Gophers offensive lineman Logan Purcell enters NCAA transfer portal

posted in: News | 0

Annandale, Minn., offensive lineman Logan Purcell has decided  to leave the Gophers football program and enter the NCAA transfer portal, he said Thursday.

Purcell, a 6-foot-7 and 300-pound tackle, played in one game during the 2022 season, but none last season, and was not among the two-deep coming out of spring practices that finished Tuesday.

The redshirt freshman was in his third year at Minnesota and his exit will open up a scholarship for another incoming player.

Five players have left P.J. Fleck’s program this month, three of them offensive linemen. Four outside players have joined the U via the portal in that time frame.

Transfer portal tracker

Incoming: WR Tyler Williams (Georgia); QB Dylan Wittke (Virginia Tech); DE Adam Kissayi (Clemson); DE Jaxon Howard (LSU),

Outgoing players (New school)

Outgoing: OL Logan Purcell; CB Victor Pless; OL Cade McConnell (Vanderbilt); OL De’Eric Mister; CB Tariq Watson.

Related Articles

College Sports |


Where will Gophers players be selected in NFL draft?

College Sports |


Gophers add third scholarship quarterback with Va. Tech transfer Dylan Wittke

College Sports |


Gophers fill glaring need at receiver with four-star Georgia transfer Tyler Williams

College Sports |


Gophers backup cornerback Victor Pless enters NCAA transfer portal

College Sports |


Gophers football adds transfer commitment from Clemson defensive end

DFL Sen. Nicole Mitchell says she won’t resign as state senate begins probe into felony burglary charge

posted in: News | 0

Woodbury Democratic-Farmer-Labor Sen. Nicole Mitchell says she won’t resign as she faces a felony burglary charge after allegedly breaking into her stepmother’s home earlier this week.

Nicole Lynn Mitchell mug shot. (Becker County Jail)

Mitchell, 49, announced her intention to remain in office Thursday as a bipartisan Senate ethics panel started moving forward with an investigation of the senator, who is accused of breaking into a Detroit Lakes home in the early Monday.

Mitchell denies she had entered the home to steal anything and has issued statements contradicting the allegations in a criminal complaint filed in Becker County District Court. In that complaint, Mitchell is alleged to have told police she entered the home through a basement window and that she knew “she did something bad.”

Statement from Mitchell

In a statement issued through her attorneys, Mitchell said she was “extremely disappointed” the criminal complaint filed against her Tuesday didn’t include “complete information,” such as that she knew her stepmother since she was four years old and cared for her wellbeing.

“It saddens me that some people are attempting to use a tragic family situation to score political points,” she said. “I am confident that a much different picture will emerge when all of the facts are known.”

Mitchell was released from jail after being formally charged on Tuesday with first-degree burglary. As part of her conditions of release, she’s not allowed to contact her stepmother, who also obtained a restraining order against Mitchell. She’s next scheduled to appear in court in June.

Already, Mitchell’s absence from the Senate has delayed two days of voting on bills as the legislature closes in on the end of session on May 20. The DFL has 34 seats in the Senate to the GOP’s 33, meaning the absence of just one senator means partisan bills can’t move forward.

On Wednesday, Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy, DFL-St. Paul, said she will consider allowing Mitchell to vote remotely for the rest of the session. In a Thursday statement, Murphy said the Senate Subcommittee on Ethical Conduct is working with Mitchell and moving forward with setting a hearing date in the next 30 days.

Senate Republicans, who unsuccessfully pushed Wednesday to accelerate the ethics investigation process, said they’re prepared to whatever is needed to resolve the investigation as soon as possible.

“Moving expeditiously with a hearing and a determination ensures the Senate maintains the highest levels of integrity in its service to Minnesotans” said Senate Minority Leader Mark Johnson, R-East Grand Forks.

Mitchell is a first-term state senator elected in 2022. Mitchell worked as a meteorologist with the U.S. military and for KSTP-TV and Minnesota Public Radio before she was elected to the Senate. She still serves as lieutenant colonel in the Air National Guard, commanding a weather unit..

She represents Senate District 47, which includes Woodbury and southern parts of Maplewood.

Alleged burglary

It’s still not exactly clear what happened Monday morning at Mitchell’s stepmother’s Detroit Lakes home, but police responded to a 911 call about a break-in at the house at around 4:45 a.m. and found the senator in the basement, according to charging documents.

In a 911 call transcript released by the Becker County Sheriff’s office, the caller, Mitchell’s stepmother, told police she had “tripped over” a person on the floor next to her bed, who then ran into the basement.

That conflicts with statements Mitchell made to officers detailed in her charging documents. In the charges, she allegedly admitted to entering her stepmother’s home through a basement window, where she had left a backpack containing her drivers’ license, two laptop computers and a cell phone.

The senator was dressed in all-black clothing and was wearing a black hat, charges said.

Mitchell denied she was there to steal anything, and in a public statement said she was checking in on her stepmother.

Burglary charge

The senator now faces a first-degree burglary charge, a felony that carries a minimum sentence of six months in jail, and a maximum of 20 years in prison.

Mitchell’s burglary charge comes a little more than a year after the death of her father. In January, a judge awarded her stepmother 100% of the father’s $172,931 estate.

In a post on Facebook, Mitchell said she was checking on her stepmother and denied stealing anything. She said she had visited the home “countless times” over the last 20 years, and that her son had a room there at one point.

Her attorney Bruce Ringstrom Sr. said his client made a “poor choice” in how she handled her concerns, but did so while under a lot of stress.

“She was dealing with a tough family situation and it exploded on her,” he said.

In an interview with the Associated Press, the stepmother said she is afraid of Mitchell. Most of her husband’s ashes were buried, she told the AP, but she sent Mitchell a small container.

Related Articles

Politics |


Other voices: Schools’ public notice plan would reduce access and harm transparency

Politics |


Sen. Nicole Mitchell’s arrest delays votes, but DFL looks to keep majority despite Republican ethics probe push

Politics |


DFL Sen. Nicole Mitchell charged with felony in Detroit Lakes burglary

Politics |


Letters to the Editor: Apparently the CAIR calendar is missing a date

Politics |


Woodbury DFL Sen. Nicole Mitchell arrested in Detroit Lakes

Prairie Island Indian Community seeks ‘hanging noose’ of 1862 from MN Historical Society

posted in: Adventure | 0

Citing a federal repatriation act, the Prairie Island Indian Community has filed a claim for the “hanging rope,” long held by the Minnesota Historical Society, that may have been used to execute a Dakota man in Mankato at the end of the five-week United States-Dakota War of 1862.

Following Dakota Wokiksuye Memorial Ride, a gathering and program was held at Reconciliation Park in Mankato, Minn., on Dec. 26, 2012, to honor a new “Dakota 38” memorial honoring the 38 Dakota men executed as part of the U.S. Dakota War of 1862. (Pioneer Press: Ginger Pinson)

The St. Paul-based nonprofit, which functions as the official state archives, plans to make a decision within a month.

“Social media accounts stating that MNHS has made a determination regarding this claim are inaccurate,” reads a written statement from the historical society, released this week. “MNHS is diligently reviewing the claim as required by (federal law) and is listening to responses from Dakota Tribal Nations. (Federal) policy provides 90 days for this process and a determination will be made by May 28, 2024.”

For some, the noose has reopened historical wounds.

More than five weeks of violent clashes between the state’s military troops and the indigenous community fueled the mass displacement of the Dakota, and has overshadowed tribal relations with both the state of Minnesota and local governments for more than 160 years since, while leaving some historians and legal experts at odds over the particulars.

In 1862, following forced relocations, broken treaties, starvation due to poor harvest and limited trading during the onset of the Civil War, some 392 Dakota men were rounded up for allegedly participating in violent attacks on settlers. In all, according to the historical society, 303 of them were sentenced to death following trials that in some cases lasted as little as five minutes. The federal government intervened, noting many Dakota had sought to help keep settlers they knew as trading partners safe during the conflict.

Nevertheless, on Dec. 26, 1862, 38 Dakota men were hanged in Mankato, convicted based on evidence that some historians have called fleeting at best.

Adding to sensitivities around the hanging rope, the Minnesota Historical Society was once led by Gov. Alexander Ramsey, the state’s first territorial governor and second state governor, a man who had once called for the expulsion and extermination of the Dakota.

Deaths of innocents on both sides of the U.S.-Dakota war have fueled debate over key details and descriptive language used by historians of various eras.

After their execution, someone apparently hid one of the nooses as a souvenir, later gifting it to the Minnesota Historical Society. Some even believe it’s the noose that hung Chaska, a Dakota man whose sentence had been commuted days prior by President Abraham Lincoln, but who was executed anyway after what some historians have dubbed a case of mistaken identity, or perhaps retribution for his close relationship with Sarah Wakefield, a white woman Chaska protected during the war.

Knowledge of the noose resurfaced around 2011, when the Minnesota Historical Society considered how best to commemorate the 150th anniversary of the U.S.-Dakota war.

Those questions led to the society inviting representatives of the Dakota to a ceremonial viewing of the noose and other sensitive objects. Some historical society staff felt at the time that the nonprofit had no business holding onto the “hanging rope,” given that the federal Native American Graves and Repatriation Act provides a path by which federally-funded institutions can return Native American remains and sacred objects to tribes and descendants.

The historical society denied a claim to the noose in 2015. On Feb. 29, it received another claim under the Repatriation Act, this one from the Prairie Island Indian Community. A call to the Prairie Island Indian Community on Thursday was not immediately returned.

A spokesperson for the historical society said their comments would be limited to a written statement issued Wednesday.

“We acknowledge that this is both a harmful and painful object that does not reflect the mission and values of MNHS today,” reads the statement. “MNHS is committed to following both the letter and the spirit of the NAGPRA regulations and to working with Indigenous communities as an institution that is a steward of many Native American collections and sacred sites.”

Related Articles

News |


Minnesota Sailor killed at Pearl Harbor is coming home

News |


The Hawaiian steel guitar changed American music. Can one man keep that tradition alive?

News |


Why trekking poles are the most underrated piece of outdoor gear

News |


Justus Ramsey Stone House could rise again — with $500,000 in proposed Legacy Act backing

News |


Obituary: St. Paul author and historian Judy Yaeger Jones believed in ‘women and their rights’

Hamas again raises the possibility of a 2-state compromise. Israel and its allies aren’t convinced

posted in: Politics | 0

By The Associated Press

Hamas has said for more than 15 years that it could accept a two-state compromise with Israel — at least, a temporary one. But Hamas has also refused to say that it would recognize Israel or renounce its armed fight against it.

For Israel and many others, especially in the wake of Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack that spurred the latest war in Gaza, that’s proof that Hamas is still irrevocably bent on destroying Israel. The United States and European countries have joined Israel in shunning the group they have labeled a terrorist organization.

For some observers, Hamas has signaled a potential pragmatism that could open a path to a solution. But the group’s vagueness as it tries to square the circle of its own positions has fueled suspicion.

Related Articles


Hamas releases video of American-Israeli hostage Hersh Goldberg-Polin


Pro-Palestinian student protests target colleges’ financial ties with Israel


Biden says the US is rushing weaponry to Ukraine as he signs a $95 billion war aid measure into law


UN calls for investigation into mass graves uncovered at two Gaza hospitals raided by Israel


It began with defiance at Columbia. Now students nationwide are upping their Gaza war protests

Hamas offers long-term “truces” instead of outright peace. It has dropped open pledges to destroy Israel but endorses “armed resistance” — and says it will fight for liberation of all “the land of Palestine.”

In the latest iteration of its stance, senior Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya told The Associated Press in an interview on Wednesday the group would lay down its weapons and convert into a political party if an independent Palestinian state is established in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip along the pre-1967-borders.

Though he again spoke of a truce, it was also a rare suggestion that Hamas could dissolve its armed wing.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to destroy Hamas after the Oct. 7 attack on southern Israel. Netanyahu has repeatedly rejected the creation of a Palestinian state and, critics say, worked to severely undermine the West Bank-based Palestinian Authority that has recognized Israel.

Here’s a look at some of the nuances in Hamas’ positions, in the past and now:

UNITY TALKS

In 2006, after Hamas won Palestinian legislative elections, it entered talks with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas over a unity government. Amid the negotiations, Ismail Haniyeh — who today is Hamas’ top political leader — said the group supported a Palestinian state along the 1967 lines “at this stage, but in return for a cease-fire, not recognition.”

The two sides eventually reached a deal under which the unity government, including Hamas, would “respect” the Palestinian Authority’s peace agreements with Israel. It was a formula that allowed Hamas to avoid accepting the accords and recognizing Israel.

Israel and the U.S. refused to recognize the unity government and imposed economic sanctions. The government quickly collapsed amid fighting between Hamas and Abbas’ Fatah faction — ending with Hamas’ 2007 takeover of Gaza.

In 2008, then-political head of Hamas Khaled Mashaal said it would accept a state in the West Bank and Gaza along with a 10-year truce with Israel. He rejected ever recognizing Israel, but he suggested Hamas would accede to a permanent peace accord with Israel if Palestinians accepted one in a referendum.

Hamas and Abbas’ PA have had multiple rounds of unity talks ever since, often emerging with variations in phrasing on Hamas’ stance. Every time, unity efforts have been wrecked by the factions’ own bitter rivalry over power and the West’s refusal to accept any government that includes Hamas unless it expressly recognizes Israel.

THE NEW 2017 ‘CHARTER’

After years of internal discussions, Hamas came out with a new political platform in 2017 that presented a dramatic change in tone from its original charter, issued in 1988.

The 1988 charter presented the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in stark religious terms. It spoke of “our struggle against the Jews,” insisted the land belonged to Muslims and declared that jihad, or holy war, was the only way to solve the Palestinian question.

The 2017 document dropped much of that religious and antisemitic rhetoric and instead presented its cause in terms of human rights, including the right of refugees to return and the right to resist occupation. It said its fight wasn’t against Jews but against Zionism, which it called a “colonial” project that had taken Palestinians’ land and repressed their freedoms.

The document enshrined Hamas’s quasi-acceptance of a state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. It said such a state, with Jerusalem as its capital and the return of Palestinian refugees, was a “national consensus.”

Still, it said it rejects “any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea.” That area includes what is now Israel, and in the context of Hamas’ agenda, such language is seen by Israel as a call for its destruction.

___

Follow AP’s war coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/israel-hamas-war