Prosecutors oppose Sen. Bob Menendez’s effort to delay May bribery trial until July

posted in: Politics | 0

By LARRY NEUMEISTER (Associated Press)

NEW YORK (AP) — Federal prosecutors on Tuesday urged a judge to reject U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez’s request to delay his bribery trial scheduled for next spring by two months, until July.

Prosecutors argued against the postponement a week after defense lawyers offered multiple reasons why they say a trial of the Democrat and codefendants, including his wife, should be delayed.

The senator gave up his position as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee after his September arrest.

Prosecutors said the original May 6 trial date was appropriate and drew no objections when it was announced even though circumstances were the same.

“The schedule was and remains reasonable, and in accord with the strong public interest in a speedy trial,” prosecutors wrote.

Defense lawyers cited over 6.7 million documents to be reviewed, an “unprecedented” foreign-agent charge and complex legal questions to be addressed as they asked for a delay of a trial now scheduled for May 6. They said a two-month adjournment would still bring defendants to trial within 10 months of their arrests.

Four defendants, including Menendez, have pleaded not guilty to a bribery conspiracy charge that alleges that Menendez and his wife accepted bribes of cash, gold bars and a luxury car from three New Jersey businessmen who wanted the senator’s help and influence over foreign affairs.

The senator, his wife and a third defendant have also pleaded not guilty to a charge that they conspired to utilize the senator as an agent of the Egyptian government even though he was prohibited from doing so as a member of Congress.

In asking for a delay, defense lawyers wrote, “Given the complexity of this case and the seriousness of the charges at issue, the speed with which this case is proceeding is extraordinary.”

They said they plan to ask Judge Sidney H. Stein in Manhattan to dismiss the indictment on multiple grounds, including for constitutional and sufficiency reasons and because New York federal court is the wrong venue.

Prosecutors said in their letter to the judge that the voluminous amount of evidence turned over to the defense should not delay the trial because it was consistent with what the government promised at the first conference in October.

“In short, if there were a right to have multiple months to digest discovery prior to filing motions, as the defendants appear to suggest, practice in this district would look quite different. The current schedule set by the Court is expedited, but reasonable,” prosecutors said.

Disney seeks records from DeSantis’ oversight board in new lawsuit

posted in: News | 0

Disney is accusing the Gov. Ron DeSantis-aligned tourism oversight district of violating Florida’s public records law by failing to properly preserve documents and turn them over in a timely manner, opening another front in an ongoing legal feud.

The entertainment giant filed a lawsuit Friday against the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District and asked an Orange County circuit judge to set an immediate hearing and order the documents to be released.

“CFTOD has prevented Disney from discovering the actions of its government through public records requests, in violation of Florida law,” Disney’s lawyers wrote in the court filing.

A tourism oversight district spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday.

In February, DeSantis replaced five Disney loyalists on the district’s board with Republican allies as part of a new state law overhauling the special district that provides government services to Disney World.

DeSantis puts GOP donor, Moms for Liberty founder on Disney Reedy Creek board

Disney’s attorneys accuse the new district administration of not fully complying with a May 11 public records request and lacking policies and procedures to ensure government-related communications on personal devices are preserved.

Disney is seeking text messages, voicemails and other communications from the district’s board members.

The district allows board members and district administrator Glen Gilzean to use personal devices and email accounts for government-related communications with no process in place for retaining those records, the suit alleges.

Furthermore, Gilzean and the board members, other than the chairman, are able to “self-select” which messages and emails they provide in response to public records requests, according to the suit.

Board Chairman Martin Garcia insists “only CFTOD’s outside attorneys be allowed to access district-related documents stored in his personal email account and devices, outsourcing this core government function to the same lawyers who are suing Disney,” the company’s lawyers wrote.

Disney attributed some of the public records issues to the departure of up to 50 employees after the state takeover and “exhausted” staffers.

“On the public records front, this has led to delays, inadequate preservation, storage and production of public records, and improper and unsupported claims of privilege and exemption from disclosure,” the Disney lawyers wrote.

The Disney-DeSantis dispute started in 2022 over the corporation’s opposition to what critics called the “don’t say gay” bill. That law limits classroom instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity.

As the battle escalated, Disney sued DeSantis and state officials in federal court, alleging a “targeted campaign of government retaliation.” The tourism district sued Disney in state court, asking a judge to void development agreements that limit its authority.

Chicago Bears’ evaluation of ‘ascending’ LT Braxton Jones will play into offseason moves — and his test against Myles Garrett was big

posted in: News | 0

Chicago Bears left tackle Braxton Jones faced the ultimate test of his development Sunday against Cleveland Browns defensive end Myles Garrett, and the second-year player thought he did “an all right job” into the third quarter.

In the end, though, Jones said he needed to do more to stop the Browns star.

On the Bears’ final drive after the Browns pulled ahead 20-17 with 32 seconds to play, Garrett got around Jones quickly on back-to-back plays to pressure quarterback Justin Fields. The two plays resulted in Fields incompletions, and that set up the final Hail Mary pass that the Browns intercepted to seal the win.

“In that fourth quarter, the game is on the line, if we score in that situation we’re going to win the game,” Jones said. “He’s going to do as much as he can to affect that, and he did do that in that last drive. I just think I have to have better sets, be more square. I can see all of the things (on film) I messed up on, but in the moment, out in the fire, I definitely could have done a better job.”

Garrett, a two-time All-Pro and four-time Pro Bowl selection, has given plenty of other offensive tackles a hard time this season while racking up 13 sacks and 26 quarterback hits. In a game against the Tennessee Titans, he had 3 1/2 sacks and five quarterback hits.

Garrett didn’t get a sack or quarterback hit Sunday while moving around on the line some so he was not always facing Jones. But NFL Next Gen Stats said he totaled seven pressures, including six in fewer than 2.5 seconds.

Pro Football Focus had Jones as giving up eight pressures.

“I’ve never seen somebody bend the edge so quick,” Jones said. “Even when I’ve had bad sets — I’ve done it against other players before — it’s never been that quick. And he just does everything so quick and efficient. He has no wasted movement. When he gets to a tackle spot, he presses your spot quickly, and that’s what makes you have to make decisions. … He’s just a different player.”

When offensive coordinator Luke Getsy was asked Thursday about Jones’ performance, he qualified his response by noting just how big of a task it is to face Garrett, saying it’s part of Jones’ growth.

“He played against the best player in the league,” Getsy said. “I thought he did a really good job most of the game. A couple times, a guy of that caliber is going to make a play or two, right?”

Garrett is just one elite opponent in many Jones is facing this season. Over the previous four games after Jones came back from a neck injury on Nov. 5, Pro Football Focus gave Jones high marks for his play.

On Sunday at Soldier Field, he and the Bears face an Arizona Cardinals team that ranks 22nd in the NFL with sacks per pass attempt (7.49%) and doesn’t have a single player with more than five sacks — seemingly a good game to get back to playing the way they want to on offense.

Getsy said he believes Jones is in a “great spot” and called him an “ascending player.” The evaluation general manager Ryan Poles has on Jones’ season in January will factor into how the Bears approach their offseason moves.

Poles opted to upgrade at right tackle, drafting Darnell Wright in the first round this spring and wanted Jones, a 2022 fifth-round pick, to continue his development on the left side. With two high first-round draft picks in 2024 — the Bears would have Nos. 1 and 5 through Week 15 — Poles could nab a top left tackle in the draft. But the Bears have plenty of other needs he might consider more pressing given Jones’ overall play.

For Jones, who is typically self-aware in talking about his play, the need to prove himself doesn’t feel that much different from usual.

“There’s always that type of pressure all the time,” Jones said. ”Just being a young guy, obviously you want to do your job, but you can’t make it more than it really is. … But just me as a person, I’m always being hard on myself. I want to have the best outcome no matter what I’m doing. I always want to have perfect games even though I know I’m never going to have a perfect game. That is my goal at the end of the day.”

After a rookie season in which he started all 17 games, Jones worked on his body during the offseason to better combat bull rushes. He said he felt stronger and “better overall in just about everything” heading into the season.

But then what Jones called “a fairly serious neck injury” affected the start of his season.

He declined to offer many specifics because the Bears didn’t release details, but he said it started out as soreness. He wasn’t 100% in his first two games, but he really began to experience the effects after Week 2. The Bears then put Jones on injured reserve for six games from Weeks 3-8.

Jones said there were “things that were definitely scary about the injury.” And he thinks the time away helped him grow mentally stronger, giving him a better appreciation for how quickly the game can be taken away.

“Just to understand that any play can be your last, and when you’re out on the field, try to give it all you can,” he said. “As players sometimes we take that a little bit for granted.”

Jones said he has felt more comfortable with the injury the last few weeks. But originally, he felt the absence set him back, putting him behind players who spent the first half of the season perfecting their crafts.

“To come back in the middle of the season and start playing again, you’re behind,” Jones said. “The biggest thing was just to keep a good mind and just stay focused as much as I could, try and get better each and every week.”

He is happy to have reduced his penalties since returning. After being called for four false starts and four holding penalties (two of them declined) over his first three games, according to Pro Football Reference, Jones hasn’t been called for another penalty.

But he still wants to improve at so much more.

The Bears have three more games to play — against the Cardinals, Atlanta Falcons and Green Bay Packers — but Jones knows what his offseason focus is going to be.

“I’ve got to make a huge jump in technique,” Jones said. “It’s going to be big for me. I feel like I’ve gotten enough strength to do what I need to do, but I’m putting myself in bad situations so it doesn’t even matter if you have strength or no strength.

“With bad technique, you’re never going to be able to play in this league. The biggest thing for me this offseason is getting technically correct. Then everything can come together and I can have a clean third year.”

()

The NFL’s oldest rivalry: Chicago Bears vs. Chicago Cardinals. A look at the rivalry that started in 1920.

posted in: News | 0

The oldest rivalry in the NFL doesn’t include a team from Green Bay.

This matchup began in 1920 when two professional football teams called Illinois home. That’s when the Chicago Bears, then known as the Decatur Staleys, faced the Racine Cardinals — named after Racine Avenue where their home venue was Normal Park and not for the city in Wisconsin — for the first time.

The Cardinals started in 1898 as the Morgan Athletic Club on Chicago’s South Side before becoming the Chicago Cardinals in 1922, then moved to Missouri to become the St. Louis Cardinals in 1960, and then to Arizona in 1988. Two winning seasons were capped by championships for the Cardinals in 1925 (though it is still controversial) and 1947. These remain the franchise’s only titles.

The team’s color has a history too. The Cardinals first used borrowed maroon jerseys from the University of Chicago.

The Bears hold the overall advantage in the series: 60-29-6 in regular-season games. But let’s look at their first 72 meetings from 1920-59, when the teams were mostly crosstown rivals.

Bears-Cardinals rivalry: Record

For 72 games played between 1920 and 1959

Bears-Cardinals rivalry: Results by venue

For 72 games played between 1920 and 1959

Bears-Cardinals rivalry: Points scored

For 72 games played between 1920 and 1959

Bears-Cardinals rivalry: Memorable moments

For 72 games played between 1920 and 1959

Nov. 28, 1920: Cardinals 7, Staleys 6

In the teams’ first meeting, when the Bears still were the Decatur Staleys, Paddy Driscoll kicked the deciding extra point in the Cardinals’ 7-6 win and kept the Bears in poor field position all afternoon with his precision punts.

“How I wished I could get him on my team!” George Halas remembered thinking in his 1979 autobiography, “Halas by Halas.”

Driscoll later signed with the Bears in 1926. He was named first-team All-Pro six times, served as a player/coach for the Cardinals for three seasons, rejoined Halas as an assistant in 1941, then stayed with the Bears through their championship season of 1963. In 1965, Driscoll was elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame’s third class.

Nov. 26, 1925: Bears 0, Cardinals 0

More than 36,000 fans packed Wrigley Field for the professional debut of Harold “Red” Grange, who signed with the Bears less than 24 hours after his last game at the University of Illinois. Fans came away disappointed as the Bears and Cardinals tied 0-0.

Driscoll, later Grange’s teammate on the Bears, punted the ball away from Grange all game, drawing a chorus of boos, and Grange rushed for only 36 yards.

“I decided if one of us was going to look bad, it wasn’t going to be me,” Driscoll told the Tribune’s David Condon 40 years later. “Punting to Grange is like grooving a pitch to Babe Ruth.”

After the game, Driscoll went to see his future wife, Mary, in the stands. He lamented fans were wrong to boo Grange for his uninspiring debut. “Don’t feel sorry for Grange,” Mary said. “It’s you they’re booing.”

Oct. 14, 1945: Cardinals 16, Bears 7

The Cardinals broke a 29-game losing streak — extending back to the 1942 season — by defeating the Bears 16-7 at Wrigley Field.

Sources: Tribune reporting and archives; Pro Football Reference

Join our Chicagoland history Facebook group and subscribe to the Vintage Chicago Tribune newsletter for more from Chicago’s past.

()