The Commission on Presidential Debates faces an uncertain future after Biden and Trump bypassed it

posted in: Politics | 0

By JONATHAN J. COOPER (Associated Press)

PHOENIX (AP) — The nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates, which has planned presidential faceoffs in every election since 1988, has an uncertain future after President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump struck an agreement to meet on their own.

The Biden and Trump campaigns announced a deal Wednesday to meet for debates in June on CNN and September on ABC. Just a day earlier, Frank Fahrenkopf, chair of the Commission on Presidential Debates, had sounded optimistic that the candidates would eventually come around to accepting the commission’s debates.

“There’s no way you can force anyone to debate,” Fahrenkopf said in a virtual meeting of supporters of No Labels, which has continued as an advocacy group after it abandoned plans for a third-party presidential ticket. But he noted candidates have repeatedly toyed with skipping debates or finding alternatives before eventually showing up, though one was canceled in 2020 when Trump refused to appear virtually after he contracted COVID-19.

In reaching an agreement on their own, Biden and Trump sidelined a commission that aims to set neutral rules and provide a forum that’s simultaneously broadcast on all major networks.

The commission suggested in a statement Wednesday that it would not immediately let go of its plans.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Stormy Daniels wore bulletproof vest to Trump trial, lawyer says

National Politics |


70 years ago, school integration was a dream many believed could actually happen. It hasn’t

National Politics |


From Hogan to a Trumpier Senate: Takeways from Tuesday’s primaries

National Politics |


Biden and Trump agree to 2 presidential debates, in June and in September

National Politics |


Biden team’s tightrope: Reining in rogue Obamacare agents without slowing enrollment

The commission was “established in 1987 specifically to ensure that such debates reliably take place and reach the widest television, radio and streaming audience,” the statement said. “Our 2024 sites, all locations of higher learning, are prepared to host debates on dates chosen to accommodate early voters. We will continue to be ready to execute this plan.”

Representatives for the commission did not respond to requests for further comment.

The Biden and Trump campaigns had both been critical of the commission’s plans, including the dates it set in September and October, after voters in many states will have already started casting ballots by mail.

Fahrenkopf on Tuesday said he had not spoken to representatives for either Biden or Trump. All the while, the campaigns had closed in on their own agreements. But he defended the importance of television debates in general.

“You learn a lot about the personality of the candidate,” Fahrenkopf said. “Not only where they stand on the issues but how they conduct themselves and how you feel about how they conduct themselves.”

Now armed with AI, America’s adversaries will try to influence election, security officials warn

posted in: News | 0

By DAVID KLEPPER and ERIC TUCKER (Associated Press)

WASHINGTON (AP) — America’s foreign adversaries will again seek to influence the upcoming U.S. elections, top security officials warned members of the Senate Wednesday, harnessing the latest innovations in artificial intelligence to spread online disinformation, mislead voters and undermine trust in democracy.

But the U.S. has greatly improved its ability to safeguard election security and identify and combat foreign disinformation campaigns since 2016, when Russia sought to influence the election, U.S. Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines testified to the Senate Intelligence Committee.

The latest warning from security officials comes as advances in AI make it easier and cheaper than ever to create lifelike images, video and audio that can fool even the most discerning voter. Other tools of disinformation include state media, online influencers and networks of fake accounts that can quickly amplify false and misleading content.

Russia, China and Iran remain the main actors looking to interfere with the 2024 election, security officials said, but due to advances in technology other nations or even domestic groups could try and mount their own sophisticated disinformation campaigns.

Russia remains “the most active foreign threat to our elections,” Haines said, using its state media and online influencers to erode trust in democratic institutions and U.S. support for Ukraine.

In recent months, Russia has seized on America’s debate over immigration, spreading posts that exaggerate the impact of migration in an apparent effort to stoke outrage among American voters.

China did not directly try to influence the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, mostly because of concerns over blowback, Haines said.

China’s ties to TikTok were one of the things cited by members of Congress who recently voted to force TikTok’s Beijing-based owner to sell the platform.

“Needless to say, we will continue to monitor their activity,” Haines said of China.

Iran, meanwhile, has used social media platforms to issue threats and try to confuse voters, Haines said. She cited a 2020 episode in which U.S. officials accused Tehran of distributing false content and being behind a flurry of emails sent to Democratic voters in multiple battleground states that appeared to be aimed at intimidating them into voting for President Donald Trump.

Previous efforts by federal agencies to call out foreign disinformation on platforms like Facebook or X, formerly known as Twitter, have quickly become caught up in debates over government surveillance, First Amendment rights and whether government agencies should be tasked with figuring out what’s true.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Stormy Daniels wore bulletproof vest to Trump trial, lawyer says

National Politics |


70 years ago, school integration was a dream many believed could actually happen. It hasn’t

National Politics |


From Hogan to a Trumpier Senate: Takeways from Tuesday’s primaries

National Politics |


Biden and Trump agree to 2 presidential debates, in June and in September

National Politics |


Biden team’s tightrope: Reining in rogue Obamacare agents without slowing enrollment

Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, the top Republican on the committee, questioned the officials about what they could do and how they would respond to “clearly fake” AI-generated videos about candidates that surface before the election.

“Who would be the person that would stand before the American people and say, ’We’re not interfering in the election. We just want you to know the video’s not real. Who would be in charge of that?” Rubio asked.

Haines responded that “I could be the person who goes out and makes that determination” but said there may be certain situations in which it would make more sense for state or local authorities to make that announcement.

Wednesday’s hearing on foreign threats to the election also covered the risk that an adversary could hack into state or local election systems, either to change the vote or to create the perception that the outcome can’t be trusted.

Jen Easterly, director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, said the federal government has worked closely with state and local election officials to ensure the 2024 election is the most secure ever.

“Election infrastructure has never been more secure,” Easterly said.

Jerome Johnson: Save Summit parking … the cheap EVs are coming

posted in: Society | 0

St. Paul is planning to replace half of historic Summit Avenue’s on-street parking capacity east of Lexington Avenue with expanded and relocated bike lanes as part of a broader objective to rebuild the thoroughfare’s street and utility infrastructure. Opposition to the plan, dominated by concern over tree canopy shrinkage, has coalesced into a call for a more comprehensive environmental evaluation of the corridor’s infrastructure needs that, presumably, spares more boulevard trees.

Trees, however, are not the issue.

They will be taken anyway as the street is rebuilt to modern load-bearing standards and aging utilities are replaced and right-sized to accommodate higher anticipated residential densities and more intense storm runoffs. Few, if any, will be removed solely to accommodate wider bike paths, taken instead to create a pothole-free street and eliminate the risk of sinkholes and sewage backups.  And with the recent removal of diseased trees leaving numerous stumps, clear spaces, and younger replacement plantings, there is no better time than now, not 2030 or 2040, to reconstruct and renew the Summit Avenue streetscape.

Focus, instead, should be on the environmental and economic impact of evolving electric vehicle (EV) technology and on mobility equity for those who depend on drive-up access to Summit corridor homes, businesses and institutions.

That’s because a fleet dominated by quieter, cleaner EVs and 50-mpg hybrids will likely meet St. Paul’s 2040 auto emissions reduction goal independent of vehicle miles driven, an outcome curiously ignored in the current plan.

EVs will also cost less than conventional autos to own and operate due to manufacturing advances and fewer moving parts. (A Chinese automaker claims it could sell an EV today in the U.S. for $12,500.)  As such, there will be more of them, many to be operated by mobility-seeking lower-income drivers vying for scarce parking along the Summit/Grand corridor.

But the city’s plan to cut on-street parking capacity, now averaging 32 percent occupancy of available spaces, will make accessibility much worse because it fails to account for higher occupancies along the avenue at different points and times. That one-block walk in January to crowded night classes at Mitchell-Hamline, to apartments near Dale Street or to a busy Grand Avenue eatery can then become an icy two-block slog with an additional street crossing when half of Summit parking is converted to an underutilized bike lane.

At roughly a couple of thousand cars currently parked per day, use of Summit Avenue by this stakeholder group is thus comparable to peak-season daily bike lane usage, which has remained flat since 2013, but greatly exceeds off-season usage. Sacrificing more permanent parking capacity and year-round venue patronage to favor stagnating, highly seasonal bicycle traffic seems patently inequitable. Add to this an affordable and proliferating EV fleet imposed on a corridor rezoned to achieve European-like residential densities and lower on-site parking minimums, and the disparity only worsens.

Keep parking intact, however, and a rebuilt Summit can still be safer for ALL users by specifying narrower (and slower) driving lanes, increased intersection visibility through extended curb bump-outs, wider sidewalks to accommodate slower riders, and buffered on-street bike lanes to protect faster riders. That may widen mid-block portions of the street east of Lexington slightly but will narrow it considerably at intersections. The world won’t end.

At some point, perhaps 2040, corridor residential density may indeed grow and lifestyles evolve to where the entire community becomes indifferent to parking-dependent drive-up traffic as walking and cycling flourish across demographic lines. It will be an easy engineering fix, then, to trade one lane of parking for wider street-level bike lanes and slightly raised, 2-foot-wide, Copenhagen-style lane separation buffers.

Either way, the 2040 air will be cleaner, the streets quieter and the corridor bustling with clean low-cost EVs underneath a widening canopy of maturing trees. With any luck, St. Paul planners will have been governed accordingly.

Jerome Johnson is a retired transportation economist based in St. Paul.

Related Articles

Opinion |


Anderson, Lunneborg, Donaldson: State law needs a tweak this year so Lakeview Hospital project can proceed

Opinion |


Real World Economics: Big corn crop is bad news for farmers

Opinion |


Skywatch: Star hopping in the spring sky

Opinion |


Your Money: Women and wealth: a values-based approach to planning

Opinion |


Real World Economics: Time to overhaul health care sector

UN’s top court opens hearings on the Israeli military’s incursion into Rafah

posted in: News | 0

By MOLLY QUELL (Associated Press)

THE HAGUE (AP) — South Africa told the United Nations’ top court on Thursday the situation in Gaza has reached “a new and horrific stage” as it sought emergency measures to halt Israel’s military operation in the enclave’s southern city of Rafah.

It was the third time the International Court of Justice held hearings on the conflict in Gaza since South Africa filed proceedings at The Hague-based court in December accusing Israel of genocide.

“Seven months ago South Africa could not have imagined that Gaza would be largely wiped off the map,” the country’s ambassador to the Netherlands, Vusimuzi Madonsela, told the panel of 15 international judges Thursday.

During hearings earlier this year, Israel strongly denied committing genocide in Gaza, saying it does all it can to spare civilians and is only targeting Hamas fighters. The country says Rafah is the last stronghold of the group. Hamas has been designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, Canada and the European Union.

Palestinians displaced by the Israeli air and ground offensive on the Gaza Strip walk through a makeshift tent camp in Rafah, Gaza, Friday, May 10, 2024. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)

South Africa argues that the military operation has far surpassed justified self-defense. “Israel’s actions in Rafah are part of the end game. This is the last step in the destruction of Gaza,” lawyer Vaughan Lowe said.

According to the latest request, the previous preliminary orders by The Hague-based court were not sufficient to address “a brutal military attack on the sole remaining refuge for the people of Gaza.” Israel will be allowed to answer the accusations on Friday.

In January, judges ordered Israel to do all it can to prevent death, destruction and any acts of genocide in Gaza, but the panel stopped short of ordering an end to the military offensive that has laid waste to the Palestinian enclave. In a second order in March, the court said Israel must take measures to improve the humanitarian situation.

South Africa has to date submitted four requests for the international court to investigate Israel. It was granted a hearing three times.

Most of Gaza’s population of 2.3 million people have been displaced since fighting began.

Related Articles


Biden administration is moving ahead on new $1 billion arms sale to Israel, congressional aides say


Palestinians mark 76 years of dispossession as a potentially even larger catastrophe unfolds in Gaza


Thomas Friedman: Biden’s real mistake in pausing military aid to Israel


Misery deepens in Gaza’s Rafah as Israeli troops press operation


Letters: Boorish behavior disrupts graduation, undermines support for the cause

The war began with a Hamas attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7 in which Palestinian terrorists killed around 1,200 people and took about 250 hostages. Gaza’s Health Ministry says over 35,000 Palestinians have been killed in the war, without distinguishing between civilians and combatants in its count.

South Africa initiated proceedings in December 2023 and sees the legal campaign as rooted in issues central to its identity. Its governing party, the African National Congress, has long compared Israel’s policies in Gaza and the occupied West Bank to its own history under the apartheid regime of white minority rule, which restricted most Blacks to “homelands.” Apartheid ended in 1994.

On Sunday, Egypt announced it plans to join the case. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs said Israeli military actions “constitute a flagrant violation of international law, humanitarian law, and the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 regarding the protection of civilians during wartime.”

Several countries have also indicated they plan to intervene, but so far only Libya, Nicaragua and Colombia have filed formal requests to do so.