Airbnb rentals could be harder to come by in Hawaii. Here’s why and when that might happen

posted in: News | 0

Grace Toohey | (TNS) Los Angeles Times

Hawaii lawmakers are hoping that phasing out short-term rentals could help ease its worsening housing crisis, where locals face the highest housing costs in the nation and one of the worst rates of homelessness.

Two bills that would allow for new regulation of “transient accommodations” have moved readily through the state legislature this spring, and if passed, could provide new avenues to limit the short-term home rental industry, which has exploded in recent years across the state’s four populated islands.

But the issue has been a challenging one for officials in cities and states across the U.S. — including Los AngelesNew YorkNashville and Bozeman, Mont. — who have looked for ways to rein in the ballooning popularity of Airbnb and other online home rental platforms without eliminating the economic benefits that such properties draw.

In Hawaii, last summer’s Maui wildfires have uniquely forced attention on the housing crisis — which was reaching a critical juncture even before the fires displaced thousands. Proponents of the short-term rental phase-outs hope this new sense of urgency could help push these bills into law in the coming weeks.

Here’s a look at how the bills could affect locals and visitors, and how soon.

What would these bills do?

The two companion bills, HB1838 and SB2919, would give counties new authority to change residential zoning, including the power to phase out short-term renting.

It’s important to note, though, that even if these bill pass, nothing would happen overnight. County officials — some of whom have said they want to change how short-term rentals are used and others who have previously tried to change such regulations — would have to adopt new rules to limit rentals. If they enact a phase-out, officials say, it would probably go into effect over several years.

“The bill does not enact anything specific to the regulation of those properties,” said state Sen. Jarrett Keohokalole, one of the co-authors on the Senate bill. “It simply … makes it clear that the counties do have the authority to regulate vacation rentals if they choose.”

The bills essentially provide the needed legal framework for counties to limit short-term rentals in a variety of ways. Honolulu officials attempted to redefine the length of a short-term rental in 2022, but a federal judge recently ruled that current state law barred them from doing so.

State Rep. Luke Evslin, the chair of the House Committee on Housing, said even if these bills pass, they probably won’t eliminate short-term rentals on the islands. Instead, Evslin said, the legislation would give local governments opportunities to define the neighborhoods where tourists could rent short-term units and, ideally, free up more homes for locals seeking long-term rentals. He said it won’t solve the state’s growing housing crisis, but he thinks it’s a first step to “stem the bleeding.”

“I think it’s one of the steps that we need to take to try and solve our housing crisis,” Evslin said, an author of the House bill. “On Kauai, for example, more units are becoming vacation rentals every year than we are building annually, so we have literally declining housing stock on Kauai, and the same thing is happening on Maui — even pre-fire.”

But a long battle looms

The bills’ supporters include many local housing nonprofits, hotel companies and local leaders, including Maui Councilmember Keani Rawlins-Fernandez.

“People are moving by the droves because there is no housing,” Rawlins-Ferandez said. She said it’s taken too long for officials to regulate the short-term rental industry, which has created this challenging fight with increasingly powerful interests.

There’s also a broad swath of opponents, including local homeowners who also rent units or rooms, Realtor groups, rental alliances and rental platforms. All of these groups have a financial interest in preserving property owners’ ability to do short-term rentals.

Airbnb’s Alex April, head of the company’s public policy for Hawaii, didn’t expressly oppose the legislation in her statement to legislators, but mentioned concerns including the financial losses that the state could see. April also cited ongoing work between Airbnb and Hawaii counties to help limit illegal renting, which has included memorandums of understanding to remove properties not operating within the law.

“We remain committed to working with you on fair and reasonable solutions that protect the rights of hosts and preserve the significant benefits that short-term rentals provide to Hawaii communities,” April’s statement said.

Airbnb also hired Hawaii’s former attorney general, David Louie, to argue against the bills, claiming in a lengthy testimony that the measures, if passed, could result in lawsuits challenging its constitutionality.

“Both Hawaii and federal litigation (have) recognized the principle that all preexisting uses of land are protected,” Louie wrote. A judge would not accept such changes to short-term rental zoning, he argued, because of how units have operated for years, leading to “substantial and unnecessary litigation.”

Evslin insisted that the bills are constitutional, but noted it will depend how counties chose to implement possible phase-outs if any further legal fight follows.

Why is this important now?

Months after the Maui wildfires, hundreds of displaced families are still living in hotels. Officials hope they will be relocated to long-term housing by this summer — a deadline that has continued to be extended.

Keohokalole, the state senator, said he wants to see the end of a system that has been “pushing local people out of their residential communities in favor of economic activity.”

“We’re seeing the wholesale conversion of residential communities in Hawaii to speculative, short-term rental development,” he said.

Hawaii Gov. Josh Green, after his annual state of the state address in January, said he was going to put “a lot of pressure” to curb short-term rentals because “that market should be for our local families,” according to the Associated Press. A majority of short-term rental owners don’t live in Hawaii, according to the governor.

Green, in a statement to the Los Angeles Times, said he supports the two bills going through the legislature that would allow for phasing-out such rentals.

“They would provide the counties with more tools to address vacation rentals in areas where they don’t want these operations to continue,” a spokesperson for Green said in a statement. “Gov. Green is open to additional changes to ensure that we can control the proliferation of illegal vacation rentals, to mitigate the years-long housing crisis that is causing local residents, our workforce of teachers, firefighters and other essential workers, to leave the islands.”

When could phase-outs begin?

Both bills have been voted out of their respective chambers and are moving into conference committee, where another round of changes can be made before a final vote — which must occur before May 3, the end of the state’s legislative session.

“Similar bills have been introduced every year for the last decade or so and never gone all that far,” Evslin said. “I don’t want to jinx it here, but I’m optimistic for their success. … I think that this is different in that there is really broad support across the legislature for action.”

If the measures pass, it would be up to county leaders to look into phasing out short-term rentals and in what capacity — but legally any phase-out would have to be occur over a reasonable amount of time, likely years, Evslin said.

_____

©2024 Los Angeles Times. Visit latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Ryan’s proposed redevelopment of Thomson Reuters site in Eagan moves forward

posted in: News | 0

Local real estate developer Ryan Cos. is one step closer to a comprehensive guide plan amendment that would change the land use designation for the 179-acre parcel in Eagan that formerly housed Thomson Reuters.

The city’s Advisory Planning Commission voted 6-0 Tuesday night in favor of recommending a land use change for the parcel from major office to a mix of light industrial and residential use.

(Courtesy of the City of Eagan)

As outlined in the developer’s proposal, 120 acres would be allocated to industrial use in the central and eastern portion of the site and could include a data center, research and laboratory spaces and an office showroom.

The remaining 59 acres would have a mix of housing types including townhomes, twin homes and single-family homes.

The proposal indicates that 35 acres at the southwest portion of the site would be marked low-density residential and could house 70 to 140 units, while the remaining 24 acres at the northwest portion of the site would be marked medium-density and house 80 to 180 units.

“There has been a dramatic shift in the office sector,” Peter Fitzgerald, vice president of real estate development for Ryan, said at the meeting. “There isn’t an office campus in the U.S., let alone in the state, that isn’t having to re-evaluate how they’re using their land,” he said.

Some Eagan residents who attended the meeting Tuesday voiced concerns about traffic congestion and pedestrian walkways along Elrene Road, which borders the site to the west.

“The amount of traffic that is generated from major office type of land use is, in rough numbers, twice as much as the rate that is generated from industrial land use,” said Aaron Nelson, an engineer for the city.

Other concerns from residents included the preservation of oak trees, duck ponds and green space in the area.

“You have a tree on the city of Eagan flag and, at the rate we’re going, we’re not going to have any trees left,” one resident said.

Two people who live near the property also noted concerns about an increase in park use at Wescott Station Park, located just south of the property, with the additional housing in the area.

Commissioner Brandon Block said he supports the proposal, adding “What else could they propose? High rise apartments? Heavy industrial? … What they are proposing does seem to fit well with this chunk of land.”

Next the proposed comprehensive guide plan amendment will be heard by the city council at the May 7 meeting.

Related Articles

Business |


Nothing fishy about BMW submerged in Burnsville pond for 20-plus years, sheriff says

Business |


Former Thomson Reuters Eagan campus could include housing, industrial uses under developer’s proposal

Business |


Supplier of fentanyl-tainted pills is spared prison in 2022 death of West St. Paul girl, 15

Business |


Salmonella cases, including four in Minnesota, linked to organic basil sold at Trader Joe’s

Business |


With new PFAS limits, some east metro cities have big water cleanup jobs ahead

Fact or fiction? Addressing common claims about gardening

posted in: News | 0

Ever wander through social media sites and wonder if you can really propagate roses by inserting cuttings into a tomato? Or if that “magical DIY fertilizer” is real? It’s easy to get lost among the thousands of videos offering “can’t-fail garden tips.”

Just how much scientific research goes into these instant success stories?

Let’s examine some of this advice:

“Place one piece under the orchid. It will grow 100 branches and bloom all year-round.”

The “piece” referred to here is a banana peel. The recipe involves fermenting a banana peel with molasses in water then using this liquid as a “magic” organic fertilizer.

Banana peels are actually beneficial to the garden when they are added to your compost. No need to slice and dice and wait three weeks for the magic to brew. Just toss the peels into your home compost bin or add to your green can.

“Use watermelon peels to make organic liquid fertilizer.”

No magic required: Add watermelon rinds to your compost. Or invert melon rinds and place in your garden as traps for snails and slugs. Scrape off the accumulated snails and slugs daily and destroy them.

“Water orchids with ice cubes” and “fertilize your orchids with a solution of rice water and garlic (or ginger).”

Visit the UC Marin Master Gardeners’ website for tips on growing healthy, productive tomatoes. (Photo by Alice Cason)

Ice cubes continue to be a controversial topic. Many online sites recommend that three ice cubes, once per week, offer the proper amount of moisture and prevent overwatering.

Orchids are tropical plants, and ice cubes can lower their temperature. It has been shown that ice cubes can harm the leaves and lead to crown or root rot over time. Water your plant “weakly weekly.” Once a week, water with half- or quarter-strength balanced, urea-free orchid fertilizer, allowing the water to flow through the pot. Do not leave the plant sitting in a puddle.

Numerous social media posts promote using your pasta cooking water to water plants. Most cooks salt their pasta water rather heavily; some chefs say, “Pasta water should be as salty as the sea.” The amount of salt in the water could be unhealthy for your soil and cause wilted or stunted growth. Even in a drought situation, watering plants with heavily salted water is not recommended.

“Chemical free”

Really? And what would that be? Everything that exists is composed of chemicals — water, air, plants, our bodies — all composed of chemicals.

This term is frequently used in marketing to make us feel secure that the product is healthy, safe, free of toxins or environmentally friendly. But, it is not chemical-free.

Phalaenopsis should be planted in a well-draining potting medium, and water should flow through the container. Do not allow plants to sit in water. (Courtesy of UC Regents)

Random garden advisors recommend “natural” weed control using common household products such as baking soda, vinegar or dish soap in a solution.

While these mixtures may not contain toxic chemicals, none of these products successfully kill weeds, but they can add a significant amount of sodium to the soil. Mulch garden areas well to inhibit the growth of weeds while also improving soil structure and providing other benefits.

Watching videos of interesting characters presenting gardening tales passed down from their grandma or picked from other social media sources can be a fun way to fill the day and plan an “instant” and “magical” garden. Still, there’s a better and more reliable channel. Spend some time on the Marin Master Gardeners’ YouTube channel at youtube.com/c/UCMarinMasterGardeners. Science-based gardening advice is scripted, fact-checked, staged, filmed, edited and presented by UC Marin Master Gardeners. Recently released topics include Earth-friendly gardening, advice for planting natives and succulents, and how to attract birds to your garden. More than 30 timely videos will help you learn about the best practices for gardening in our Mediterranean climate.

Take a spin around our recently redesigned website, marinmg.ucanr.edu, which offers tips on selecting plants for Marin’s microclimates, seeding, soil prep, irrigation and much much more.

Sponsored by UC Cooperative Extension, the University of California Marin Master Gardeners provides science- and research-based information for Marin home gardeners. Email questions to helpdesk@marinmg.org. Attach photos for inquiries about plant pests or diseases. Please call 415-473-4910 to see when a master gardener will be at the office or drop off samples 24/7 in the sample box outside the office. To attend a gardening workshop or subscribe to Leaflet, a free quarterly e-newsletter, go to marinmg.ucanr.edu.

Homeless Advocates Lend Support in Suit Over City’s Refusal to Expand Housing Vouchers

posted in: Society | 0

Seven local organizations sought permission to file an amicus brief in support of the City Council and Legal Aid Society’s lawsuit, which is looking to compel the Adams administration to implement a package of laws to expand eligibility for CityFHEPS, a rental subsidy program.

Gerardo Romo / NYC Council Media Unit

Councilmember Pierina Sanchez, who sponsored two of the bills the mayor has so far refused to implement, speaks at a rally in support of CityFHEPS expansion last summer.

A group of homeless advocacy organizations are weighing in on a lawsuit against the Adams administration over its refusal to implement a package of laws that would expand the city’s rental subsidy program to more New Yorkers.

The seven local groups—Win, Coalition for the Homeless, Help USA, Homeless Services United, Interfaith Assembly on Homelessness and Housing, New York Coalition for Homeless Youth, and Community Service Society of New York (a City Limits funder)—are seeking the court’s permission to file an amicus brief in the case.

They’re backing Legal Aid Society and the City Council’s efforts to compel City Hall to enforce the legislation, which lawmakers passed last summer—overriding the mayor’s veto—and which would expand eligibility for City Family Homelessness and Eviction Prevention Supplement (CityFHEPS) rental vouchers.

Under the program, voucher holders pay up to 30 of their income on rent, up to a set maximum, while the city covers the difference. The Council’s legislation would extend eligibility to include those earning 50 percent of the area median income (currently $69,900 for a family of three in New York City), eliminate work requirements and allow households at risk of eviction to apply without requiring they spend time in the shelter system first, among other reforms.

“As experts who are in the trenches working with and advocating for individuals experiencing homelessness, [we] urge this Court to order Respondents to implement these common-sense laws before more New Yorkers are needlessly forced into homelessness,” reads the document the advocacy groups filed with the court Tuesday.

In a statement, Christine Quinn, a former Council speaker who is now president of the shelter provider Win, called CityFHEPS “a tried-and-true program that reduces homelessness,” and that the administration’s inaction on the bills, “not only makes it harder for families to exit shelter but undermines New York’s ability to combat the homelessness crisis.”

Mayor Eric Adams has maintained that expanding the program would be too costly and would make it harder for existing voucher holders to find apartments, citing a historically low availability of affordable rental housing.

City Hall pointed to its other efforts to improve CityFHEPS: eliminating a rule that required applicants spend at least 90 days in shelter before they could be eligible, letting people use vouchers to rent homes in New York outside the city, and offering more flexibility on using vouchers cover utility costs. In February, the city launched an initiative to “fast-track” the creation of hundreds of affordable units specifically for voucher holders in shelter.

“Let’s be clear: Since day one, Mayor Adams and this administration have been dedicated to connecting as many New Yorkers to permanent, affordable homes as possible and we’ve made historic progress in doing just that,” a spokesperson for City Hall said in a statement.

The administration also argues that the Council doesn’t have the legal authority to legislate public assistance reforms, citing New York State’s Social Services Law, claiming it only extends that power to certain state agencies as well as to the city’s Department of Social Services, which can do so as a “local arm of” the state.

Legal Aid Society, which filed the lawsuit in February on behalf of a proposed class of New Yorkers who say they’re unable to access vouchers due to the mayor’s refusal to enact the expansion, has disputed that reasoning.

“The Council has long legislated in the field of social services, and its role in these matters is clearly found in the relevant statutory and case law,” Legal Aid attorneys wrote in court papers filed last week. It cited several past examples, including in 2021 when lawmakers passed a bill to raise the value of CityFHEPS vouchers, which the city implemented.

“We’re still in the midst of a five decade old homelessness crisis in New York City, and we need to help people move into permanent housing. That is really the only solution,” said Dave Giffen of Coalition for the Homeless, one of the seven organizations that filed the amicus brief. “Vouchers are not the only solution to mass homelessness, but they’re a very effective solution.”

The legal fight is playing out on the heels of another battle between homeless advocates and City Hall over New York’s right to shelter rules. A settlement was recently reached in that case that temporarily narrows re-sheltering rights for newly arrived immigrants. (Currently, undocumented people are not eligible for CityFHEPs).

“After what we’ve been through now with the challenge to the right to shelter, the mayor needs to stop trying to duck his responsibilities to the people in the city who are most in need,” Giffen added.