Clementine, dog taken from owner in St. Paul robbery, is found safe

posted in: Society | 0

A dog stolen from her owner in a St. Paul robbery has been found and is safe, police said Friday.

Two young men approached Greta Deane in the Payne-Phalen area about 4 p.m. Wednesday and asked her about her dog.

One of the suspects yanked her dog’s leash and the other shoved Deane onto the pavement, and they ran away with Clementine. The 7-year-old dog is a French bulldog-Boston terrier mix.

“I’m just profoundly grateful and deeply thankful,” Deane said Friday afternoon, just after police reunited her with Clementine. “I couldn’t imagine not getting her back.”

She planned to take Clementine to the veterinarian’s office on Friday because she said her dog is injured and fell asleep as soon as she got home. “I’m worried about her demeanor and her condition physically,” Deane said. Clementine has medical conditions and takes prescription medications.

No one was immediately under arrest and the investigation is active, said Alyssa Arcand, a St. Paul police spokeswoman.

“Thanks to everyone who shared (information) and looked out for Clementine, we were able to locate her” in the 500 block of Selby Avenue in St. Paul Friday, Arcand said.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


St. Paul stranger-rape charge: Residential surveillance video helped lead to Maplewood suspect

Crime & Public Safety |


First person sentenced in Alex Becker murder gets 30-year term

Crime & Public Safety |


Mother charged in baby’s fentanyl overdose death at Roseville hotel

Crime & Public Safety |


St. Paul police make arrest in Mac-Groveland break-in and sex assault

Crime & Public Safety |


Rosemount teen faces upgraded manslaughter charge for punch that killed Vietnam vet

Charges revealed against a former Trump aide and 4 lawyers in Arizona fake electors case

posted in: Politics | 0

By JACQUES BILLEAUD (Associated Press)

PHOENIX (AP) — Authorities revealed Friday the conspiracy, fraud and forgery charges filed against an ex-aide of former President Donald Trump and four attorneys in Arizona’s fake elector case, but the names of former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows and lawyer Rudy Giuliani remained blacked out. The Arizona attorney general’s office released a copy of the indictment that revealed nine felony counts had been filed against Mike Roman, who was Trump’s director of Election Day operations, and attorneys John Eastman, Christina Bobb, Boris Epshteyn and Jenna Ellis. The lawyers were accused of organizing an attempt to use fake documents to persuade Congress not to certify Joe Biden’s victory.

The office had announced Wednesday that conspiracy, fraud and forgery charges had been filed against 11 Arizona Republicans who submitted a document to Congress falsely declaring that Trump won in Arizona in the 2020 presidential election. They included a former state GOP chair, a 2022 U.S. Senate candidate and two sitting state lawmakers.

The identities of seven other defendants, including Giuliani and Meadows, were not released on Wednesday because they had not yet been served with the indictments. They were readily identifiable based on descriptions of the defendants, but the charges against them were not clear. Roman, Epshteyn, Bobb and Ellis declined to comment, did not respond or could not be reached. Representatives of Eastman, Meadows and Giuliani have attacked the prosecution as political.

Trump himself was not charged but was referred to as an unindicted co-conspirator.

With the indictments, Arizona becomes the fourth state where allies of the former president have been charged with using false or unproven claims about voter fraud related to the election.

Those charged in the Arizona case are scheduled for their initial court hearing on May 21.

The 11 people who had been nominated to be Arizona’s Republican electors met in Phoenix on Dec. 14, 2020, to sign a certificate saying they were “duly elected and qualified” electors and claiming that Trump carried the state. A one-minute video of the signing ceremony was posted on social media by the Arizona Republican Party at the time. The document was later sent to Congress and the National Archives, where it was ignored.

Biden won Arizona by more than 10,000 votes.

Southwest Airlines is considering changes to its quirky boarding and seating practices

posted in: News | 0

By DAVID KOENIG (AP Airlines Writer)

DALLAS (AP) — Southwest Airlines is studying changes to its quirky boarding and seating policies as it searches for ways to raise more revenue.

Airline officials say they are studying possible changes but won’t have anything to announce until September. That tease is leading to speculation about whether Southwest might ditch some longstanding traditions, including the practice of passengers picking their own seats only after they board a plane.

CEO Robert Jordan says he is proud of Southwest’s “product,” but it was developed when flights weren’t as full as they are today, and customers’ preferences change over time, prompting the “deep dive” into “transformational options” in boarding and seating.

“Early indications, both for our customers and for Southwest, look pretty darn interesting,” he told analysts and reporters Thursday.

Every other major U.S. airline sells first- or business-class seats with more room and amenities. They assign seats long before passengers arrive at the airport. And increasingly, they charge extra if economy-class passengers want to pick a particular seat, such as one in an exit row or near the front of the cabin.

Those policies generate significant “ancillary revenue.” Delta Air Lines took in $4.4 billion in “premium products” during the first quarter.

Southwest doesn’t have a first-class cabin or assigned seats. Passengers line up in the gate area in an order determined partly by who checked in first and – increasingly – who paid extra to move up in line. The lucky or high-paying ones get in the “A” boarding group, followed by the middling “B” crowd and finally the dreaded “C” group, whose unfortunate inhabitants usually wind up in a middle seat, maybe in the back of the plane.

Over the years, Southwest customers learned to check in online exactly 24 hours before departure to get the best shot at grabbing the seat they wanted. In 2009, the airline began charging an extra fee — called EarlyBird — to move up in the boarding line. The fee starts at $15 per flight but goes up when planes are full.

Jordan said any changes must generate significant new revenue and can’t slow down flights. Beyond that, he was deliberately and repeatedly vague, but executives did indicate that two possible changes have been ruled out already.

Ryan Green, Southwest’s chief commercial officer, said the airline won’t impose baggage charges — it’s the only U.S. carrier that lets passenger check one or two bags for free. He said Southwest also won’t install curtains like those that separate premium cabins from the economy-class section on other airlines.

Savanthi Syth, an airlines analyst with Raymond James Financial, said the lack of assigned seating is “a huge pain point for passengers,” although a shrinking contingent still likes it. Syth thinks passengers would prefer the ability to select a seat in advance to trying to get a better spot in the boarding line.

“More importantly, I think it opens you up to a greater pool of passengers that would not consider (Southwest) because of the stress of the current process,” she said. “This is particularly important now that Southwest has lost the differentiation of no change or cancellations fees.” Southwest’s closest rivals dropped change fees too during the pandemic.

Syth is less convinced that Southwest needs a first-class cabin, but she thinks adding extra-legroom seats could be attractive. “There are plenty of tall people who could use the extra space,” she said.

Southwest executives are frequently asked about changes in their policies around baggage, seating and first-class cabins. At an industry conference in November, Jordan said there was nothing in the works.

What changed?

Southwest’s financial results have become more dismal. The company reported Thursday that it lost $231 million in the first quarter, which was worse than analysts expected and a wider loss than a year ago.

The Dallas-based airline faces sharply rising labor costs — up 19% or $462 million from a year ago, and that was before flight attendants ratified a new contract with sharply higher wages. Spending on maintenance and airport fees are rising by double-digit percentages. And Southwest can’t add as many flights as it would like because a production crisis at Boeing means there are fewer new planes.

The company is freezing hiring other than critical positions, and it will take the rare step of pulling out of four airports in August to cut costs. Even with revenue rising on strong travel demand, the airline needs more to offset inflation.

The airline promises that whatever it decides, it won’t change Southwest’s unique character. That could be a tricky balancing act in the view of its many loyal customers. They must wait out the next several months.

“We are committed to a set of new strategic initiatives. I have hinted at boarding and seating and the cabin, and we’re going to share those with you at investor day” in September, Jordan told analysts.

Can steelmaking be made climate friendly?

posted in: News | 0

The U.S. Department of Energy awarded nearly $1.5 million to the University of Minnesota’s Natural Resources Research Institute to develop carbon-free methods of readying iron mined in the state for steelmaking.

NRRI, which has labs in Hermantown and Coleraine, received $575,000 as part of a $2.8 million grant to work with the University of Minnesota to develop a microwave hydrogen plasma process to replace blast furnaces. It also received $900,000 as part of a $3 million grant to work with Tufts University in Medford, Mass., to develop a method to directly reduce iron ore concentrates with ammonia.

Both processes would eliminate carbon emissions from that step in the steelmaking process. Reduction of greenhouse gases, namely carbon dioxide, is key in slowing or preventing the worst effects of a warming climate.

The global steelmaking industry accounted for approximately 7% of carbon dioxide emissions in 2020, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

“It’s a huge amount of greenhouse gas emissions from just iron and steel alone,” said Matt Mlinar, research group leader for minerals processing and metallurgy at NRRI. “They (the Department of Energy) are trying to look for alternative ways to produce the same products while not emitting CO2.”

Both methods the NRRI will help research replace carbon with hydrogen, either through the microwave hydrogen plasma process or with ammonia, which is a nitrogen and hydrogen compound.

Typically, coal or natural gas is used to remove oxygen from iron before a traditional oxygen furnace or, increasingly, an electric arc furnace converts it to steel.

Carbon monoxide in fossil fuels can pick an oxygen atom off the iron oxide, removing it from the iron but forming carbon dioxide and other gases as a byproduct. Those gases are then released into the atmosphere. But if hydrogen is used instead, two hydrogen atoms can bond with one oxygen atom from the iron oxide and form water, and water vapor is a far more desirable byproduct than greenhouse gases.

“We want hydrogen to do the reduction, and not the CO (carbon monoxide) because then the CO2 (carbon dioxide) will form, and herein lies the problem,” said Brett Apigarelli, a senior research scientist at NRRI.

The projects were part of $28 million in funding announced last week by the Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, or ARPA-E, under the Revolutionizing Ore to Steel Impact Emissions, or ROSIE, program.

“Iron and steel production are among the most difficult industrial sectors to decarbonize, which is why ARPA-E is laser focused on accelerating game-changing technological breakthroughs to lower emissions from these critical sectors,” ARPA-E director Evelyn N. Wang said in a news release. “Today’s announcement will help the nation achieve President Biden’s ambitious clean energy and net-zero goals while also reinforcing America’s global leadership in clean manufacturing for generations to come.”

Separately, the NRRI last year received a $2.1 million grant from the Department of Energy to study different lower-carbon technologies for the iron and steel industries. That includes using biochar, wood heated to a high temperature in a low-oxygen setting, to replace coal in the steelmaking process.

Mlinar said ARPA-E, which is funding the hydrogen projects, is known for backing “moonshot” research.

“They fund a lot of really, really high-risk, high-reward projects that otherwise it’s hard to get funding for,” Mlinar said.

Eric Enberg, a volunteer for the Northland Chapter of the Citizens’ Climate Lobby, said carbon dioxide emissions from the iron ore and steelmaking industries were long considered difficult to abate.

But that’s changing.

“How do we ever decarbonize these things?” Enberg said. “Well, it’s turning out that it’s a lot easier than we thought. There’s a lot of things we can do — not as cheaply perhaps right now versus carbon-based fuels.”

Enberg said federal funding could help ideas advance beyond the so-called “valley of death” when new technologies under development putter out.

Citizens Climate Lobby has also been arguing for a price on carbon. Enberg if the industry sees traditional carbon-intensive methods and processes becoming cost-prohibitive, it could spur them to adopt lower-carbon or carbon-free processes.

“You need to have the push and the pull,” Enberg said.

If the hydrogen processes work, and are then scaled up, they could transform the state’s iron mining industry again.

First, high-grade was mined, and it could be added directly to a blast furnace. When that was depleted, processing lower-grade ores into concentrated pellets became the norm.

But lower-carbon or carbon-free methods could take pellets out of the equation.

Enberg said the industry should be quick to adopt new technologies in Minnesota because if pellets aren’t needed, there’s nothing stopping ore mined on the Iron Range from being shipped out of state for processing somewhere else.

“We really need to take advantage of this opportunity; otherwise, it’s going to be gone,” Enberg said. “And if it’s gone, then the Iron Range is going to be stuck with the technology from the last century. It will not have moved forward, and the technology and the jobs and all that are going to be somewhere else.”