officer killing suspect

Crime & Public Safety |


MN pharmacist refused to fill emergency contraception prescription. Court to decide if that was discrimination.

Crime & Public Safety |


Man sentenced for putting bogus bomb outside St. Paul City Hall/Ramsey County Courthouse

Crime & Public Safety |


Judge revokes sex offender’s probation after lewd conduct at Rosedale Center

Crime & Public Safety |


Jury acquits Hastings woman accused of siphoning mother’s trust fund

Why Washington’s Elites Are So Miserable

posted in: Politics | 0

Washingtonians know how success is measured. Walk into their offices, and you’ll see its artifacts hanging on their walls: photographs of handshakes with senators, gifts from prominent constituents or lobbying clients, and framed newspaper clippings with their names in them.

That used to be Arthur Brooks, the longtime head of the American Enterprise Institute. In 2019, he left his role at the top of the center-right think tank to study happiness at Harvard. And his research suggests why the traditional formula for success in Washington is leaving the city’s high achievers unhappy and unfulfilled.

According to Brooks, who recently co-authored Build the Life You Want: The Art and Science of Getting Happier with Oprah Winfrey, the relationship between success and happiness is exactly the opposite of what many are trained to expect.

“The success that you’re impelled toward will not actually bring you greater happiness,” he told Ryan Lizza on a new episode of the Playbook Deep Dive podcast. “If you’re coming to Washington, D.C., as a super-striver and you’re trying to depend for your human flourishing on the quality of your connections and the depth of your Rolodex, you’re going to be a very lonely person.”

Fortunately, Brooks argues, it’s possible to achieve both happiness and success, even in a culture as competitive and cut-throat as Washington.

This transcript has been edited for length and clarity.

So, Arthur, let’s start with something you’ve written about before. What was the revelation you had when you turned 40?

I wrote my bucket list when I was 40 and I found it when I was 50, and I’d hit everything on that list. And I was less happy. And I thought to myself, “Well, that’s not what I expected.”

Now, I know as a social scientist that your heart’s desire is going to come to you. The problem is that you usually find that your heart’s desire was the wrong desire.

So what was the shift in thinking? 

There was nothing wrong with what was on my 40-year-old bucket list. The problem was that I was attached to those accomplishments, and I didn’t recognize that until I was 50. But I was hanging my well-being on the accomplishment of worldly tasks, and that’s inherently empty.

So in the meantime, I started doing research on exactly the problem with that, and I found this negative result. I did all the things that were supposed to make me happy: get successful, be happy. And I found that I had gotten at least my own metrics of success and hadn’t gotten happier. On the contrary, I recognized that I needed a different approach and started to do the work and found that actually I needed to stand up to Mother Nature’s imperatives. Mother Nature says money, power, pleasure and fame are going to make you happy, at least in some measure.

Those are the measures of kind of a good life in earthly terms. And the problem with that — there’s nothing wrong with those things per se — the problem is when you assume that you’ll be happy when you get those things, you’re going to be sorely disappointed. And so the result is, I recognized that the problem was not attaining the things on my 40-year-old bucket list; it was being attached to those things on my 40-year-old bucket list.

I needed to detach myself from those accomplishments. I needed intention toward goals without attachment to the result. And so I made a reverse bucket list where I was going to make a list of all of the ambitions and desires. And then I was going to cross out those things, not because I wasn’t going to get them, but because easy come, easy go. I am not going to tie my happiness to the accomplishment of an earthly reward. And that has changed my life.

Another big part of success and happiness that you talk a lot about is your relationships. They’re definitely a big part of business in this town. You have this great phrase, “real friends” and “deal friends.” What is the balance here?

So this really gets back to Aristotle, who if you read one person on friendship, Aristotle is the one to read.

So in the Nicomachean Ethics, he talks about the levels of friendship. And at the bottom is kind of these friendships of convenience or transaction. And look, the world goes round because we get along. You work with people, you do business with people, you transact with people. There’s nothing wrong with that but that’s not enough for your happiness. That’s not enough for your flourishing.

He says, above that are these friendships of basically admiration, where you admire somebody’s characteristics — and that’s better.

But it’s not really at the highest level, which he thinks of as the virtuous friendship, or the perfect friendship, which he calls the atelic friendship. “Atelic” means it doesn’t have a telos. It doesn’t have a usefulness to it.

And basically what this means is that your transactional friendships are useful — those are deal friends. At the top, which you need for happiness, according to Aristotle, and by the way, all modern social psychologists and common sense and your grandma — they will tell you that you need people who are useless to you, that you just love.

And if everybody’s useful to you, you’re going to be lonely. There’s nobody there to take your 3:00 a.m. phone call. That’s just a fact.

So what’s your advice for your average D.C. striver who comes to town and sees their decades of career development as a collection of deal friends? How does someone like that have more useless friends?

Well, if these are your only friends, you’re going to be lonely. And that’s actually one of the reasons that loneliness has been increasing. We have a great surgeon general, Vivek Murthy, and he writes about loneliness. He told me in an interview that loneliness is our greatest public health threat, more than coronavirus, more than gun violence or opioid mortality. It’s loneliness.

That explains the rise in deaths of despair, of suicide and alcoholism and drug addiction? 

Yeah. And you can actually find the people who have overcome really adverse circumstances in their life if they have a lot of oxytocin in their life, which is the neuropeptide of human connection, which only comes from eye contact and touch. And you only have deep eye contact and touch with your useless friends, quite frankly. You don’t look deeply into the eyes of your business partner unless you’re trying to freak them out.

The truth is that you try to look into the soul of somebody whose soul you’re interested in. And, you know, oxytocin, which is once again, biology is psychology and psychology is biology — and it’s a perfect example of this. And there’s just less and less.

If you’re coming to Washington, D.C., as a super striver and you’re trying to depend for your human flourishing on the quality of your connections and the depth of your Rolodex, you’re going to be a very lonely person.

You need to actually do the work to have real friendships as well. And those are the people who don’t really care how connected you are on the Hill.  

You don’t get that eye contact when you’re at the holiday party looking over their shoulder to see if someone more important is coming by, right?

Man, I love that about D.C. And you know, it’s a cliche and it’s absolutely true.

You’ve had a series of mini careers — AEI, academia, a professional musician — and you’ve talked about the different career models that one can have. What are they?

So most of the world, especially for the striver, tells you that you have a linear career path, and that means work hard, play by the rules, achieve and don’t make any big changes in your career unless it’s the next step up in the line.

That’s a pretty classic model in D.C., right?

Oh, yeah. Now, interestingly, that’s the model that we tend to impose on our students, but it’s not the actual career model for all of our students.

Another career model that’s actually been quite, quite common in the past — so probably your grandfather, probably my father — was called the expert career model. And that’s the one in which you don’t make very many changes at all. You’re looking for a career that gives you the ability to excel, to be good at what you do, but it doesn’t take over your life so that you can have a life. It has a lot of security, there’s a lot of appreciation, and it’s just kind of a slow-moving thing. My father was a professor at the same university for 40 years. That’s working at the Post Office, that’s doing the one thing, the one-and-done kind of career.

The third career model is called the transitory career model, which is a career that’s entirely based on serving your lifestyle. So in other words, you don’t live to work. You work to live.

This is what everybody’s parents are worried you’re going to do, which is that you don’t have very much ambition. Now you’re a barista in Portland, Maine; and then you’re going to do a little stint as a long haul trucker out of Baton Rouge; and then you fall in love with somebody in San Diego. You basically do this work. It pays the bills, but you’re just trying to live. Those are three different career models.

Here’s the one that characterizes a lot more people than they think — and it really characterizes me — which is called the spiral career model.

The spiral career model is when you have a series of mini careers of your own design, because there’s a pattern inside your head of what you’re trying to achieve as a human being.

Now, it might not seem like it has rhyme or reason, and it might seem weird to outsiders, but it really makes sense to you if you’re properly going through the ancient, philosophical experience of discernment.

The whole point is that you’re trying to figure out what the point of your life is — the why of your life. It follows different contours on the basis of that, and sometimes you make more money and sometimes less. Sometimes you’re in the for-profit sector, sometimes in the government or non-profit sector. Maybe you take seven years off to raise your kids and come back into working part time. But the coherence of it is what you’re trying to do to shape your mission.

How does your age influence this? You’ve written about the differences between fluid intelligence, which we have when we’re younger, and crystallized intelligence, which comes in later. Is there a lesson here for Washington’s strivers? 

I mean, it’s the idea of the Hindu ashramas. It maps on perfectly to the different kinds of intelligence that were first discovered and explicated by Raymond Cattell, the great British social psychologist in the ‘60s and ‘70s.

Cattell noticed that people have a wellspring of working memory, of innovative capacity and very clear focus, in their twenties and thirties. That’s what makes people really good at what they do individually. That fluid intelligence increases with your knowledge all the way through your twenties and thirties. It tends to peak at about age 39 or 40.

Then your working memory starts to falter. It’s not horrible and it’s not structurally a problem. It’s not like something’s wrong with your brain. It’s basically a memory filing problem where there’s too many files. That’s what it comes down to. But also our innovative capacity isn’t as good. You inevitably find that early Rolling Stones was better than later Rolling Stones. I was writing papers in my early thirties that were so mathematically sophisticated that I can’t read them today.

So after this, is that when crystalized intelligence kicks in?

Later in life, when fluid intelligence is decreasing, there’s a second kind of intelligence that comes in called crystallized intelligence that doesn’t require working memory. It doesn’t require this indefatigable focus or innovative capacity. What it requires is wisdom, teaching ability, use of metaphor, use of language, pattern recognition. What it requires is you being able to use the vast library in your head to teach other people. You go from your innovator curve to your instructor curve. That crystallized intelligence makes it much easier for you to teach, for you to lead teams, for you to be a mentor, for you to explain things.

And young people will come in right out of graduate school at my university and they’ll say, “What’s the secret to getting great teaching evaluations?” And the answer is, get old because you’re a naturally better teacher under the circumstances.

You’re a better teacher now?

Oh, yeah. And the reason is because I’m 59, not 29, which is better when it comes to being able to explain things. That increases through your forties, fifties, sixties, and seventies and stays high in your eighties and nineties.

The ultimate crystallized intelligence profession is historian because you have to explain a lot, you’ve got to know a lot, and you’ve got to be clear and rich in your language. Historians are a pure crystallized intelligence profession. The average historian does half of her or his work after the age of 67, and the better half is the second half. So if you’re a historian, take care of your health because your best books are coming in your eighties.

You were the head of AEI. Have any of your political views changed since you left D.C. and have just immersed yourself in happiness studies?

I’m not sure my political views have changed, but I think my approach probably has.

Here’s the thing, Ryan, that I probably changed over the last few years. And maybe it’s because I left Washington, and maybe it’s because I study happiness, and maybe it’s just because I’m getting old: I’m not right. I’m actually wrong — I just don’t know on what.

It’s statistically impossible that I’m right on everything that I think. I’m wrong on a bunch of stuff and the only way I’m going to figure that out is by surrounding myself with and having loving conversations where I listen to people with whom I disagree. That’s something that’s really changed a lot.

I’m a lot less defensive about my views and I’m a lot less attached to my views.

I was writing the obituary for Thich Nhat Hanh, the great Vietnamese Buddhist monk, in the Washington Post. And I remember thinking about this really important idea that he had, which is our greatest attachment tends to be to our opinions. We clutch on them as if they were jewels. It’s almost as if you had a right to kill somebody in self-defense if they contradict you. That’s certainly true on college campuses. That’s certainly true in the 5 percent political fringes on the right and left in America.

And as I was writing his obituary, I asked myself, “What is my attachment to my own political views?” So I’m on my reverse bucket list, which I put together on my birthday. This last year, I listed half of my political opinions and I crossed them out. Not because I don’t hold them, but because I’m not going to be attached to them. If you disagree with me, come sit down next to me because I want to hear what you have to say. And you probably are going to make some pretty good points.

Republican Steve Garvey’s CA Senate bid heats up — and Democrats rejoice

posted in: News | 0

It’s gametime for Steve Garvey.

The baseball legend, who’s running as a Republican to represent California in the U.S. Senate, is rising in polls — giving the state’s marginalized GOP new hopes of having a candidate on the ballot in November. It’s also handing his Democratic competition a much-welcomed political foil.

Garvey, former first baseman for the Los Angeles Dodgers and San Diego Padres, is set to appear on Chris Cuomo’s NewsNation show Friday night. The primetime appearance comes on the heels of a new POLITICO | Morning Consult poll that puts him in a statistical dead heat for second place — alongside two prominent Democratic House members — in a marquee congressional race.

Since launching his campaign in October, Garvey kept a relatively low profile compared to his Democratic competition, namely Reps. Adam Schiff, Katie Porter and Barbara Lee, who are all vying for the top two spots in California’s March 5 open primary. But his jump in the polls, along with a growing schedule of public appearances, has shown he’s a serious contender for the seat formerly held by Dianne Feinstein.

“People are stressed and they’ve been looking for a voice,” Garvey said in an interview. “And I think that’s one of the reasons things are coming together, and we’re building momentum.”

Garvey’s rise is especially a boon to Schiff, who enjoys a nearly 10-point lead in the crowded field. Schiff is in the front of the pack with the support of 28 percent of likely voters, including those who are undecided but leaning toward backing him. Garvey is next with 19 percent, while Porter has 17 percent and Lee is at 14 percent — a statistical three-way tie.

Schiff appeared eager to turn the contest into a two-person race against a Republican where he’d have a distinct advantage come November in the heavily Democratic state.

“There is a real possibility that Republican Steve Garvey could finish in the top two … and advance to the General Election,” Schiff’s campaign wrote in a fundraising email Thursday. “If that happens, Adam is the best candidate to beat him.”

While Schiff already has the biggest war chest among the contenders, largely thanks to his national reputation as a Donald Trump antagonist, fundraising off of fellow Democrats like Porter and Lee wouldn’t have been as effective.

Now he’s got a political opposite — in another kind of celebrity candidate.

Porter also took note of Garvey’s polling, writing in a fundraising email Thursday that his ascent is “threatening to keep Katie from advancing to the general election.”

Lee took yet another route — viewing her three-way tie for second as a welcome sign of momentum.

“Now is not the time to take our foot off the gas,” she wrote to supporters.

Garvey’s fame, especially among fans of baseball in the 1970s and 80s, comes with strong name recognition. That’s freed his campaign to focus on courting donors and appear on friendly TV and radio shows. He’s expected to release fundraising figures at the end of January, following the quarterly reporting deadline.

The 75-year-old Californian’s appearance on Cuomo’s “no-nonsense” show Friday, along with a Wednesday visit to the border with Republican Rep. Darrell Issa, suggests he’s carved a moderate path. That position will be closely scrutinized as he tries to consolidate Republican support while appealing to California’s wider electorate.

Garvey’s campaign says he’ll be making more appearances starting next year to share his vision on quality of life issues, like public safety and homelessness. The candidate is aiming to tap into voters’ frustrations and blame the blue state’s dominant Democratic Party.

“California was the heartbeat of America. Now it’s only a murmur, because it’s been suppressed by a progressive vacuum,” Garvey said on Fox Business last week.

Californians haven’t elected a Republican to statewide office since 2006, when Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger was in power, and the party has continually struggled to find legitimate candidates to run at the top of the ballot. Garvey, despite never holding political office, is perhaps the best chance the California GOP has had in years to win a statewide race. For Republicans, half-expecting to be shut out of the November ballot, that alone is a victory.

His two decades playing baseball on national television make him a household name in Los Angeles, home to 5.6 million of California’s 22 million registered voters. Even in the absence of a political record, he has more name recognition than Sen. Laphonza Butler, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s pick to serve the rest of Feinstein’s term, according to the POLITICO | Morning Consult Poll. Among likely primary voters, 37 percent had never heard of Butler, compared to 22 percent who had never heard of Garvey.

Despite Schiff painting him as a “far-right, MAGA” Republican, Garvey has been noncommittal about his take on former President Donald Trump — which could hurt him with conservatives.

But so far, his lack of support for Trump doesn’t seem to be turning off supporters. Garvey saw backing from 51 percent of people who voted for Trump in 2020 in the latest poll — far outpacing the other Republicans in the race.

“Look, I think people want to win,” said Lanhee Chen, a Republican political consultant and former candidate for California controller. “Whether you’re a Trump supporter or not, winning is an important thing for Republicans who have not won in a while.”