What to stream: A guide to the ‘Planet of the Apes’ film franchise

posted in: News | 0

Katie Walsh | Tribune News Service

It’s been over five decades since the first “Planet of the Apes” movie premiered in 1968, and this week, the 10th “Planet of the Apes” film bows in theaters, “The Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes,” seven years since the last “Apes” film. A franchise filled with sequels, remakes and reboots, here’s your guide to all things “Planet of the Apes” to get you ready for the new movie.

Based on a 1963 sci-fi novel by French author Pierre Boulle (he also wrote the novel “The Bridge Over the River Kwai”), the original “Planet of the Apes” films were produced by 20th Century Fox. Since that studio now resides under the Disney corporate umbrella, all nine previous films are available to stream on Hulu (owned by Disney). The five original franchise films, made between 1968 and 1973, and the 2001 Tim Burton remake are also all available on Starz (or for rent on iTunes, Prime Video, etc.), while the four franchise reboot films (2011-2017) are also available on Max (or for rent elsewhere). But a Hulu subscription will get you access to all the “Apes” movies you can stand.

The 1968 “Planet of the Apes,” directed by Franklin J. Schaffner and starring Charlton Heston, was written by “Twilight Zone” creator Rod Serling and “Kwai” screenwriter Michael Wilson. Heston stars as an astronaut who travels to a strange planet ruled by apes (then realizes he was on Earth all along). The film was a smash success and earned Oscar nominations for the score and costumes, and an honorary Oscar for its makeup effects, the first given to a makeup artist.

Capitalizing on the success, the producers moved quickly on a sequel, “Beneath the Planet of the Apes” (1970), in which Heston only appeared in a few scenes before his character was killed off. In the film, another astronaut travels into the future and finds Heston’s character imprisoned by a group of subterranean human mutants. The film was not a critical success but it was a box-office hit nonetheless. More apes!

“Escape from the Planet of the Apes” (1971), “Conquest of the Planet of the Apes” (1972) and “Battle for the Planet of the Apes” (1973) brought the story back to Earth and used the sci-fi story of the apes as an allegory for contemporary social issues, including racial injustice. The character of Caesar, played by Roddy McDowall, who leads an ape rebellion, was introduced in “Conquest” — more on him later.

In the 1970s, there was also a live-action CBS TV series, and an animated series, but the franchise died out throughout the ‘80s and ‘90s, despite efforts to reboot it. They finally succeeded in 2001 with Tim Burton’s remake starring Mark Wahlberg, Helena Bonham Carter and Paul Giamatti. Wahlberg stars as an astronaut who travels through a wormhole to an ape planet where humans are enslaved and ultimately leads a human rebellion. It was a difficult production and not well-received, but still did well at the box office, which is why they keep making these movies.

Ten years later, husband-wife screenwriting duo Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver relaunched the “Apes” franchise with their concept for “Rise of the Planet of the Apes,” focusing on our old pal Caesar from “Conquest” and “Battle.” “Rise” was directed by Rupert Wyatt, and Caesar was portrayed by motion-capture king Andy Serkis. The film was a critical and financial success, earning an Oscar nomination for visual effects. Because this is “Planet of the Apes,” that meant one thing: sequels.

Future “The Batman” director Matt Reeves took over directing on “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes” (2014) and “War for the Planet of the Apes” (2017), following Caesar’s journey as an ape leader, from uprising to armed clashes with humans. The films were great successes with critics, fans and moviegoers, and “War” brought Caesar’s story to a fitting conclusion. The latest film, “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes,” takes place 300 years after the events of “War,” introducing a new cast of characters.

Hopefully that brings you up to speed with a brief overview of all things “Planet of the Apes,” one of the most enduring, and popular, film franchises in cinema history.

———

(Katie Walsh is the Tribune News Service film critic and co-host of the “Miami Nice” podcast.)

©2024 Tribune Content Agency, LLC

Quick Fix: Mac and Cheese Primavera

posted in: Adventure | 0

Linda Gassenheimer | Tribune News Service

Do you love mac and cheese? It’s a favorite dish for many of us. Here’s a light version with springtime vegetables: asparagus, yellow squash and zucchini.

Sharp cheddar cheese finishes this colorful and tasty dish. It’s a quick, vegetarian meal. Frozen chopped or diced onion is used for speed. I keep a package on hand to use in quick recipes.

HELPFUL HINTS:

If using thick asparagus, cook the dish 2 minutes longer.

Any type of onion can be used instead of frozen chopped onion.

COUNTDOWN:

Prepare ingredients.

Make the recipe.

SHOPPING LIST:

To buy: 1 container fat-free, fat-free, no-salt-added vegetable broth, 1 onion, 1 small yellow squash, 1 small zucchini, 1 bunch asparagus 1 box elbow macaroni, 1 package shredded reduced-fat sharp Cheddar cheese, 1 container nonfat ricotta cheese, 1 piece Parmesan cheese, 1 bottle cayenne pepper and 1 bottle smoked paprika.

Staples: salt and black peppercorns.

Primavera Mac and Cheese

Recipe by Linda Gassenheimer

2 1/2 cups fat-free, no-salt-added vegetable broth

1 cup diced onion

1 cup yellow squash cubes

1 cup zucchini cubes

1 cup elbow macaroni

1 cup shredded reduced-fat sharp cheddar cheese

1/4 cup nonfat ricotta cheese

4 spears asparagus cut into 1-inch pieces

1/4 teaspoon cayenne pepper

2 teaspoons smoked paprika

Salt and freshly ground black pepper

1/4 cup freshly grated Parmesan cheese

Add vegetable broth to a large nonstick skillet and place skillet over medium-high heat. When liquid comes to a boil, add the onion, yellow squash, zucchini and macaroni. Bring back to a boil and cook 5 minutes. Stir in the cheddar cheese, ricotta cheese and asparagus. Continue to boil 5 minutes stirring to scrape cheese from the bottom of the skillet. Check macaroni to make sure it is cooked. Add cayenne and smoked paprika, salt and pepper to taste. Divide between two dinner plates and add parmesan cheese on top.

Yield 2 servings.

Per serving: 482 calories (16 percent from fat), 8.4 g fat (4.4 saturated, 2.1 g monounsaturated), 21 mg cholesterol, 33.5 g protein, 70.6 g carbohydrates, 6.3 g fiber, 981 mg sodium.

(Linda Gassenheimer is the author of over 30 cookbooks, including her newest, “The 12-Week Diabetes Cookbook.” Listen to Linda on www.WDNA.org and all major podcast sites. Email her at Linda@DinnerInMinutes.com.)

©2024 Tribune Content Agency, LLC

Fact check: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is wrong about a ban on NIH research about mass shootings

posted in: News | 0

By Louis Jacobson | KFF Health News (TNS)

“Congress prohibits the NIH from researching the cause of mass shootings.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in an April 21 post on X

____

The National Institutes of Health is the federal government’s main agency for supporting medical research. Is it barred from researching mass shootings? That’s what presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said recently.

Kennedy, whose statements about conspiracy theories earned him PolitiFact’s 2023 “ Lie of the Year,” is running as an independent third-party candidate against President Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic candidate, and the presumptive Republican nominee, former President Donald Trump.

On April 21 on X, Kennedy flagged his recent interview with conservative commentator Glenn Beck, which touched on gun policy. Kennedy summarized his gun policy views in the post, writing, “The National Institutes of Health refuses to investigate the mystery; in fact, Congress prohibits the NIH from researching the cause of mass shootings. Under my administration, that rule ends — and our kids’ safety becomes a top priority.”

But this information is outdated.

In 1996, Congress passed the “ Dickey Amendment,” an appropriations bill provision that federal officials widely interpreted as barring federally funded research related to gun violence (though some observers say this was a misinterpretation). Congress in 2018 clarified that the provision didn’t bar federally funded gun-related research, and funding for such efforts has been flowing since 2020.

Kennedy’s campaign did not provide evidence to support his statement.

What Was the Dickey Amendment?

After criticizing some federally funded research papers on firearms in the mid-1990s, pro-gun advocates, including the National Rifle Association, lobbied to halt federal government funding for gun violence research.

Related Articles

National Politics |


Stormy Daniels tells jury about sexual tryst with Trump at hush money trial; his lawyers’ request for mistrial is denied

National Politics |


Inside the far-right plan to use civil rights law to disrupt the 2024 election

National Politics |


Donald Trump calls Joe Biden weak on antisemitism, ignoring his own rhetoric

National Politics |


In Holocaust remembrance, Biden condemns antisemitism sparked by college protests and Gaza war

National Politics |


Donald Trump to visit St. Paul for Republican fundraising dinner

In 1996, Congress approved appropriations bill language saying that “none of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control.” The language was named for one of its backers, Rep. Jay Dickey (R-Ark).

But the Dickey Amendment, as written, did not ban all gun-related research outright.

“Any honest research that was not rigged to produce results that helped promote gun control could be funded by CDC,” said Gary Kleck, a Florida State University criminologist. But CDC officials, experts said, interpreted the Dickey Amendment as banning all gun-related research funding.

This perception meant the amendment “had a chilling effect on funding for gun research,” said Allen Rostron, a University of Missouri-Kansas City law professor who has written about the amendment. Federal agencies “did not want to take a chance on funding research that might be seen as violating the restriction” and so “essentially were not funding research on gun violence.”

Also, the Dickey Amendment targeted only the CDC, not all other federal agencies. Congress expanded the restriction to cover NIH-funded research in 2011.

Although the Dickey Amendment didn’t bar gun-related research, federal decision-makers acted as though it did by not pursuing such research.

Moving Past the Dickey Amendment

Over time, critics of the gun industry made an issue of the Dickey Amendment and gathered congressional support to clarify the amendment.

In 2018, lawmakers approved language that said the amendment wasn’t a blanket ban on federally funded gun violence research. By 2020, federal research grants on firearms began to be issued again, starting with $25 million to be split between the CDC and NIH.

By now, the CDC and NIH are funding a “ large portfolio” of firearm violence-related research, said Daniel Webster, a professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Also, the Justice Department’s National Institute of Justice has funded the largest study of mass shootings to date, Webster said, and is seeking applications for studies of mass shootings.

Our Ruling

Kennedy said, “Congress prohibits the NIH from researching the cause of mass shootings.”

Although the Dickey Amendment, a provision of appropriations law supported by the gun industry, didn’t prohibit all federally supported, gun-related research from 1996 to 2018, decision-makers acted as though it did.

However, in 2018, Congress clarified the provision’s language. And since 2020, CDC, NIH, and other federal agencies have funded millions of dollars in gun-related research, including studies on mass shootings.

We rate Kennedy’s statement False.

(KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs of KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling and journalism.)

©2024 KFF Health News. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Stormy Daniels tells jury about sexual tryst with Trump at hush money trial; his lawyers’ request for mistrial is denied

posted in: News | 0

Molly Crane-Newman and Josephine Stratman | New York Daily News

NEW YORK — Stormy Daniels told a riveted jury Tuesday that sex with Donald Trump made her feel dizzy and had the room spinning as she wondered how she ended up half-naked in a Lake Tahoe hotel room with the then-reality TV star at the former president’s hush money trial.

Her testimony sparked a demand by Trump’s lawyers for a mistrial – which was denied.

In one of the trial’s more surreal moments, the porn star recounted her tryst with Trump in 2006 as the former president looked on with a scowl.

“What could possibly go wrong?” she remembered her publicist telling her, encouraging her to go to meet with Trump. Daniels thought it could be a good business opportunity since she wrote and directed and wanted to branch out from only adult films.

Daniels and Trump met at his hotel room, which was “three times the size” of Daniels’ apartment, where they chatted about the business of the porn industry and had a “very brief” discussion of Melania, Trump’s new wife.

Trump wore a silk pajama set, which Daniels, which she made fun of, asking him if “Mr. Hefner knew you stole his pajamas?”

Trump changed.

He suggested that she come on “The Apprentice,” telling her she was “smart and blond and beautiful,” just like his daughter.

“You’re not just a dumb bimbo,” he told her, Daniels said. “You’re more than people think.”

At one point, Daniels went to use the bathroom. When she came back out, Trump was perched on the bed, striking a pose in just his boxers and a t-shirt.

“At first, it was just startling, like a jump scare,” she said. “I wasn’t expecting him to be there, especially minus a lot of clothing.”

Trump watched from the defense table, glowering at points and muttering to himself and his lawyers. During much of her testimony, he kept his eyes trained on the ceiling.

“I felt the room spin in slow motion,” she said, wondering how she misread the situation to end up in this position. “I felt the blood leave my hands… almost like when you stand up too fast.”

She tried to crack a joke and leave, but Trump blocked her exit. Daniels said there was an “imbalance of power” but that she wasn’t threatened.

“The next thing I know, I was on the bed, somehow on the opposite side,” she said. “I had my clothes and my shoes off. My bra however was still on. We were in missionary position.”

Afterward, Daniels said she was ashamed, telling “very few people” that they’d had sex.

Trump continued to call her after, ringing her up several times a week.

“He always called me honeybunch,” she said.

Trump didn’t ask her to keep the encounter confidential, Daniels said.

Move for mistrial denied

Daniel’s explosive testimony prompted a demand by Trump’s lawyers for a mistrial — which Judge Merchan promptly denied.

Trump lawyer Todd Blanche said Stormy Daniels’ testimony in the morning was “unduly and inappropriately prejudicial to President Trump,” and asked the court to severely limit her testimony at the “next trial.”

The parts of the testimony Trump’s team took issue with included her testimony on condom use during sex, their differing heights and the power dynamic between the two.

“This is the kind of testimony that there’s no coming back from,” Blanche said.

Susan Hoffinger countered that the defense opened the door in opening statements by making claims about Daniels, impugning her character and credibility. She said she was extremely mindful not to elicit too much testimony.

“At the end of the day, your honor, this is what the defendant was trying to hide.”

Daniels sheds light on hush money deal

Daniels also testified about the hush money deal that lies at the heart of the case against Trump.

She said she was approached in a parking lot in 2011 when she was with her infant daughter, she said, where she was “threatened” and told not to share her story. Scared, she kept mum on it.

Then, after Trump announced his candidacy in 2015, Daniels’ agent approached her about telling her story. She talked it over with a lawyer and decided to share it.

Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger asked whether this decision was guided by what happened to her in the parking lot and wanted to ensure it was documented.

“Yes,” Daniels said.

Daniels also testified that it was her and her agent’s idea to sell the story to news outlets.

“My motivation wasn’t money, it was to get the story out,” Daniels said adamantly after Hoffinger asked if she wanted lawyer Keith Davidson to negotiate with Cohen for money. “I was motivated out of fear and not money.”

Daniels understood Trump to be the beneficiary, that neither of them could acknowledge knowing the other, and that she would be liable for $1 million “every time I said something”

“I was afraid that if it wasn’t done before the nominations and things, then I wouldn’t be safe,” she said, then clarifying she meant the election.

Stormy sworn in

Daniels sashayed up to the witness box, swore to tell the truth, and spelled out her stage name. Trump turned his head and looked at her just before she took her seat. He averted his eyes from her at points, looking up at the ceiling as she spoke.

The adult film actress, who told the jury her real name is Stephanie Clifford but prefers going by Stormy, began her day in court talking about her Louisiana upbringing, religious schooling and getting into tap dance.

She got into exotic dancing after a friend invited her to see her dance. Daniels thought it “was the same kind of dancing I did.” It was not. Years later, at 23, she got her start in porn after agreeing to be a clothed extra in one film.

The former president’s legal team began the day’s proceedings asking Judge Juan Merchan to prevent her from divulging “salacious” details of their alleged tryst more than a decade ago.

But prosecutor Susan Hoffinger said it was vital for the prosecution to establish the credibility of Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, promising, “It’s not going to involve any details of genitalia.”

Merchan said he would allow limited testimony on the topic.

Daniels has long alleged she slept with Trump at a 2006 charity golf tournament in Lake Tahoe, not long after his marriage to Melania and less than a year after the birth of his youngest child.

When she testified at her former lawyer Michael Avenatti’s trial, at which he was accused and ultimately convicted of stealing her advance book proceeds, the adult film star rejected descriptions of the encounter as an affair.

“I don’t consider getting cornered coming out of a bathroom to be an affair,” Daniels testified.

Jurors last week heard extensive testimony from her lawyer in 2016, Keith Davidson, who told the court about Michael Cohen’s eleventh-hour effort to pay her off before the election Trump won to ensure the electorate wouldn’t learn of her claims before heading to the polls.

Daniels first sought to go public about the tryst with Trump in a 2011 interview with InTouch, but the story was killed after Cohen threatened to sue. The magazine published her claims years later, in March 2018, reporting that it had corroborated her claims with her ex-husband and that she’d passed a lie detector test.

Trump is facing 34 felonies in his Manhattan criminal case, all of which he denies, alleging he covered up his reimbursement to Cohen for paying off Daniels after he took the White House.

Prosecutors say the payments came as the last stage of a scheme to influence the results of the 2016 election first devised at Trump Tower between Trump, Cohen, and former tabloid publisher David Pecker.

On Monday, jurors saw the 2017 checks to Cohen bearing Trump’s famous spiky signature and handwritten notes by his former finance chief calculating the fixer’s debt for handling the hush money deal.

Trump’s defense has claimed that he didn’t know about the payment and believed he was paying his then-personal lawyer for legitimate legal work.

“We didn’t put it down as construction costs, the purchase of sheetrock, the electrical costs,” Trump said on his way into court on Tuesday morning. “The legal expense that we paid was put down as legal expense. There’s nothing else you could say.”

During testimony by Hope Hicks on Friday, Trump’s former campaign press secretary and White House communications chief said Trump acknowledged Cohen had paid off the porn star when it was first reported in detail, claiming to her he didn’t know about it and that Cohen did it out of “the kindness of his heart.”

Hicks conceded that would be out of character for Cohen, casting doubt on the likelihood he didn’t expect to be paid back.

——-

©2024 New York Daily News. Visit at nydailynews.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.