From stirring to cringey: Memorable moments from past presidential debates

posted in: Politics | 0

By WILL WEISSERT

WASHINGTON (AP) — It could be a well-rehearsed zinger, a too-loud sigh — or a full performance befuddled enough to shockingly end a sitting president’s reelection bid.

Notable moments from past presidential debates demonstrate how the candidates’ words and body language can make them look especially relatable or hopelessly out-of-touch — showcasing if a candidate is at the top of their policy game or out to sea. Will past be prologue when Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump debate in Philadelphia on Tuesday?

“Being live television events, without a script, without any way of knowing how they are going to evolve — anything can happen,” said Alan Schroeder, author of “Presidential Debates: 50 years of High-Risk TV.”

Here’s a look at some highs, lows and curveballs from presidential debates past.

Biden blows it

Though it’s still fresh in the nation’s mind, the June debate in Atlanta pitting President Joe Biden against Trump may go down as the most impactful political faceoff in history.

Biden, 81, shuffled onto the stage, frequently cleared his throat, said $15 when he meant that his administration helped cut the price of insulin to $35 per month on his first answer and inexplicably gave Trump an early chance to pounce on the chaotic 2021 withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan. It got even worse for the president 12 minutes in, when Biden appeared lose his train of thought entirely.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Trump leads Harris by a point in NYT-Siena College national poll

National Politics |


Fall legislative preview: Congress returns for busy fall session

National Politics |


Kamala Harris-Donald Trump debate this week elevates stakes of Pennsylvania voting

National Politics |


Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are preparing for their first debate in Philly. Here’s what’s at stake.

National Politics |


Grief over Gaza, qualms over US election add up to anguish for many Palestinian Americans

“The, uh — excuse me, with the COVID, um, dealing with, everything we had to do with, uh … if … Look …” Biden stammered before concluding ”we finally beat Medicare.” He meant that his administration had successfully taken on “big pharma,” some of the nation’s top prescription drug companies.

Biden at first blamed having a cold, then suggested he’d overprepared. Later, he pointed to jetlag after pre-debate travel overseas.

In the frantic hours immediately after the debate, a Biden campaign spokesperson said, “ Of course, he’s not dropping out.” That was correct until 28 days later, when the president did just that, bowing out and endorsing Harris on July 21.

The age question

Biden was asked in Atlanta about his age and got into an argument with Trump over golf. It was the opposite of knowing a sensitive question was coming and still making the answer sound spontaneous — a feat President Ronald Reagan pulled off while landing a line for the ages during 1984’s second presidential debate.

Reagan was 73 and facing 56-year-old Democratic challenger Walter Mondale. In the first debate, Reagan struggled to remember facts and occasionally looked confused. An adviser suggested afterward that aides “filled his head with so many facts and figures that he lost his spontaneity.”

FILE – President Ronald Reagan, left, and his Democratic challenger Walter Mondale, shake hands before debating in Kansas City, Mo., Oct. 22, 1984. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds, File)

So Reagan’s team took a more hands-off approach toward the second debate. When Reagan got a question about his mental and physical stamina that he had to know was coming, he was ready enough to make the response feel unplanned.

Asked whether his age might hinder his handling of major challenges, Raegan responded, “Not at all,” before smoothly continuing: “I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent’s youth and inexperience.” The audience, and even Mondale, cracked up.

Then, capitalizing on years of Hollywood-honed comedic training, the president took a sip of water, giving the crowd more time to laugh. Finally, he grinned and left little doubt that he’d rehearsed, adding, “It was Seneca, or it was Cicero, I don’t know which, that said, ‘If it was not for the elders correcting the mistakes of the young, there would be no state.’”

Years later, Mondale conceded, “That was really the end of my campaign that night.”

Reagan is further remembered for using a light touch to neutralize criticisms from Democratic President Jimmy Carter in a 1980 debate. When Carter accused him of wanting to cut Medicare, Reagan scolded, “There you go again.”

The line worked so well that he turned it into something of a trademark rejoinder going forward.

Gaffes galore

In 1976, Republican President Gerald Ford had a notable moment in a debate against Carter — and not in a good way. The president declared that there is “no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe and there never will be under a Ford administration.”

FILE – Jimmy Carter, left, and Gerald Ford, right, shake hands before the third presidential debate, Oct. 22, 1976, in Williamsburg, Va. (AP Photo/File)

With Moscow controlling much of that part of the world, the surprised moderator asked if he’d understood correctly. Ford stood by his answer, then spent days on the campaign trail trying to explain it away. He lost that November.

Another awkward moment came in 2012, when Republican nominee Mitt Romney got a debate question about gender pay equality and recalled soliciting women’s groups’ help to find qualified female applicants for state posts: “They brought us whole binders full of women.”

Aaron Kall, director of the University of Michigan’s debate program, said key lines affect not just who a debate’s perceived winner is but also fundraising and media coverage for days, or even weeks, afterward.

“The closer the election, the more zingers and important debate lines can matter,” Kall said.

Not all slips have a devastating impact, though.

Then-Sen. Barack Obama, in a 2008 Democratic presidential primary debate, dismissively told Hillary Clinton, “You’re likable enough, Hillary.” That drew backlash, but Obama recovered.

The same couldn’t be said for the short-lived 2012 Republican primary White House bid of then-Texas Gov. Rick Perry. Despite repeated attempts and excruciatingly long pauses, Perry could not remember the third of the three federal agencies he’d promised to shutter if elected.

Finally, he sheepishly muttered, “Oops.”

The Energy Department, which he later ran during the Trump administration, is what slipped his mind.

Getting personal

Another damaging moment opened a 1988 presidential debate, when Democrat Michael Dukakis was pressed about his opposition to capital punishment in a question that evoked his wife.

“If Kitty Dukakis were raped and murdered, would you favor an irrevocable death penalty for the killer?” CNN anchor Bernard Shaw asked. Dukakis showed little emotion, responding, “I don’t see any evidence that it’s a deterrent.”

Dukakis later said he wished he’d said that his wife “is the most precious thing, she and my family, that I have in this world.”

That year’s vice presidential debate featured one of the best-remembered, pre-planned one-liners.

When Republican Dan Quayle compared himself to John F. Kennedy while debating Lloyd Bentsen, the Democrat was ready. He’d studied Quayle’s campaigning and seen him invoke Kennedy in the past.

FILE – Sen. Lloyd Bentsen, D-Texas, left, shakes hands with Sen. Dan Quayle, R-Ind., before the start of their vice presidential debate at the Omaha Civic Auditorium, Omaha, Neb., Oct. 5, 1988. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds, File)

“Senator, I served with Jack Kennedy. I knew Jack Kennedy,” Bentsen began slowly and deliberately, drawing out the moment. “Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you’re no Jack Kennedy.”

The audience erupted in applause and laughter. Quayle was left to stare straight ahead.

Wordless blunders

Quayle and George H.W. Bush still easily won the 1988 election. But they lost in 1992 after then-President Bush was caught on camera looking at his watch while Democrat Bill Clinton talked to an audience member during a town hall debate. Some thought it made Bush look bored and aloof.

FILE – President George H.W. Bush looks at his watch during the 1992 presidential campaign debate with other candidates, Independent Ross Perot, top, and Democrat Bill Clinton, not shown, at the University of Richmond, Va., Oct. 15, 1992. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds, File)

In another instance of a nonverbal debate miscue, then-Democratic Vice President Al Gore was criticized for a subpar opening 2000 debate performance with Republican George W. Bush in which he repeatedly and very audibly sighed.

During their second, town hall-style debate, Gore moved so close to Bush while the Republican answered one question that Bush finally looked over and offered a confident nod, drawing laughter from the audience.

A similar moment occurred in 2016, as Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton faced the audience to answer questions during a debate with Trump. Trump moved in close behind her, narrowed his eyes and glowered.

Clinton later wrote of the incident: “He was literally breathing down my neck. My skin crawled.”

That didn’t stop Trump from claiming the presidency a few weeks later.

Motorist now faces third-degree murder charges for Park Tavern DWI crash that killed 2, injured 9

posted in: Society | 0

Murder charges were added Monday in the case against a motorist who authorities say had a blood-alcohol level more than four times the legal limit to drive when he plowed into a St. Louis Park bar patio on Labor Day weekend, killing two people and injuring nine others.

The Hennepin County Attorney’s Office said video surveillance at Park Tavern supports two counts of third-degree murder against Steven Frane Bailey, 56, of St. Louis Park, for the Sept. 1 killing of Kristina Folkerts and 30-year-old Gabriel Quinn Harvey.

Kristina Folkerts and Gabe Harvey. (Courtesy of GoFundMe)

Folkerts, who died at the scene of blunt-force injuries, was a 30-year-old mother of three children from St. Louis Park who was working as a server at the time of the crash.

Harvey, a 30-year-old from Rosemount, was a health unit coordinator at nearby Methodist Hospital. He was at the restaurant with several hospital workers celebrating a colleague’s last nursing shift. He died that night at Hennepin County Medical Center in Minneapolis.

According to the attorney’s office, prosecutors did not yet have the surveillance video at the time of the original Sept. 3 charges, although references to the video were included in police reports.

Bailey still faces the previously filed charges of criminal vehicular homicide and criminal vehicular operation in connection with the crash.

Prosecutors often charge multiple counts if applicable to give the jury options, or to use as bargaining tools during plea negotiations.

According to state statute, a person commits third-degree unintentional murder for “perpetrating an act eminently dangerous to others and evincing a depraved mind, without regard for human life.” The charge carries a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison, with a presumptive sentence between 10 to 15 years.

Four Methodist Hospital nurses were among the injured. One was treated and released with minor injuries the day of the crash, while two others were in serious condition and one was in fair condition, a hospital spokesman said Friday.

Prosecutors: He hit two cars first, sped away

According to the attorney’s office, the surveillance video shows Bailey’s BMW turn right from Louisiana Avenue onto Oak Leaf Court and then turn right into the near-capacity Park Tavern parking lot. Several people are walking in the area, and other vehicles are driving within the parking lot throughout the incident.

The video shows that Bailey would have had a clear view of the patio, tables, umbrellas and the numerous individuals seated outside from the time he pulled into the lot and throughout his course of travel.

Bailey passed several parked cars, then stopped briefly after passing an empty parking space on his passenger side. He then backed up and hit a parked car with the rear end of his car. He drove away.

Within seconds, Bailey can be seen on video accelerating at a high rate of speed in what appears to be an attempt to flee the scene, according to the attorney’s office. As he accelerated through the parking lot, a black SUV turned into the area where Bailey was driving. He appeared to swerve slightly in an attempt to avoid the SUV. Bailey’s vehicle then hit the rear driver’s side of the SUV without slowing down and continued to accelerate straight toward the patio.

Bailey then accelerated past 11 parking spaces and plowed his car through a metal fence and into the patio seating area, striking occupied tables and multiple people. He continued to drive “all the way through the full length of the patio without braking” and did not slow down until his car “came to an abrupt and violent halt” when it hit several boulders and the base of a steep incline, the attorney’s office said.

Steven Frane Bailey (Courtesy of the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office)

When police arrived, Bailey was still in his SUV. As officers approached him they allegedly heard him on the phone saying, “I hit the gas instead of the brake and went right through a thing” and “I’m probably going to jail,” according to the Sept. 3 criminal complaint.

Bailey “appeared calm but was slow to respond to officers’ directions … (his) speech was slurred, and his eyes were bloodshot and watery. As he exited the vehicle, (Bailey) was unsteady on his feet and fell to his knees.”

In addition, he made several “spontaneous” statements such as saying when he was told they were going to perform a field sobriety test he said, “You don’t need to do fields. I know what I did.”

A preliminary breath test showed his blood-alcohol content was 0.325. The legal limit to drive in Minnesota is 0.08.

When he was booked into Hennepin County jail and told he was being held on criminal vehicular homicide charges, Bailey allegedly said, “You got to be kidding me” and “My life’s pretty much (expletive) now, isn’t it?”

Prior DWIs

Minnesota court records show that Bailey has two previous drunken driving convictions: a fourth-degree misdemeanor DWI in Waseca County in 2014 and a third-degree gross misdemeanor DWI in Hennepin County in 2015.

Bailey remains jailed in lieu of $1 million bail without conditions, or $500,000 with conditions. He’s scheduled to return to court for an Oct. 1 hearing.

Bailey’s attorney, Tom Sieben, has not responded to a request Monday for comment on the upgraded charges.

Related Articles

Crime & Public Safety |


Gunfire just outside Northtown Mall leads to arrest and lockdown of shopping center Sunday

Crime & Public Safety |


Domestic disturbance suspect killed in crash while fleeing West St. Paul officers, police say

Crime & Public Safety |


Friends of Madeline Kingsbury recall witnessing abuse by accused killer

Crime & Public Safety |


Man armed with AK-47 shot by police after firing inside Minneapolis apartment building

Crime & Public Safety |


Arden Hills bar owner gets jail time, probation for hiding gun after friend fatally shot Mounds View man

Trump leads Harris by a point in NYT-Siena College national poll

posted in: Politics | 0

Dayana Mustak | (TNS) Bloomberg News

Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump leads Vice President Kamala Harris by a point in a new national poll by the New York Times and Siena College, as the U.S. election enters its final stretch.

The survey of 1,695 registered voters conducted Sept. 3-6 shows support for Trump at 48% against 47% for Harris, within the three-percentage point margin of error. The poll was carried out via telephone, using live interviewers, in English and Spanish.

The poll shows 56% of registered voters say Trump would do a better job handling the economy, while 51% of voters rate current economic conditions as poor.

Harris and Trump are set to face off on Tuesday night in Philadelphia in what’s currently their only scheduled debate before the November election.

The survey found that 28% of likely voters said they felt they needed to know more about Harris, who became the Democratic nominee when President Joe Biden announced in July he wouldn’t run again.

Democrats had a slight edge in enthusiasm in the latest survey, with 91% saying they were enthusiastic about voting versus 85% of Republicans.

_____

©2024 Bloomberg L.P. Visit bloomberg.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Fall legislative preview: Congress returns for busy fall session

posted in: Politics | 0

Niels Lesniewski | (TNS) CQ-Roll Call

WASHINGTON — With the political conventions in the rearview mirror, Congress returns this week facing the traditional election year push and pull of members wanting to get out of Washington as quickly as possible while doing just enough to avoid a government shutdown.

House conservatives have been agitating about attaching a noncitizen voting bill to the September stopgap spending bill, and for Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to pitch a plan to punt the spending debate into 2025.

The stopgap bill released Friday night by House Republicans would combine a six-month continuing resolution with a House-passed bill that supporters say would help to ensure that noncitizens can’t vote in federal elections — something Democrats note is already against the law. If it becomes law, the continuing resolution would set a March 28 deadline to avert a partial government shutdown.

As with any spending bill in the narrowly divided House, its path to passage is far from certain. And in any case, Senate Democrats are unlikely to seriously entertain the noncitizen voting legislation — which likely would set up a scenario where the Democrat-led Senate would kick back a “clean” stopgap bill that would force a decision on Johnson’s part.

Aside from that, appropriators might rather tackle spending issues in the lame-duck session, while current members are still in office. That would set the stage for an omnibus spending package — exactly what House conservatives would like to avoid.

“Democrats support a CR to keep the government open,” Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., wrote in a weekend letter to colleagues. “As I have said before, the only way to get things done is in a bipartisan way. Despite Republican bluster, that is how we’ve handled every funding bill in the past, and this time should be no exception. We will not let poison pills or Republican extremism put funding for critical programs at risk.”

Spending won’t be the only thing on the agenda, however.

The farm bill lapses at the end of September, meaning it will need an extension either as part of the continuing resolution or in some other legislative vehicle. And the fiscal 2025 national defense authorization measure is still awaiting action.

Schumer began the recess talking up the possibility of attaching legislation advanced by the Rules and Administration Committee intended to counter the use of deepfakes in political advertising.

“These are American bills. We are going to fight because democracy is at such risk. We’re going to fight to get these done in every way that we can, and we hope our Republican friends will relent,” Schumer told NBC News. “As I said, we do have some Republican support. This is not a Democratic or Republican issue. Democracy is at risk if these deepfakes are allowed to prevail.”

The House is kicking off a week full of bills targeting China, many of which are likely to have bipartisan support because they are being considered under suspension of the rules, an expedited procedure that requires a two-thirds majority vote to pass.

That may be the primary substance, but there’s also plenty of room for more politics.

In the Senate, Schumer could opt to call another vote on legislation intended to support access to and availability of fertility treatments like IVF. A procedural vote to advance the measure back in June only got 48 votes. Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine crossed over in support. Sixty votes were needed.

Still, since then former President Donald Trump has been talking up his support for IVF and there may be a political advantage for Democrats to forcing another vote, especially if the Trump doubles down on his support during Tuesday night’s presidential debate.

House Republicans will surely have plenty of politically charged votes of their own.

There is an ongoing possibility of an effort to impeach President Joe Biden — which could be forced onto the floor agenda by conservative agitators even if Republican leaders would prefer to focus on other matters.

___

©2024 CQ-Roll Call, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Visit cqrollcall.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.