Net neutrality restored as FCC votes to regulate internet providers

posted in: News | 0

By DAVID HAMILTON (AP Technology Writer)

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The FCC on Thursday restored “net neutrality” rules that prevent broadband internet providers such as Comcast and AT&T from favoring some sites and apps over others.

The move effectively reinstates a net neutrality order the commission first issued in 2015 during the Obama administration; under then-President Donald Trump, the FCC subsequently repealed those rules in 2017.

Net neutrality is the principle that providers of internet service should treat all traffic equally. The rules, for instance, ban practices that throttle or block certain sites or apps, or that offer higher speeds to customers willing to pay extra.

“In our post-pandemic world, we know that broadband is a necessity, not a luxury,” FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said in a statement ahead of the vote.

The telecommunications industry opposed the reintroduction of the rules, as it has before, declaring it an example of unnecessary government interference in business decisions.

The measure passed on a 3-2 vote split by party lines, with Democratic commissioners in favor and Republicans opposed.

Opinion: 50 Years Later, Economic Abuse Survivors Are Still Living Like It’s 1974

posted in: News | 0

“In the 50 years since the Equal Credit Opportunity Act became law, so much has changed: women are home buyers, can open credit cards and despite a persistent gender wage gap, are able to accumulate wealth. But for survivors of domestic violence, the vast majority of whom experience economic abuse, so much remains the same.” 

John McCarten/NYC Council Media Unit

CityViews are readers’ opinions, not those of City Limits. Add your voice today!

Hank Aaron shattered Babe Ruth’s homerun record, Richard Nixon became the first American President to resign from office. Boston was ordered to begin desegregating its public school system and “Happy Days” made its small screen debut.

The year was 1974. And for the first time in history, women were granted the right to open a credit card in their own name. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), which was later amended to prohibit widespread credit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, gender and marital status, became law in 1974 at a time when financial and other forms of discrimination against women was rampant.

Though women were technically permitted to open a bank account in the 1960s, most banks required the signature of a husband to do so. Many mortgage lenders would not consider a married woman’s income if she was of child bearing age, and single women often could not qualify for mortgages on their own. Women could not open a credit card account in their own name, nor could they build individual credit histories.

Men controlled women’s access to finances, and denied them the ability to accumulate wealth, savings and financial stability, directly affecting the ability to be safely housed.

In the 50 years since the ECOA became law, so much has changed: women are home buyers, can open credit cards and despite a persistent gender wage gap, are able to accumulate wealth. But for survivors of domestic violence, the vast majority of whom experience economic abuse, so much remains the same. 

New York City recently defined economic abuse as a form of domestic violence. Economic abuse is nearly universally experienced by domestic violence survivors, and it is also deadly: the majority of survivors cite economic abuse as among the primary reasons they stay in or return to an abusive environment. 

Economic abuse can take many forms, including preventing a survivor from maintaining employment, controlling and withholding money, providing an “allowance,” lying about assets, restricting access to finances, credit or important financial documents. One especially pernicious form of economic abuse is coerced debt, which occurs when force, threats, intimidation and/or lies are used to cause a survivor to incur a debt. 

While domestic violence does not discriminate, women are 1.5 times more likely than men to experience intimate partner violence. And Black and Hispanic women are more likely to be seriously injured or killed than white women as a result of intimate partner violence. Moreover, transgender populations experience a twofold increase in such violence.

For women experiencing domestic violence and the economic abuse that so often accompanies it, it might as well still be 1974. Many survivors cannot control their finances or plan for their futures, they are prohibited from working or attending school, and as a result of coerced debt, they are saddled with high debt loads and low credit scores, which make it difficult to access housing, employment, cell phones, vehicles and ultimately, safety.

In 2024, this is simply unacceptable. We have tools to help survivors of domestic violence achieve financial autonomy. New York must expand access to direct cash assistance programs and to low and no barrier cash grants, which will remove a significant obstacle to safety by addressing survivors’ immediate financial needs. 

We must ensure that there is an adequate supply of stable temporary and permanent supportive and affordable housing so that when they are ready, survivors have a safe place from which to heal. 

Funding for career counseling, job training and internship placement will help survivors secure living-wage employment. And free childcare will enable survivors to secure housing and employment and manage legal and other appointments. 

There are currently no laws on the books to relieve survivors of a coerced debt burden. New York State must pass A.1309/S.2278-A, sponsored by Assemblymember Linda B. Rosenthal and State Senator Cordell Cleare, as an important first step. This legislation will provide survivors of domestic violence with a legal means to prove a debt that was coerced as a result of identity theft, fraud, force, or other illegitimate means, and to discharge the coerced debt and remove any negative marks on their credit report related to it. 

Taken together, these policies will help usher in the 21st century for countless survivors of domestic violence who continue to live like it’s 1974 because the law has not changed to reflect the growing threat that economic abuse poses for survivors and their ability to achieve safety.  

April is Financial Safety and Stability month. In 2024, we have the tools to ensure that survivors of domestic violence who have experienced economic abuse can take control of their finances and build a safe and stable future. We must not leave any survivors behind in 1974.

Nathaniel Fields (he, him, his) is the chief executive officer of Urban Resource Institute (URI). blair doroshwalther (they, him) is the program director of the Economic Empowerment Program at URI.

North Oaks’ Frankie Capan III shoots a 13-under, 58 to take Round 1 lead in Korn Ferry Tour event

posted in: News | 0

Frankie Capan III had the round of a lifetime Thursday at Texas Rangers Golf Club in Arlington.

The North Oaks’ product carded a 13-under, 58 in Round 1 of the Veritex Bank Championship to break the course record — which was a 59 by current world No. 1 Scottie Scheffler in 2020 — and claim a three-shot lead in the Korn Ferry Tour event.

Capan was 4-under through eight holes when he went on a scintillating scoring spree. Capan eagled the par-5, 9th before carding seven-straight birdies from holes No. 10-16.

He parred the 17th and 18th holes, hitting a 6-footer for par on the final hole to cap off the 58. His round was the talk of Golf Twitter on Thursday, as many of the sport’s biggest media personalities took note of the performance.

Capan — who earned his Korn Ferry status through Q-School in the fall of 2022 and even played in the 3M Open via a sponsor’s exemption last summer — entered the week in 30th on the Korn Ferry Tour points list. The top 30 at season’s end earn their PGA Tour cards. Currently, there is no native Minnesotan on golf’s top tour.

With a win this week, Capan would catapult into fourth on the points list. So while there’s plenty of golf to play this weekend, Capan’s round of a lifetime could also prove to be a life-changing event.

Here’s why Harvey Weinstein’s New York rape conviction was tossed and what happens next

posted in: Politics | 0

NEW YORK (AP) — The decision by New York’s highest court to overturn the rape conviction of movie mogul Harvey Weinstein has reopened a painful chapter in America’s reckoning with sexual misconduct by powerful figures — an era that began in 2017 and helped launch the #MeToo movement.

Here’s what you need to know about why Weinstein’s rape conviction was thrown out and what happens next:

WHY WAS THE CONVICTION TOSSED?

New York’s Court of Appeals found the trial judge in the rape case prejudiced Weinstein with “egregious” improper rulings, including a decision to let women testify about allegations that Weinstein wasn’t charged with.

In its 4-3 decision, the court’s majority said it was an “abuse of judicial discretion” for Judge James Burke to allow testimony from these other women about “loathsome alleged bad acts and despicable behavior.”

“Without question, this is appalling, shameful, repulsive conduct that could only diminish defendant’s character before the jury,” they said.

Weinstein’s attorney Arthur Aidala had argued that Burke also swayed the trial by giving prosecutors permission to confront Weinstein, if he chose to testify, about his past history.

He said Weinstein wanted to testify but opted not to because he would have had to answer questions about more than two-dozen alleged acts of misbehavior dating back four decades, including fighting with his movie producer brother, flipping over a table in anger, snapping at waiters and yelling at his assistants.

WILL WEINSTEIN BE RELEASED?

Weinstein, 72, will remain imprisoned because he was convicted in Los Angeles in 2022 of another rape and sentenced to 16 years in prison.

Weinstein has been serving time in New York, most recently at the Mohawk Correctional Facility, about 100 miles (160 kilometers) northwest of Albany.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

The Manhattan district attorney’s office has indicated it plans to retry Weinstein, which means his accusers could be forced to retell their stories on the witness stand.

“We will do everything in our power to retry this case, and remain steadfast in our commitment to survivors of sexual assault,” the prosecutors’ statement said.

Weinstein was convicted in New York on charges of criminal sex acts involving forced oral sex on a TV and film production assistant in 2006 and rape in the third degree for an attack on an aspiring actress in 2013.

Weinstein maintains his innocence and contends any sexual activity was consensual.