By NICOLE WINFIELD

VATICAN CITY (AP) — As the Vatican switches gears from saying goodbye to Pope Francis to electing his successor, the status of a once-powerful Italian cardinal and whether he can vote in the May 7 conclave have been a constant question and source of gossip.

Related Articles

A pregnant woman in Gaza’s ruins fears for her baby under Israel’s blockade

Trump’s threats gave Europe the political will to spend more on defense. But challenges are ahead

China shrugs off threat of US tariffs to economy, says it has tools to protect jobs

The Vietnam War ended 50 years ago, but the battle with Agent Orange continues

5-year-old girl, her parents among those dead in vehicle ramming in Vancouver

Cardinal Angelo Becciu was once an influential Vatican chief of staff who was a leading papal contender himself. But he fell from grace in 2020 when Francis forced him to resign his job as head of the Vatican’s saint-making office and his rights as a cardinal because of allegations of financial misconduct.

Becciu denied wrongdoing but was put on trial in the Vatican criminal court and convicted of finance-related charges in December 2023. He is appealing the conviction and 5 1/2-year prison sentence and has participated in the pre-conclave meetings, but there is a lingering question about whether he can actually vote in the conclave.

On Monday, cardinals entering the pre-conclave discussions were inundated with questions by journalists about whether Becciu would be allowed in the Sistine Chapel or not. No decision was taken, but Italian media reported late Monday that Becciu told his fellow cardinals he would withdraw his participation.

Becciu rose to prominence and power under conservative Pope Benedict XVI and is very much affiliated with the conservative Vatican old guard. While he initially became a close adviser to Pope Francis, Becciu’s subsequent downfall at the hands of Francis might suggest he would vote for someone keen to undo some of Francis’ reforms.

At 76, Becciu is under the age limit of 80 and technically eligible to vote, but the Vatican’s official statistics list him as a “non-elector.” When he was ousted in 2020, Becciu told a hastily arranged news conference that he would not be voting in any future conclave. But recently he has insisted he is entitled to vote and canon lawyers have been poring over the Vatican document regulating the conclave to determine if he’s right.

The document, known by its Latin name Universi Dominici Gregis, lays out the criteria for electors, making clear that all under-80 cardinals have the right to elect the pope, except those who have been “canonically deposed or who with the consent of the Roman Pontiff have renounced the cardinalate.” It adds that after a pope has died, “the College of Cardinals cannot readmit or rehabilitate them.”

There has never been any clarity on what exactly Becciu renounced or how: The one-line statement issued by the Vatican press office on Sept. 24, 2020 said merely that Francis had accepted Becciu’s resignation as prefect of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints “and his rights connected to the cardinalate.” There is no indication he has been sanctioned canonically.

After he forced Becciu’s resignation, Francis visited Becciu on occasion and allowed him to participate in the life of the Vatican. But Francis also changed Vatican law to allow the city state’s criminal tribunal to prosecute him.

Italian daily Domani reported last week that during the initial pre-conclave discussions, Becciu was presented with two letters signed by Francis before he died indicating he should not participate in the conclave. But it wasn’t clear what weight those letters have or whether the College of Cardinals can override Francis’ wishes.

The issue is not minor, since Becciu’s participation or lack thereof could invalidate the election.

Asked again Monday if Becciu would participate in the conclave, Vatican spokesman Matteo Bruni demurred. He said the issue was discussed but that there was “no resolution.”

Questions, meanwhile, have continued to swirl about the integrity of the trial that convicted Becciu and eight others. During the proceedings, the court heard that Francis intervened on several occasions on behalf of the prosecutors and that the prosecution’s prime witness against Becciu was coached and manipulated by outsiders.

The appeal is scheduled to begin in September.

Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.

It’s hard to believe it’s been 50 years since I left Vietnam — 50 springs, 50 winters, each one carrying me further from the life I once knew. I still remember the last moments like a photograph that never fades: the rush, the fear, the silence on the plane as we left everything behind. I was younger then, with little more than the clothes on my back and the weight of memory in my heart  — alongside my brother Thomas with ony $10 in my pocket to the destination, Minnesota.

Settling in Minnesota was not easy. The language was foreign, the winters colder than I ever imagined, and the distance — cultural, emotional, spiritual — was something no plane could bridge. But we made a life here. I worked, raised children, and built something out of the unknown. Still, I always carried Vietnam with me — in the food I cooked, the stories I told, the quiet moments when the past came rushing in.

Now, looking back after five decades, I see a Vietnam that is almost unrecognizable. Skyscrapers rise where there were once rice fields. The country has grown, prospered, transformed into a modern economy no longer marked by war or poverty. I see photos of busy cities, young people speaking fluent English, startups and smartphones. It’s no longer the “third world country” it once was.

And yet, my feelings are mixed.

Part of me swells with pride. Vietnam has endured, overcome, and stood tall on the world stage. But another part aches. I wonder what my life would have been had I stayed — what kind of person I would be in that new Vietnam. Would I belong there now? Or has time made me a stranger to the country of my birth?

I am grateful for the life I have made in America, but I am also haunted by the Vietnam I lost — and astonished by the one that rose in its place. As an expat, I live between two homes: one I helped build, and one I can only visit in dreams and headlines.

Time has a strange way of folding in on itself. One moment I am on the tennis court, racket in hand, chasing a ball like it’s the only thing that matters. Next, I’m standing in front of a classroom, guiding students through lessons that reach beyond textbooks — lessons about resilience, respect and the value of effort. Tennis keeps my body moving; teaching keeps my spirit alive. Both have been with me these past 40 years, anchoring me in this chapter of life.

It’s hard to describe the feeling of seeing your impact ripple through generations. A former student brings their son to stop by to my class and says, “You taught me — now you’ll teach my son.” That moment stays with me. I realize my work matters. I have helped build something — confidence, hope, a belief in possibility. Teaching has been more than a job; it’s been a calling. Nearly five decades now, and each lesson is still fresh with purpose.

But before any of this — before tennis, before chalkboards and Zoom calls — I was just a boy. A boy growing up near a U.S. military base, curious and wide-eyed, watching the strange, loud world of American soldiers and jeeps and radios. I remember sneaking near the fences, speaking broken English, and sometimes being handed a candy bar, a can of C-ration ham and beans, even whiskey they didn’t want. I knew all the brands of cigarettes — from Camel to Winston. I knew the brand names of whiskeys. That’s where it started — my fascination with America, with its people, with the rhythm of its language and the promise of something different.

That life feels like a distant film reel now, playing in black and white. But I carry it all with me — the noise of the base, the lessons of the classroom, the crisp thwack of a well-hit serve. These moments, scattered across decades and continents, make up the mosaic of who I am.

I am not only a refugee or a teacher, not only an athlete or a father. I am all of these at once — shaped by war, rooted in education, and still running across the court — chasing that next point, the next set, the next match, and that next life to touch.

Fifty years. So much has changed. And yet, in my heart, the old and the new Vietnam live side by side. I am grateful for the family and friends who support me in this journey and for a good life here in America.

Related Articles

Real World Economics: The buck stops Trump, or so it appears

Skywatch: Dippers and bears flying high

Your Money: Checklist — spring clean your finances

Working Strategies: The Power of Yes in job search

Joe Soucheray: Was politics a factor in Mary Moriarty’s charity to Tesla vandal?

Francois Nguyen escaped Saigon on April 29, 1975, during the chaos leading up to the fall of the city the next day. He had witnessed the devastating Vietnam War firsthand before fleeing the country. At 19 years old, he came to the United States, sponsored by Catholic Charities, and settled in St. Paul. Today, he teaches math and statistics at Saint Paul College. He is married and has four children. In his free time, he enjoys playing tennis.

Lakers coach J.J. Redick was upset after Game 4 that no foul was called when Luka Doncic went down to the floor with 35 seconds to play in Minnesota’s 116-113 victory.

“Luka got tripped,” Redick said. “That was a blatant trip.”

The NBA confirmed the coach’s assertion in its last-two minute report released Monday, noting, “McDaniels steps forward into Doncic’s path, initiating illegal foot contact that causes him to lose his balance.”

Minnesota led by one at the time. Had a foul been called, Doncic would’ve gone to the line for two free throws. Instead, the Lakers had to call a timeout to salvage possession, and Minnesota stole the ball on the ensuing inbounds play.

Related Articles

How Anthony Edwards shot the Timberwolves back into Game 4, then helped win it

Dane Mizutani: Was that Anthony Edwards taking the torch from LeBron James?

Another comeback for the Timberwolves, this time to go up 3-1 on the Lakers

Timberwolves: 3 minutes that defined Minnesota’s Game 3 victory

Meet the tattoo artists who have created a movement among Timberwolves fans

The Timberwolves trailed by 10 at the start of the fourth quarter of Game 4 on Sunday at Target Center. It’s human nature at that point for a star player to feel as though he needs to start forcing the issue to shoot his team back into the game.

And that’s exactly what Anthony Edwards did to help send Minnesota back to Los Angeles with a 3-1 series lead in their first-round playoff series against the Lakers.

For all the justified talk about how Edwards made the right plays in the final few minutes to secure Sunday’s victory, he got Minnesota back into the game thanks to old habits that delivered a spurt of sensational results.

Just 13 seconds into the fourth quarter, Edwards rose up from 28 feet to bury a lengthy triple.

The next time down, again down 10 points, he stopped and popped over a pair of Lakers defenders to hit another three. There were no passes delivered past half court on that Timberwolves possession. The same was true the next time down, when Edwards dribbled at the top of the floor before wading his way into the paint and missing a contested attempt.

Anthony Edwards #5 of the Minnesota Timberwolves celebrates the win against the Los Angeles Lakers after Game Four of the First Round of the 2025 NBA Playoffs at Target Center on April 27, 2025 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Timberwolves defeated the Lakers 116-113 to take a 3-1 series lead. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by David Berding/Getty Images)

Minnesota went away from Edwards to start the next possession. But after Julius Randle drew a foul, Edwards got the ball back on the ensuing out-of-bounds play. He dribbled for 13 seconds before tossing a grenade to Donte DiVincenzo at the end of the shot clock.

With just more than eight minutes to play and the Wolves down nine, Edwards again attacked from the top of the floor, this time hitting the shot he found in the middle of the paint. The next time down he dribbled the ball up the floor, took a couple of dribbles at Lakers guard Austin Reaves, then stepped back to bury a triple to bring Minnesota within four with still more than seven minutes to play.

Those four-plus minutes featured the same hero ball that at times sank the Wolves throughout the season. But, man, were they ever swimming this time.

Until the well ran dry. Edwards attempted another triple over a double team that misfired with five and a half minutes to play. Minnesota scored just seven points over a six-minute span in the frame.

Timberwolves coach Chris Finch said Edwards has grown “leaps and bounds” when it comes to finding others in late-game situations and not forcing the issue. But …

“I actually thought there were times we could’ve found each other a little bit better,” Finch said.

After Naz Reid scored five straight points, Edwards again came down the floor, isolated up top and took a tough triple try that hit off the iron. But a foul was called on Luka Doncic for hitting Edwards’ wrist, and he buried all three free throws.

The next time down, with just under three minutes to go and the Wolves up by one, Edwards dribbled down the floor, ran toward the baseline and took a tough, 20-foot stepback jumper just 10 seconds into the shot clock that hit off the front iron. Now Finch was upset.

As soon as the shot missed, the coach turned toward his bench, threw his arms up and yelled, “Why?”

Hero ball had served Minnesota well to get back into the game, just as it had in many memorable stretches in the past. But once the hot hand cools, you have to shift back to better basketball. It’s awesome to be a team’s home-run hitter, but sometimes you have to hit for contact.

Edwards hasn’t always grasped that concept. He did Sunday. That mid-range jumper was his last field goal attempt of the game.

The next time down the floor, Edwards pressed the blitzing defense and beat the two defenders to the baseline to draw a third Lakers body. Just as was the case in Game 3, when he hit Reid for an open triple, Edwards knew one of his teammates would be open on the wing.

This time, it was Donte DiVincenzo, who attacked Reaves’ closeout and got to the bucket for an and-1 layup. Two trips later, the Lakers again blitzed Edwards, who made the simple pass to a nearby Reid. Reid got into the lane and dumped it off to Jaden McDaniels, who completed an easy and-1 flush to put Minnesota on top for good.

“He just took over in the second half. Had it going,” Finch said. “Super aggressive, and I think there was only one really bad shot that he took in the last few minutes. But other than that, I thought he did a great job.”

While “Hero Ball” carries a negative connotation, Minnesota doesn’t want to completely discourage Edwards. He has to have the leash to deliver the special runs like he had at the beginning of the fourth quarter to make a comeback possible. However, those runs often don’t win you games, but rather put you in a position to do so by executing down the stretch.

Edwards is beginning to understand how to fill both roles.

“You could see it in his eyes that he was going to make the play. He was going to bring us home,” Finch said. “Now he’s hitting way more doubles and singles, and those plays are timely. He’s still being aggressive for himself, committing the defense. I think he has an understanding where the defense is going to be when he starts and when he ends his play.”

The results are showing.

“He’s been real meticulous with what he’s doing late in the games. He’s taking his time, really sizing up the defense, understanding where guys are going to be on the court, taking what’s there and available,” Wolves guard Mike Conley said. “He had the three going there for a little bit, then he started getting downhill, making plays. So just happy with him being able to seek out different matchups and take advantage.”

Anthony Edwards #5 of the Minnesota Timberwolves celebrates his basket against the Los Angeles Lakers in the fourth quarter of Game Three of the First Round of the 2025 NBA Playoffs at Target Center on April 25, 2025 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Timberwolves defeated the Lakers 116-104 to take a 2-1 series lead. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by David Berding/Getty Images)

Related Articles

Dane Mizutani: Was that Anthony Edwards taking the torch from LeBron James?

Another comeback for the Timberwolves, this time to go up 3-1 on the Lakers

Timberwolves: 3 minutes that defined Minnesota’s Game 3 victory

Meet the tattoo artists who have created a movement among Timberwolves fans

5 takeaways from Timberwolves all-important Game 3 win over Lakers