It might feel like the presidential election is still a long way off. It’s not.

There are just over 70 days until Election Day on Nov. 5, but major dates, events and political developments will make it fly by. Think about it this way: The stretch between now and then is about as long as summer break from school in most parts of the country.

In just two weeks, Sept. 6, the first mail ballots get sent to voters. The first presidential debate is set for Sept. 10. Former President Donald Trump, the Republican nominee, is scheduled to be sentenced in his New York hush money case on Sept. 18. And early in-person voting will start as soon as Sept. 20 in some states.

Here’s a look at why the calendar will move quickly now that the Democratic and Republican conventions are wrapped.

Who’s ready to vote?

The first batch of ballots typically sent out are ones to military and overseas voters. Under federal law, that must happen at least 45 days before an election — which this year is Sept. 21.

Some states start earlier. North Carolina will begin sending mail ballots to all voters who request them, including military personnel and overseas voters, in just two weeks, Sept. 6.

Voter registration deadlines vary by state, with most falling between eight and 30 days before the election, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The deadline is Oct. 7 in Georgia, one of this year’s most prominent presidential battlegrounds.

Nearly all states offer some version of in-person voting, though the rules and dates vary considerably. In Pennsylvania, another of the major presidential battleground states, voters can visit their local election office to request, complete and return a mail ballot beginning Sept. 16. For those counting, that’s about three weeks from now.

The gloves come off

Whether and where the Democratic and Republican presidential and vice presidential nominees debate has been a point of contention for weeks. But for now, two match-ups are on the calendar.

Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris have accepted an invitation from ABC News to debate Sept. 10 in Philadelphia.

Harris’ pick for vice president, Tim Walz, and Trump’s, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, have agreed to an Oct. 1 debate hosted by CBS News in New York City.

Harris has forecast a possible second debate with Trump, but her proposal appeared to be contingent on the GOP nominee’s participation in the Sept. 10 debate. Trump has proposed three presidential debates with different television networks.

Vance has challenged Walz to a second vice presidential debate on Sept. 18, although it’s not been set.

A possible criminal sentence for Trump

Related Articles

MN U.S. Senate race: Republican Royce White faces steep climb against 3-term Democratic U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar

With conventions over, a 10-week sprint to the White House begins

Anti-Trump Republicans at DNC offer tips on approaching swing voters

Young Black and Indian women share an identity with Kamala Harris — some are beaming, while others sit at a crossroads with her stance on Gaza

Fact-checking Day 4 of the Democratic National Convention

Trump is scheduled to be sentenced Sept. 18 in his hush money criminal case, though his lawyers have asked the judge to delay the proceeding until after Election Day. A decision is expected in early September.

In a letter last week to Judge Juan M. Merchan, Trump’s lawyers suggested that holding the sentencing as scheduled, about seven weeks before Election Day, would amount to election interference. On Sept. 16, Merchan is expected to rule on Trump’s request to overturn the guilty verdict and dismiss the case because of the U.S. Supreme Court’s July presidential immunity ruling.

Trump was convicted in May on 34 counts of falsifying business records to conceal a $130,000 hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels just before the 2016 presidential election. Falsifying business records is punishable by up to four years in prison. Other potential sentences include probation, a fine or a conditional discharge that would require Trump to stay out of trouble to avoid additional punishment.

Next steps in Trump’s other New York cases

On Sept. 6, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments in Trump’s appeal of a jury’s verdict last year ordering him to pay $5 million to writer E. Jean Carroll after it found him liable for sexually assaulting and defaming her. Trump also is appealing a verdict in a second trial in January in which a jury found him liable on additional defamation claims and ordered him to pay Carroll $83.3 million. Trump’s lawyers have until Sept. 13 to file a brief in that appeal.

On Sept. 26, a New York appeals court will hear oral arguments in Trump’s challenge of a nearly $500 million civil fraud judgment in state Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit against him. The court typically rules about a month after arguments, meaning a decision could come before the November election. Trump’s lawyers argue that a judge’s Feb. 16 finding that the former president lied for years about his wealth as he built his real estate empire was “erroneous” and “egregious.” State lawyers responded in court papers this week that there’s “overwhelming evidence” to support the verdict.

What about Trump’s election and document cases?

A state case in Georgia that charged Trump and 18 others in a wide-ranging scheme to overturn his 2020 loss in the state is stalled with no chance of going to trial before the election.

Federal prosecutors have brought two criminal cases against Trump, but one was dismissed by a judge last month and the other is likely to be reshaped by the recent U.S. Supreme Court opinion that conferred broad immunity on former presidents for official acts they take in office.

Special counsel Jack Smith has appealed the dismissal by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon of an indictment charging Trump with hoarding classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida and obstructing the FBI’s efforts to get them back. But even if a federal appeals court reinstates the case and reverses the judge’s ruling that Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional, there’s no chance of a trial taking place this year.

In light of the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling, a federal judge in Washington is now tasked with deciding which allegations in a separate case charging Trump with plotting to overturn the 2020 election can remain part of the prosecution and which ones must be discarded. Deciding which acts are official and which are not is likely to be an arduous process.

FILE – County employees open ballots in the mail ballot processing room at the Washoe County Registrar of Voters office in Reno, Nev., June 3, 2024. (AP Photo/Andy Barron, File)

Fights over voting and the election

Before the first ballots are even cast, both camps are gearing up to fight over voting.

Battles over election rules have become a staple of American democracy, but they’re expected to reach new heights this year. Trump installed his own leadership team at the Republican National Committee, including a director of election integrity who helped him try to overturn Biden’s win in 2020. The RNC has filed a blizzard of lawsuits challenging voting rules and promises that more are on the way.

Democrats also are mobilizing and assembling a robust legal team. Among other things, they are objecting to GOP efforts to remove some inactive voters or noncitizens from voter rolls, arguing that legal voters will get swept up in the purges.

Republicans have particularly escalated their rhetoric over the specter of noncitizens voting, even though repeated investigations have shown it almost never happens. Some also are pushing to give local election boards the ability to refuse to certify election results.

All indications are these efforts are laying the groundwork for Trump to again claim the election was stolen from him if he loses and to try to overturn the will of the voters. But there’s no way to know if that will happen until the ballots are cast.

Related Articles

At least 5 Secret Service agents have been placed on modified duty after Trump assassination attempt

With conventions over, a 10-week sprint to the White House begins

Anti-Trump Republicans at DNC offer tips on approaching swing voters

Young Black and Indian women share an identity with Kamala Harris — some are beaming, while others sit at a crossroads with her stance on Gaza

Fact-checking Day 4 of the Democratic National Convention

Associated Press writers Kate Brumback and Christina A. Cassidy in Atlanta, Meg Kinnard in Chicago, Nicholas Riccardi in Denver, Michael R. Sisak in New York and Eric Tucker in Washington contributed to this report. AP election researcher Ryan Dubicki in New York also contributed.

BERLIN (AP) — People were killed and injured in an attack on Friday at a festival in the city of Solingen in western Germany, the news agency dpa reported. It wasn’t immediately clear how many casualties there were.

The local Solinger Tageblatt newspaper reported that authorities called on people to leave downtown Solingen and that one of the festival organizers, Philipp Müller, said on a stage that emergency workers were fighting for the lives of nine people.

The dpa report cited unidentified police sources as saying the weapon was believed to be a knife and no one had yet been arrested. The attack happened on a central square, the Fronhof.

The festival marking the city’s 650th anniversary began on Friday and was supposed to run through Sunday.

Solingen has about 160,000 inhabitants and is located near the bigger cities of Cologne and Duesseldorf.

According to City Hall, since rolling out new stricter re-sheltering rules for adult migrants without children in May, it’s assessed over 2,600 shelter extension cases, issuing over 850 approvals and over 1,780 denials.

Emilio ate an apple outside the city’s “Reticketing Center,” at the former St. Brigid’s School in the East Village, where migrants can get a ticket to leave the city or reapply for an extension of their shelter stay.

Emilio, who asked that his full name not be used, was waiting near Tompkins Square Park for his friend, who like him hails from Ecuador. The two were visiting the Center to apply for more time in the shelter system; Emilio had been in the city since April, and was previously staying in a shelter in Midtown.

“They gave me 60 days,” Emilio, 39, said in Spanish, noting that he had recently applied for asylum with the federal government. He was assigned to two more months at the city’s large tent shelter for migrant adults at Randall’s Island. 

A couple of hours after arriving, his friend, Marcelo Canchingre, 37, emerged from the former St. Brigid’s School with a strip of white paper with the address of a Long Island City shelter. Canchingre arrived in the city in November, and had been sleeping in a shelter in Flatbush until his time ran out. He was already working at a restaurant in Manhattan.

“Not bad. You’re only a few stops from Manhattan,” Emilio commented after looking at the address. 

“They gave me 30 days,” Canchingre said, about the length of shelter stay he’d just received. Unlike Emilio, he has yet to apply for federal asylum.

It’s been several months since new rules went into effect for how migrants and asylum seekers can earn more time in the city’s shelters, based on their efforts to leave the system and often determined on a case-by-case basis. The city is now granting longer, 60-day extensions to those who fall into a category known as Permanently Residing Under the Color of Law (PRUCOL), meaning they’re eligible for certain public benefits.

As a result of a New York Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance guideline issued in May, migrants who have applied for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) or asylum—among other criteria—might be eligible for safety net assistance and state public benefits, such as temporary shelter.

The city has been granting additional shelter time for those with PURCOL status for months, but offering them longer, 60-day extensions, rather than 30 days as others have received, appears to be a more recent development, according to homeless advocates.

The legal settlement that established the current rules for re-sheltering adult migrants without children, reached in March, specifies that those who meet the city’s varied criteria for more time after an initial stint must be offered at least another 30 days if the applicant is older than 23, and at least 60 days for those who are younger.

When asked when the city had initiated this change, City Hall stated that the longer extensions to migrants with PRUCOL status began after the settlement with the Legal Aid Society and Coalition for the Homeless was reached.

But according to Josh Goldfein, an attorney for the Legal Aid Society who negotiated the right-to-shelter settlement, this change was implemented recently.

He said the idea of granting more time to those who’ve applied for asylum was proposed to the city by advocates in the last month or so. Additional time will provide stability to asylum applicants while they wait to obtain a work permit, Goldfein said, which they can only do 150 days after filing.

“They [the city] told us that was their plan,” Goldfein said, “But this is the first time I’m hearing that they went ahead and actually implemented it.” The mayor’s office said it did not have figures to share when asked how many people had received 60-day extensions because of their PRUCOL status.

On the morning of Aug. 13 outside the Reticketing Center, City Limits spoke to nine migrants after they applied for a shelter extension. All eight who had filed an asylum application received two months in a replacement approval notice. The one who hadn’t submitted for asylum received a 30-day extension instead.

Under the settlement reached in March, migrants applying for another bed after initial 30- or 60-day shelter stays could get extensions for “extenuating circumstances,” such as recovering from a medical procedure or if they have an upcoming immigration court date.

They could also earn more time if they show “significant efforts” to leave the system, such as applying for Temporary Protected Status—under which they can obtain work authorization—attending classes or securing a job, among other factors.

According to City Hall, since rolling out the new, stricter re-sheltering rules in May, it’s assessed over 2,600 shelter extension cases at the Reticketing Center, issuing over 850 approvals and over 1,780 denials.

The city wouldn’t detail how it weighs applications, but Goldfein said the 20-point system it began using this spring, in which someone can earn points for every effort they demonstrate to leave shelter, hasn’t changed.

“When people request extensions,” explained Dave Giffen, executive director at Coalition for the Homeless, “they are first screened for PRUCOL status, then if they do not have PRUCOL status, they can still request a shelter extension based on extenuating circumstances.”

When it was time to speak to a case manager inside the facility, migrants leaving the Reticketing Center that day reported being asked a few questions at most, while most said they were not asked any questions at all.

“We went in. We waited,” said Colombian Fernando Alemán, 23, in Spanish, who entered with a friend, and was given 60 more days at another shelter. “They didn’t ask us anything. They gave us the letter and the new address.”

Right: A man enters the Reticketing Center. Left: A prepackaged meal distributed to shelter applicants.
Photos by Adi Talwar.

Several, like Emilio, went out to eat the pre-packaged meals—consisting of an apple, boiled egg, and a bread roll—they had received inside.

More than 14,000 adult migrants without children remained in the city’s shelter system at the end of June, the most recent month for which population data is available. The stricter rules for shelter extensions over the last few months has resulted in more migrants sleeping and setting up camp outdoors, according to media reports, and city officials recently cleared one such encampment on Randall’s Island. 

Another more than 51,000 people in shelter in June were migrant families with children, who aren’t subject to the tougher re-sheltering rules. But many families with children in the system have been issued 60-day shelter deadlines, at which point they must reapply for another placement. And this week, city officials confirmed that they will begin issuing two-month notices to migrant families with kids in Department of Homeless Services’ shelter sites, who until now had avoided the time limits. 

Some 8,835 migrant families with children, or more than 30,000 people, were staying in DHS shelters at the end of June. Homeless and immigrant advocates have slammed the policy change, saying that forcing homeless children to move shelters every two months is disruptive to their routines and access to education, and comes just as the new school year is about to start. 

More faith-based shelters to open

On the morning of Aug. 13, some asylum seekers came out of the Reticketing Center with optimism on their faces.

But others complained that they were assigned to shelters far from where they worked, or were assigned to one of the nine houses of worship across the city that have opened as part of the faith-based shelter program announced by the mayor last year.

Under the plan, 50 houses of worship were selected to provide overnight housing for more than a dozen adults per facility, but after more than a year, just nine are currently providing shelter for migrants.

Unlike other shelters the city has opened, the religious sites can take in far fewer people and only operate overnight.

“They open at 7 p.m., and you leave at 7 a.m.,” said a Haitian immigrant in French, who did not want to be identified by name but who said he was assigned to one such site. 

Migrants and asylum seekers have the option of going to two “daytime hospitality centers,” which are open from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. and provide food, showers, and clothing distribution.

According to Peter Gudaitis, executive director and CEO of New York Disaster Interfaith Services (NYDIS), two more faith-based shelters are supposed to open this month and over 20 more are working to open.

For months, the program has been stalled by the Fire Department’s approval process, including complying with rules around the number of beds, and a Department of Buildings (DOB) requirement to obtain a temporary use permit.

“All delays are still related to the FDNY and DOB code compliance for getting a Temporary Use Permit,” said Gudaitis.

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Daniel@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

Robert Lloyd | Los Angeles Times (TNS)

“Pachinko,” a beautifully wrought historical melodrama, is back for its necessary second season, to fill in some holes, fiddle with loose ends and extend the story even farther beyond the borders of Min Jin Lee’s 2017 novel. It is a transitional season, which ends with little resolved and gaps still to fill, and while it offers all the sensual pleasures of the first season’s performances and production, its portion of love and death, it is very much the middle of a book.

Unlike the novel, which proceeds chronologically, the series, returning Friday on Apple TV+, alternates between the “present day” — 1989 Osaka — and the evolving story that gets us there. Season 1 began in 1915 before the birth of main character Sunja (Minha Kim) in Japanese-occupied Korea, then followed her through her country-girl youth into a romance with handsome, dangerous Hansu (Lee Minho). An unexpected pregnancy led to a marriage of convenience, later affection, with Isak (Steve Sanghyun Noh), a Christian preacher; together they moved to Osaka to join his brother Yoseb (Junwoo Han) and wife, Kyunghee (Eunchae Jung), where they become Zainichi, the term for Koreans living in Japan — a population much discriminated against. (Incidents of prejudice dot the current season, almost as a reminder of what the first season firmly established.)

That storyline got us to 1938. The new season picks up in early 1945 (skipping much of the novel), and times are difficult as Japan fearfully braces for an American attack; Sunja and Kyunghee eke out a living selling kimchi, and the cabbage has almost run out. Sunja’s children, Noa (Kang Hoon Kim), her son with Hansu, and Mozasu (Eunseong Kwon), her son with Isak, have grown accordingly. Noa, who is unaware of his birth father and takes after his adoptive father, is shy and studious, Mozasu brash and unsuited to study. Isak is in prison, having been arrested last season for rabble-rousing; Yoseb is working in a munitions factory in Nagasaki, which should raise an eyebrow. But a friendly new character, Mr. Kim (Kim Sungkyu), is hanging around helpfully, and Hansu, keeping an eye on them from near and far, will be back and involved.

(The Nagasaki sequence, which opens the fifth episode, is shot in black and white in standard aspect ratio, before returning to color and widescreen when the bomb drops. The title credit that follows omits the usual cheerful shots of the cast dancing to the Grass Roots’ “Let’s Live for Today” as inappropriate. Understandably.)

Nearly all the capital of the 1989 storyline having been spent in the first season, showrunner Soo Hugh has had to create fresh material to keep those characters busy while the earlier narrative catches up. (At the end of the season, they still have three decades to go.)

Older Sunja (Yuh-Jung Youn) is still living in Osaka with her successful son Mozasu (Soji Arai), who has grown up to own pachinko parlors — a sort of pinball cum slot machine — and, as a somewhat disreputable if popular business, one of the few avenues then open to Koreans. (Mozasu himself, a major character last season, is mostly absent from this one.) Mozasu’s son, Solomon (Jin Ha), college-educated in America, is in Tokyo, involved in high finance and real estate. In Season 1, he’d attempted to pry an old woman from her home in hopes of putting a golf resort on the land and impressing his bosses; in the end, he advised her not to sign the papers, but the current season finds him unfortunately back on that horse, in a complete moral backsliding. (I found the particulars of Solomon’s business dealings somewhat hard to follow, or perhaps just not worth the effort.)

Related Articles

Your audience is filled with Republicans. The Democratic convention is underway. How to cover it?

‘Jackpot!’ stars Awkwafina and John Cena discuss dystopian LA lottery comedy

Phil Donahue, whose pioneering daytime talk show launched an indelible television genre, has died

‘Bad Monkey’ review: Comedic crime caper stars Vince Vaughn as a motormouth detective

What to watch: A Laci Peterson ‘bombshell’? No, but ‘American Murder’ is a solid look at infamous case

This authorial trouble making might be expressed in the old Hollywood formulation as “boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy gets girl, boy loses girl, boy gets (possibly a different) girl” and so on, whether or not we are actually talking about boys and girls. It’s a problem familiar to ongoing original series, where fresh conflicts must be created each year. One expects it will build eventually to another shot at redemption — the series is too sentimental, too good-hearted not to offer him the chance.

And of course we get enough of Good Solomon to justify our interest, just as we get enough of Good Hansu to make up for his criminality. Parts of Solomon’s story, which brings in some unsavory characters, do feel constructed as a deliberate mirror of Hansu’s; perhaps not coincidentally they are played by the show’s best-looking actors. As to Sunja’s new, extra-textual adventures, she’ll strike up a friendship with a man at the supermarket that allows for an adorable scene in a Mexican restaurant, something seemingly new to 1989 Osaka.

Though historical events are acknowledged, what with World War II and the Korean War falling within the earlier timeline, and the Japanese asset price bubble and crash on the horizon in the later one, the current season focuses on family life and domestic detail, even as, or perhaps because it’s disrupted. In 1989, Sanju travels on her own from Osaka to Tokyo to check on her grandson, whom she senses is not all right. There’s a lovely scene in which she slices vegetables alongside Solomon’s Japanese love interest and former colleague, Naomi (Anna Sawai); I almost wrote “throwaway scene,” but, in fact, that naturalism is essential to the series, making something real out of the extravagant, even soap-operatic plotting.

And food, often in short supply in the earlier storyline, plays a part — making a meal, making a living, making a place at the table, making a home — most tangibly, out of a barn that Sanju, Kyunghee, Noa, Mozasu and Mr. Kim occupy at the end of the war. (Hansu’s tragedy is that though he provides support for the family, with or without the knowledge, he remains an outsider.) Characters speak of a “life well lived,” which is not at all the same thing as living well.

Obviously, this is not the season to start with “Pachinko,” but if you haven’t yet, it’s worth beginning at the beginning. Even if you watched the first season — which, given that you’ve read this far, I assume you have — it may be worth a look back to remember who all these characters are, what they have to do with one another, and what kind of trouble they got in and out of previously. And if the new season lacks the expositional energy of the first, if it’s more muted in tone, if Sunju is not quite the ray of sunshine she was, her older self will still have occasion to say here that hers was a life well lived.

©2024 Los Angeles Times. Visit at latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.