When they don’t recognize you anymore

posted in: All news | 0

By Paula Span, KFF Health News

It happened more than a decade ago, but the moment remains with her.

Related Articles


FDA will allow three new color additives made from minerals, algae and flower petals


Despite historic indictment, doctors will keep mailing abortion pills across state lines


Cancer before age 50 is increasing. A new study looks at which types


US infant mortality dropped in 2024. Experts partly credit RSV shots


‘Landmark study’ led by UNLV shows new path to treat, prevent autism

Sara Stewart was talking at the dining room table with her mother, Barbara Cole, 86 at the time, in Bar Harbor, Maine. Stewart, then 59, a lawyer, was making one of her extended visits from out of state.

Two or three years earlier, Cole had begun showing troubling signs of dementia, probably from a series of small strokes. “I didn’t want to yank her out of her home,” Stewart said.

So with a squadron of helpers — a housekeeper, regular family visitors, a watchful neighbor, and a meal delivery service — Cole remained in the house she and her late husband had built 30-odd years earlier.

She was managing, and she usually seemed cheerful and chatty. But this conversation in 2014 took a different turn.

“She said to me: ‘Now, where is it we know each other from? Was it from school?’” her daughter and firstborn recalled. “I felt like I’d been kicked.”

Stewart remembers thinking, “In the natural course of things, you were supposed to die before me. But you were never supposed to forget who I am.” Later, alone, she wept.

People with advancing dementia do regularly fail to recognize beloved spouses, partners, children, and siblings. By the time Stewart and her youngest brother moved Cole into a memory-care facility a year later, she had almost completely lost the ability to remember their names or their relationship to her.

“It’s pretty universal at the later stages” of the disease, said Alison Lynn, director of social work at the Penn Memory Center, who has led support groups for dementia caregivers for a decade.

She has heard many variations of this account, a moment described with grief, anger, frustration, relief, or some combination thereof.

These caregivers “see a lot of losses, reverse milestones, and this is one of those benchmarks, a fundamental shift” in a close relationship, she said. “It can throw people into an existential crisis.”

It’s hard to determine what people with dementia — a category that includes Alzheimer’s disease and many other cognitive disorders — know or feel. “We don’t have a way of asking the person or looking at an MRI,” Lynn noted. “It’s all deductive.”

But researchers are starting to investigate how family members respond when a loved one no longer appears to know them. A qualitative study recently published in the journal Dementia analyzed in-depth interviews with adult children caring for mothers with dementia who, at least once, did not recognize them.

“It’s very destabilizing,” said Kristie Wood, a clinical research psychologist at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and co-author of the study. “Recognition affirms identity, and when it’s gone, people feel like they’ve lost part of themselves.”

Although they understood that nonrecognition was not rejection but a symptom of their mothers’ disease, she added, some adult children nevertheless blamed themselves.

“They questioned their role. ‘Was I not important enough to remember?’” Wood said. They might withdraw or visit less often.

Pauline Boss, the family therapist who developed the theory of “ambiguous loss” decades ago, points out that it can involve physical absence — as when a soldier is missing in action — or psychological absence, including nonrecognition because of dementia.

Society has no way to acknowledge the transition when “a person is physically present but psychologically absent,” Boss said. There is “no death certificate, no ritual where friends and neighbors come sit with you and comfort you.”

“People feel guilty if they grieve for someone who’s still alive,” she continued. “But while it’s not the same as a verified death, it is a real loss and it just keeps coming.”

Nonrecognition takes different forms. Some relatives report that while a loved one with dementia can no longer retrieve a name or an exact relationship, they still seem happy to see them.

“She stopped knowing who I was in the narrative sense, that I was her daughter Janet,” Janet Keller, 69, an actress in Port Townsend, Washington, said in an email about her late mother, diagnosed with Alzheimer’s. “But she always knew that I was someone she liked and wanted to laugh with and hold hands with.”

It comforts caregivers to still feel a sense of connection. But one of the respondents in the Dementia study reported that her mother felt like a stranger and that the relationship no longer provided any emotional reward.

“I might as well be visiting the mailman,” she told the interviewer.

Larry Levine, 67, a retired health care administrator in Rockville, Maryland, watched his husband’s ability to recognize him shift unpredictably.

He and Arthur Windreich, a couple for 43 years, had married when Washington, D.C., legalized same-sex marriage in 2010. The following year, Windreich received a diagnosis of early-onset Alzheimer’s.

Levine became his caregiver until his death at 70, in late 2023.

“His condition sort of zigzagged,” Levine said. Windreich had moved into a memory-care unit. “One day, he’d call me ‘the nice man who comes to visit’,” Levine said. “The next day he’d call me by name.”

Even in his final years when, like many dementia patients, Windreich became largely nonverbal, “there was some acknowledgment,” his husband said. “Sometimes you could see it in his eyes, this sparkle instead of the blank expression he usually wore.”

At other times, however, “there was no affect at all.” Levine often left the facility in tears.

He sought help from his therapist and his sisters, and recently joined a support group for LGBTQ+ dementia caregivers even though his husband has died. Support groups, in person or online, “are medicine for the caregiver,” Boss said. “It’s important not to stay isolated.”

Lynn encourages participants in her groups to also find personal rituals to mark the loss of recognition and other reverse milestones. “Maybe they light a candle. Maybe they say a prayer,” she said.

Someone who would sit shiva, part of the Jewish mourning ritual, might gather a small group of friends or family to reminisce and share stories, even though the loved one with dementia hasn’t died.

“To have someone else participate can be very validating,” Lynn said. “It says, ‘I see the pain you’re going through.’”

Once in a while, the fog of dementia seems to lift briefly.

Researchers at Penn and elsewhere have pointed to a startling phenomenon called “paradoxical lucidity.” Someone with severe dementia, after being noncommunicative for months or years, suddenly regains alertness and may come up with a name, say a few appropriate words, crack a joke, make eye contact, or sing along with a radio.

Though common, these episodes generally last only seconds and don’t mark a real change in the person’s decline. Efforts to recreate the experiences tend to fail.

“It’s a blip,” Lynn said. But caregivers often respond with shock and joy; some interpret the episode as evidence that despite deepening dementia, they are not truly forgotten.

Stewart encountered such a blip a few months before her mother died. She was in her mother’s apartment when a nurse asked her to come down the hall.

“As I left the room, my mother called out my name,” she said. Though Cole usually seemed pleased to see her, “she hadn’t used my name for as long as I could remember.”

It didn’t happen again, but that didn’t matter. “It was wonderful,” Stewart said.

The New Old Age is produced through a partnership with The New York Times.

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

©2025 KFF Health News. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Hurricane season is coming. Here’s what forecasters predict for the East Coast

posted in: All news | 0

Hurricane forecasters are, once again, predicting a busier-than-average hurricane season for the East Coast in 2025.

AccuWeather forecasts are predicting a “dynamic” 2025 season, said lead forecaster Alex DaSilva. Forecasters currently think 13 to 18 named storms could impact the East Coast. Of those, 7 to 10 could become hurricanes and a handful become major storms with sustained wind speeds reaching 111 mph or greater. Using analog years, or years with similar environmental conditions, the team can create a prediction of how this year may go.

“These are the areas that we’re concerned with: right around the northern Gulf Coast, the Big Bend of Florida, the west coast of Florida, and then getting up into the Carolinas as well, especially the Outer Banks of North Carolina,” DaSilva said. “This could mean that we could be seeing a lot of recurving systems that clip the North Carolina coastline or South Carolina coastline before continuing to move to the north and to the east.”

Hurricane season begins June 1 and runs through November.

Researchers at Colorado State University have released their forecast for the season, predicting 17 named storms. Of the named storms, researchers forecast nine to become hurricanes, and four could reach “major” hurricane strength, which is a Category 3 or higher. The team predicts 2025 hurricane activity will be about 125% of the average season from 1991 to 2020. About half the storms could make landfall in the United States, and forecasters said there is a 26% chance that one will make landfall on the East Coast.

Last year, the CSU team predicted 2024 hurricane activity would be about 170% of the average season from 1991-2020, but by the end of the season, the actual percentage was about 130%. By comparison, 2023’s hurricane activity was about 120% of the average season.

The Atlantic basin finished the 2024 season with 18 named storms, 11 hurricanes and five intensified to major hurricanes. Five hurricanes made landfall in the continental U.S., with two storms making landfall as major hurricanes.

“So far, the 2025 hurricane season is exhibiting characteristics similar to 1996, 1999, 2006, 2008, 2011 and 2017,” said Phil Klotzbach, a senior research scientist in the Department of Atmospheric Science at CSU and lead author of the report.

The Weather Company, which runs The Weather Channel, partnered with the forecast team at Atmospheric G2 for its predictions. Currently, they predict 19 storms to form in 2025, nine of which will become hurricanes and four of which will reach Category 3 status or stronger.

While still above average, predictions for 2025 are less severe than conditions going into the 2024 hurricane season. Like in years past, warm water (which acts as fuel for tropical storms) will be a major factor for storm development.

“It’s likely going to be much of the same thing — above-average temperatures,” DaSilva said. “2024 was basically the warmest year we had on record for the Atlantic basin, and this year’s tracking a little bit below that right now. It’s still likely to be a top five, if not a top three, year for sea-surface temperatures across the Atlantic, and that can yield rapid intensification.”

La Nina could also be on the way out, DaSilva said. La Nina is a climate pattern that typically cools sea-surface temperatures along the equator and dampens wind shear in the Atlantic Ocean and was cited as a concern ahead of the season last year. Wind shear is the enemy of tropical systems, so it typically allows storms to form and stay strong. Toward the later part of this season, DaSilva said, there’s evidence to suggest that the end of the season could lean toward a neutral weather pattern. A warmer-than-normal tropical Atlantic combined with neutral conditions typically provide a more conducive environment for hurricane formation and intensification.

This week marks Hurricane Preparedness Week, and forecasters at the National Weather Service are encouraging the public to get ahead of prepping for potential storms. This includes identifying emergency evacuation routes, assembling disaster supplies and preparing their homes before the season begins.

Hurricane preparation tips

Have a go bag ready to take things with you if you need to leave in a hurry.
Trim trees around your home before a storm to prevent damage from broken branches.
Have enough non-perishable food, water and medicine to last each person in your family a minimum of three days.
Have extra cash, a battery-powered radio and flashlights. You may need a portable crank or solar-powered USB charger for cell phones.
Write down a hurricane plan and share it with your family. Determine family meeting places, including an out-of-town location in case of evacuation.

Eliza Noe, eliza.noe@virginiamedia.com

FedEx board member Steiner is picked to be next USPS postmaster general amid talk of privatization

posted in: All news | 0

By SUSAN HAIGH

David Steiner, a former CEO of the nation’s largest waste management company who currently serves on the FedEx board of directors, is poised to take over control of the U.S. Postal Service, becoming the nation’s 76th postmaster general.

Related Articles


Trump revives, then discards, then revives again the idea of taxing the rich in big GOP bill


Stockholm City Council rejects US Embassy demands to end DEI programming


Fishermen battling with changing oceans chart new course after Trump’s push to deregulate


Rights groups sue to free Venezuelans deported from the US and held in El Salvador


Freed Palestinian student accuses Columbia University of inciting violence

The announcement of Steiner’s appointment, which heightened concerns from postal unions over possible efforts to privatize the USPS, was made Friday by Amber McReynolds, chairperson of the USPS’ Board of Governors, during a meeting of the independent group that oversees the service.

“We anticipate that Mr. Steiner will join the organization in July, assuming his successful completion of the ethics and security clearance processes that are currently underway,” McReynolds said.

Friday’s announcement by the the Board of Governors comes as President Donald Trump and his adviser Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency have raised the idea of privatizing the nearly 250-year-old Postal Service, which has faced financial challenges amid a changing mail mix and other issues.

The choice of Steiner has been seen by the postal unions as a harbinger for possible privatization of some or all of the venerable quasi-public institution, which is largely self-funded and has a mission to serve every address in the country — nearly 167 million residences, businesses and post office boxes.

Postal unions have held protests throughout the country over potential privatization, job cuts and possibly ending the universal service obligation.

Brian L. Renfroe, president of the National Association of Letter Carriers, said Steiner is not just any executive from the private sector but someone who sits on the board of one of the Postal Service’s top competitors.

“His selection isn’t just a conflict of interest — it’s an aggressive step toward handing America’s mail system over to corporate interests,” Renfroe said in a statement. “Private shippers have been waiting to get USPS out of parcel delivery for years. Steiner’s selection is an open invitation to do just that.”

Renfroe’s union represents 205,000 active city letter carriers and around 90,000 retirees.

Mark Dimondstein, president of the American Postal Workers Union, which represents more than 220,000 USPS employees and retirees, likened the appointment of Steiner to a fox guarding a hen house.

“FedEx has a very different agenda than the public postal service. And they’re a major competitor of the United States Postal Service,” he said. “I’m not talking about any attributes of an individual, but to me, that’s the last type of person you will put in charge of the public institution as the anchor of the mailing package industry in the country.”

Steiner, who will leave the FedEx board, said in a written statement that he admires the public service mission of the USPS and called it “an incredible honor to be asked to lead the world’s greatest postal organization.”

“I believe strongly in maintaining its role as an independent establishment of the executive branch,” said Steiner, who served as CEO of Waste Management Inc. from 2004 through October 2016.

In a written statement, McReynolds called Steiner “the right person to lead the Postal Service at this time to ensure this magnificent and historic organization thrives into the future.”

“Dave is a highly regarded leader and executive with tremendous vision, experience and skill that can be applied to the long-term mission and business needs of the Postal Service,” she added. “Our Board looks forward to working with Dave as he takes on the core mandates of providing universal and excellent service for the American public and doing so in a financially sustainable manner.”

The Postal Service is in the midst of a 10-year modernization and cost-cutting plan that began in 2021 under Postmaster Louis DeJoy, who resigned in March. The plan is an attempt to stop losses at the agency, which has a budget of about $78 billion a year and is mostly self-funded, including through stamps and packages.

Known as “Deliver for America,” the initiative has received markedly mixed reviews. While postal officials contend it has led to major efficiency improvements, some members of Congress have criticized it for leading to mail delays, unsustainable postage increases and declines in business.

Besides privatization, there’s also been talk of possibly moving the USPS under the control of the U.S. Department of Commerce.

The choice of Steiner was first reported by The Washington Post.

Trump revives, then discards, then revives again the idea of taxing the rich in big GOP bill

posted in: All news | 0

By LISA MASCARO and SEUNG MIN KIM

WASHINGTON (AP) — After musing publicly and privately with the idea of raising the top tax rate for wealthy millionaires as Republicans draft his big bill in Congress, President Donald Trump early Friday backed off that call — sort of.

Related Articles


FedEx board member Steiner is picked to be next USPS postmaster general amid talk of privatization


Stockholm City Council rejects US Embassy demands to end DEI programming


Fishermen battling with changing oceans chart new course after Trump’s push to deregulate


Rights groups sue to free Venezuelans deported from the US and held in El Salvador


Freed Palestinian student accuses Columbia University of inciting violence

Trump posted on social media that hiking taxes on anyone, even the rich, could stir a political backlash, reviving the “Read my lips: No new taxes” warnings of the Bush-era that helped topple a president. The post came days after he floated the idea of higher taxes on those single filers earning $2.5 million and above.

But this time, the president, didn’t completely discourage GOP lawmakers from pursuing that option as they rush to finish their massive tax breaks and spending cuts package this weekend.

“The problem with even a ‘TINY’ tax increase for the RICH, which I and all others would graciously accept in order to help the lower and middle income workers, is that the Radical Left Democrat Lunatics would go around screaming, ‘Read my lips,’” Trump wrote.

“In any event, Republicans should probably not do it, but I’m OK if they do!!!” Trump wrote Friday.

The last ditch-push by the president comes as Republicans are laboring to push his “big, beautiful bill” toward public hearings next week, on track for a House vote by Memorial Day. Divisions run strong in the party, and the president’s on-again, off-again push for millionaires taxes complicates the outcome.

Over the past months, Trump has repeatedly brought up the idea of imposing a higher rate for millionaires and the president revived his request in private talks.

Trump told Speaker Mike Johnson again this week he wants to see a higher rate on the wealthy in the big bill coming from Congress, according to a person familiar with the conversations and granted anonymity to discuss the private talks.

The president sees higher taxes on millionaires as a way to clip the argument coming from Democrats that the GOP’s big tax package only benefits his wealthy friends, including billionaire Elon Musk, the person said.

Thanks to Trump’s 2017 tax cuts bill, the top rate is now a 37% bracket that expires at the end of the year. That rate is for incomes beyond about $600,000 for single filers. Trump would like to see that rate expire, reverting back to 39.6%, or 40%.

This week Trump pitched top rate on incomes of around $2.5 million for individuals and $5 million for couples.

The debate over millionaires has been raging with a robust collection of anti-tax activists led by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, Grover Norquist at Americans for Tax Reform and others working vigorously to prevent any tax hikes.

Trump appeared Friday to have again heeded the message from Gingrich, who has warned that George H.W. Bush during the 1988 presidential campaign pledged to not to implement any new taxes as president.

Bush then faced an onslaught of criticism during his unsuccessful 1992 reelection campaign for breaking that promise. Trump posted a few weeks ago that Gingrich was correct. But on Friday the president said independent candidate Ross Perot had caused Bush’s loss that year.

As the conversations swirl in public and private, they keep coming back to Trump’s own politically-populist instincts, touching off the GOP divide.

“I’m not excited about the proposal, but I have to say, there are a number of people in both the house and the Senate who are,” said Sen. Mike Crapo, the GOP chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said earlier this week on the Hugh Hewitt show, “and if the President weighs in in favor of it, then that’s going to be a big factor that we have to take into consideration as well.”

Related Articles


FedEx board member Steiner is picked to be next USPS postmaster general amid talk of privatization


Stockholm City Council rejects US Embassy demands to end DEI programming


Fishermen battling with changing oceans chart new course after Trump’s push to deregulate


Rights groups sue to free Venezuelans deported from the US and held in El Salvador


Freed Palestinian student accuses Columbia University of inciting violence