‘He is my lifeline’: Man in limbo after brother from Venezuela is detained by ICE while trying to donate kidney

posted in: All news | 0

CHICAGO — For the past year, three days a week for four hours, Alfredo Pacheco, 37, has been undergoing dialysis. Most days, even if he feels ill, he pushes himself to work after the procedure, thinking of his three young children who wait to see him again one day back in Venezuela.

As time passes, however, he feels weaker and a bit more tired every day, he said.

Pacheco was diagnosed with end-stage renal disease not long after arriving in Chicago seeking asylum. It was then that doctors told him that he needed a kidney transplant, “or else I would die,” he said. Medical records also show the acute illness that has drastically changed his life.

His older brother, José Gregorio González, 43, who was denied entry to the country at the southern border, tried to enter once again hoping to donate a kidney to save his brother’s life. He managed to cross and stay in the United States under immigration supervision.

After a long and complicated process to get approved for the transplant under public insurance, the brothers had an appointment in a Chicago hospital in April to go forward with more tests for the organ exchange. But on March 3, González was arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs authorities and now awaits deportation at Clay County Detention Center in Indiana, leaving Pacheco, once again, desperate and fighting for his life.

The two are pleading with immigration authorities to release González on humanitarian parole to donate the kidney. “After that, I will return to Venezuela,” González said from a call in the detention center.

Los dos lloramos cuando se lo llevaron, él sabe que él es mi vida,” Pacheco said, or in English, “We both cried when they took him because he knows that he is my lifeline.”

The two Venezuelan brothers, affected by both immigration and health care policies at the federal and state level, showcase the turmoil and uncertainty immigrant families are facing in the country, advocates and attorneys said.

As the Trump administration continues to double down on efforts to deport unauthorized immigrants, it has now reached an agreement with Venezuela to resume repatriation flights. That and the threat from the state to dismantle the Medicaid coverage for noncitizen adults means “immigrants are under attack,” said Cook County Commissioner Alma Anaya, who also serves as the vice-chair of the Health and Hospitals Committee.

“(Their story) highlights the complexities of some of the policies. Big decisions are being made statewide and federally that are ultimately deciding whether a person lives or dies,” Anaya said.

In Pacheco’s case, the decision is in the hands of González’s immigration agent, said their attorney Peter Meinecke, who is also the managing attorney at The Resurrection Project legal team. The request for humanitarian parole is made directly to the ICE officer in charge of the detainee’s case, and the agent can authorize their release for a set period at their discretion.

“It is ultimately an opportunity to leave detention for the sole purpose of undergoing the kidney donation to save his brother’s life, and then ICE will be able to detain him again and eventually remove him from the country,” Meinecke said, who added that González does not have a criminal background.

In most cases, the maximum amount of time immigrants are released under humanitarian parole is one year. Most are released under supervision or with ankle monitors, Meinecke said.

From the detention center, through a phone call, González said his biggest concern is that he will be deported before immigration agents can consider his case. For him, staying in the United States is no longer about finding a better job or stability, but rather to save his brother’s life.

When he made his way north in late 2023, González wanted to join Pacheco like thousands of other migrants in Chicago with dreams to work and craft a better future for their children and families in their native Venezuela. He first tried to enter the country but failed the credible fear screening, after learning that his brother was diagnosed with end-stage renal failure, he tried again under the CBP One app, which allowed migrants to make appointments to enter the country.

It was then that González was put in removal proceedings and detained for a few months, but since there were no deportation flights to Venezuela, he was released to join Pacheco in Chicago under immigration supervision in March 2024.

Due to the previous order of removal, unlike Pacheco, González cannot apply for asylum or any other kind of immigration relief. ICE officials had no immediate comment, citing confidentiality rules.

The oldest of six and having lost two younger siblings to accidents over the last few years in Venezuela, González felt it was a blessing to be by Pacheco’s side even if it was only for a few months to donate his kidney.

Related Articles


Federal judge to consider releasing immigration activist who took refuge in churches


Mahmoud Khalil’s lawyers appear in New Jersey court over jurisdiction of Columbia activist’s case


A look at who has been detained or deported in a US crackdown on pro-Palestinian protesters


US economic growth to slow in the next 30 years, fueled by debt and declining birth rates, CBO says


Turkish student at Tufts University is latest Palestinian supporter swept up in US crackdown

At the detention center, González said, he prays from time to time and writes to his brother, still hopeful that he will be released even for a few months to donate his kidney to his brother so that he can stay in the country and reach the goals that he couldn’t.

It is a promise that the two say they have made to each other despite the uncertainty the two face. They rely on each other and the thought of their family back in Venezuela for strength.

Pacheco’s children, a girl, 17, and twin boys, 9, still don’t know that their father has a terminal illness. He refuses to tell them because he hopes to get the transplant that could eventually get him back on track with his plans when he first migrated to the United States.

He got to Chicago in July 2022 and applied for asylum shortly after. He said he fled from violence and political turmoil since he was a part of the armed forces in Venezuela. He wanted to find a job here and eventually bring his wife and children.

But in January 2024, he ended up in the emergency room, experiencing strong stomach pain and nonstop vomiting. Though he had lost almost 15 pounds in less than a month, he was afraid to go to the doctor.

“My world completely fell apart,” Pacheco said.

Because Pacheco has a pending asylum case, he is covered under the Illinois Medical Benefits for Asylum Applicants and Torture Victims (AATV) program, an extension of the Medicaid program. Under state-sponsored insurance, however, certain treatments, such as kidney transplants, are typically harder to process for those who have an irregular immigration status, often taking a long process that could affect the patient’s life expectancy, according to health care experts. Most times, case managers help patients with irregular immigration status or those who are in the country without permanent legal status to navigate the process.

In Illinois, immigrants who lack permanent legal status to reside in the country and are diagnosed with kidney failure can access kidney transplants, thanks to a 2014 law and the Illinois Transplant Fund (ITF), which provides financial support for health insurance premiums, enabling them to qualify for transplants.

Pacheco managed to get on the waitlist for a kidney transplant at the University of Illinois Hospital, a spokesperson for the institution confirmed. Even if González is not compatible with Pacheco, if he has a kidney, it could buy Pacheco time and a faster appointment for a transplant.

“Every day that passes without José Gregorio González being released from detention to donate his kidney puts his brother Alfredo at a greater risk of losing his life,” said state Democratic Party Chair Elizabeth “Lisa” Hernández, who supports the expansion of medical coverage for adults in the country without permanent legal status or irregular immigration status in Illinois, including HBIA. “The situation we are in is unfortunately unsurprising given the current administration’s haphazard crackdown on hardworking, law-abiding immigrants and their families. José deserves the chance to save his brother’s life. The Department of Homeland Security and the Trump Administration on humanitarian grounds should afford him and every immigrant that very opportunity.”

For now, Pacheco only works delivering packages for Amazon from time to time, on days when dialysis does not get the best of him, he said. Last month he couldn’t pay rent of his basement apartment in Cicero, but his landlord’s daughters helped him to pay. They’re also helping to collect signatures to support his case and submit it to the ICE agent, begging for mercy.

larodriguez@chicagotribune.com

King Charles III’s brief hospital stay reminds UK that monarch is still a cancer patient

posted in: All news | 0

By DANICA KIRKA, Associated Press

LONDON (AP) — King Charles III waved to well-wishers in central London on Friday as he headed for his country estate in western England a day after he was briefly hospitalized because of side effects from a scheduled cancer treatment.

Charles canceled planned engagements on Thursday afternoon and Friday on the advice of his doctors, Buckingham Palace said, without providing details about the “temporary side effects” that he experienced.

But the episode was a reminder that the king is 76 and continues to undergo treatment for an undisclosed form of cancer diagnosed more than a year ago.

Britain’s King Charles III is driven by car from Clarence House, his London home, along The Mall towards Buckingham Palace in London, Friday, March 28, 2025. (Yui Mok/PA via AP)

That reality has slipped away from the collective consciousness since last spring, when Charles returned to public duties after stepping away for almost three months to focus on his initial treatment and recovery. In the intervening months, he has attended D-Day commemoration events in France, presided over the State Opening of Parliament and even embarked on a nine-day visit to Australia and Samoa.

But during the early stages of his treatment, Charles continued fulfilling his constitutional duties as head of state, including reviewing government papers and meeting with the prime minister.

Here’s a brief rundown of what we know about the king’s health.

What happened?

The king went to the London Clinic on Thursday morning for a scheduled cancer treatment. The clinic is a private hospital in central London, where Charles has been receiving treatment since his diagnosis in February 2024.

“Following scheduled and ongoing medical treatment for cancer this morning, the king experienced temporary side effects that required a short period of observation in hospital,” Buckingham Palace said in a statement. “His majesty’s afternoon engagements were therefore postponed.”

A man takes a picture of Buckingham Palace in London, Friday, March 28, 2025, after the Palace said King Charles III was hospitalized for observation on Thursday, experiencing “temporary side effects,” related to a scheduled cancer treatment. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

The king then returned to his home at Clarence House, where he reviewed papers and made calls, the palace said. Queen Camilla didn’t join him at the hospital.

“His majesty would like to send his apologies to all those who may be inconvenienced or disappointed as a result,” the palace said in a statement.

Will this affect future events?

The king is expected to press ahead with his work in the coming days, including a state visit to Italy scheduled for early April.

Why did the palace decide to reveal this information?

Palace officials have recognized that it’s better to release some information about the king’s health, rather than allow media speculation to fill the void when he’s forced to cancel scheduled events.

But they have tried to walk a fine line, seeking to balance the public’s legitimate interest in the health of the head of state with Charles’ right to privacy.

Britain’s King Charles III is driven by car from Clarence House, his London home, along The Mall towards Buckingham Palace in London, Friday, March 28, 2025. (Ben Whitley/PA via AP)

This was seen first in January 2024, when the palace announced Charles was being treated for an enlarged prostate, followed by the cancer diagnosis a few weeks later.

The decision to talk about the king’s health issues marked a departure from past palace protocols. For example, when Queen Elizabeth II began missing events toward the end of her life, royal officials repeatedly said that she was suffering from “mobility issues,” without providing further details. Her death certificate listed the cause as “old age.”

Tourists stand in the rain at Buckingham Palace in London, Friday, March 28, 2025, after the Palace said King Charles III was hospitalized for observation on Thursday, experiencing “temporary side effects,” related to a scheduled cancer treatment. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

The public was unaware that Charles’ grandfather, King George VI, had lung cancer before his death in February 1952 at the age of 56. Some historians suggest that even the king wasn’t told about the gravity of his condition.

Charles’ decision to break with the past has paid dividends

Health authorities have applauded the king’s openness, saying his disclosures saved lives by encouraging thousands of men to have prostate exams.

Mounted soldiers during the Changing of the Guard ceremony in London, Friday, March 28, 2025 after Buckingham Palace says King Charles III was hospitalized for observation on Thursday after experiencing “temporary side effects,” related to a scheduled cancer treatment. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

Royal experts say Charles’ candor has also brought him closer to the public by demonstrating that he faces the same kinds of challenges that they do. Health is, after all, the great leveler.

Why is Charles doing so much?

Charles’ busy schedule is a reminder that this is a man who waited around seven decades to become monarch and he wants to make the most of it.

The king has been open about his desire to demonstrate that the monarchy still has a role to play as a symbol of unity and tradition in the sometimes fractious, multicultural nation that is 21st-century Britain.

Tourists stand at the entrance to Clarence House that serves as the London residence of King Charles III and Queen Camilla, in London, Friday, March 28, 2025 after Buckingham Palace says King Charles III was hospitalized for observation on Thursday after experiencing “temporary side effects,” related to a scheduled cancer treatment. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

And the job of a modern king is to take part in a whirl of public events, from the pageantry of state occasions when he wears the crown and rides through the streets of London in a horse-drawn carriage to more mundane appearances such as opening public buildings or handing out awards for public service.

Charles took part in 372 public engagements last year, even after stepping aside for almost three months because of cancer treatment, according to data compiled by The Times of London newspaper. That made him the second-busiest royal behind his sister, Princes Anne, who had 474 engagements.

Members of the Household Cavalry march into the entrance to Clarence House in London, Friday, March 28, 2025, after Buckingham Palace said King Charles III was hospitalized for observation on Thursday, experiencing “temporary side effects,” related to a scheduled cancer treatment. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

Charles has long been known as a workaholic, and Queen Camilla said last year that he “won’t slow down and won’t do what he’s told.” During her Reading Room literary festival in July, the queen told author Lee Child that her husband was “doing fine,” but hadn’t heeded her advice to curtail his schedule.

Prince Harry once said that his father worked so hard that he would fall asleep at his desk and wake up with bits of paper stuck to his face.

Related Articles


Hegseth tells Philippines the Trump administration will ramp up deterrence against China threat


Putin suggests putting Ukraine under UN-sponsored external governance


Powerful quake rocks Myanmar and Thailand and kills more than 150 people


Suspected US strikes pummel Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen


Today in History: March 28, Three Mile Island nuclear plant accident

What are royal experts saying?

The king’s busy schedule has obscured the fact that he is an older man with cancer, said Robert Hardman, author of “Charles III: New King, New Court, the Inside Story.”

“We’ve seen him go back to normal,” Hardman told the BBC on Friday.

“I think this is sort of a reminder that this is a head of state undergoing treatment for cancer, because I think a lot of us tended to forget it.”

Trump’s school choice push adds to momentum in statehouses

posted in: All news | 0

By Robbie Sequeira, Stateline.org

More than a dozen states in the past two years have launched or expanded programs that allow families to use taxpayer dollars to send their students to private schools. Now, President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress want to supercharge those efforts.

Trump in January issued an executive order directing several federal agencies to allow states, tribes and military families to tap into federal money for so-called school choice opportunities. Those can come in the form of education savings accounts, voucher programs, tax credits or scholarships. Trump’s order also aims to expand access to public charter schools, which are free from some of the rules that apply to traditional public schools.

Meanwhile in Congress, 24 Republican senators have signed on to legislation that would provide $10 billion in annual tax credits to individuals and corporations who make charitable contributions to organizations that provide private-school scholarships. A Nebraska Republican introduced a companion measure in the House.

Already this year, Idaho, Tennessee and Wyoming have approved school choice programs, and bills are advancing in Kansas, New Hampshire, Ohio, South Carolina and Texas. A bill in Mississippi died before advancing. Most of the measures still in play would open programs to all families regardless of income, though some states would cap the total amount of money available.

Supporters of school choice say it gives parents control of their kids’ education — and an escape hatch if they are dissatisfied with their local public school. Many conservatives, religious institutions and private schools are in favor of school choice, along with some people of color who live in districts with underperforming public schools.

“Every child is different. They learn in different environments. There are just so many factors, that I believe that parents should be the ones that make the decision on where their child is going to do the best and have the most success,” said Indiana Republican state Sen. Linda Rogers. A former educator, Rogers has sponsored a bill in her state that would provide additional money to charter schools, which are considered to be a form of school choice.

Opponents, including teachers unions, public school professionals and many rural lawmakers of both parties, say such measures undermine traditional public schools by shifting money away from them.

“When we start to take from public schools, we’re hurting our kids, our lower-income kids. They will not prosper from this legislation,” Tennessee Democratic state Rep. Ronnie Glynn said during the floor debate on a far-reaching voucher bill in his state.

Joshua Cowen, a professor of education policy at Michigan State University, said vouchers are a budget-buster for states.

“Vouchers don’t shift costs — they add costs,” Cowen said in a phone interview. “Most voucher recipients were already in private schools, meaning states are paying for education they previously didn’t have to fund.”

The switch to remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, which gave parents a front-row seat to watch what their children were — or were not — learning in their classes, contributed to the recent school choice momentum. So did parent frustration over prolonged public school closures.

“Parents got a good look into sort of what was happening in schools,” said Bella DiMarco, a senior K-12 education policy analyst at FutureEd, an independent think tank at Georgetown University. “There was a lot of talk during the pandemic around school choice … of what public schools aren’t doing for their kids.”

The first modern school voucher program, created in Milwaukee in 1990, was a bipartisan effort to help lower-income families afford private schools. In recent years, more states have moved from school choice programs focused on certain groups, such as low-income students or students with disabilities, to universal programs open to students of all backgrounds.

“Historically, the programs were always sort of targeted to students in need,” DiMarco said. “But in the last couple of years, the new push has been for these universal programs.”

Currently, more than 30 states and Washington, D.C., have at least one school choice program. More than a dozen states now offer universal or near-universal access, allowing K–12 students to participate in school choice regardless of income.

EdChoice, a nonprofit that advocates for school choice, estimates that 1.2 million students are attending private schools this school year with the help of public tax credits, scholarships or vouchers.

Different strategies

States that enacted school choice programs this year have pursued different strategies.

The program Idaho enacted last month, for example, will provide an annual tax credit of $5,000 per child ($7,500 for students with disabilities) to help cover private education expenses.

Tennessee’s new program will provide 20,000 scholarships of roughly $7,000 each. During its first year, half of the Tennessee scholarships will be reserved for households earning less than $173,000 for a family of four, but that restriction will be removed in subsequent years.

About 65% of the Tennessee vouchers are expected to be awarded to students who already attend private schools, according to a legislative analysis.

Related Articles


Trump restricts federal research funding, a lifeblood for colleges


Lawmakers to consider changing Minnesota teacher pension rules


Amid plummeting diversity at medical schools, a warning of DEI crackdown’s ‘chilling effect’


Turkish student at Tufts University is latest Palestinian supporter swept up in US crackdown


350-pound teacher accused of stepping on sixth-grader’s back during lockdown drill in northwestern Minnesota

Critics say the cost of the program will grow quickly, creating a hole in the state’s budget. Tennessee Republican Gov. Bill Lee, who pushed hard for the proposal, suggested that Trump’s executive order might provide additional resources. Lee told reporters he hasn’t yet analyzed the order, “but I think there’s opportunity there.”

“The president wants to support states like ours who are advocating for school choice,” Lee said in a news conference after lawmakers approved the measure. Lee was at the White House when Trump signed an order calling for the U.S. Department of Education to be dismantled.

Texas lawmakers also are actively debating a voucher program, a longtime priority for Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, who worked to defeat resistant rural Republicans in last year’s state legislative elections and who also attended the White House event. The Senate passed a bill that would provide $10,000 per student ($11,500 for students with disabilities) annually through education savings accounts. A similar House proposal is under review.

Kansas is considering a universal refundable tax credit — $8,000 per child for accredited private school tuition and $4,000 for non-accredited private schools. The program starts with a $125 million cap, increasing annually if participation hits certain thresholds.

Ballot box defeats

School choice opponents question the wisdom of sending taxpayer dollars to schools that may lack certified teachers, follow nonstandardized curricula or discriminate in admissions. Many private schools have testing standards, maintain religious requirements or exclude LGBTQ+ students or those with certain disabilities, for example.

In some Republican-led states that have expanded school choice, Democrats have filed bills to increase oversight and place restrictions on these programs. A bill in Tennessee would require background checks for teachers at private schools that receive voucher money. And an Iowa bill would require that property tax statements include information on how much money education savings accounts subtracted from local public schools.

As voucher programs have grown, they have attracted greater scrutiny.

ProPublica, an investigative journalism outlet, last year found that Arizona’s universal voucher program has mostly benefited wealthier families. Some Arizona parents have tried to use voucher money to pay for dune buggies and expensive Lego sets, according to press reports.

Critics also note that despite recent legislative successes, school ballot initiatives fared poorly at the ballot box last fall.

Voters in Colorado rejected a measure that sought to enshrine school choice rights in the state constitution.

In Nebraska, voters partially repealed a state-funded private school scholarship program.

And in Kentucky, voters overwhelmingly rejected a constitutional amendment that would have allowed the use of public money to support private schools, with 65% of voters — and a majority in every county— opposed.

“There’s a handful of these billionaires that have been pushing vouchers for 30 years,” said Cowen, the Michigan State University professor. “The school choice movement is not necessarily driven by public demand, but rather by wealthy donors and political maneuvering.”

Stateline reporter Robbie Sequeira can be reached at rsequeira@stateline.org.

©2025 States Newsroom. Visit at stateline.org. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

What Happened This Week in NYC Housing? March 28, 2025

posted in: All news | 0

Each Friday, City Limits rounds up the latest news on housing, land use and homelessness. Catch up on what you might have missed here.

Homes in Bushwick, Brooklyn. Photo by Adi Talwar.

Welcome to “What Happened in NYC Housing This Week?” where we compile the latest local news about housing, land use and homelessness. Know of a story we should include in next week’s roundup? Email us.

ICYMI, from City Limits:

We’re hosting a mayoral forum on April 7, where we’ll ask the candidates who want to run the city about their plans for NYCHA, and addressing family homelessness. RSVP today!

City marshals must post notices of eviction online within 24 hours of serving them in person or face discipline, according to new rules. The enforcement comes after a City Limits investigation found some marshals were not complying with a state law aimed at offering more transparency in how evictions are carried out.

Meet the grassroots groups working to organize Bushwick tenants against evictions, poor conditions, and rent hikes.

As the state budget deadline approaches, a bill to update New York’s solar tax credit is looking likely to pass with it. Supporters say the changes would make it easier for low-to-middle income homeowners to access the benefit, and help them afford the costs of installing solar panels.

Neighborhood volunteers who rallied to support immigrants housed in the giant tent shelter at Floyd Bennett Field are finding new ways to help those families, even after the city shuttered the site last month.

Gov. Kathy Hochul’s plan to make it easier to hospitalize New Yorkers involuntarily would only further marginalize people experiencing homelessness and mental health challenges, says oped author Victor M. Herrera.

ICYMI, from other local newsrooms:

A firm contracted to provide security and fire watch at NYCHA developments is accused of having falsified timesheets for guards who “frequently abandoned their posts or failed to show up for work,” according to The City.

The Rent Guidelines Board is once again debating annual rent adjustments for stabilized tenants across the city. Its latest report found that landlords saw a 12 percent increase in revenue this year, lending credence to tenant advocates who’ve been calling for a rent freeze. But property owner groups say older regulated buildings are still struggling to keep up with repair costs, NY1 reported.

The Trump administration will end funding for federal Emergency Housing Vouchers next year, four years ahead of schedule—jeopardizing nearly 8,000 households in the city that relay on the subsidies to pay their rent, according to Gothamist.

The City Council passed a package of bills intended to get unsightly sidewalk sheds down faster, the Daily News reports.

A group of conservative lawmakers are suing in an attempt to overturn Mayor Eric Adams City of Yes for Housing Opportunity plan, claiming it violated environmental review laws, according to amNY.

The post What Happened This Week in NYC Housing? March 28, 2025 appeared first on City Limits.