High school football: Section quarterfinal predictions

posted in: News | 0

Teams are listed by their section seeds.

CLASS 4A

No. 5 Como Park (4-4) at No. 4 Johnson (5-3), 3:30 p.m.

Johnson’s young nucleus of weapons gets a taste of postseason action by hosting an intracity rival. Como Park enters the contest as a winner of four of its previous five games, but can the Cougars slow the Governors’ offense down? Our pick: Johnson 30, Como Park 21

No. 6 South St. Paul (3-5) at No. 3 Simley (5-3), 6 p.m.

The Spartans are the heavy favorites, but it’s never an easy task to take down your fierce rival twice in a season. Simley beat South St. Paul 35-12 in late September. The Spartans can’t look ahead to a potential showdown with second-seeded Chisago Lakes in a semifinal. Our pick: Simley 27, South St. Paul 14

CLASS 5A

Hastings (2-6) at Two Rivers (7-1), 7 p.m.

Hastings beat Two Rivers 9-7 in the early stages of the season, a major data point that likely prevented Two Rivers from garnering a higher seed.

Since then, the Warriors have flourished. They finished with the No. 5 Quality Ratings Formula score among all Class 5A teams by Minnesota Scores.

The winner of this game will meet St. Thomas Academy in the section semis. A Warriors-Cadets matchup would be highly anticipated. But Hastings has already shown it’s capable of tearing those plans apart. Our pick: Two Rivers 21, Hastings 10

No. 5 Tartan (2-6) at No. 4 Highland Park (3-5), 7 p.m.

Tartan bested Highland Park 6-0 back in Week 2, yet the Scots still got the nod for home field in this one. A similarly low-scoring contest could play out in this one given the general lack of offensive production between these two this season. Points should be at a premium. Our pick: Tartan 13, Highland Park 7

Boston Common lined with reminders of those still kidnapped by Hamas

posted in: News | 0

In a solemn reminder of the lives still in peril, the Boston Common was lined Monday night with the fliers of Israelis kidnapped by Hamas terrorists Oct. 7.

Boston, MA – October 23, 2023:Examples of the display on the common showing victims of the assault on Israel. (Chris Christo/Boston Herald)
Boston, MA – October 23, 2023:Examples of the display on the common showing victims of the assault on Israel. (Chris Christo/Boston Herald)
Boston, MA – October 23, 2023: People take in the display on the common showing victims of the assault on Israel. (Chris Christo/Boston Herald)

Bishop Fenwick’s playoff status up to judge

posted in: News | 0

The postseason fate of Bishop Fenwick’s student athletes is now up to Essex Superior Court Judge Janice Howe.

On Monday, Howe presided over an emergency hearing as Bishop Fenwick pursues an injunction against the Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association’s ruling that the school is barred from participating in any postseason activities for the 2023-24 academic year. The MIAA enforced the punishment due to what it deemed Bishop Fenwick’s negligence in allowing ineligible student-athletes to participate and ensuing lack of accountability.

Bishop Fenwick allegedly used varsity baseball players whose fifth-year waiver applications contained misinformation and also used St. Mary’s middle school as a feeder system for its varsity teams.

While as of Monday evening Howe was yet to pass judgment, one is expected in short order. The timing is crucial as the MIAA fall state tournament will be underway across all sports within two weeks. Until this time the MIAA has handled Bishop Fenwick like an out-of-state team as it pertains to the power rankings. They do not appear in any updated standings but count towards an opponent’s team’s rankings. If the court were to rule in Bishop Fenwick’s favor, this would change, potentially altering the postseason fortunes for numerous teams.

Bishop Fenwick’s legal counsel took aim at its lack of participation with the inclusion of four girls volleyball players at Monday’s hearing.

Bishop Fenwick has made the case both in the lead-up to the hearings and Monday that the MIAA’s judgment is, “void for lack of due process.” The school has argued that the association’s ruling is inconsistent and arbitrary with regards to its past handling of similar situations. Its lawyer, Leo Fama, pointed to a 2012 situation with the Gardner swim team in which the MIAA originally prevented the school from participating in winter state tournaments for using ineligible players before ultimately changing its mind.

In the fall of 2021, Sutton’s girls soccer team was deemed to have used ineligible student-athletes midway through the state tournament but was allowed to keep playing as long as those student-athletes no longer took the field.

The MIAA, however, has stated on numerous occasions, including in affidavits submitted prior to Monday’s hearing, that Bishop Fenwick continues to lack accountability for its actions. MIAA executive director Bob Baldwin wrote that Bishop Fenwick attempted to distance itself from the varsity baseball player’s waiver process, “placing the blame solely on (the student-athlete) and his family and the-then athletic director.”

Trump defiant as political and legal worlds collide

posted in: Politics | 0

DERRY, N.H. — Other criminal defendants might play it safe when a gag order they’ve been subjected to gets temporarily lifted.

Donald Trump is not your average defendant.

At a series of appearances on Monday in New Hampshire, the former president seemed to take delight in flouting the court system that now endangers his livelihood and the judges urging him to watch his mouth. Clearer still was that he fully intends to wring political advantage out of the cases he is navigating.

It is, he told his followers, all “bullshit.”

Hours before he’s expected to appear back in court for his civil fraud trial in New York, Trump stood on a stage in a cavernous sports complex in southern New Hampshire and hurled insults at President Joe Biden and his Justice Department. He mocked New York Attorney General Leticia James and swiped at Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. And he wondered if his indictments would make his late father proud.

“I got indicted four times in the last 12 minutes. I heard we got two more, but I heard the DOJ called ‘no don’t do it’ because we’ve gone up in the polls every time I’ve gotten indicted,” Trump joked to cheers.

“‘Don’t indict him anymore. This is killing us,’” he went on, taking on the voice of a fictional caller from the DOJ. “We’re going to indict him right into the White House.”

Trump and his allies have long used the criminal cases against him to rally the MAGA base, an enduring feature of his unique brand of grievance politics. But never have those legal problems so clearly intersected with his political fate. Two Trump-aligned lawyers, Sidney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro, recently agreed to plea deals in the Georgia election interference criminal case, right as Trump is upping efforts to defend his legal cases in the court of public opinion.

In a reflection of just how intertwined his legal and political paths have become, Trump’s campaign moved swiftly to fundraise off news of the gag order with email pleas to supporters reading, “I won’t let a gag order silence YOU.” And there has been consideration in Trump world about what an appeal of the gag order could mean electorally. The appeal could further delay the proceedings, which is what the former president has wanted, according to two people familiar with discussions and granted anonymity to speak freely.

Hanging over all the deliberations is a recognition that Trump likely won’t stop talking about it, though perhaps in more moderated tones.

“This is the first time in history that somebody’s been indicted and his poll numbers have gone up,” Trump said. “When you get indicted, screw them, because the people understand it’s bullshit.”

“Bullshit, bullshit,” the crowd chanted back.

Earlier in the afternoon, while filing for New Hampshire’s presidential primary ballot at the secretary of state’s office in Concord, Trump said he is not concerned “at all” about losing attorney-client privilege with Powell after he claimed she was never his attorney despite having once said just that. Trump went on to insist he did “nothing wrong,” that his mounting legal challenges were “dirty politics” and that he might go after his own political opponents.

“It’s a two-way street,” Trump said. “Now it can happen the other way also, and that’s a sad moment for our country.”

Trump’s remarks come amid an intensifying fight — in Washington, D.C., and New York — about the danger his rhetoric poses to the efforts to hold him accountable in criminal and civil court. And they underscore the rhetorical tightrope he is now going to have to walk as the primary voting season nears.

Judges in both cities are weighing concerns that Trump’s social media bombast and penchant for invective against his perceived enemies could poison the jury pool in his criminal cases or spook witnesses from being fully candid.

On Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan gave Trump a temporary reprieve from a gag order she had imposed just three days earlier, after Trump’s attorney John Lauro argued that parts of the order were vague and indecipherable. Within hours, Trump had resumed his attacks on the lead prosecutor in his Washington and Florida criminal cases, special counsel Jack Smith, calling him “deranged” and also swiping at a potential witness in his Florida trial.

Chutkan had already warned Trump that some of his comments in that vein had violated his pretrial conditions of release. She imposed the gag order last Tuesday to formally bind Trump from making specific incendiary statements about Smith and his team, potential witnesses and court officials.

His comments, and any others he makes on the campaign trail or Truth Social, could figure into his legal fight to permanently lift the gag order — or a decision by Chutkan to reimpose it.

Already, Trump has run afoul of another judge’s gag order. Arthur Engoron, who is presiding over the civil fraud trial of Trump’s business empire, slapped Trump with a $5,000 fine last week after he learned that Trump’s campaign website continued to feature an attack on Engoron’s top clerk — even after the judge had order Trump to take it down and refrain from future attacks.

Trump’s attorney Chris Kise said the issue was an oversight because of some automated campaign procedures. Engoron said his decision to levy a nominal fine reflected that inadvertence. But he warned that he would impose far heavier punishment — including potential jail time — if Trump committed further violations.

Trump appeared to stay within those bounds at his Derry rally, where nearly 2,000 supporters from across New England packed into a gymnasium to see him.

Clad in bright red “Make America Great Again” hats and T-shirts depicting Trump behind bars, the former president’s fans danced on chairs to Michael Jackson’s “Beat It” as they waited for him to arrive. They laughed and clapped as he impersonated Biden from the podium and jeered as Trump ripped the president’s approach to Israel. Cries of “we love you” occasionally rose up from the crowd.

In interview after interview on Monday, Trump’s supporters stressed they would not leave his side even as his legal problems mount. In fact, they said, the more charges pile up against him, the more motivated they are to vote for him again.

“We think it’s a bunch of bullshit,” Jackie Thibault, a Chester, N.H., Republican, said as she clutched a hand-painted “Trump 2024” sign. “We see what they’re trying to do with him. … They’re so afraid of him, and that’s why they’re going after him.”

There was an undercurrent of confusion among some of Trump’s supporters — Thibault included — about why Powell and Chesebro took plea deals last week and what that could mean for Trump.

“I don’t understand that,” Thibault said.

But Trump’s “got a plan,” she said. “I’m hoping he does.”