Kevin Hart, Doja Cat, ‘Up’ house part of Airbnb’s new Icon experience

posted in: Adventure | 0

Airbnb wants to give guests access to worlds they’ve only dreamed of.

The company unveiled its Icon category, described as “extraordinary experiences from the world’s greatest icons.”

Guests will be hosted by Kevin Hart, Doja Cat or TikTok sensation Khaby Lame, stay in Prince’s “Purple Rain” house, or spend the night in the Musée d’Orsay.

“Icons take you inside worlds that only existed in your imagination — until now,” Brian Chesky, Airbnb co-founder and chief executive officer, said in a news release.

Throughout the year, Airbnb will release 11 Icon stays around the U.S. and the world.

Drift off in the ‘Up’ house:

In Abiquiu, New Mexico, you can sleep inside Disney and Pixar’s most iconic home by exploring Carl’s world in a detailed recreation — complete with more than 8,000 balloons. Oh, and it will rise into the air, in case you were wondering.

Spend the night in the Ferrari Museum:

For those with a need for speed or a love of heavy machinery, the Ferrari Museum in Maranello, Italy, features a bed crafted from the same leather as Ferrari seats. You’ll sleep “next to 110 elite trophies, and the Ferrari cars that won those trophies.” You’ll also get to ride along with Marc Gené as he takes you on a lap around the Pista di Fiorano.

Step into X-Men ‘97:

In Westchester, New York, for a few days you can live out your childhood dreams like the Marvel X-Men in a recreation of professor Xavier’s mansion.

Go VIP with Kevin Hart:

The comedian is taking you on a journey into his members-only Coramino Live Lounge for an A-list evening. You’ll join Hart and his friends in this secret speakeasy, where you’ll enjoy a tequila tasting and live stand-up.

Wake up in the Musée d’Orsay:

Stay in the Paris art museum’s iconic clock room. From the terrace, you’ll see the Opening Ceremony of the Olympic Games along the River Seine.

Join a living room session with Doja Cat:

In an intimate experience, the singer will be hosting you and giving a living room performance of her favorite songs and her latest album.

Stay in Prince’s “Purple Rain” house:

Prince purchased the mansion in Minneapolis from the movie “Purple Rain,” and no one has been able to tour the land until now. You get a chance to stay at the mansion and listen to rare tracks by rock music icon.

Game with Khaby Lame:

The famed TikToker invites you to his hometown of Milan, ideal for those seeking an overnight gaming experience.

Go on tour with Feid Feid is going on tour and taking you with him. For one week you’ll join the reggaeton artist and his crew for rehearsals, ride along on the tour bus and get backstage access for every show.

Live like Bollywood star Janhvi Kapoor:

Take a trip to Chennai, India, in style with Bollywood star Kapoor in her family home. The intimate experience includes learning her beauty secrets to tasting her favorite southern Indian dishes.

Make core memories with Inside Out 2:

You’re cordially invited to an overnight stay at Headquarters, aka the control center of Riley’s emotions.

How to book

The listings won’t go live all at once. In order to get your booking, Airbnb is doing it via lottery.

Each guest can request to book the location once it goes live. For example, you can request the “Up” house now through May 14, but a stay in Prince’s pad won’t be available until August.

From there, those selected will receive a “digital golden ticket.” The experiences are priced under $100 per guest — with some being free.

“As life becomes increasingly digital, we’re focused on bringing more magic into the real world. With Icons, we’ve created the most extraordinary experiences on Earth,” Chesky said.

For more information, visit the Airbnb Icon category page.

_________

©2024 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Visit at ajc.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Williams Pipeline Saga Ends, But the Fight to Phase Out Gas Continues

posted in: Society | 0

After three attempts to get permits for its pipeline project failed, Williams Companies Inc claims it’s walking away. But as other companies seek to expand fracked gas infrastructure in New York, activists say the fight feels far from over.

Jeff Reed/NYC Council

A rally against the proposed Williams pipeline on the steps of City Hall in March 2019.

Since 2017, environmental activists have been battling attempts to build the Williams Pipeline, a gas infrastructure project that would start in Pennsylvania, make its way through New Jersey and end in New York City’s Rockaways.

Now, the company claims the saga has finally come to an end. Williams Companies Inc, the entity responsible for the proposal, notified state authorities last month that it would let a 2019 federal permit that green-lit the project expire on May 3, and would not be seeking an extension.

And despite celebrating the decision as a victory, activists say the fight to end the expansion of fracked gas infrastructure across the state continues.

“The Williams pipeline may have been defeated. But the fight has shifted,” said Sara Gronim from the environmental non-profit 350 Brooklyn, which vehemently opposed the expansion over the years. “There are other forces in the natural gas industry in New York that have not yet recognized that New York State is moving off gas.”

Since 2019, when New York passed its landmark climate law that requires the state to mostly phase out fossil fuels like gas by 2050, utility companies have spent nearly $5 billion to maintain and expand gas infrastructure across the region, according to the Building Decarbonization Coalition. 

The latest fossil-fueled project to mobilize local environmental groups is the proposed enhancement of the 30-year-old fracked gas Iroquois pipeline, which runs from Canada to New York City.

The venture, carried out by the Iroquois Pipeline Operating Company, aims to boost capacity by enhancing four compressor stations to increase the flow of gas to New York City by November 2025. It seeks to add a total of 125 million cubic feet per day of natural gas to its existing infrastructure, to be distributed by utilities like National Grid and Con Edison.

And with the industry pushing hard to keep gas flowing, activists say there’s also no guarantee that Williams won’t reapply for an expansion in the future. 

“For now, they have admitted defeat with this particular project. But if they see another opportunity in the northeast they could come back,” Gronim said.

Three tries, three denials

Gronim has reason to worry, if precedent is any indication: in the past, Williams kept reapplying for permits even after they were denied.

For years, Williams pushed for the new pipeline, claiming it was necessary to meet projected peak demand levels for gas. But environmental groups say the proposed expansion, which would include adding approximately 23.5 miles of underwater pipeline from New Jersey to Rockaway, would be harmful for the environment, churning up arsenic, lead, and other contaminants from the sea floor. 

Under a federal law known as the Clean Water Act, gas companies are required to seek out a state water-quality permit to lay down pipelines. In New York, the regulatory body responsible for sifting through these applications is the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). 

When Transco, the Williams’ subsidiary in charge of the project, applied for a water-quality permit for the first time in 2017, it was denied. The company resubmitted its plan a year later only to have it refused again. Despite the denials, it didn’t give up: a third attempt was made in 2019, but that too was shot down

FERC

The route of the proposed Williams pipeline.

On the national level, Williams was granted permission for the project from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the agency tasked with regulating the interstate transmission of gas in the U.S. But that expired earlier this month.

In an email a spokesperson for Williams reiterated that they “have decided not to pursue an extension of the [FERC] certificate.”

“Natural gas remains a critical part of our country’s energy mix, necessary to ensure reliability for more intermittent resources during periods of peak demand and to progress our nation’s climate goals,” the spokesperson added. 

All eyes on Iroquois 

Williams’ move to walk away from the federal extension is being viewed as a victory by the environmental community, which has already moved on to the next big pipeline fight. 

Now, they are hoping to stop the Iroquois Pipeline Company from enhancing two New York based compressor stations along its route, which runs from Wadington on the border with Canada all the way to Dover near Connecticut . 

In a brochure issued by the company, they cite a need to “meet the increasing need for natural gas in the northeast region” as a main driver behind the project.

The company applied for two air permits in late 2022 and is awaiting approval from the DEC. The decision is due any day now.

In this case, they didn’t need to apply for a water-quality certificate because they aren’t laying down new pipes. Instead, they have to justify the chemicals and pollutants that the project will release into New York’s air. 

Fracked gas releases greenhouse gasses that bring about climate change, including a potent pollutant known as methane. U.S. natural gas pipelines are leaking between 1.2 million and 2.6 million tons of methane per year, according to a report by the Environmental Defense Fund.

In the project’s brochure the company highlights that it “will be subject to an extensive environmental review as part of the regulatory process” and will seek to reduce “overall emissions at project sites,” through the use of specialized turbines and methane recovery systems. 

“We are dedicated to preserving our environment by seeking ways to minimize intrusions to, and maximize protection of, our natural resources,” the company’s brochure said.

The regulatory agency that governs utility companies, the New York State Department of Public Service (NYS DPS), issued a statement in February backing the company’s effort. The agency claims the expansion “is necessary to ensure Con Edison’s and National Grid’s continued provision of safe, adequate, and reliable gas service to customers in the downstate region.”

Food & Water Watch

Environmental groups rallying in Albany last week, pressing the governor to oppose the Iroquois pipeline expansion.

“The focus must continue to be on the legitimate energy needs of the state,” a spokesperson for the Iroquois Pipeline Company said in an email,  echoing the DPS’ statement.”This project is essential for Con Edison and National Grid to continue to reliably serve their New York customers during the transition to cleaner energy sources.”

The public was given a chance to weigh in during the permit approval process, too. Residents who live in Athens and Dover, NY, where the compressor stations are located, expressed concerns over health risks associated with pushing more gas through the pipeline. 

“Compressor stations are semi-permanent facilities that pollute the air 24 hours a day as long as gas is flowing through pipelines,” the Concerned Health Professionals of New York pointed out in the comments they submitted to the DEC. These pollutants, they argued, “are known contributors to preterm birth, childhood asthma, heart disease, stroke, respiratory distress, and shorter lifespan.”

According to environmental nonprofit Food & Water Watch, compressor stations also emit cancer-causing chemicals like nitrogen oxide (NOx), fine particulate matter, carbon monoxide, benzene, and formaldehyde. A 2019 study found that air emissions from 74 compressor stations in New York State contained 39 chemicals known to be human carcinogens. 

“The air is already terrible in Athens. Who knows what kind of repercussions we might see to our health,” said Mary Finneran, a retired high school teacher who lives in a neighboring community and says she drives by the compressor stations often. The Iroquois pipeline also passes less than a quarter mile away from an elementary school. 

“We have to fight for the well-being of our kids,” Finneran added.

The former teacher joined environmental groups Wednesday on a quest to personally deliver the comments they submitted to the DEC to Gov. Kathy Hochul. They’re urging the administration to ensure  the Iroqouis’ proposal for expansion meets the same fate that the Williams project did. 

“We saw with the Williams pipeline that the gas was not wanted. But now the fossil fuel industry is again pushing for a new project,” said Emily Skydel, a senior organizer at Food & Water Watch.  

“I think they are throwing darts at the board to see what sticks. So they’ll do whatever they can to get a project approved.” 

To reach the reporter behind this story, contact Mariana@citylimits.org. To reach the editor, contact Jeanmarie@citylimits.org

Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

Willow Smith, daughter of Jada and Will, becomes third author in her family

posted in: News | 0

Willow Camille Reign Smith came home on Friday.

Technically, perhaps, the 23-year-old was born in California, where she lives today. But the writer, singer and activist is the youngest child of Baltimore’s favorite daughter, Jada Pinkett Smith, and she comes from a long line of strong, confident, proud Black Baltimore women including her grandmother, Adrienne Banfield-Norris.

In Smalltimore, that’s enough reason to embrace Willow Smith as family.

And more than 300 Baltimore-area women turned out Friday night at the Enoch Pratt Free Library to support Smith, who is on a book tour for her first novel, “Black Shield Maiden,” published Tuesday by Random House.

“I love being Black,” Smith told her interviewer, Glory Edim, founder of the Well-Read Black Girl website and podcast.

“I want to inspire people who felt like they didn’t have a voice to just sing and know that deep in your heart your voice is valuable.”

Smith is the third member of her family to put pen to paper. Her father Will Smith’s autobiography “Will” written with the help of Mark Manson, was published in 2021. Last fall, her mother’s memoir, “Worthy,” made waves with its candid examination of Pinkett Smith’s relationship with her husband.

But instead of probing her own psyche, Willow Smith created a work of historical fiction to explore the possibility that Viking warriors, who ventured as far south as Morocco, might have encountered African people and their culture. While studying the legend of Erik the Red, Smith stumbled on Thorhall the Hunter, a fictional character who some historians have hypothesized was based on a real-life Black man. If Thorhall had a daughter, Smith wondered, what would she be like?

Her speculations resulted in the fictional character of the warrior maiden Yafeu, the protagonist of a book that Smith spent six years writing with her friend, Jess Hendel.

That intellectual rigor impressed Shawn Lee, 45, of Baltimore, who attended the discussion with her daughter. Lee said she first became familiar with Willow Smith from the “Red Table Talk” show that ran from 2018 to 2023 and was co-hosted by Pinkett Smith, Banfield-Norris and Willow Smith.

“I admired the way she handled all those grownup conversations,” Lee said. “She’s a very intelligent young lady.”

Though the crowd at the Pratt was almost exclusively female, participants ranged from senior citizens to preschoolers. If older audience members became acquainted with Willow Smith primarily through her movie-star parents, the opposite is true for members of Generation Z.

Willow Smith, a singer, songwriter, and activist, discusses her new book, Black Shield Maiden, at the Enoch Pratt Central Library on Friday. (Kim Hairston/Staff)

Willow Smith, a singer, songwriter, and activist, discusses her new book, Black Shield Maiden, at the Enoch Pratt Central Library on Friday. (Kim Hairston/Staff)

of

Expand

They became fans of Willow Smith in 2010, when she was 9 years old and her debut single, “Whip My Hair,” peaked at number 11 on Billboard’s Hot 100. They have followed her career as a singer-songwriter with viral hits like “Meet Me at Our Spot” and a new album, “Empathogen,” released on May 3. They admire the fashionista with her father’s height and her mother’s delicate features who turned heads earlier this week at the Met Gala.

“My children have grown up being fans of Willow,” said LaShelle Bynum, 64, of Baltimore. “I came to this talk tonight because I wanted to learn about her for myself.”

Here is some of what Bynum discovered:

Though Willow Smith can rock a gold chain dress over a black bikini, she thinks of herself as a bookworm and nerd.

“I was a really voracious reader when I was growing up,” she told Edim. “I was always asking my dad to take me to the bookstore.”

She is a big fan of historical fiction series, and cited Jean M. Auel’s “Earth’s Children” and Marion Zimmer Bradley’s “The Mists of Avalon” as favorites.

“What I love about historical fiction,” she said, “is that there is an interesting mix between going back in time and using that period to comment on current situations.”

The intersection of real life and make-believe can be a perilous place for an author; when Smith’s publisher released two early excerpts of “Black Shield Maiden” in May 2022, it inspired a backlash of criticism from the Arab world, which characterized those passages as anti-Muslim.

“The Imazighen are not mythological tribes,” wrote Rania Kettani in “The Gazelle,” a student -run publication that operates out of New York University. “We are well and alive.”

Kettani wrote that she objects to “half of my genealogy” being depicted as “barbarous and dangerous religious zealots.”

Smith wasn’t asked about the controversy during her talk at the Pratt, and it couldn’t immediately be determined whether the disputed passages had been rewritten prior to publication.

But in a post on social media that has since been deleted, Smith’s co-author, Hendel, wrote that the pair had conducted considerable research on Islamic societies and added that the novel “tackles directly prejudices about the Amazigh and other Islamic peoples.”

Smith said Friday at the Pratt she is planning at least two more sequels to “Black Shield Maiden.”

Column: Kids like to swear. Do I blame Olivia Rodrigo? Or do I blame myself?

posted in: News | 0

I turned to the parent next to me and asked what she was going to do about all the, you know … I didn’t want to say it. The what, the parent asked. All of the swearing, the F-bombs and such, I said. This was several weeks ago, at the United Center, where Olivia Rodrigo was playing the second of two shows. Soon, if her new album, “Guts,” was any indication, she would be singing F-words and S-words and lots of other B(ad)-words, loudly and prolifically, and to judge by the lines to get in, she would be singing them to many, many children, middle school-aged and younger.

Which meant, of course, thousands of young children shouting back naughty, naughty words. I wasn’t clutching my pearls in horror. But I was wondering:

Have we all decided — you, me, Olivia, Beyoncé, Taylor Swift — that young children can swear now?

Kim Vanhyning, the parent beside me, from the village of Channahon near Joliet, was attending with her two children, ages 9 and 12, and their grandmother Dorothy, who whispered: The kids recently lost their 7-year-old brother to cancer; they had shirts made that read “(Expletive) Cancer.” They knew swear words more intimately than they liked. And yet, Kim said, for tonight, “the rule is: Sing the swear words, but only tonight.”

At their age, I would have felt weird swearing in front of my mom.

Kim Vanhyning nodded: “I know! I wouldn’t have dreamed of cursing in front of my parents.”

“Yup,” her mother said, confirming it.

But these days — screw it, I guess.

I asked many more parents of young children at the United Center how they planned to deal with inevitable hailstorm of bad words, and the responses were so full of nuance — so lacking in generational clutching of their own pearls — that I wondered if attitudes on when and how children swear had shifted. Sure, parents at an Olivia Rodrigo show are likely more indulgent than most. But even within this sample, there’s subtlety. Mary Davis, from the Chicago suburbs, told me her kids “can’t swear tonight or at home, but they know all the swears and are great at finding words to substitute.” Jenny Grippo of McHenry said, “I’m a bad person to ask. I swear a lot. My daughter” — Avery, 10 years old — “she’s used to it, so I’ll let her enjoy the moment and sing whatever she likes, but she can not say swears at home and she can not swear in front of me.”

“I wish,” Avery deadpanned.

Cry about the decline of morality and coarsening of culture, but I would like to thank Olivia, and Taylor, and Beyoncé, and Nicki Minaj and other contemporary Top 40 singers for their contributions to the mainstreaming of swearing. I really like swear words. Though we don’t have mountains of rigorous university-backed studies on the impact of swearing — and even fewer on its effect on children — we do know from what exists that cursing can help manage emotions, and that people who swear extravagantly tend to be among society’s truth tellers. (Lacking filters, they are regarded as warmer people, more trustworthy.) When Taylor Swift released her first album at age 16, the only use of profanity was one utterance of “damn.” Now 34, her latest album, “The Tortured Poets Department,” has seven songs marked as explicit, and according to online linguistic breakdowns on its lyrics, the F-bomb has become her fourth most frequently used word.

Because, well, (expletive) — just living out in the world erodes our filters.

Before you say Olivia Newton-John never relied on cursing, or that the Beatles became superstars without dropping F-bombs, know there were practical reasons they couldn’t. Partly, federal regulations against profanity on radio stations, which drove record sales. Spotify, YouTube, TikTok, the places people hear music today carry no such regulations.

“I understand why it would be disconcerting for those of us over 40 to be standing in an arena of 8-year-old girls collectively screaming the F-word, but it’s a pretty natural part of the evolution of music and technology,” said NPR music critic Ann Powers. “If your parents were raised on hip hop, metal and punk, they are probably not shocked.”

And yet, the morning after “Tortured Poets Department” was released, during the drive to school, my daughter, age 7, already memorized the chorus of a song that goes “(Expletive) it if I can’t have him,” and was singing loudly, no worries. I was startled, then winced, without being shocked. Olivia R. sings about driving past “the places we used to go ‘cause I still (expletive) love you, babe.” Beyoncé sings, “Don’t be a (expletive), come take it to the floor.” And I could blame them.

But no, it’s me, hi, I’m the problem, it’s me.

“The stories we tell about the way we use language is the real story of how language is changing,” Jason Riggle, a linguist at the University of Chicago, told me. Our anecdotal truths get closer to the emotional truth of how we feel about cursing than clinical studies. When he said that, I thought of my favorite online video ever: A very young British child stands at the window of a suburban living room and tells her mother, “There’s a (expletive) goat outside.” The mother, sensibly, replies, “It’s just a goat.” But the girl, now frowning and serious, corrects: “No, it’s a (expletive) goat.” And indeed, when the camera pans over, there is a goat in their yard.

My daughter asks to watch this video the way she asks to watch Disney+. It’s my fault for (accidentally) showing it to her in the first place, but her love for it doesn’t worry me: It teaches, in its way, that with naughty language, context always matters. It shows the power of the right emphasis. And that well-timed language can generate a visceral thrill.

When I was a kid in the ‘70s and ‘80s, a bad word on the radio could be a shock. Charlie Daniels singing “son of a bitch” in “The Devil Went Down to Georgia,”  should you catch the unbleeped version, landed like a slap. I will never forget the Sunday afternoon I was in the car with my Italian grandmother and we were listening to the Pretenders’ “Precious” on the radio and somehow the DJ’s bleeping finger was slow and Chrissie Hynde sang, very clearly: “But not me baby, I’m too precious — (expletive) off!”

“Mio Dio!,” Grandma said.

Swearing is among the great joys of adulthood. I swear a lot. Why wouldn’t my daughter want to? It serves as anger, punctuation, a laugh, a threat, shorthand. Emma Byrne, a scientist who studies artificial intelligence and wrote a book on swearing (“Swearing is Good For You”), described an experiment in which subjects plunged their hands into ice water; those told to swear as they did this reported feeling less pain. If you ever sat in a car with the windows rolled up and cursed at the top of your lungs, you can attest to the therapeutic benefits of shouting bad words.

Not that everyone is as comfortable with swearing as I am.

Even Olivia Rodrigo has said her producers asked if all this swearing is a bit much. My daughter swears mainly to press my buttons, then reassures me that she would never do it at school, or at someone else’s home, or in Target or anything. I choose to believe her.

Related Articles

Entertainment |


A combustible Cannes is set to unfurl with ‘Furiosa,’ ‘Megalopolis’ and a #MeToo reckoning

Entertainment |


‘Slow’ review: He’s asexual. She’s not. The movie explores what happens next.

Entertainment |


‘Bodkin’ review: A true crime podcast descends upon rural Ireland, with mediocre results

Entertainment |


Twin City Model Railroad Museum celebrates 90 years this Saturday

Entertainment |


Column: About that ‘SNL’ student protest sketch — and a lousy time for political satire

Parents do bring up childhood swearing as a concern, said Emily Perepa, a clinical social worker with the Family Institute at Northwestern University, but it’s usually not the reason a child goes into therapy. “Music may help a child express emotions, even if they are not using those words themselves out in the world. But are they quoting a lyric? I am less concerned than if it’s impacting them at home or school. Do they swear without processing the emotions behind a lyric? Are they unconcerned when it’s disrespectful to other people?” Marianne Breneman, a life coach for children from Farmington Hills, Michigan, spends a lot of time listening to swearing in middle schools and is mostly concerned with the kids “who can’t form a complete sentence without swearing. My fear isn’t a limited vocabulary but limited emotional regulation.” She tells parents that middle school is where kids swear as a way to try on personalities. Yet, she added, most parents are “not as concerned with swearing as parents were when you and I grew up.”

Take Laurie Viets of Irving Park, 52. She has 12-year-old twins and a 15-year-old. “We are a swearing family,” she told me. “We have always been. When we first had kids, we asked: ‘Do we stop swearing?’ Well, no, we can’t. Not realistically. I’m not going to be a hypocrite. I just tell (the kids) to swear appropriately. Don’t call each other swear words. And no slurs, of course. And also, don’t make me look bad in front of the other parents.

“Context matters so much with swearing. I was a DJ in Minnesota, which means we also don’t listen to clean versions of songs. Oh, no. We get annoyed when Alexa tries to play the clean versions. It’s like, ‘Alexa, darling, do you not know this family by now?’”

Powers, who wrote a 2017 history, “Good Booty: Love and Sex, Black & White, Body and Soul in American Music,” pointed out that when recorded music began more than a century ago, overt sexual metaphor and innuendo, often sung by female blues singers, was among the most popular music: “Like precode Hollywood, before the FCC stepped in, language in popular music was once freer.” She says the switch began with sometimes raunchy 12-inch versions of popular songs made only for discos. Then came punk, hip hop. Still, music itself is a language, and all languages have profanity. As novelist Rumaan Alam wrote in a New Yorker essay about his kids swearing during pandemic quarantine: “Not swearing is just about decorum, and that’s a kind of facade.”

Profanity is a construct we tentatively agree on.

Fundamentally, it’s letters. Famed linguist Geoff Nunberg likens curse words to “magic spells” entirely dependent on social circumstances. I have been substituting “(expletive)” in this story out of respect to readers who might be offended but chances are I’m not fooling anyone about the identity of the actual words. That’s why I almost never play safe versions of songs for my daughter (although my wife, more skittish, usually does). The American Academy of Pediatrics has argued that exposure to profane language could lead to aggressive, numbing behaviors in children. But other studies conducted on swearing and children found mild behavioral changes at most when kids are exposed to offensive language — assuming the language is not derogatory or abusive.

Timothy Jay, a professor emeritus at the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, who has been studying the effects of swear words for 50 years, has heard it all. “What I tell parents is it is inevitable,” he told me. “Your children will swear. It’s part of how we evolve.” In fact, his studies have busted myths about swearing. His 2015 paper for the journal Language Sciences, for instance, shredded the folk wisdom that people who swear frequently have limited vocabularies. His findings found no less English fluency between swearers and non-swearers. (Any difference, he said, had more to do with class and income.) He’s not been surprised by the prolific F-bombs in contemporary pop. It’s a merging of trends: Children swear more than they did a generation ago, but also: since more women entered the workforce, more women swear in public.

Consider it a byproduct of gender equity.

Shocking words, of course — homophobic, racist, sexist — still exist. That’s why, in 2022, both Beyoncé and Lizzo backpedaled from the use of “spaz” in their lyrics; the word is ableist. But context is king. My daughter has told me several times, as if it were a recess legend, about a teacher in Michigan who she heard once said a swear word … in school!

Innocence exists in the world.

Though the fact that “The Tortured Poets Department” has 57 profane words means that “language like this is just mainstream enough now for Taylor Swift to use it without fear of alienating fans,” said Riggle. “It means whatever change in society we maybe feared has already happened.” It could also be, he said — having found in studies that those who initiate swearing in a relationship tend to carry more power — a show of female singers displaying strength.

Certainly, if you’re a parent, as Amy Johnson, executive director of Chicago’s Neighborhood Parents Network, said, it’s hard to punish for swearing now “when there are bigger concerns in the world.” Worrying about naughty words can feel like a luxury.

Still, some parents fight the good fight.

Outside the United Center, Cynthia Escalona of Chicago told me her 12-year-old daughter never swears and is not allowed to swear anywhere. “When she’s singing, she just skips over bad words.” She was not allowed to swear along with Olivia Rodrigo.

And yet, her daughter pointed out, “I will be swearing in my head.”

cborrelli@chicagotribune.com

Olivia Rodrigo performs her song “Bad Idea, Right?” at the United Center in Chicago on March 19, 2024. (Trent Sprague/for the Chicago Tribune)