Drug-resistant germs will kill millions more people in coming decades, researchers warn

posted in: News | 0

Corinne Purtill | (TNS) Los Angeles Times

Since the dawn of the antibiotic age, opportunistic pathogens have evolved defenses faster than humans can develop drugs to combat them.

At the same time, humans have unwittingly given the bugs an advantage through the overuse of antibiotics, allowing pathogens that survive their exposure to pass on their resistant traits.

Now, a new report finds that unless officials take action to develop new medications, “superbug” infections could kill nearly 2 million people a year in 2050 — a 67.5% increase from the 1.14 million lives lost this way in 2021.

An additional 8.22 million will die of causes related to those infections in 2050, according to a study from the Global Research on Antimicrobial Resistance Project published this week in the Lancet, a medical journal.

GRAM is a joint project of the University of Oxford and the University of Washington School of Medicine’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. The report is the most comprehensive assessment yet of the risk of antimicrobial resistance, or AMR, which the World Health Organization has long identified as one of the top 10 threats to global public health.

It was released in advance of a United Nations General Assembly meeting later this month on drug-resistant pathogens.

“The numbers in the Lancet paper represent a staggering and unacceptable level of human suffering,” said Henry Skinner, chief executive of the AMR Action Fund, a public-private partnership that invests in new antibiotic development, who was not involved in the study. “A continued failure of governments to meet their moral obligations to protect and care for their people, as this paper shows, will doom millions of people to needless deaths.”

Roughly two-thirds of AMR deaths in 2050 will be among people ages 70 years or older, the report estimated. Older people are already at greater risk for drug-resistant infections, which are often acquired in hospitals and care facilities.

Between 1990 and 2021, the report noted, deaths due to AMR increased by more than 80% for people ages 70 and older.

Across all ages, the mortality rate from resistant pathogens is projected to be highest in South Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean.

New antibiotic development has been painfully slow, especially when compared with drugs with better financial incentives for producers. Vital as they are, antibiotics aren’t meant to be taken over the long term like medications for chronic conditions. The most powerful have to be used as rarely as possible, to give bacteria fewer opportunities to develop resistance.

In June, the World Health Organization warned that far too few new antibiotics are currently in the global development pipeline, and the ones that are there fall far short of the innovation required to vanquish the most dangerous microbes.

Of the 32 antibiotics under development against bugs on the WHO’s 2024 bacterial priority pathogen list, the organization noted, only 12 took nontraditional approaches, which is vital for staving off the rise of drug resistance. And of those 12, only four were active against pathogens that WHO identified as the most critical threat to public health.

The scenario laid out in the GRAM report is grim, its authors noted, but not inevitable. Improvements in vaccine distribution and access to clean drinking water and sanitation have helped halve AMR-related deaths among children younger than 5 between 1990 and 2021, even as superbugs proliferated.

With better infection control measures and accelerated drug development, the report found, up to 92 million lives could be saved between 2025 and 2050.

“The data shows that if we take action toward better stewardship practices, improved access in low- and middle-income countries, and new investments to bolster the antibiotic pipeline, then we can save tens of millions of lives,” said James Anderson, chair of the AMR Industry Alliance.

___

©2024 Los Angeles Times. Visit at latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Bismarck diocese sues federal government over abortion, IVF and gender-based rights

posted in: Society | 0

BISMARCK — The Catholic Diocese of Bismarck and the Catholic Benefits Association are suing the federal government over recent regulations that increase protections for transgender workers and those seeking reproductive health care.

The complaint points to parts of the The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, signed into law by President Joe Biden in 2022, that outline federal protections for workers seeking abortions and fertility treatments.

It also mentions the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s new workplace harassment guidelines, which additionally provide transgender workers rights related to pronoun usage, bathroom access and gender-affirming health care.

The Catholic Diocese of Bismarck is a member of the Catholic Benefits Association. Together, the entities contend the new mandates “ran roughshod” over their rights as religious employers by ruling some of the church’s teachings — which reject abortion, in vitro fertilization and “transgender ideology” — as unlawful workplace conduct.

“Betrayal” is how the complaint describes the rule’s adoption after pro-life groups supported the PWFA allegedly before it mentioned abortion.

“The EEOC’s rulemaking has betrayed the firm understanding that the PWFA exists to protect pregnant women, postpartum mothers, and their babies — not force religious employers to provide material support for and engage in speech supportive of abortions or immoral fertility treatments,” the complaint states.

It is emphasized that the diocese “does not and will not” accommodate employees who obtain or direct abortion, ”immoral fertility treatment” or transgender affirmation. Such affirmations include the usage of “false pronouns” and the allowance of “improper access to single sex spaces” — like bathrooms.

It argues that the rule puts religious employers at a crossroads of having to either comply with the standards and cast aside their beliefs, or to uphold their ideals and fall vulnerable to penalties.

The Catholic Diocese of Bismarck and Catholic Benefits Association further argue the new interpretations of sex-based discrimination do not protect their religious freedoms and are contradictory to the original purpose of Title VII outlined in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlaws workplace discrimination.

Based on court documents, the EEOC’s defense aligns with its responses to related concerns raised in a fall 2023 public comment period.

The commission said the idea that discussions of religious perspectives related to aforementioned topics would be considered unlawful harassment is a false interpretation. It states that such conduct would be penalized only if it creates a “hostile work environment,” which the commission would interpret on a case-by-case basis.

It also said religious exemptions are still allowed in accordance with Title VII, and as such, the EEOC would evaluate religious exemption requests on a case-by-case basis as well.

In a memorandum, EEOC Chair Charlotte Burrows wrote that the motion to suspend the rules, set forth by the Catholic Diocese of Bismarck and Catholic Benefits Association, should be denied. Burrows said the entities lack standing because they cannot demonstrate harm or confusion resulting from the rules, nor can they prove that the EEOC’s discretionary approach is unlawful.

Attorneys representing the Catholic Diocese of Bismarck and the Catholic Benefits Association have asked U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Traynor to temporarily suspend enforcement of the regulations while the lawsuit takes place.

Related Articles

News |


‘She should be alive today’ — Harris spotlights woman’s death to blast abortion bans and Trump

News |


Now a Roe advocate, woman raped by stepfather as a child tells her story in Harris campaign ad

News |


In ‘You Must Stand Up,’ Amanda Becker captures the scramble after Dobbs

News |


More women had their tubes tied after Roe v. Wade was overturned

News |


Kamala Harris gives abortion rights advocates the debate answer they’ve longed for in Philadelphia

Department of Justice sues Visa, alleges the card issuer monopolizes debit card markets

posted in: News | 0

By MAE ANDERSON

NEW YORK (AP) — The U.S. Justice Department has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Visa, alleging that the financial services behemoth uses its size and dominance to stifle competition in the debit card market, costing consumers and businesses billions of dollars.

The complaint filed Tuesday says Visa penalizes merchants and banks who don’t use Visa’s own payment processing technology to process debit transactions, even though alternatives exist. Visa earns an incremental fee from every transaction processed on its network.

According to the DOJ’s complaint, 60% of debit transactions in the United States run on Visa’s debit network, allowing it to charge over $7 billion in fees each year for processing those transactions.

“We allege that Visa has unlawfully amassed the power to extract fees that far exceed what it could charge in a competitive market,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland in a statement. “Merchants and banks pass along those costs to consumers, either by raising prices or reducing quality or service. As a result, Visa’s unlawful conduct affects not just the price of one thing – but the price of nearly everything.”

The Biden administration has aggressively gone after U.S. companies that it says act like middlemen, such as Ticketmaster parent Live Nation and the real estate software company RealPage, accusing them of burdening Americans with nonsensical fees and anticompetitive behavior. The administration has also brought charges of monopolistic behavior against technology giants such as Apple and Google.

According to the DOJ complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Visa leverages the vast number of transactions on its network to impose volume commitments on merchants and their banks, as well as on financial institutions that issue debit cards. That makes it difficult for merchants to use alternatives, such as lower-cost or smaller payment processors, instead of Visa’s payment processing technology, without incurring what DOJ described as “disloyalty penalties” from Visa.

The DOJ said Visa also stifled competition by paying to enter into partnership agreements with potential competitors.

In 2020, the DOJ sued to block the company’s $5.3 billion purchase of financial technology startup Plaid, calling it a monopolistic takeover of a potential competitor to Visa’s ubiquitous payments network. That acquisition was eventually later called off.

Visa previously disclosed the Justice Department was investigating the company in 2021, saying in a regulatory filing it was cooperating with a DOJ investigation into its debit practices.

Since the pandemic, more consumers globally have been shopping online for goods and services, which has translated into more revenue for Visa in the form of fees. Even traditionally cash-heavy businesses like bars, barbers and coffee shops have started accepting credit or debit cards as a form of payment, often via smartphones.

KBW analyst Sanjay Sahrani said in a note to investors that he estimates that U.S. debit revenue is likely at most about 10% of Visa revenue.

“Some subset of that may be lost if there is a financial impact,” he said. Visa’s “U.S. consumer payments business is the slowest growing piece of the aggregate business, and to the extent its contribution is affected, it is likely to have a very limited impact on revenue growth.”

He added the lawsuit could stretch out for years if it isn’t settled and goes to trial.

Visa processed $3.325 trillion in transactions on its network during the quarter ended June 30, up 7.4% from a year earlier. U.S. payments grew by 5.1%, which is faster than U.S. economic growth.

Visa, based in San Francisco, did not immediately have a comment. Visa shares fell $13.53, or 4.7%, to $275.10 in afternoon trading.

The best national parks for seeing spectacular fall foliage this year

posted in: Adventure | 0

By Laurie Baratti, TravelPulse

As autumn starts to settle over the U.S., plenty of leaf-peepers are eagerly awaiting the annual show of Mother Nature’s splendor — that is, leaves turning to brilliant shades of yellow, orange and red. But, understanding precisely where and when this phenomenon will reach its peak vibrancy in various areas of the country takes more than just guesswork.

For those keen to witness the trees’ colorful transformation, national parks are always popular because where better to view the changing of the seasons than places where forests are preserved and protected? However, some types of trees have more potential for picturesque pigmentation than others, just as some parks provide better access to areas where the kaleidoscopic effect is on display.

Related Articles

Travel |


Forget Paris — here are 5 lesser-known romantic destinations around the world

Travel |


Tips to make your U.S. road trip less stressful

Travel |


Family travel 5: Now is the time to travel with toddlers, preschoolers

Travel |


Why cruise demand is even bigger now than pre-pandemic

Travel |


A siblings-only trip offers a way to expand adult relationships, but planning is key

Which is why onX, which offers digital maps and other resources for outdoor enthusiasts via a suite of apps, recently analyzed its data to determine which national parks will probably prove the best for brilliant fall foliage this year.

According to Frommer’s, the company applied its Hunt app’s “Deciduous Tree Layer” filter to pinpoint parks with the highest density of trees renowned for their vivid autumn hues, including oaks, maples, hickory and birches. By combining this data with trail mileage information, its analysts curated a list of nine parks where visitors stand the best chance of seeing vast amounts of spectacular foliage this fall.

And, in terms of getting the trip timing right, data compilers also leaned on satellite imagery from 2023 to determine when each of these parks attained peak color last year, providing valuable insights on how to plan for your autumn outings this year. Of course, the radiance of autumn leafage can be affected by another crucial factor: weather. So, you may want to take into account meteorologists’ forecasts about where fall foliage is likely to be at its best.

Here’s a look at the top national parks for fall foliage, according to onX:

1. Great Smoky Mountains National Park, North Carolina and Tennessee

Trail miles: 1,025

Tree types: oak, maple, beech, hickory, birch

2023 peak fall dates: October 16–30

2. Shenandoah National Park, Virginia

A view out over the piedmont from Skyline Drive on a fall day in the Shenandoah National Park in Virginia, November 5, 2016. (KAREN BLEIER/AFP via Getty Images)

Trail miles: 664

Tree types: oak, maple, birch, ash

2023 peak fall dates: October 16–30

3. Cuyahoga Valley National Park, Ohio

Trail miles: 311

Tree types: hickory, maple, beech, aspen

2023 peak fall dates: October 16–30

4. Acadia National Park, Maine

Trail miles: 186

Tree types: oak, maple, birch, aspen

2023 peak fall dates: October 16–30

5. Isle Royale National Park, Michigan

Trail miles: 186

Tree types: aspen, birch, beech, elm, ash, cottonwood, oak

2023 peak fall dates: October 2–30

6. Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota

Trail miles: 157

Tree types: aspen, birch, maple

2023 peak fall dates: October 16–30

7. Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky

Trail miles: 76

Tree types: oak, ash

2023 peak fall dates: October 16–30

8. New River Gorge National Park, West Virginia

Trail miles: 73

Tree types: oak

2023 peak fall dates: October 16–November 13

9. Indiana Dunes National Park, Indiana

Trail miles: 13

Tree types: oak, ash, maple, beech

2023 peak fall dates: October 16–30

©2024 Northstar Travel Media, LLC. Visit at travelpulse.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.