Which headband is best?

If you’re an athlete looking to keep the sweat from your eyes or you’re just trying to accessorize your outfit with a headband that complements your look, there is a headband out there for you. We’ve gathered and reviewed some of the best headbands so you can find the best one for your needs.

What to know before you buy a headband

Fashion vs. sport

Fashion: Fashion headbands are all about completing your look. This doesn’t mean they can’t also have a splash of function to help you keep hair out of your face.
Sport: Sport headbands are far more weighted toward function, but they can still serve as a part of a look. They’re typically designed to absorb or wick away moisture and sweat in addition to keeping your hair out of the way. They’re supposed to be breathable, so if you feel hot with your headband on, you may want a different one.

Styles

Wrap: Wraps work by wrapping around your head. They’re made to stretch while being comfortable. Fashion headbands might be wraps, but sports headbands are always wraps.
Alice: These headbands are shaped a bit like a horseshoe; they sit at the top of the head while remaining open at the bottom where the sides end, usually just behind the ear. This variety of headband is named after Lewis Carroll’s “Alice in Wonderland” illustrations.

Materials

Headbands are made from a number of materials. If you’re interested in learning more, you can find a breakdown of common headband materials by visiting the headband buying guide from BestReviews.

What to look for in a quality headband

Colors and prints

Since headbands are largely worn as fashion accessories, they come in practically any color or with any print you can possibly imagine. Solid colors are a bit easier to match to your outfit. Prints can get overwhelming and may be the mark of equally high fashion and expense.

Fit

Headbands are almost always one-size-fits-all by way of stretching. However, there are adjustable headbands for those who need that extra bit of fine-tuning, generally accomplished by using ties.

You’ll probably be wearing your headband for quite awhile. Wraps generally are more comfortable than Alice bands, since the latter sometimes include teeth that can dig into your scalp. If you prefer Alice bands, you can find padded-tipped bands.

How much you can expect to spend on a headband

You can find any number of decent headbands that match your needs below $15 and as low as $1. There are higher-priced headbands from well-known brands available for up to $50 as well.

Headband FAQ

Are headbands appropriate for office wear?

A. This depends on your particular office’s dress code and the type of headband. Generally speaking, headbands don’t fall under formal business attire rules, but casual business attire with the right headband is usually OK.

Does your hairstyle preclude you from using a headband?

A. No. All hairstyles can be had while wearing a headband. That said, some headbands are specifically designed for certain hairstyles and types, such as keeping long hair out of your face.

What’s the best headband to buy?

Top headband

Nike Swoosh Headband

What you need to know: This stylish athletic headband from a popular brand comes in lots of colors and designs.

What you’ll love: It’s machine-washable, so it’s easy to clean after even the sweatiest workouts. It’s stretchy, long-lasting and stays in place easily.

What you should consider: It fits a bit snugly.

Top headband for the money

Scunci Effortless Beauty Stretch Hair Combs

What you need to know: The comb design makes this headband the perfect choice for keeping your hair in place.

What you’ll love: This pack of three headbands is very effective for use with thick and/or curly hair.

What you should consider: Be careful when using this headband, as it can very easily be bent out of shape.

Worth checking out

Under Armour Performance Headband

What you need to know: Under Armour is made for athletes, and this moisture-wicking headband is no exception.

What you’ll love: The polyester and rubber materials are very breathable, and it comes in a few colors to fit your style.

What you should consider: This headband needs to be hand-washed and hung to air-dry.

Prices listed reflect time and date of publication and are subject to change.

Check out our Daily Deals for the best products at the best prices and sign up here to receive the BestReviews weekly newsletter full of shopping inspo and sales.

BestReviews spends thousands of hours researching, analyzing and testing products to recommend the best picks for most consumers. BestReviews and its newspaper partners may earn a commission if you purchase a product through one of our links.

By Ilena Peng, Bloomberg News

Halloween is shaping up to be a test for the chocolate industry, as high cocoa costs threaten to accelerate a consumer shift toward cheaper and trendier sweets such as sour gummies.

Related Articles

A look at consumer prices 9 months into the second Trump administration

Cannabis shop at Joseph’s restaurant in Oak Park Heights approved

Starbucks halts 2-year sales slide, but costly improvements hurt its profits

Meta shares slide after company projects higher expenses for 2026

Google’s corporate parent posts first-ever quarter with $100B in revenue in latest show of its power

For candy makers, Halloween remains crucial — the holiday made up nearly 18% of annual U.S. candy sales last year, second only to Christmas. But chocolate makers have been passing along costlier input prices to consumers, and that’s leaving an opening for rivals — who have already seen a shift toward non-chocolate treats — to grab more market share.

It’s the latest example of demand destruction as the chocolate industry is grappling with high prices amid a precarious supply outlook. While cocoa futures in New York have slumped about 50% from a record set in December, they’re still historically elevated. Chocolate makers are hoping nostalgia during the Halloween season can offset the broader shift away from their products.

“Chocolate is chocolate,” said David Branch, a sector manager at Wells Fargo Agri-Food Institute. “We’re seeing less sales away from holidays and more sales during holidays. People are not buying it all the time, but when they want it, they want it.”

The problem is that, increasingly, they’re wanting it less often. Chocolate candy volumes dropped 6% in the 12 weeks ending Oct. 5, as the average price per pound jumped nearly 14%, according to data from consumer research firm Circana. Meanwhile, sales volumes for non-chocolate Halloween-themed candy — think Haribo sour gummy bats — rose 8.3% during the same period.

“I feel like it’s a weekly game between chocolate and non-chocolate, who’s winning that race,” said Sally Lyons Wyatt, Circana’s chief adviser for consumer goods and foodservice insights. Shoppers are still embracing chocolate despite the price increases, she said, but “it’s a jump ball almost between who’s going to get the shares right now.”

More than half of shoppers said they would prioritize gummy candies in their Halloween spending, and just shy of half said the same for hard candies, NielsenIQ researchers found.

Sugarfina, where gummies make up about 85% of its offerings, is selling out its product lines at a faster pace than last year, including a new tangerine-flavored “super sour” star that was gone by mid-October, according to Chief Executive Officer Scott LaPorta. The profitability of gummies has increased relative to chocolate as cocoa costs have risen, he added.

Haribo, best known for its gummy bears, is also seeing higher demand this year, said Hannah Curlee, the company’s seasonal brand manager. Higher chocolate prices have played a role, but gummies also provide a “seasonal creativity that chocolate can’t always match,” Curlee said.

Chocolate companies are fighting back with more promotions and seasonal offerings. They’re also taking action to keep prices down, using nuts and creams to cut back on costly cocoa ingredients.

Some of the biggest companies are stretching their broader portfolios. At Mondelez International Inc., owner of the Cadbury and Toblerone brands, gummies are the priority in the American market, said Chantal Butler, president of the company’s U.S. confectionery segment. Limited-time offerings like Halloween-themed Sour Patch Kids and Oreos “contribute significantly to the demand we see this time of year,” she added.

Still, the U.S. market in particular “is slower than we’ve seen in quite a while,” Mondelez CEO Dirk Van de Put said on an earnings call Tuesday. The company in response has launched more affordable products after its promotional strategy earlier this year “was not giving us the volume effect that we were hoping for,” he said.

Hershey Co. has new Halloween flavors and packaging in the gummy product lineup it launched last year in partnership with Shaquille O’Neal. That’s alongside ghost-shaped Twizzlers and “trickies” Jolly Rancher gummies with colors that don’t always line up with the expected flavors. Sugar-based sweet sales are stacking on top of chocolate sales, with few consumers explicitly choosing one over the other, according to a Hershey spokesperson.

Guittard Chocolate Co., a California-based chocolate company that sells largely to specialty candymakers, expects Halloween demand to be consistent with past years even as the industry works through cocoa supplies purchased earlier this year at much higher prices.

Some confectioners are coming out with new products to “take some of the pressure off” but consumers also require consistency in their favorite products — even at higher costs, said CEO Gary Guittard.

(With assistance from Kristina Peterson.)

©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Visit bloomberg.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Everyone knows someone — or maybe is that person — who shuts their eyes tight during the scary parts of a horror film and forces their friend to go first in the haunted house.

Others avoid scary movies and haunted houses altogether during Halloween. In a study published in August, a team at the University of Colorado Boulder studied how people’s brains respond to threats and fear.

Brain cells in the interpeduncular nucleus glow green in a mouse’s brain after a shadow appears on the ceiling. (Photo courtesy of CU Boulder)

The researchers found that a group of neurons, called the interpeduncular nucleus or IPN, plays a role in controlling how people respond and adapt to threats. IPN is a brain circuit located in the midbrain near the brain stem. The team discovered that this circuitry is highly activated the first time a person sees a potentially threatening situation, but as soon as individuals realize there is no threat anymore, the IPN shuts down.

“The first time that you see a very scary movie and there is a scene that you are not anticipating, your IPN is going to be very activated,” psychology and neuroscience professor Susanna Molas said. “But if you see this movie, you re-watch the movie over and over across the same week, your IPN is going to start learning that the scary scene is not as scary anymore, and the IPN will be less active across repeated exposures. It’s the same if you go to a haunted house.”

The more frightened a person is, the more the IPN should be engaged, Molas said. It’s also possible that people who love haunted houses and have a high tolerance for scary movies might have a less active IPN. There may also be a cognitive aspect of the person having more rationale when dealing with spooky situations.

“I think that there is an interplay between natural threat responses, but at the same time, more cognitive assessment,” Molas said. “So it’s possible that some people have a different balance of the natural threat response versus thinking whether this situation is actually creating a danger or a harm.”

For the study, the research team exposed mice to a projected shadow periodically over three days that mimics the approach of an aerial predator. The mice’s instinct was to run away. The team used advanced imaging techniques to measure the mice’s brain activity during the threat. Molas said she was surprised by how quickly the mice adapted their behavior and stopped running away from the shadow.

“I was struck to see that by three days, the animals already understood that the threat is not a danger anymore,” Molas said.

Disruptions in the IPN circuit could also play a role in mental health conditions, such as anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. About 19% of adults in the U.S. have an anxiety disorder, according to the National Alliance on Mental Illness. In a normal threat response, the IPN activity decreases once the brain identifies that there’s no real threat. With anxiety, the IPN remains active in anticipation of a negative effect happening in the future.

Related Articles

Halloween is a challenge for chocolatiers as high prices bite

Need a Halloween costume? Check out this list inspired by 2025 pop culture

How Americans will be celebrating Halloween, according to a new AP-NORC poll

In the ‘City of Souls,’ the living don’t fear the dead

Americans’ top fears for 2025, according to a survey

It’s important to understand the causes and some of the brain regions involved with anxiety so scientists can develop better, more specialized treatments for it, Molas said.

“Anxiety is a very prevalent disorder in our society and the neural circuits behind that are still not completely understood,” she said. “There’s been huge progress, but there are some brain areas that, like the IPN, have not been considered for many decades.”

A month after the Minnesota Twins fired manager Rocco Baldelli following the conclusion of a disappointing 92-loss season, the team has finally settled on his replacement: Derek Shelton.

Shelton will become the 15th manager in club history, a source with knowledge of the hiring confirmed. If that name sounds familiar, it’s because Shelton was the Twins’ bench coach for two seasons serving under both Paul Molitor and then Baldelli in 2018-19 before getting hired to manage the Pittsburgh Pirates for five-plus seasons. He was fired by Pittsburgh in May and replaced by bench coach Don Kelly.

President of baseball and business operations Derek Falvey is very familiar with Shelton, 55, who was finalist in the Twins’ last managerial search before Baldelli was hired. Good friends from their time with the Tampa Bay Rays, Shelton, a long-time major league coach, agreed to stay on Baldelli’s staff for his first season at the helm.

Following the 2019 season in which the Twins won 101 games, Shelton was hired by the Pirates, where he remained until the middle of this season. Shelton had a 306-440 (.410) record during his time in Pittsburgh. Working with the low-budget Pirates, Shelton lost 100 games in two consecutive seasons. The Pirates moved on from him after a 12-26 start to last season.

Shelton, who was a minor league catcher in the early 1990s, pivoted to coaching later that decade. He managed a New York Yankees’ affiliate before moving on to work for the then-Cleveland Indians, first in the minor leagues and then the majors.

He first became a major league coach in 2005 in Cleveland, serving as hitting coach through the 2009 season. He then moved to Tampa Bay and held the same role, overlapping on the coaching staff with Baldelli, before serving as the Blue Jays’ quality control coach for a season in 2017. From there, he joined the Twins for two seasons before getting his first chance to manage.

Other reported finalists for the job included James Rowson, who was the Twins’ hitting coach from 2017-19, former Seattle Mariners manager Scott Servais and Ryan Flaherty, the Chicago Cubs’ bench coach.

Related Articles

How can the Twins rebuild the roster they tore down?

Charley Walters: Torii Hunter talked to Twins about managerial job but wasn’t interviewed

North St. Paul’s Louie Varland: Journey to World Series ‘a crazy, fun ride’

Twins offseason: Who will Minnesota have to make decisions on, and when?

Twins: Three potential managerial candidates emerge