Op-Ed: You Can’t Give Somebody Something Unless You Take it From Somebody Else

posted in: News | 0
Sir Winston Churchill, once opined that “You don’t make the poor richer by making the rich poorer”. But, that’s what Democrats keep on proposing is that they will do just that if they keep on getting elected. Photo credit ShutterStock.com, licensed.

DELRAY BEACH, FL – That in a nutshell is what is behind the principle of Socialism. The left-wing liberals are constantly crying that our capitalist free enterprise system creates an uneven playing field whereby some people do better financially than do others. Is that a bad thing? The Socialists, using the sin of envy, propose to take money away from the successful to give it to the less than successful, a theory of redistribution of wealth from the Obama years. In their minds, they think an all powerful government creates prosperity while companies and corporations create poverty. They never point to any country that uses Socialism/Communism, as their economic system, that has become an economically successful country.  In fact, the only countries that they can point to are countries that are economic basket cases, namely Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela, and most poverty stricken countries in  Africa and Asia.

You’d think that that pitiful record of economic disaster in those countries, that the politicians in the the United States, especially on the Democrat side, would then be championing free enterprise capitalism, but just the opposite is true, they are proposing a whole slew of socialist proposals and programs hoping that all the “FREE STUFF” they are offering up to the voters are going to turn into votes for them come election time. That late former oracle, Sir Winston Churchill, once opined that “You don’t make the poor richer by making the rich poorer”. But, that’s what the Democrats keep on proposing is that they will do just that if they keep on getting elected.

There never has been a better economic system created by man, to relieve poverty than that of a capitalist free enterprise system that has been handed down to us by our founding fathers. Of course, there will always be people who don’t prosper or take advantage of what our economic system offers due to various problems such as, disability, illness, drug and alcohol addiction, and just by being lazy. Our system has been the “shining light on the hill”, and that’s why so many people around the world want to immigrate here. The problem we face is that our immigration laws are written so poorly that we are being “invaded” by people who are entering our country illegally. It has been exacerbated by the present Biden Administrat ion who have, in effect, left our border wide open to all who want to taste the benefits that our country has to offer. We have given incentives that the illegals have taken advantage of, by the millions. This has caused a major problem in our country of having to be a humanitarian country by admitting people who, in the main, are taxing our welfare system and causing havoc in many of our states and cities. The Democrats have been eerily silent as the immigration system spirals out of control. Biden and his spokespeople, continue to claim that the border is closed, DHS Secretary Mayorkas and his press spokeswoman have continued to spread that lie, even in the face of video pictures showing a steady flow of illegals crossing into our country. In addition, a steady flow of illegal drugs continue to be smuggled into our country, practically unabated, especially deadly Fentanyl, Heroin, and Meth, which last year accounted for over 100,000 deaths, mostly among our young people.

The Democrats seem to be geared up to punishing the successful people by over taxing them, and over regulating them (a form of punishment) instead of trying to give financially strapped people a hand up rather than a hand out. Our economy, after Trump took office, had been on a roll by creating an economy that was the envy of the world. That changed when Joe Biden and his administration took office. Biden, through incompetence or just plain animus toward Trump, canceled most of the beneficial policies that Trump initiated. As a result, we now face an economic recession and a supply chain crisis along with an inflation rate of 7.1%. Do we really want to adopt the “snake oil” that the Democrats are pushing by trying to give somebody something by taking it away from someone else? Let’s continue to try to make AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, a position in the world we held before the Biden Administration took over.

NYCHA Blames Dreary Financial Outlook on $454 Million in Unpaid Pandemic Rent

posted in: News | 0

More than 73,000 NYCHA households are behind on rent, which officials say will force the public housing authority to draw from dwindling operating reserves and make other cuts in the year ahead—and could potentially hamper its repair plans. Meanwhile, the state’s already exhausted Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) to aid New Yorkers in arrears is unlikely to reach NYCHA.

Adi Talwar

A New York City Housing Authority building in the Ingersoll Housing complex near Downtown Brooklyn.

More than 73,000 NYCHA households are behind on rent, which will force the public housing authority to draw from dwindling operating reserves and make other cuts in the year ahead—and could potentially hamper repair plans required under an agreement with the feds, officials said Wednesday.

Meanwhile, the state’s already exhausted Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) to cover New Yorkers’ rent arrears is unlikely to reach NYCHA tenants, who were given the lowest priority under the COVID rent relief initiative. The roughly 31,330 NYCHA households who have applied for ERAP relief owe a combined $250 million, authority officials said, but the relief fund, which pays landlords up to 12 months of unpaid rent, could only cover a maximum of $120 million.

“Any money we’d get through ERAP only solves half of the problem of arrears,” NYCHA Chief Financial Officer CFO Annika Lescott-Martinez said.

The revenue hole, she added, will make it harder for the housing authority to comply with the requirements of its 2019 agreement with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), in which the city committed to investing billions to make capital repairs and to address problems like mold, pests and lead paint on specific timelines. All told, tenants owe $454 million in total arrears systemwide, including money that was not paid prior to the pandemic.

“At some point if you don’t have sufficient revenue, it becomes more difficult to achieve those goals,” Lescott-Martinez said.

NYCHA officials, outlining the agency’s financial outlook at a board meeting Wednesday, pointed to dwindling rent collections over the last several years. The housing authority collected 88 percent of rent from tenants over 12 months in 2019, but only 65 percent in 2022, with arrears growing from $125 million to $454 million during the same period.

“There has been a change in attitude around paying rent,” since the start of the pandemic and the launch of the ERAP program, said NYCHA CEO Lisa Bova-Hiatt.


But it’s doubtful whether NYCHA will even receive that $120 million, since the state legislation that established ERAP prioritized funding for tenants in private-market apartments over NYCHA applicants. Demand for the relief program has long outstripped available funds, and it’s unlikely that the $800 million the state allocated this spring to replenish the program will be enough to cover the tens of thousands of applicants still waiting. The portal to apply for the program is set to close in mid-January.

“By law, this program cannot pay applications from subsidized housing unless all others are paid first,” Hazel Crampton-Hays, a spokesperson for Gov. Kathy Hochul, said in a statement. NYCHA officials said they have urged state lawmakers to make changes to ERAP, either by refunding it again or better prioritizing their applicants in light of the housing authority’s fiscal woes. A bill which would have given NYCHA the same priority for ERAP as other tenants passed the State Senate in June, but not the Assembly.

“We continue to evaluate the funds remaining in this program and how many applications will ultimately be paid once the portal closes next month, and we remain in ongoing communication about these issues with impacted parties,” Crampton-Hays added.

In the meantime, NYCHA tenants with a pending ERAP application are protected from eviction under state law until a decision is made on their case, which also makes them ineligible for other rental assistance programs.

“Both NYCHA and the tenants are very much in this holding pattern, where we can’t enforce, and they are expecting ERAP, and they are not paying,” Lescott-Martinez told board members Wednesday. “Our goal is house people so it’s really not in our prerogative to try and evict everyone, but we really do need the revenue.”

Iziah Thompson, a senior policy analyst specializing in public housing at the Community Service Society (a City Limits funder), criticized NYCHA’s framing around the arrears, but said unpaid rent is indeed a serious problem for an agency that relies on monthly payments to cover about a third of its operating budget.

“The idea that there is some sort of ‘culture change’ is an unfair characterization,” Thompson said. “But they are totally right to blame this shortfall on unpaid rent.”

He said state lawmakers chose to effectively exclude NYCHA from the rent relief fund, punishing hundreds of thousands of tenants. “They put them on the end of the list without thinking about how NYCHA needs rent to operate,” he said.

NYCHA officials told board members that without that full rent funding stream, the agency will be forced to draw $65 million from its operating reserves in 2023, after tapping additional millions from those reserves during the last two years. The housing authority said that fund will have less than a month’s reserves left at the end of this year without an infusion of cash, well below the three to four months-worth that HUD recommends.

Anticipating a $35 million year‐end deficit in 2023, NYCHA is planning additional proactive measures, such as cutting “non-essential contracts,” which top officials described as financial, legal and back-office jobs. The authority already eliminated 50 percent of vacant budgeted positions in its central office, and future reductions may still be on the table.

“The goal is to prioritize services for residents, but we wanted to telegraph that, while we have been able to manage the problem over the last three years by pulling from our reserves, you can’t continue to do that,” Bova-Hiatt told reporters.

The dire economic projections come as NYCHA continues its push for other capital funding streams, asking tenants at some 25,000 apartments to cast ballots in the year ahead for one of three money-raising models. Residents will decide if they want to turn their development over to private management through NYCHA’s existing RAD-PACT program, by entering into a newly-created public trust or by maintaining the current public housing model under Section 9.

NYCHA officials say converting complexes to RAD-PACT or the Preservation Trust will allow them to raise more money by switching to the Section 8 program, which comes with more federal funding than Section 9. But some tenants remain deeply skeptical of both proposals.

Officials say the authority needs around $40 billion in capital funds to address systemic issues with its housing stock, following decades of disinvestment and underfunding from all levels of government that have left buildings riddled with violations and more than 673,000 open work orders.

Advocates say state and federal lawmakers need to act fast to ensure NYCHA can make those desperately needed capital repairs—and that public housing tenants remain housed.

“If they don’t want to see a bunch of public housing tenants evicted, then they need to provide these funds,” Thompson said. “There’s tons of blame to go around and we don’t want to play blame game. This money just needs to come from somewhere.”

Opinion: Fare Hike is the Wrong Approach to MTA’s Financial Woes

posted in: Society | 0

“If New York’s city and state leaders truly prioritize a society where social equity as well as environmental sustainability are fundamental values, discussion of subway and bus fare increases would not be on the table. And if the overarching goal is to bring riders back to the nation’s greatest public transit system, why disincentivize them with higher fares?”

Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) officials recently said they may need to raise subway and bus fares by 5.5 percent in 2023 to shore up the operating budget, which has been drained by a pandemic-induced drop in daily ridership. Fares could go as high as $3 by 2025.

Before the pandemic, subway and bus fares accounted for 42 percent of MTA revenue. Now, fares make up just 23% of the operating budget.  The loss in farebox revenue has helped lead to a $1.6 billion deficit.  MTA officials say they plan to ask the state for more money but they’ll still have a $600 million shortfall.

At $2.75 per ride, subway and bus fares in New York City are already among the most expensive major public transit systems in the country. And although 900,000 New Yorkers live in poverty, only around 278,000 riders are enrolled in the system’s half-price Fair Fares program. Thousands of New Yorkers with limited incomes likely experience days where they are forced to choose between food or going to work, a job interview or class.

If New York’s city and state leaders truly prioritize a society where social equity as well as environmental sustainability are fundamental values, discussion of subway and bus fare increases would not be on the table. And if the overarching goal is to bring riders back to the nation’s greatest public transit system, why disincentivize them with higher fares?

Instead, why not lower fares, drastically, to a ridiculously affordable amount, perhaps just $1 per ride. Lowering the fare would not only take a vast portion of the economic burden off the backs of millions of current transit users, it just might incentivize scores of other leery New Yorkers to hop back on buses and subways, significantly growing farebox revenues over time.

During a Nov. 30 board meeting, MTA Chair Janno Lieber basically instructed local and national policy makers and advocates to put on their thinking hats and come up with an alternative funding solution if they want to avoid a fare increase.

“We could definitely avoid a fare hike if there is a plan, an answer, coming from all of the decision makers, Washington, Albany, City Hall, and maybe others, that fills the $600 million gap,” Lieber said.

In addition to seeking more federal aid, perhaps city and state leaders could also explore potentially significant and currently untapped revenue streams on the city’s largest public space, our streets.

Last year, the MTA and governor postponed a predicted two-year fare increase in a move meant to attract riders back to the system. Despite that muted effort, day to day ridership on the subway, bus and commuter rail system has remained at about 60 percent of pre-pandemic levels.

Meanwhile, car ownership numbers are way up and automobile traffic has come roaring back with streets, avenues and bridges just as choked up and congested as they were before the pandemic. Data shows the number of automobiles paying tolls on MTA-controlled bridges and tunnels has not only rebounded, on some days, it actually surpasses pre-pandemic numbers. For example, on Nov. 28, MTA collected tolls from 904,337 vehicles, or 118 percent of the comparable pre-pandemic day.

And while the implementation of congestion pricing will tap into that traffic in parts of Manhattan, producing around $1 billion each year in revenue for MTA coffers, it’s still far short of what the system needs to continue offering the level of service it does today on a long term basis.

Data from the city’s Department of Transportation shows an average 443,000 cars crossed the Ed Koch-Queensborough, Williamsburg, Manhattan and Brooklyn Bridges each day in 2018.  Assuming those numbers are still somewhat accurate, tacking on an additional $3 crossing fee could bring in an extra $1.3 million in dedicated daily funding that could be earmarked for the MTA.

The city is also home to an estimated 3 million or more curbside parking spaces and around 95 percent of those spaces are free. Laid next to each other, those 3 million street parking spaces would span nearly halfway around the earth.

New York City, unlike most other large U.S. cities, does not have any residential parking program that would require monthly or yearly permits to park in certain neighborhoods. Instead, the estimated 45 percent of New Yorkers who own automobiles are essentially provided a subsidy to store cars, the overwhelming majority of which are SUVs the size of tiny Manhattan studio apartments, on public space for free.

If the city implemented a system where automobile owners are charged an average $100 per year for a neighborhood parking permit, revenues could reach well into the hundreds of millions of dollars in MTA funds. In other neighborhoods, metered hourly parking might be a better approach, but in any case, charging drivers a nominal fee to store their automobiles would benefit far more New Yorkers than those inconvenienced.

If there were ever a moment for a brave, bold and fair rethinking of how we fund the nation’s largest public transit system, it’s now. Whatever the funding solution turns out to be, New Yorkers who rely on the subways and trains for their livelihoods shouldn’t be the ones bearing the financial burden.

Cody Lyon is a former journalist and a Manhattan Community Board 1 member.

NYC Housing Calendar, Dec. 21-28

posted in: Society | 0

City Limits rounds up the latest housing and land use-related events, public hearings and upcoming affordable housing lotteries that are ending soon.

John McCarten/NYC Council Media Unit

Councilmembers and advocates rally for the Fair Chance For Housing bill Thursday morning.

Welcome to City Limits’ NYC Housing Calendar, a weekly feature where we round up the latest housing and land use-related events and hearings, as well as upcoming affordable housing lotteries that are ending soon. If you know of an event we should include in next week’s calendar, email jeanmarie@citylimits.org.

To get more resources like this as well as our latest reporting on local housing issues, sign up for City Limits’ Mapping the Future newsletter here.

Upcoming Housing and Land Use-Related Events:

Sunday, Dec. 25 at 11.a.m: The Doe Fund and formerly homeless families will gather in Washington Square Park for an annual candlelight memorial in honor of “Mama” Doe, the homeless woman whose death led to the creation of The Doe Fund. More here.

Wednesday, Dec. 28 at 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.: Brooklyn Public Library is holding Brooklyn Supports at Bushwick Library in which their social work program will assist the public with housing and food assistance referrals. More here.

NYC Affordable Housing Lotteries Ending Soon 

The New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) are closing lotteries on the following subsidized buildings over the next week.

  • 30-75 32nd Street Apartments, Astoria, for households earning $85,712 to $156,130
  • 571 Ocean Pkwy, Brooklyn, for households earning $81,429 to $156,130
  • 150 Bayard Street Apartments, Brooklyn, for households earning $47,520 to $187,330
  • Brook Avenue Apartments, The Bronx, for households earning $16,183 to $165,500
  • 2733 E 12th St Apartments, Brooklyn, for households earning $69,086 to $187,330